An observation about teenagers

Anyone else noticed that (White, of course) teenage boys are more impressive than ones from 10-15 years ago? More confident, standing upright, better dressed, eyes more focused, better hairstyle.

I have been noticing it big time. My belief is that Trump’s victory had a major impact on the collective psyche of young Whites. Other possible factors:

  • Red pill knowledge has worked its way into popular consciousness
  • Telewitz is for old people, the kids watch age-appropriate shitlord YouTubers
  • GenX parents
Advertisements

96 thoughts on “An observation about teenagers

  1. Youtubers Dude Perfect, five wyt ch-rist-ian men doing impossible trick shots outdoors. My boys love it. As well, tons of videos of science experiments outdoors, like backyard scientist.

    The sitcom is dead as rocks. In my opinion, seinfeld killed it (plus cosby). The sitcom was the foundation of tv watching. Ward Cleaver was a man I could trust to get my back. Archie Bunker was a loudmouth…. just like ME. He’d also get my back. Bill Cosby is a blk. They don’t have anyone’s back. Seinfeld was a NYjew. He not only didn’t have anyone’s back, without that laughtrack the show is about a bunch of sociopaths.

    TV changed from Americans behaving like Americans, including the day to day funny interactions, to terrible people we don’t want to know.

    But the people who create the youtubes, they include Americans behaving like Americans.

  2. I’d say couched in most of this is the meme culture, which from my POV, really sprang to life in late 2015 as Trump’s candidacy started to pick up momentum.

    Bridging off of GiA’s comment, the meme culture supplanted the sitcom, with its truisms couched with just the right touch of humor and satire. I don’t think it’s too much of a stretch to say that some of those meme creators would/will have your back.

    Dude Perfect is a fun channel to watch. Each video gets millions of views almost instantly. YT definitely has a pull with the younger crowd.

    To add to that, gamergate had a hand in helping to redpill (so to speak) those young men and many a channel were able to spring up to aid in the cause. They speak out about SJWisms, essentially dispelling all the mumbo jumbo of the MSM. That’s yuge!

    Just to rattle off some channels for others perusal:

    -the rageaholic (I’d say he’s my generation’s Dennis Miller; plenty of quality content from him)
    -geeks and gamers (good at calling out the media and hollywood mumbo jumbo)
    -thequartering (same as g&g)
    -it’sagundam (this dood is hilarious!)
    -salty cracker (this man covers a broad range, with good coverage)
    -zeducation (a young shitlord in the making)
    -e;r (rarely posts but when he does, hits the nail squarely on the head)

  3. I know a pretty smart 22-year old whose dad is a late-model boomercuck, but the young man is okay. I once saw him take some real offense to being called, mistakenly, a Millennial. PA’s observation is more than just a coincidental perception, it’s real, and in the kids who know what’s up it’s visceral.

    I just wish there was an uncucked church I knew of that I could recommend to these kids.

    Looking for one for myself, as well.

  4. Pingback: An observation about teenagers | Reaction Times

  5. Agree with all and an observation from the field: I’ve been sentenced to a lifelong term in a middle school – probably for karmic krimes I committed in my youth and so I’ve been watching these trends over the last 15 years. When I first started, the White kids would sort of wring their hands and pitch in to cover for a black classmate (most of whom didn’t pull their weight). As time has gone on, and my understanding of the red pill has grown, me of the Hater of Group Work tribe has actually started increasing group work but in a specifically targeted way to give the experience of learning the truths of biological inequality in a “safe space.” The lessons went very well.

    In the last 3 years or so though, when a black does something useless or stupid or lazy, a sizable majority of the kids just look at them like a disgusting parasite or something. No pity, no help, just “this person is ruining what would otherwise be a cool class – now Mr. X can’t do (insert fun thing)”. Never seen anything like it, but the programming has definitely moved beyond just my classroom and there’s a cultural force at work. I would say: Memes, Youtube, Trump, and something…else.

    I have now started moving from biological realism, which they all seem to understand, to population “trutherism”.

  6. Young white men may also look manlier lately as compared to the prior decade due to beards making such a big comeback. And so are some forms of plain, masculine clothing like simple flannels or even mechanic’s shirts with the round name tag area.

    However, I just can’t get past this skinnypants stuff. I refuse to wear skinnypants.

    Call me old-fashioned, but unless a man is skiing, swimming or wrasslin’ I don’t think he should be wearing any kind of tight pants at all.

  7. I have three teenage sons. I agree with all that’s been posted about memes and YouTube. There’s just a ton of content there that’s funny and engaging and transparently the truth.

    But part of what I think is happening to this age group is what’s happening in the adult world; a huge schism between the true Z whites on one side, and the black/brown/yellow/woke whites on the other side. As a gen Xer, I don’t think we were nearly as politically aware at this age. That political awareness is being forced on kids by teachers and media, so they’re either accepting and supporting the hollow Narrative, or doing what so many kids have done throughout the ages; rebelling. Instead of rebelling with long hair or loud music, they’re doing it politically. Part of that rebelliousness is what’s been derided by SJWs, and noticed by PA, as acting white. And, back to YT, thanks to so much good content there, they have this common resistance culture. Which is why it’s such a target.

  8. I think history will not look kindly on the Millennials. They are basically, fucking useless. Captain Capitalism just put up an article that was a scathing indictment of just how useless they are you should check it out on his blog.

    I think Gen Zyklon saw this and some of them, not all mind you, because there are still a LOT of David Hogg / Goblina types running around, decided ‘that is not for me’. Millennials were eased into the poz, Z was born 100% inside the Matrix and lots of them want out badly. They will have to be prepared for war by the time they reach middle age so perhaps they know this or are being taught it? I don’t think anyone can say with a straight face that by the time Z reaches middle age 2050 the US won’t look like a much more fucked up version of Brazil or something similar. (Assuming our current pozzed trajectory remains unaltered).

    tl;dr- More of them seem put together than the previous generation but they are still a minority in a sea of pozzed out anti-gun, anti-capitalist, know nothing retards.

    Side topic– Jeffrey Epstein is dead, this isn’t 100% surprising because he had a LOT of secrets that needed to be kept by those in very high places. Having worked in and around the prison system for almost a decade I can tell you that the chance of him doing suicide unassisted on a lock ward or observation unit where he was housed is slightly higher than zero. Make of that what you will, like Seth Rich I think it will be memory holed quickly.

    That being said, I’d like some opinions about this. If you are a teenager and someone offers you money for a service. Not at gunpoint, but here is 500 dollars can you ‘massage’ me and you knowingly go along with it, are you a ‘victim’? I’m being 100% honest here, by 15-18 I knew damn well what was right and wrong and I feel pretty certain these girls who are all being painted as 100% innocent did as well. I don’t think a middle aged dude ought to be soliciting minors for handjobs, but on the other side of it, painting them like they are –children– who were preyed upon isn’t exactly the truth either. This is my old CH brain coming out here with THOTs gonna THOT basically. Just curious what others think I’m sure the responses will be all over the place depending on your level of religiosity and if you have kids yourself or not.

  9. JiDC
    At the time Rome became a Republic, chastity was so important they were willing to kill to protect it. By the time of the Republic’s end, orgies, public debauchery, and faghottry were common.

    We’ve see that in the past half century here. Chastity was important. Now it’s less common than a threesome.

    In a patriarchy, betas get women. When a patriarchy falls, women revert to their preferred choice, which is sluttery with the few men they find attractive.

    We’re living through the fall of a great civilization. The rules on the books, protecting women and children, still exist. But in practice they’re no longer enforced unless it’s politically advantageous. It’s like tardiness rules at work; they exist as a last ditch effort to fire people you don’t want.

    These girls are are fertile, biologically adult women. They’re underage because we have rules that say so. The girls don’t care about the rules: they’re horny and they wanna hump.

    As the civilization continues to collapse, we’ll see allof these rules collapse. Pederasty will become common. 12 year old girls in common law marriages producing children.

    Right up until a group decides to end it. That group will be men. Inside or outside, invaders or “revival”, those men will change the culture by bloody force.

    Things will not improve till that event. When it happens, it will be swift and merciless and final. A new culture, one which may not resemble ours, will follow.

  10. If Epstein was simply providing teenage pussy to high level politicos, that would be one thing. Yeah blah blah it’s still underage trafficking and no teenage girls should be doing that. Muh Aryan Princesses

    On the other hand, the suspicion is that they don’t know what they are getting into, and once they are into it, there’s no getting out.

    What was really going on there on the Island? Were kids being abused and tortured and killed, and cannibalized? Were their faces being carved out while they were alive and worn as masks? Were their organs being eaten?

    That’s the scary imputation to it all. My opinion, as in my opinion, is that’s what’s going on. But how far involved was the focal point of the man Epstein himself, is a more specific question. He was probably pretty far into it. So much of that conspiracy stuff involves and uses plausible deniability for the players, so that they have an out. The individual players know what is going on, at the deeper levels, but they don’t actually know for sure explicitly.

    In any case, those teenage girls get locked into, as in LOCKED into, a position they can’t get out of. It seems unlikely they are given the option to leave.

  11. The current red pill thinking about the higher levels of power, is that it’s Satanic death torture cannibal rituals, and in order to reach the high levels, one has to partake. Hillary Clinton for instance, was rumored w/ Huma Abedin to have wearing children’s faces and or eating them. That is supposedly what was on, was it Weiner’s computer?

