Watch this if you can stomach it: if your browser won’t let you play the embedded video, open the Twitter post and play it there.
Recall the recently-quoted mercenary soldier’s observation in which he contrasts the savage behavior of Russian soldiers that he witnessed at the end of WWII with the more peaceful behavior of tribal Africans he later encountered on that continent:
“What’s especially striking for me is that later when I was in the so-called savage countries [of Africa], I compared the behavior of these authentic savages in the jungle with that of the mobs of Soviet soldiers. What I noticed, is that the lust for destroying another’s property does not exist among actual savages. But among communists, it was ubiquitous.” — Rafał Gan-Ganowicz [Link to longer quote]
Some time ago on a different blog I pointed out to a black commenter, who came across as someone who finds the corrupting influence of liberalism on Whites secretly pleasing, that this same liberalism also corrupts blacks, by design. I gave an example and added, “whaat… you actually thought they liked you?”
The above-quoted words clarified something for me. Namely, an understanding of the difference between the Communist and the Savage. It helps understand why, for example, much-older people are resistant to “racist” perspectives while we are frustrated with their civnat pigheadedness. The miscommunications occurs because we talk past each other on the Communist vs the Savage. “Communist” understood most broadly as a destructive incarnation of envy, not strictly in its USSR iteration.
They, the older conservative civnats, won’t accept absolute “racism,” which is what they are hearing from us. When we talk, they hear “all blacks are depraved — therefore fedpost.” When they, the older civnats, talk we hear “many blacks are good — therefore we must let them live among us.”
We are both partly right, we are both partly wrong, we both appear to reach conclusions that are unacceptable to the other. Closer to the truth is that all people are good as long as they are left alone in their exclusive, homogeneous natural habitat. People are evil when they embrace communism, understood in its broadest, ultimately Satanic form.
This is why, for example, Ganowicz observed Africans in Africa behaving better than Russian soldiers in 1945. And this is why we today observe blacks worldwide behaving like demons on a sugar-high. The tourist, the immigrant, the weaponized minority, the invader — there isn’t a firm line separating those things. Once you leave your home, once you are in a racially or ethnically mixed environment, the road to depravity becomes the easier path.
Blacks, being a spiritually weak race, naturally embrace every worldly temptation that liberalism throws at them, such as voting at near-hundred percent for programs that morally, culturally, genetically transform them into animals. And now we see them, and judge them quite accurately in the embedded clip above as animals. And of those who don’t riot, many feel the vicarious satisfaction in BLM’s depravity. When their highest collective aspiration is to see us destroyed, the (noble) savage has become the (envious) communist. This will not be forgotten.
It’s satisfying for many blacks to watch that horror from Sweden. Feels like winning to them. But blacks don’t win in this. By comparison, three generations of Eastern Europeans today, who don’t even remember WWII, hate Russians because of their Soviet forefathers’ savagery. With blacks today, their savagery is recorded in fine detail. Blacks also lack Russians’ offsetting advantage of otherwise being European peoples capable of running a superpower and with a demonstrated ability to create some of the greatest works of human civilization.