    Given the nature of power in human societies, it seems not likely. So what’s the evidence?

    Can there even be any evidence? If you are not seeing it with your own eyes, what would be the evidence? True Detective, the tv show? All the death surrounding the Clintons?

  12. Jay, you’re thinking as a man, and acting as a man. With women, reject logic entirely.

    I dated a girl (20 at the time) many moons ago who legitimately had thought about stripping for money. ‘Get paid to just take off my clothes? That’s too easy’ is a close paraphrase to the words she said. Her choice of topic that day, mind you, voluntarily discussed on her behalf.

    Women are cavalier with their sexuality because they did nothing to earn it: born with a vagina, grow boobs, notice boys, begin the process of extracting male attention. Women of all ages are tight-kneed with ‘creeps’ but flirty with the ‘powerful’ type. ‘He is a MODEL omgosh this is so much fun!’ ‘He is a MILLIONAIRE omgosh this is so much fun.’ The sales of FSOG and the content of the books is the confirmation of this idea.
    In the photos of the blonde plaintiff, when she was still sexually illegal, she is smiling freely. There is no body language that suggests anything other than youthful enthusiasm on her behalf.

    It is men- collectively through society- who must protect womens’- collectively- purity for both her sake and the purpose of healthy mating in the future. They don’t know the importance of what they’ve got. It’s only after her sexuality has been taken for granted, and people are less interested, that she attempts to ration out the rotten leftovers she previously gave away for free when the fruit was ripe.
    BPS did a great video on the lack of in-group loyalty of women years back, and addressed the sexual element of this very well.

    In conclusion, a thought: “A woman’s morality is her father’s morality.” Everyone addresses the damage on sons of a father removed, the horror manifests equally on daughters.

  13. I would speculate that the “girls” who end up on the Island, and generally on that level of sex work for the real deal secret handshake club, that many are eventually let out and go on with their lives. That not all of them are so terribly mistreated, or even mistreated at all. But some of them don’t make it out and get sacrificed and killed in the most horrible ways.

    Is that a fair reading of the wider red pill interwebz consensus, about What’s Going On?

    What would be the evidence of such crime? Is it possible that such crime could be occurring, on a Scale as speculated, and the evidence be kept off of the internet?

    I think that it’s possible that such evidence for example secret tapes, could be kept in the dark. Certainly the mainstream web has more-or-less effective protocols for scrubbing unwanted videos. Most sane people, as in pretty much all sane people, don’t want to see such videos, and nor such evidence. Eyes wide shut, as they say.

    Re Epstein. He may have been let suicide. He may have been given two choices. It makes not much difference on whether he died by his own hand, if he was compelled to do so because of what he knew. It’s absolutely certain that he EASILY EASILY EASILY coulda been kept alive, had we a real justice system. Here’s how: two guys keep a watch on him 24/7. What an idea. The real clown world of the situation is them telling us that they couldn’t keep him alive because it’s too complicated to have to check on him too often, and that they couldn’t spare the manpower, or something. According to Jazzhands of FTN, the head warden at that federal pen, was a morbidly obese black woman.

  14. The current lead at DS is that Epstein was obsessed w/ immortality and would never have killed himself. My boy Chris Dangerfield [ youtube channel: Dangerfield ] also outright rejects the plausibility of his suicide.

    No. He was let kill himself, is my read. Anyone can be made to rather be dead. Try and imagine the persuasion they can bring to bear. Not even the standard torture type stuff, but weird stuff like injections that turn you into something helpless for instance. Or the classic leverage they have on someone via their loved ones (if they have any).

  15. Death Obsession is obv to be rejected. It’s a sign of something not right. Sickness I suppose. Also it’s simply a boring cliche.

    Woody ‘not everyone’s favorite jew’ Allen had a excellent scene in one of his films, back before he got me-too’d and or deserved it. It may have been Annie Hall. Some tall and strong goyish-type uberman was affecting much braggadocio and declaiming to Miss Wasp NY about how he was to die and it was torn apart and eaten wild alive by the bears. He may have specified which type (of bear).

    The joke being that it was a cliche then too. Those pretentious NY wasps, virile though they might appear to the jew, were sick and wanted to die authentically to make up for their inauthentic lives. (Or at least that’s what Woody was saying; was he right?) In contrast let us consider: the Herzog film Bearman guy, he got to experience it irl and it totally sucked. Or at least that was the imputation given by Herzog: that it was a lengthy and excruciating death; but w/ Herzog he may have been bullshitting such imputation entirely, simply for dramatic effect. He recommended to the tape’s owner [ the guy’s gf? ] that it be destroyed. Was it?

  16. The Herzog film is Grizzly Man and the eponymous guy in question w/ the eponymous name, is eponymously known as Timothy Treadwell. The movie was pretty good as in watchable, but them not including even at all, his moandeath cries, seemed like an odd choice which they shoulda included. But actually they really couldn’t include that stuff, as it’s pretty awful. Like you used to think when you were youngerish, Death: What a drag!

    One detail from the film though, which I watched a long time ago and don’t remember much, is that Treadwell’s father let shared the detail that Timothy was an “aspiring actor” and came this close to getting Woody Boyd’s character on Cheers. It’s hard to imagine anyone coming close to filling Harrelson’s shoes.

    The other theme from Grizzly Man, is that Treadwell was looking from something meaningful and heroic, and which he seemingly failed to find.

    The other point is that Cheers in on Netflix and I watched the pilot recently, and it really sucked. Yeah those shows can take a while to find their stride, but still. Ted Danson was a pretty White-looking jew though. Would you recognize him as not-white, were he to serve you a beer? Is he even actually semitic?

    In the pilot Shelley Long is about to get married to this Ivy League professor and blah blah blah she is taken w/ Sam’s greatness. They actually write it into the script though, that she calls him in re his prowess, a magnificent barbarian.

  17. My dog got into a fight today, and took a big poop. It was pretty exciting. I went to an AA picnic and sat with the older men. Boomers as it turns out. Good people but all the talk about guns blah blah blah; what’s next, muscle cars? There was a woman at the table who sat next to me and whom I know , and I shared a little much with her, about our townie background in common, and she called me “a pup” which is matronizing af and personally an unpleasant put-down, but I have learned that people will and always give you the feedback you deserve. For instance I was starting in on to tell her some of my problems as if she could do something for me? which she can’t.

    It’s always good to get out and mingle and meet people, even if it’s not easy. Even if you have “social anxiety”. Oddly enough there was another group at the park who were singing gospel songs. I maybe should have gone over with them and sang with them. Those “missed opportunities” are often signs that you’re missing it, the train of life is speeding away. Because I had been thinking just an hour earlier if I shouldn’t bring my uke and play some songs, and gospel songs would be one possibility, as I know a few.

    The classic song that begins, I went across the River and I lay down to sleep. That’s originally more of a gospel song but blues and White folk too. The opening lyric is about how your life goes by and the next thing you know, it’s gone, and or you are constrained by your past and what has happened: You got shackles on your feet, maybe literally or maybe not.

    When I woke up there was a-shackles on my feet

    Sorry (not) to emote-r post, but so it goes.

  18. My dog got into a fight today, and took a big poop.

    Every comment from everyone here should begun in similar fashion. I was going to write something but reading that first line I lost my train of thought and realized I had nada. Like Nada Surf, I wish I were popular enough to invent such prose. (What a lame sorta one-hit wonder song. More like runner-up wonder song.)

    On the topic of shackles: did someone put them on us or were they there and we subliminally put them on, not realizing what we were in for? Or a combination of the two? Are we too afraid to take them off? Are they even locked?

    It touches on a post CH once had about certain men being afraid of success because then they’d have to measure up to that standard all the time and in some ways, exceed it. I had read something similar beforehand and realized that that was me. In some subconscious way I’d sabotage many an opportunity. Some of it was simply not knowing any better as I didn’t have much guidance growing up and to say I was naive is an understatement.

    Like the idea of prisoners getting institutionalized: are we so used to how things are that breaking free scares us or we just don’t know any better to break free? (Sorry for the rambling thoughts.)

    The barriers we need to break through are more mental than anything else and for the past five years, since reading CH, taking the red pill and parsing through the proper comments, I’ve been trying to finally shake the “old” off. Most of the dust has been removed, but that lingering soot it still there. Like furniture you always need to polish. Though at times I still find myself stuck to what I call phantom habits: while I’ve broken the pattern of old habits, that lingering feeling of doing the bad habit still lingers, like a phantom limb, where you can still feel your fingers are moving on an arm you lost.

    It’s time for me to bring the fight and crap over the whole friggin’ situation. Only way to be sure.

    Glad you’re all my bros

  19. The sixty-four thousand dollar question is whether white teenagers will cuck on “racism” as is self-servingly ill-defined by the demon horde?

    For white female teenagers, will they mudduck cause: racism?

    And for white teenage male, will his individual desire for Supremacy prevail contra the collectivist pathology of anti-racism?

    The “cuck” is cross-generational, yet, expresses with generational uniqueness.

    What “we” know as the “cuckservative” and its degenerate acquiescence on the defining issue of “race” isn’t the equivalent cuck to be found amongst white teenagers.

    Race is true

    Perfection is Truth.

    A “master race” reality is mundane.

    Its deniers, self-annihilators.

    White teenagers getting no “hell passes.”

  20. Nice post Mendo.

    Elk, singing with the holy rollers is pretty fun. They love it when our types jump in.

    Epstein – what an energy vacuum. How many people are devoting their time and energy to this “story” right now? Would a guy’s time be better spent watching porn and jerking off? Is there an appreciable difference? Who the heck even knows if he’s dead?

  21. “The sixty-four thousand dollar question is whether white teenagers will cuck on “racism” as is self-servingly ill-defined by the demon horde?”

    Absolutely correct.

    The corollary to that is, will they summon the courage to act (with urgency) on intra-racial procreation, by any means necessary?

    Will they even have the skills necessary to do so?

    If the generation before them cucked at the foot of the pussy pedestal, then who will show them how it’s done?

    If they don’t act on THAT simple, most-fundamental basic biological requirement then looking and acting tougher than their forbears won’t amount to much.

  22. “…by any means necessary?”

    Not talking about rape here. (Though it may come to that). I’m talking about placing the urgency of procreation at the top of our survival issues, and seeing it as a project worth doing, above all the other distractions teenage boys are into.

    How many “tough” late teen boys out there are saying “Man, I can’t wait to knock up my woman and have her pop out four kids!”

    That used to be girls’ thing, to push for families…., but girls “liberated” now, so they push for hypergamy, which means it’s up to the boys. Unless there’s some other way I’m not seeing…

  23. “ionalist Right ….black-pillesque attitude about the fate of our natio….ollower-90% for their f…re to leap over so….e ever-retreating moral h….”

    the Renaissance was born out of the black plague. ice people were born out of severe, generations-long hardship.

    these “nations” you speak of, PA… what exactly do they offer to our long term survival, if every single one of them exists only by the graces of the NWO?

    is it “black-pilling” to point out that we’ve made a deal with the devil himself?

    to me that’s looking on the bright side. deals can be broken.

  24. Like the idea of prisoners getting institutionalized: are we so used to how things are that breaking free scares us or we just don’t know any better to break free? (Sorry for the rambling thoughts.)

    This is an important point. We are creatures of habit and the desire for freedom is not innate in most of us. “Few men seek freedom but rather prefer a just master.” We are creatures of our environment and cultural upbringing and the times we are born in most of all.

    PJ I think a big first step towards having more children is having supportive parents. Most treat teen pregnancy and early fatherhood as worse than cancer. I think the biggest challenge here for young people is to remain faithful to one another when they have children and to deal with the stress of raising children. Small, close knit communities and good parenting can go far in relieving these challenges.

  25. “I think a big first step towards having more children is having supportive parents”

    I agree. Geographic mobility (atomization) is the great unacknowledged fertility killer.

  26. “PJ I think a big first step towards having more children is having supportive parents.”

    very good point. it starts by breaking the multigenerational selfishness cycle.

  27. “Anyone else noticed that (White, of course) teenage boys are more impressive than ones from 10-15 years ago?”

    No. It’s a desperate effort to lend credibility to the “rise of Generation Zyklon”. Besides, it does not fit the driving Alt Right/manosphere narrative. Whether it be on at unz.com, or over at Vox Day, or on Julian Banc’s sites, there are a plethora of commenters who lament about today’s white youth–soyboys, as they are referred to.

    I would venture to say that that modern teenage boys are no more or no less impressive than their predecessors.

    To IKR…

    “It is men- collectively through society- who must protect womens’- collectively- purity for both her sake and the purpose of healthy mating in the future.”

    Then would you not agree that the Roosh’s and Roissy’s of the world must be severely dealt with? Even the venerable The Z Blog noted their moral degeneracy and Alt Right hypocrisy when supporting their aims. Guys claim they want virginal women, or women with little sexual experience. However, they employ every trick in the book to bed them; when women refuse, guys label them “cold”. When they succumb, guys call them “sluts”. It’s a lose-lose situation. It is obvious that the father failed in his duty to properly instruct his son to refrain from trying to rut every women he sees. Curious, as I thought the Bible condemned sex outside of marriage. More importantly, a closer reading suggests that the heroes of the Bible are not meant to be models of outward toughness, but exemplars of inner fortitude. So why have so many Christians accepted secular standards of masculinity as the basis for Biblical manhood?

  28. Allyn, you are overreaching. You don’t demonstrate sufficient intelligence or insight, or mere curiosity, to make those sweeping criticisms. The PUA phase of the AltRight has been discussed to death, including on this blog, as a stage through which Western men passed toward an awakening from Leftist deception.

    At this point, anyone who hasn’t advanced past their focus area (PUA, men’s rights, anti-feminism, white nationalism) into a holistic nationalism is niche-interest at best, irrelevant at worst. Even Christian bloggers who are stuck in political correctness are churchians at best.

    PUA was a boyish phase of a certain cohort of bloggers ten/fifteen years ago. The Washington DC scene was an epicenter of this for some reason. I was unwittingly part of that scene as a single guy in 2002 – 2003. Hot bitches spilling out of the clubs, foreign au-pairs partying everywhere… that world no longer exists. I still see the DC scene when I come out of my office on a Friday evening and it’s, let’s say, not a target-rich environment for pickup if you dig pretty chicks.

  29. I would venture to say that that modern teenage boys are no more or no less impressive than their predecessors.

    There’s two approaches to take on it. First is their physical and mental health.

    What are their rates of obesity and drug addiction?
    How do their test scores compare?
    How tall are they, and how strong are they?

    It’s a fact that young men are not as high T as they were two and three and four generations ago. I don’t know that everything reduces to T levels though. T-levels kind of become a stand-in for a sort of outdoorsy vigor score, and it’s just a reality that people don’t have the same levels of outdoorsy vigor that they used to have, because they aren’t working on the farm like everyone used to do. But that doesn’t mean they are weak and unhealthy. It does probably mean they have more neotenous faces and features, and that their bone structure is more gracile than robust. Those are complicated trends and relevant; but not really what we are getting at.

    Because look. People are more dependent on advanced technical society, or technology, or whatever it is to be called. This progression of increasing dependence has been going on for a long time, and it stops and starts, but it’s probably true that never more so than now, are more fat unhealthy people allowed to continue on their fat unhealthy lives.

    The real question that we are wanting to evaluate though is, are White 20-somethings, Gen Z, more confident or whatever, than their Millennial predecessors 10 and 20 years ago, and perhaps their Gen X predecessors 25 and 30 years ago.

    So are they?

    It’s a fact that they are more red pilled. The full component of red pillery is dispensed on the chans by the time the high-iq set is 15 years old.

    How many millennials and gen-x were aware of how they were being SUBJUGATED by hostile elements, and demeaned and put down in every way possible?

    Versus how many Gen Z’s are fully aware of that going on?

    I think the prior generations were more or less totally in a haze about the Race and their Identity, and it’s hard to consider their health independent of those things. To some extent their Race and Identity were implicit and intact in an implicit way, but to some extent they were not, and a lot of people got lost. “We lost a lot of good men out there”

    If we want to continue on this question, treat the question of what it means for a young people to be “impressive.”

  30. — How many millennials and gen-x were aware of how they were being SUBJUGATED by hostile elements, and demeaned and put down in every way possible?

    I appreciate the clarity of the entire comment. Late GenXer Fast Eddie recently wrote about how everyone, at the time in the 80s and 90s, thought that all of that subjugation narrative was a joke. No one took it seriously.

  31. i do far more lurking than commenting here, but with a 13 year old son, it’s hat in the ring time. my daughter is 18 and has all the features and swallowed the degeneracy of the late millennials. her older half sister and major influence is now a doctor with the moral sense of a stick, with an absolutely useless stay at home and play video games while the dishes pile up pseudo dad atheist husband. i mention this because the contrast between my daughter and son could not be more stark.

    to fill in a little more, my wife and i are fully around the block on red pill and feminism is cancer, saw what public schools did to the two step kids, and decided our kids would have none of that. we’ve sacrificed all the way to send both our kids to private parochial schools the entire way through.

    the point here is all it takes is the natural tendency of kids to rebel to throw a wrench into the whole works. my daughter appears to have swallowed the victim olympics narrative completely, and only God knows how this will turn out. in my darker moments, i wish for the cwii cultural denouement sooner rather than later so she can see where this sick culture will lead, and reject it. i fear for her soul.

    my son on the other hand, knows pretty well where this all is going. i am about to start a trail life troop locally since the bsa is totally cucked, and we are done now that the local troop accepted a so called trans girl -> boy uncritically. none of the leaders, most of whom i like and care for, have not expressed their own limits, nor have they thought through where this might lead them or their boys in the troop. i am willing to risk pariah status for the sake of my own integrity, and keeping to the principles i hope my son will fully understand some day. i’ve seen at least one boy one year older than my son and a product of public schools flash me the (OK) hand sign, with a testing look. i merely said “i know what that means”. we’ll remain in the gray man world for now.

    in spite of the place the larger culture thinks it might have for my son, he remains good natured and loving, has a strong plan for his own future, loves having both his mother and i completely involved in his dreams, and is a devout Christian in keeping with the efforts of my bride and i.

    lastly, i think i should fill in a little more, since having children was not a huge part of any thought of mine until i was nearing 30. i was surrounded by boomers growing up, as my parents were both pre boomer silents and the youngest in their families. my cousins are def boomers, almost cartoons of the cliche in some cases. i consider myself a joneser / early x er, as some of what douglas copeland wrote years ago really rang true. so i’ve tried to do it right, but like they say, “every saint has a past, every sinner a future”.

    the point i hope anyone past the tl;dr cliff above might take away is that having children in this day and age is an extremely risky prospect given the outcomes i’ve seen in my own most beloved children – they are almost at the diametrical poles of possible outcomes. i can try to convey the terror my wife and i endured for the 2 months or so of crisis my daughter experienced about 2 years ago, but i would fail.

    it was some level of dante’s hell thinking she would take her own life, a waking and awakening nightmare, coming out of bed from one of those and putting my fist through a sheetrock wall battling the horror that caused me to wake up. i do not want any pity or sympathy; i wished for the family i have, and am thankful for it all. just please understand that at this point in history, children require eyes wide open and some bit of fortitude in the face of almost any possible outcome.

    regardless, i am thankful for all this; what a huge round slice of human experience. i am also near white hot rage at times when i think of how badly this civ has been subverted, and how deeply that subversion has descended upon my daughter. none of this has been lost on my son, young gentleman as he is. i suspect he will see and understand the whole picture within a couple of years, and beware the warrior that emerges. i suspect he is very far from alone.

  32. i should add that the vector for the cultural poison that got my daughter started was an unrestricted smart phone. be warned, but that is a story for another day.

  33. “Unrestricted smart phone”… the foremost tool of Satan these days… for every “just in case of emergency” use, there are 999,999,999 examples of vanity, profanity, and inanity.

    Thanks for sharing bryanb… you and your family are added to my prayers.

  34. thanks kindly for the sentiments. i have to admit that part of the attraction of reading here is my wife’s polish heritage – she’s half, now my children one quarter. i’ve been around long enough to observe and know there is generalized insight into the genetic base of individual characteristics and emergent characteristics of culture. regarding how those bear on and effect my family i have some learning to do.

  35. Our oldest is almost 11, a girl. The desire to use electronics is strong. We don’t allow them to create any accounts or use apps like TikTok or any social media. But I know the push will come soon. All of my nieces and nephews, and most of my daughter’s friends, have phones and unlimited data.

    They’re for “emergency purposes”, you know. For when your ten year old is at the mall and needs a ride home. /sarc

    There are some older kids in my area that are pushing back against phones, though. One group of sixth- and seventh-grade girls purposely plan phone-free activities and some don’t even have phones. It’s refreshing. By far, the best thing we do is take them outside, a lot. And we leave our phones behind, too, and limit the way we use them. Family time has been put to the forefront. We eat dinner, clean up, and go for a walk, then read or play cards or whatever until bedtime. Modeling good habits and expecting the kids to follow is key.

    I know teens are all about escaping the family, and we’re so uncool I can see my kid trying everything she can to get away from us, but we’re not having it. It’s a battle I might very well lose, but I’m not giving up the fight.

    Best wishes for you and prayers for your family.

  36. “You don’t demonstrate sufficient intelligence or insight, or mere curiosity, to make those sweeping criticisms.”

    PA, I offered the requisite insight. If you want to resort to ad hominem as a way to salve your bruised ego, be my guest. PUA was not a “boyish phase”; rather, it is an embedded, and competing, component of the Alt Right. While it is on the downside of its career, it remains a potent force. These niches today, which are simultaneously part of the Alt White and Alt Lite culture, constantly engage in a tug of war for control for the soul of the Alt Right. Granted, there is an unwritten rule about not punching to the right, but that has not prevented Vox Day, Greg Johnson, Brett Stephens (The Amerika Blog), and others from public sniping.

    “I was unwittingly part of that scene as a single guy in 2002 – 2003. Hot bitches spilling out of the clubs, foreign au-pairs partying everywhere… that world no longer exists. I still see the DC scene when I come out of my office on a Friday evening and it’s, let’s say, not a target-rich environment for pickup if you dig pretty chicks.”



    The reality is that world exists today. D.C. and other urban areas remain hotspots for poontainment. Do not let the media driven MeTooMovement give you the impression that guys are no longer combing the concrete jungle to number close. The dozens of young men and women I am around with all tell me their stories at the watercooler. It would appear you are out of the loop.

    “It’s a fact that they are more red pilled. The full component of red pillery is dispensed on the chans by the time the high-iq set is 15 years old.”

    Suburban Elk, as Steve Sailer astutely pronounced, it comes down to “Who/Whom”. Do today’s teenagers generally even comprehend this “red pill” versus “blue pill” dichotomy in the first place? Just a cursory question to the high schoolers in the neighborhood revealed no such knowledge. And when I gave the “OK sign”, then had little idea about its hidden meaning.

    “How many millennials and gen-x were aware of how they were being SUBJUGATED by hostile elements, and demeaned and put down in every way possible? Versus how many Gen Z’s are fully aware of that going on?”

    That is a mighty big assumption there, Chief. In what specific ways were yesterday’s teens unwittingly being taken advantage of by outside forces they had no knowledge of? If they were aware of such forces, how are you certain they lacked the wherewithal to withstand those pressures? It is more than likely that Generation X was acutely aware about race and their own identity, especially if they lived in the suburbs in the 1980’s and experienced first hand the wonders of integration thanks to bussing vibrants from the ghettos. Perhaps they thought of matters differently than yourself about race growing up and today act in ways contrary to your experiences, and that is the reason why you are of the belief that “many good men were lost”.

  37. chakrates, the invisible apps like kik and snapchat are the ones where she exercised her cherished “privacy”. in my new world, there should be no such thing as privacy from parents until the age of majority. i learned too late that its possible to link a child’s iphone to one belonging to a parent, where everything, including content and application install permissions, is visible and in control of the parents.

    our miss resulted in her acquiring an online predator, that had been part of one of her “friend’s” lives. they formed a cult, and to this day, i don’t know what all really comprised the full conversation. i do know it was a full identity and gender political trip down a rabbit hole with full on degeneracy as the norm. she now thinks she’s gay, and was at one time during the crisis claiming that i abused her mentally (good and insistent parenting is def not conflict free). to fill in further for perspective, my relationship with her up until then was as close as any father and daughter in history. with the crisis fading in the rearview, things are slowly returning to normal – she wants a place of her own, and i’m to stay involved with guidance in the form of supporting wiser paths, posing indifferent / reticent for the stupider stuff.

    she has trouble forming friendly and casual relationships, and has been ghosted by online “friends” over and over. just no idea that the messy world of compromise, pain, joy, give and take is an essential part of learning how to have relationships in the face to face world. she has become literally addicted to the phone – and i am qualified to state that as the case literally.

    my wife and i both work on these cursed machines, and i spend plenty of time learning for its own sake using this world’s infinite library as a tool, but i know it is a terrible example.

    i’ve only mentioned this to one friend and his wife, and one cousin whose granddaughters are just behind yours. i’ve told many acquaintances and frankly friendly strangers with kids the outline i just shared above in the hope that it will help avoid that misery.

    please feel free to share this story as the experience of a friend if you think it might help someone. good luck to you and thanks all again for the sentiments.

  38. bryanb, thanks for sharing your story. there’s a lot to unpack here… You seem like a stand-up guy so I’m going to be blunt about a few things.

    First, you’re ascribing too much power to modern technology to corrupt young minds, and not enough power to good old fashioned biology as the antidote. So let’s just drop the “iphone ruined my daughter” narrative and start looking for solutions. No one is to blame here. This is Darwin at work, and guess what…you’re as much an environmental force as any other in your daughter’s life.

    Second, your son may be a “perfect gentleman” but he will not be spared from the “empowered woman” juggernaut. One way or another, he will be forced to do battle with it and whether or not he prevails will be directly related to him observing how you handle your wayward daughter.

    So let’s get you up to speed here…

    There’s a thing called “the fundamental premise” that says that sperm is cheap and eggs are expensive that governs all human societies. The rot of modern civilization (and also the backbone of the old beta male patriarchy) is based on this idea. Women are infallible, men exist to serve and protect them.

    What happened in the last 50 years is that women were “liberated” via birth control and on-demand fetus culling. So literally women are now completely off the hook from all accountability from absolutely everything. this narrative, which, as you’ve astutely noted, is spread at light speed through technology. However, with or without technology, it is the post birth control narrative and it isn’t going away just by hiding from your head in the sand. It’s here to stay. At least for now.

    However, know this: it’s all a sham. it’s a bogus narrative. the only thing women have gained is the freedom to be unaccountable pieces of shit. that’s all. and that’s all you to know.

    now…the fix.

    everyone is hooked into these devices because they’re looking for something they’re not getting. in your daughter’s case she’s looking for the same thing every other woman since Eve has looked for: attention, particularly from an alpha male.

    This is going to sound counter-intuitive to your civilized sensibilities, but your daughter is correct that you “abused her mentally”. You did this by being too nice to her. Being deprived of having to work for the top dog’s approval is what the modern day savage that used to known as a “woman” considers “abuse”. She wanted to fear your rejection and instead you rolled out a welcome mat and laid down underneath it.

    … And you’re still doing it:

    “i’m to stay involved with guidance in the form of supporting wiser paths, posing indifferent / reticent for the stupider stuff.”

    Sounds fair enough… for someone who’s EARNED IT, but from your account it shows like she’s done everything in her power NOT to earn it.

    The good news is, there’s any easy fix and it starts now, today. (And remember, your son is watching).

    First, take your emotional attachment out of it stop treating her like she’s special. She has the legal backing of the state to kill your grandchildren via abortion. She’s a licensed sociopath with the power to kill fetuses at will and there’s nothing you can do about it. She’s contributing nothing to society, nothing to your household. She’s a total and complete parasite at this stage of her life. The wise thing for a busy man such as yourself to do is to rid yourself off this wench and get her out of your house so you can focus your energy and resources on the well-behaved family members who actually act like FAMILY.

    This sounds severe, I know. But a course correction is necessary. And… she will LOVE the change in your attitude. Trust me.

    Moving on…

    Your “guidance” needs to switch from wanting to be involved in her shitty life to shoving her out the door so she can get the ego-check that she so desperately wants and needs. She wants her own place? Great. You picked up some moving boxes for her. Can she be out by Saturday? Great. Because you already ordered a new easy chair and flat screen TV for your new man cave.

    This is how it’s done with modern, sociopath women. (Remember, your young man is watching.)

    Next, you’re going to lighten up and stop worrying about how she turns out. One way or another, she’s going to be fine. Your over-caring is just a thinly veiled version of pussy pedestalizing. She senses that as weakness, and she’s correct. You’re weak for continuing to devote resources to a parasite.

    The fundamental premise still holds – eggs ARE expensive, but only eggs that are viable and fertile, and hers are already on the path of going to waste. You should have no problem pointing this out to her, albeit in a teasing, zfg way.

    So from now on you’re going to “correct” her behavior by teasing her about being such an absolute useless piece of shit. Not in a vicious way, because that is also over-caring, but in a zfg way.

    You should tell her that you did, in fact, abuse her by not marrying her off to some Pakistani goatherd while she was still young and somewhat desirable. But that now it would be impossible because the goatherd would want such a high dowry to marry a miserable aging brat like her that you could never afford it.

    This may seem harsh but if you do it correctly (poker-faced, with a twinkle in your eye) it will be funny. And, believe me, she will put down her smart phone and want to spend more time interacting with this new shitlord in her life that used to be her very boring and predictable father.

    One last bit, use the other women in her and your lives to create tension. Play favorites. Reward the women around her with attention and playfulness if they act better than her. She shouldn’t get a pass just for being your daughter. Make her work. Women want to work. Fear of rejection is what makes them want to work. Approval makes them complacent. Your wife is the exception to the rule, probably because she had a proper shitlord for a father.

    This stuff works on ALL women, Bryan. And it makes life a helluva lot more fun knowing that you have this power to shape their lives, even in the face of seemingly overwhelming odds.

    Hope this helps.

    Godspeed, brother. And remember, your young man is watching.

  39. pj’s formidable post is, alas, “sounds good on paper” Cyberian wisdom doled out from the ivory towers of Chateau Society.

    Note the “alas”. On a side note, I’m curious if you yourself have daughters, alte kamerad.

    It reminds me a bit of Rand’s solution for fixing the world in Atlas Shrugged… heroic and inspiring to think that it can all be fixed so long as the real men and women… the ones of superior mind, creative energy, and talent… merely withdraw their favors from the world and then kick back and wait for said world to come to its senses and plead for the return.

    Here’s the rub… for every creative genius of like mind, there are many others, equal or better, ready to take the place of those who withdraw.

    Same with daughter… if uncool dad withdraws his approval, just go out to facebook, the more whiny and skin-showing the better, and swim in the deluge of likes and support, and the subsequent brain chemical rush of ersatz affirmation from all the cool peers..

    And then there’s the rub of those-who-would-correct-the-world getting enough like-minded support from THEIR environs… often a quixotic quest from even immediate family.

    Now, this isn’t to say that a father SHOULDN’T follow a goodly measure of said advice and techniques… I’m just saying that the hard path will very well likely turn out to be narrow, and lonely, and few who find it for the sake of the souls of others…

    … in short, it’s a path you should take with only your own soul and honor in mind.

    Any subsequent good outcome in re the soul and honor of another will be an additional… and might I caution, rare… blessing from The Most High.

  40. Greg, you’ll note that the tone of my post is directed first at Bryan and his son’s well-being, second towards his daughter’s.

    It is my opinion that his daughter is already no longer “needing” his support so much as a reference for proper behavior. If she’s an “independent woman” then he should treat her as such. She’s old enough to kill her own fetuses, or get married. What more is there?

    You’re oversimplifying by saying this is simply about “withdrawing attention”. Obviously this takes skill and practice to apply skillfully and practically. Without knowing Bryan IRL, the best I can do is give GENERAL advice, which is what I did. And my advice, taken with a grain of salt and tailored to his particular situation, is VERY solid and likely not available to him elsewhere.

    And your advice to Bryan is…..?

    “I’m just saying that the hard path will very well likely turn out to be narrow, and lonely, and few who find it for the sake of the souls of others…”

    so very, very useful to Bryan’s situation.

    Streetsweeper is right… You do just show up and take dumps here without flushing the toilet.

    And for the record, I do have a daughter, now grown. And my woman is younger enough than me to be my daughter. I get to practice this stuff every single waking moment of my life, whether I want to or not.

  41. In what specific ways were yesterday’s teens unwittingly being taken advantage of by outside forces they had no knowledge of?

    Let me count the ways. Or instead let’s try this —

    You answer the question, Allyn71. Your comment implies your position is that Gen X Whites were NOT being taken advantage of, or subjugated or what-have-you, by hostiles and subversive elements. Is that your belief?

    If that is your belief and opinion and perspective, then we are starting from different points entirely.

    Clarify your position, Allyn71. Are Whites in America under siege, and were they or were they not, 50 years ago?

  42. Suburban Elk, as Steve Sailer astutely pronounced, it comes down to “Who/Whom”. Do today’s teenagers generally even comprehend this “red pill” versus “blue pill” dichotomy in the first place? Just a cursory question to the high schoolers in the neighborhood revealed no such knowledge. And when I gave the “OK sign”, then had little idea about its hidden meaning.

    Last time you interjected your opinions in this blog, you referenced then also, “who /whom.” And then also as I recall, it was misused. Or if I am mistaken, clarify its relevance to the topic at hand, which topic is —

    Were Gen X Whites under assault as Whites, by hostile forces. To reference who / whom, in defense of the assertion that they (Whites) were not (under assault), is exactly backwards, and it calls into question your motives and or your wits.

    Who / whom is relevant in calling out who is subjugating Whom; not as a denial that such subjugation is in effect.

    *********************

    As for teens not knowing of the red pill metaphor; you got to be kidding. That metaphor is mainstream and it’s everywhere. Of course some kids are not current on meta political discourse, and perhaps don’t get the reference. But give me 100 White American boys with iq’s north of 120, and it’s a safe bet that 99.9 per cent of them will know the metaphor and something of its relevance.

    On the “OK sign.” So some kid doesn’t recognize it? wow.

    That is a mighty big assumption there, Chief. In what specific ways were yesterday’s teens unwittingly being taken advantage of by outside forces they had no knowledge of? If they were aware of such forces, how are you certain they lacked the wherewithal to withstand those pressures? It is more than likely that Generation X was acutely aware about race and their own identity, especially if they lived in the suburbs in the 1980’s and experienced first hand the wonders of integration thanks to bussing vibrants from the ghettos. Perhaps they thought of matters differently than yourself about race growing up and today act in ways contrary to your experiences, and that is the reason why you are of the belief that “many good men were lost”.

    Please see my previous comment. Do you disagree that Whites in America are under assault? That is THE starting point for the red pill journey. And per your paragraph above, it would seems that you dispute that contention; in which case

    A) you are a normie; or
    B) you are a normie; or
    C) there is no ‘C’

    You say Gen X was “acutely aware about race”. I was Gen X, and my awareness of Race, pre red pill, was quite a bit informed by jews. Though truth be told, I had good instincts and they were never entirely overridden.

    In any case, I am not sure what your larger point is. Answer my direct questions, if you will please.

    Are Whites in America under assault, and if so, by whom, and for how long?
    What does “who / whom” mean in your book?

    And btw Sailer doesn’t use who / whom accurately, or rather, specifically. He uses it in a general, non-specific sense. An accurate use of it, implies exactly who, and exactly whom. The jews, and their enemies. Or vise versa for that matter. But Sailer can be dodgy on that.

  43. pj, I have no idea why you took personal butthurtedness from my observations… I actually praised your post as formidable and agreed with the lion’s share of your advice.

    This is why we lose… one little iota of not agreeing lock-step and the ad hominem Alinsky shaming attempts come out.

    You want to align yourself with a half-witted sock like dweebstreep, that’s more of a slam against you than it could ever be against me. I in no way “took a dump” on your post, and offered some sound… and too-little-heard… elaboration on what is conventional chateau wisdom, with an emphasis on the pitfalls of “conventional”, as it’s come to be understood when paired with wisdom.

  44. “I’m just saying that the hard path will very well likely turn out to be narrow, and lonely, and few who find it for the sake of the souls of others…”

    so very, very useful to Bryan’s situation.

    Let’s let Bryan be the judge of that, shall we… you presumptuous ass. (((shakin’ mah haid)))

    The point that went over your haid is that, whatever Bryan decides to do in re his daughter, he should do it with an eye on his own integrity, and not so much with the hope that others will see the light.

    Sound advice for ALL situations and ALL men.

  45. Advice on the internet is always dodgy. In my opinion plumpjack’s advice above seems pretty solid. I have to say it seems relevant, if impolite, the question of what are her looks. Does she keep herself up, or is she letting herself go? Is she manly or feminine?

    Manly women don’t want to dyke out, but some of them feel that their options are limited.

  46. last thing i wanted with these posts was to start a shitstorm here the likes of which constantly played on CH and likely got it deplatformed. i’m offering all this candidly, honestly and hopefully that someone might benefit, not as blog slap fest. so apologies PA, but some things must be said.

    pj, congratulations on having raised your daughter to adulthood.

    but this:

    “Same with daughter… if uncool dad withdraws his approval, just go out to facebook, the more whiny and skin-showing the better, and swim in the deluge of likes and support, and the subsequent brain chemical rush of ersatz affirmation from all the cool peers..”

    is something you seem not to understand. you may not have had the experience, but you may rest assured it is very real, and is like TV on steroids as far as cultural programming. WOULD ANYONE WHO DISAGREES PLEASE SPEAK UP,? because i may well be an idiot.

    the presumption of offering me advice when i asked for none, is also a lot like the dick measuring, cock blocking crap that made the CH comment section useless. what a waste of time. ask me questions any time, and i’ll respond as a gentleman. assuming you’re doing me any favor by reading down to me from between the lines is your mistake. you might well be a nice and truly stand up guy – that approach will leave a doubt.

    let me continue by saying there was a time when i finally came into my own, when i was not afraid of one frickin’ thing in this world, or near enough. then we had kids. the prospect losing one of them is when the game gets very serious. there is not a loving parent in the world who does not have that voluntarily accepted vulnerability, at least not in the culture to which i aspire.

    only a fool would take for granted that one’s child threatening suicide is a game. screwed up women? yes, no doubt. but hear this good: i signed up to be a dad, and often that means trying to protect your kids from their own stupidity, no matter what the cost. i’m surprised i survived my own stupidity some times, and i recognize that my daughter has many of my own foolish characteristics, (clearly genetically based) but also a distinct lack in ability to have the ZFG attitude i had. our daughter is quite pretty, takes care of herself, is lonely being alone, but remains pure even after being treated badly by boys of crappy character, thus posing gay. she still has, surprise, some growing up to do. sucks, but can’t and won’t last forever.

    so yea, both she and our son ARE more important than me, and the prospect of sacrificing myself if necessary to save them (simplistic though that sounds) was implicit to me when we decided to have them. i hold this to be one of the foundations of being a man. that, more than the fun but superficial games that really only grease the way to the blessings of progeny, is implicit in having kids. i’ve seen a handful of people around here where we live literally lose their minds after burying their kids. no human being wants to bury their kid, period. i mourn for them.

    don’t imagine i don’t know pretty well the entire litany that roissey developed to help understand the mess free thotism got us to here. also no need to assume that i didn’t take every piece of insight CH articulated that i might find useful to get through what we’ve been through. i got more than my share of notches, both sublime and useless, made shameful mistakes in the process, and finally married a good woman. roissey might well be there himself now, given that CH evolved into a generalized brilliant critical, cynical and rapier hilarious skewering of the cartoon degeneracy as a favor to us all. roissey, if you’re reading this brother, remember for me that all saints have a past, and all sinners a future. you have done something very real for men of this age. please find some way to continue and endure in our midst.

    i have put no woman on a pedestal since well before i was married, now for more than 20 years, happily and with gratitude. as you might have by now inferred, i can be a real asshole. i take if for granted that men and women are fundamentally different, and wear the pants in my family. my wife and i both accept our places and work from our strengths. what more can be prescribed, except that more people have such a blessing? i learned this from men of a better time that came before me, whose shoes i am not fit to wear, and who to my eternal shame, i did not have the sense to really thank before they crossed the dark river.

    i have no interest in posing as some washed up gamesman, proving how much better i am than this fucked up culture simply because i can dish out some extreme medicine in the mistaken belief that doing so will push it back more than a fraction of an iota. believe me, i want to do war with this shit, HUNGRILY. we all got here for reasons we didn’t cause, can’t control and can’t cure. tilting at windmills has no attraction; i’ve got more important things to do at home, including possibly defending it, if necessary. this thing will only work out in the zeitgeist, which is the war going on right now for hearts and minds.

    that is what my son sees and knows from me by both word and action. peace.

  47. — believe me, i want to do war with this shit, HUNGRILY

    “Amused mastery,” or the feigning of indifference, is a useful tactic. Some are better at this than others. A posture of Outcome Independence clashing against the very burning fact that this Outcome is the most important thing in the world.

    At low stakes such as game/pickup, or when you’re negotiating the price of a car, poker face is easy. At cosmic stakes such as when Trump refrains from unburdening himself of his anger with the globopedo network prematurely… that kind of an iron discipline requires a combination of character traits that few have.

    Self-control is evidence of strong character and maturity regardless of age, but anger is a healthy basic instinct. Authenticity is a healthy way to be. Our civilization can’t be ordered around the average man’s ability to feign indifference. Even if you and I might be able to pull it off from time to time, we still need the other 800 million of our White neighbors to be able to do the same.

    I talk of the need for a leader. Everyone but the most clueless at this point feels similarly, in desiring to finally be able to take this poz head-on. Effectively. With a leader, a strategy, a support infrastructure.

  48. our awareness and the realities of our circumstances will call forth remedies. i take as given 3 rules, articulated by someone much wiser than myself:

    -no first use of force
    -no harm to innocents
    -keep strictly to the moral high ground

    whether this comes to a true leader, or an entire civ deciding on an extended sit down strike or some other rubicon crossing event is impossible to say, but it is coming.

    our greatest personal vulnerability is our children, the targeting of whom is no accident. our civ is being destroyed by an infection trying to break the absolutely essential intergenerational bond. i’ve tossed this around for a long while, and its incandescent brilliance is like Kurtz’ understanding of “the horror”. we are nearly defenseless against this attack, which angers me like nothing else.

    nothing real survives of our civilization if our children cannot carry it forward.

    thank you for the huge amount of work necessary in maintaining a forum dedicated to keeping this, PA.

  49. last thing i wanted with these posts was to start a shitstorm here the likes of which constantly played on CH and likely got it deplatformed.

    No worries, bryan… not your fault. There are some (ahem) personalities in Cyberia that can’t help but start bullshit, and then when they get it shoved back down their throats, act like the other guy was the aggressor and shit-stirrer… acting EXACTLY like the Alinsky dweebs of the Left that we here on the alt-R castigate for such behavior..

    Which is, of course, why we lose.

    On a side note, I don’t believe the “lunch room food fights” were really what got the chateau 86’d, but that’s a tale of woe for another day.

    Thanks for the validation on some of my points… I too congratulate even my detractors for raising their children successfully… and even for their alleged half-their-age supermodel 10 current girlfriends which they keep so handily in line…

    But my original question of whether pj had children stemmed from his a) too-pat by-the-alt-R-book AWALT advice on what works with daughters these days and b) the general inclination of those without children to pontificate in Cyberia on how they should be handled.

    I reiterate your original point and my corroboration thereof: smart phones these days have become the frontline offense of the Synathedral, ergo Satan, in the corruption of our youth… and thus far we, as a society in toto, have not mounted any counter-attack worthy of the name beyond a few pockets of enforced downtime within all-too-few families.

  50. — I don’t believe the “lunch room food fights” were really what got the chateau 86’d

    I don’t rule out commenter Ari******us having played a part in that. Not necessarily “reporting” the Chateau, but in being the system’s last-ditch attempt to subvert the commentariat, in which he failed. There were certain very, very bright tells that he’s high level ops, and a Special Person. Even his Germanophilia, paradoxically, fit that pattern. I can get into that more later. And other tells, objective and subjective.

    I’ve always liked the Looch and Trav personalities and A’s over-the-top viciousness toward both confirmed to me that my gut feeling about them is well placed.

  51. Suburban Elk

    “As for teens not knowing of the red pill metaphor; you got to be kidding…”

    I stated do they comprehend it, as in grasp mentally or to puzzle out. They obviously “know” of it, as in having previously heard the phrase before. And I would take your bet. How about a sawbuck on it?

    As far as today’s whites being under assault, again, it comes down to Who/Whom, i.e. one’s perspective. Some would argue absolutely, while others would vehemently oppose. The truth of the matter is that I am not going to change your worldview, as you obviously believe whites are being trampled on by Jews or globohomos or vibrants or whatever boogeyman suits one’s fancy. For me, I am comfortable in my own racial skin. Am I personally “assaulted” as a white man? Is White America under “attack”? Let me put it this way → The fact is that white normies today are the ones under siege and are threatened to be torn to shreds—the Alt Right screeches at them “race traitor” for not aligning to their views, while the Radical Left demands at every turn to “check your white privilege”, for merely making their own choices about race and culture. We are a Silent Majority, as we go about their business taking care of their families and navigating through the Clown World that the Coalition of the Fringes, along with mainstream pundits, corporatists, and politicians have opened up the last four years. The extremes get the publicity in the mainstream media and the Alt Right/Radical Left propaganda machines. White normies, it would seem, are viewed as a “pariah”.

    As far Generation X being “taken advantage” or “subjugated” without them realizing it regarding race, it depends upon Who-Whom, i.e. one’s perspective. For those living in the South in the 1980’s, they were on the frontlines when it came to full-fledged integration. Some undoubtedly held to their parental attitudes, while others completely took a 180 despite objections by Mother and Father. When it came to the northern environs, and integration by way of bussing, the exact situation applied. Moreover, we were not informed by “Jews”, we were informed by our family, our friends, our faith, and the media when it came to race and culture. Either those attitudes softened or hardened over time as a result of our life experiences.

  52. bryanb,
    I definitely made more than my share of mistakes with family. There was one fundamental mistake I made, however, that I will never make again and that is underestimating the power of “tough love”, particularly with regards to women, including and especially younger, attractive women.

    We as a species are hardwired to deal with adversity. Women are hardwired to sacrifice themselves and give birth. And they can HANDLE it.

    Just fine.

    So much of the issues young women face, including their addiction to social media, could be fixed if they were being challenged in the way that nature intended. She’s threatening to commit suicide? Of course she is. She’s horny as all hell and fucking bored to death.

    It is my opinion that the terrible “suffering” of young women is actually just men projecting vulnerability onto them in order to keep them dependent. Women are tough as hell. Stupid and malleable, yes, but they can be pushed…. hard…to do incredible things. A smart man and especially a smart FATHER takes advantage of this innate biological trait of theirs.

    That was the thrust of my advice, that you probably have some unused power here to impinge on your daughter’s comfortable little parent-manipulation bubble and push her past her comfort zone.

    Not that I can read your particular situation clearly (I can’t). I just know that the standard guy thing is to coddle women and then feel bad for them for supposedly having all kinds of issues which are really just manifestations of boredom.

    “i have put no woman on a pedestal since well before i was married, now for more than 20 years”

    horseshit. if this were true then you must not be that attracted to your wife, or love your daughter as much as you say. we are men and we are hardwired to go weak in the knees for the women we love. the fact that they can hook us over and over with their ploys is a key part of the journey and it is what makes us want to get up every day and make it happen with them. and they will continue to look for new ways to one-up us, because they’re women, and we will fall for it briefly before wising up and growing to the next power level.

    “i want to do war with this shit, HUNGRILY. we all got here for reasons we didn’t cause, can’t control and can’t cure.”

    Look up the bombing of Dresden. We ABSOLUTELY did this to ourselves.

    And we can ABSOLUTELY cure ourselves of this. At least SOME of us can. And will. And already are.

  53. pj, glad you’ve found what works for you.

    i stand by everything i’ve said, but i’m not up for illustrating it any further, as i value our privacy and i think i accomplished what i set out to do.

    see you all in another thread.

  54. @BryanB

    Just reading this. You’re not crazy at all. GE was much closer to the mark that this all reads like alt-right parenting fanfic.

    I won’t say Fatjack’s comments were utterly idiotic. There’s a grain of truth to his unsolicited advice. But I will say the guy has a habit of trying to take digs at other guys on this board (myself and GE included) out of insecurity. Hell, he was railing against a separate, sovereign ethnostate not long ago just to try and get a rise. Anybody that emotional online probably doesn’t have much stability in real life, at home. So I’d take his advice for what it’s worth- which isn’t much.

    This is the pure pozz victim/savior shit you’re up against:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/38606507/student-raises-more-than-10000-after-parents-cut-her-off-over-black-boyfriend

    Those parents followed the Fatjack tough love plan to the letter- and that’s what it got them.

    I don’t have kids, not married. But my parents faced a similar problem with my oldest sister back in the day, even before smartphones. Not mud sharking, but she was shacking up with a guy in college. My parents found out because she was never home when they called her. Said they didn’t support that. Told her to modify her behavior. She flat out said no. They pulled her funding for college and said she could come back home.

    Instead, she moved in with the guy and launched a several month smear campaign against my parents. Called the parents of her friends and twisted the story into one where my parents cut her off, penniless for no reason. Then she targeted my parents’ friends in their Catholic church. As you would expect, my parents’ cathcuck “friends” sold them out faster than Hillary with a private server.

    Throughout all of it, my parents loved her. Never fought back. Never gave the church busybodies the truth. They were hurt their daughter could act like that.

    As time passed it settled into an uneasy detente. I’ll write more about it if you’re curious, and I’ve got time.

    In the meantime, I don’t have any advice- just support. Glad you’re my bro.
    FE

  55. illuminating story FE. life often takes sloppy turns. i would have your parent’s back for all that, because that story is personally familiar. i’m sure the detente and how its playing out would be enlightening, but use your time wisely.

  56. “I won’t say Fatjack’s comments were utterly idiotic. There’s a grain of truth to his unsolicited advice. But I will say the guy has a habit of trying to take digs at other guys on this board (myself and GE included) out of insecurity. Hell, he was railing against a separate, sovereign ethnostate not long ago just to try and get a rise. Anybody that emotional online probably doesn’t have much stability in real life, at home. So I’d take his advice for what it’s worth- which isn’t much.”

    Not-Slow Eddie, the guy who signs off every post by telling a bunch of internet strangers that he’s “glad” they’re all his “bros” pontificating about being “emotional” online. Rich stuff.

    Did you ever think of asking if anyone actually WANTS to be your “bro”, Not-Slow Eddie?

    You clearly don’t understand anything about tough love or how or when to use it. Especially when to use it on yourself. (Here’s some unsolicited tough love advice: stop being a supplicating fag and calling a bunch online strangers your “bros”).

    “Those parents followed the Fatjack tough love plan to the letter- and that’s what it got them.”

    An absurdly over-simplified reading of the situation. That’s what it “got them”? Did you even read what GE wrote above? At the very least they saved their dignity. Do you think there might be some o-t-h-e-r stories out there where the parents do this and it actually works?

    Regardless, who cares? One sensationalized alt-right story does negate a single thing I said. You underestimate the audience here.

    “I don’t have kids, not married”

    What was your age again, Not-Slow Eddie, 35?

    “Instead, she moved in with the guy and launched a several month smear campaign against my parents. Called the parents of her friends and twisted the story into one where my parents cut her off, penniless for no reason. Then she targeted my parents’ friends in their Catholic church. As you would expect, my parents’ cathcuck “friends” sold them out faster than Hillary with a private server.”

    Right. This explains your confusion. Your nice-whyte parents did what they thought was the right thing, which is to uphold religious dogma social norms at the expense of being pragmatic. Just like you uphold your alt right fanaticism at the expense of making do with what you have.

    Your parents could have encouraged her to start popping out little ones, because that’s basically what your sister was on her way to doing anyway. But instead they cockblocked her and said she has to do it the old fashioned way. Retarded, but pretty standard.

    And then there’s you… What a disappointment you must be to them. Just as fanatically religious as they are, but minus the offspring.

    Where exactly are you going with your alt-right, ethnostate fanaticism, Not-Slow Eddie? 35 years old, no kids, but you want your own ethnostate.

    Hmmmm….

  57. @Fatjack

    Must’ve hit pretty close to the mark to rile up a menopause soaked screed of that length. I’ve met 30 yo bar skanks with more composure of wit and brevity.

  58. I don’t rule out commenter Ari******us having played a part in that. Not necessarily “reporting” the Chateau, but in being the system’s last-ditch attempt to subvert the commentariat, in which he failed. There were certain very, very bright tells that he’s high level ops, and a Special Person. Even his Germanophilia, paradoxically, fit that pattern. I can get into that more later. And other tells, objective and subjective.

    If he was some sort of operative, he was the best of the breed and one of the few such actually worthy of the chateau’s commentariat. He was EXTREMELY well-versed in the samizdat literature and players of the alt-R before it was the alt-R, back in the day. Also extremely well-rounded in Western literature and culture in general. I at first suspected he was King playing a non-religious persona in order to generate a different take, for himself and others.

    Like many pure intellects, he would up generating a lot of heat along with whatever light was brought to the table… not surprising, given Cyberian forums in general and us yeggs in particular, ever-too-willing to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, but I digress.

    I’ve always liked the Looch and Trav personalities and A’s over-the-top viciousness toward both confirmed to me that my gut feeling about them is well placed.

    Again, wood cuts wood, and steel sharpens steel. Ironically enough, trav and I always went hammer-and-tongs on the issues of White women and Christianity, but found four-square agreement and just about every other issue, go figger.

    Looch? Meh… rarely contributed anything but Eliot Has Green Hair drive-by snarking… self-admitted sock, who changed ’em more than his actual socks in meat world. I always suspected he was trav’s alter-ego because they were in lock-step with the mischling-mentality stuff, the antiChristian inanities, and the all-White-women-are-worthless spiel in order to encourage fucking every other race… but likely as not he was just one of the other like-minded clown car passengers.

  59. I have a strong feeling that aristacunt the archivist got CH shoa’d out of sheer spite

    CH ultimately siding with the commentariat against him was a breaking point

  60. In the most base sense, it is very primitive.

    Either white father truly cares about the “sexual selection” of his daughter(s) or he doesn’t?

    The pathology of anti-racism has conditioned white boy from very early on to take no offense to the “sexual selection” of his white female peers.

    Clearly, this coercive pathology can carry on into fatherhood, and has, becoming the very essence of “cuck.”

    To “cuck”’ just is for white males to be indifferent to the “sexual selection” of white female whether as potential future suitors or as fathers.

    In other words, a white father has to actually care about who his daughter(s) gives herself to.

    Claiming one doesn’t care as long as it’s “love” is the modern degenerate cop-out.

  61. Heh, heh… Cassius Clay, the same negro who, upon returning from The Rumble In The Jungle in Zaire, exclaimed: “Thank God my great granddaddy got on that boat!”

    I obviously like what he says to that limey cuck, but the bottom line is, he (an icon to muh black com-mun-i-tay even more than MLK) could have started a Back To Africa movement with teeth, or even a serious segregated homeland effort here in ‘Murrica, but wound up being just another negro celebrity FIRMLY ensconced in the American Dream he and his ilk bad-mouthed, while their own mouths were full.

  62. i just take it as ammo to leave the raciss screaming leftards pointing and sputtering. fun and games with cog dis.

  63. @Elk

    That guy is funny, and it is rough out there- especially online. I think everybody already knows this. At the same time, guys like that piss me off. I don’t like entitlement. Yeah, most of those chicks are 2’s and 3’s demanding a “prince.” And that’s ridiculous, but what about him? He’s just a goofy looking dude with a hat and a beard. Why would any top shelf broad want him? What does he bring to the table? I think the guy even says he can’t remember the last time he went on a date. Well, no shit with that attitude when you look like that.

    Online is 100% looks based. It’s for significantly above average looking guys and very average (or older and still hot but used up) broads. Real life is quickly following suit.

    I refuse to believe every single guy on this board (guys who already believe in self-improvement and going after what they want) cannot get to at least a 7 just keeping himself in shape, getting a good haircut, and wearing stylish clothes that fit. Once you’re there, you have a shot at 8s and even the occasional 9.
    FE

  64. GE, you grossly overestimate that clown. He knew some Greek mythology but failed big time in terms of Ancient historians and philosophers. His knowledge of Germany and WWII was above average but nothing stellar. Is he a cubicle mate of yours at Langley?

  65. At the same time, guys like that piss me off.

    The youtube channel is “Keeping It Keith” and it was linked by DS.

    He is quick with his wits and clever, but he presents as hipster normie. Above average intelligence. It’s a classic German phenotype, and being from Pennsylvania, that’s a good guess on his ethnicity.

    Totally agree though that he is no alpha dog. He has to lose weight and dress like an adult. You can’t be fat and in the manosphere, unless you are also big and strong and an athlete and no one can tell you otherwise.

    Here is a how to dress, for someone aspiring not to look like a millennial (or worse, a boomer) [ NAm, NAb ] —

    1. Not like youtuber Keeping It Keith: see above
    2. Don’t wear tee shirts, and especially don’t ever wear tee shirts that have anything printed on them
    3. Baseball caps are ok, but suspect; go easy on the logos, and no exceptions for ironic logos; they really should have no logos, as you are not getting paid to rep (are you?)
    4. Shorts are also iffy, but ok on certain occasions like Sunday in the park and or Fourth of July
    5. Try to always wear a collar
    6. Always always always always, wear leather shoes, and shiny ones are best
    7. Wear a belt; if you are actually from the upper classes you can wear suspenders, but otherwise stick w/ a belt

    All your clothes should be untorn and un-frayed. Always follow these rules, even when lounging around.

    Captain Obvious, whom I was dogging recently for his terrible meme about going to a dark place and not caring, made a good post once about “the presidential look”, which I hadn’t known about. The presidential look means to have short and well cut hair, be clean shaven, and no glasses.

    I found a good stylist at Cheap Clips, but then ironically the last time I was there just recently she was busy and the other stylist was not, and I slacked on my strict standards (of being an asshole) and let the other stylist cut my hair (with the same instructions) and it looks a lot worse now than it did the prior time. It was a mistake.

    Getting your hair cut is something of a test of how effective your manly personality, actually is, in the world. Do you get what you want?

  66. “You can’t be fat and in the manosphere, unless you are also big and strong and an athlete and no one can tell you otherwise.”

    Well said.

  67. Is he a cubicle mate of yours at Langley?

    Yeah, we’re in that division whose sole purpose was shutting down all the alt-R Cyberian memes… how are we doing?

    And where’s my paycheck?

  68. Getting your hair cut is something of a test of how effective your manly personality, actually is, in the world. Do you get what you want?

    That was an underlying theme of the old TRS podcast The Fatherland (deceased, 2017?) — being effective as a man, in the world. It’s easy to play pretend, but when it actually comes down to it, it can be a touchy thing, getting what you want (and need). Which starts off with respect.

    They once did a whole half-a-show on haircuts and how difficult they are. Going to Great Clips is obv low-rent prole and ill advised. Otoh that thar place is cheap and has one or two talented bitches (and let’s be real: fags) who will do a good job.

    But the hair cut is an intimate thing. It’s an old and overplayed joke about how they like to rub up on you (let’s hope not the fags), and let you get a whiff of their perfume. There was one time, a long time ago, when I was fairly disrespected by a bitch haircutter, and I woulda coulda shoulda got up and left. That was 15 years ago now; life is indeed a live-and-learn.

    I don’t like “men’s barbershops” but a lot of manly posters on the internet will insist that those are the way to go, and the obv choice. They may be right, but the other solution of finding someone you like at the cheap alternative, is also workable.

    Back to the show The Fatherland. The particular Life Stagey angle that they had, was about stepping up, as a man, and treating yourself as one of those, and dealing with the world in a way that maintains and reinforces some reasonable verisimilitude of dignity. On the other hand it’s shit tests until the day you die and you eventually someone’s wiping your ass hopefully with Care.

    One of the Fatherland regulars had a short little story about how when some random female will say to you “I like that [ article of clothing ]” and how you ought to respond.

    What you ought to reply back with is not a gay and cringey “Thank you” but rather something like Yeah so do [ you fawning twat ]; that’s why I’m wearing it

    It’s kind of trite but it gets to the larger point. The default response of “Thanks” is letting them approve of your choices and unless are a child? that’s not how it Be.

    That show was Something in it’s prime. Internet Hall of Fame. But and here’s the thing: It ended badly. As in bad sex badly. That badly. The host literally and on air simpered back to his wife and implored of her forgiveness. Oh Jim Jim Jim …

    I don’t know that that’s exactly how it went down, but that’s what the DS thread related. The tragic denouement is online somewhere. Which is why the stopped producing it, because it’s so much compromising material.

  69. Thanks, thordaddy, for your virtue signaling. And, Suburban Elk, men and women BOTH hit the “wall”. Hard. The video is just bitter guy lamenting about women on Internet dating apps. As far as how to dress or have the hair cut, guys have their own look. If they are a salt of the earth type, a dude who is going to have your back, that’s the most important thing. Your laundry list of how a guy MUST look is simply your preference. To each their own.

  70. GE thinks highly of aristacunt because aristacunt polished his knob on more than a few occasions. As far as I can remember, GE was the only commenter he ever praised.

  71. Go figure that flattery will get you everywhere with the biggest legend in his own mind the chateau has ever seen.

  72. GE thinks highly of aristacunt because aristacunt polished his knob on more than a few occasions. As far as I can remember, GE was the only commenter he ever praised.

    Your usual homoerotic Alinsky shaming tactics notwithstanding, if you weren’t such a snarky little eggplant, maybe you’d get some praise for your intellect and past activities on behalf of the cause on occasion, instead of the insipid circle jerk-offs from the Eliot Has Green Hair sock brigade.

    Note that I’ve used the selfsame coin of the realm that YOU chose to deal in, so as to be sure you’d catch my drift. Otherwise your understanding leaves much to be desired.

  73. Go figure that flattery will get you everywhere with the biggest legend in his own mind the chateau has ever seen.

    Says the fuckwit sock who keeps trying to tell me “it’s not about you” while making the vast majority of his posts about Eliot.

    Behold the moops, inventing even MORE ways to fail. (((shakin’ mah haid)))

    When are you ankle biters FINALLY going to learn that you can’t bring straws to a joust?

  74. Out of respect for PA, I’ll stop after this.

    GE, just to make it clear..

    I don’t take you seriously. You’ve never gotten more than my 10% – if that. I just think you’re annoying as fuck. There’s a suction to your lameness that slowly removes the life from every comment section you appear in. I’m bummed you found this place.

  75. Yeah, we all can see how you don’t really care, moops.

    Trying to put a burr under my saddle is about the only thing you ever did attempt seriously… but all it ever got you was a continued smack-around, like a petulant little dweeb.deserves.

  76. Allyn… Unless you are conceding to a racism as virtue, I think you’ve got things backwards. The real virtue-signalers are the “white fathers” who preen and pose and posture toward either a complete indifference to or an outright preference for their daughters’ anti-racist “sexual selections.”

  77. Out of respect for PA, I’ll stop after this.
    GE, just to make it clear..
    I don’t take you seriously. You’ve never gotten more than my 10% – if that. I just think you’re annoying as fuck. There’s a suction to your lameness that slowly removes the life from every comment section you appear in. I’m bummed you found this place.

    That pretty much sums it up for me too. Very well said. I had high hopes for this place for the first few days. It was a GE free zone for about a week and there was actually good conversation the likes of which had long been gone at CH. As soon as I saw GE had come around, I knew it would go downhill rapidly and it did. He basically drives off the good commenters who also self censor to avoid having to deal with his idiotic complaints and rebuttals that would require reams and reams of background explanation to explain but would fall on deaf ears anyway. The best thing I can say about him that is GE is a midwit trying to play with the bigboys. But I strongly suspect otherwise. I still say he is a paid shill designed to derail blogs and forums. Its why I don’t come here much anymore. As far as living in people’s heads, its that very lameness that does it. Not unlike when one of my kids’ nursery rhyme songs runs through my mind and I can’t stop thinking of it but it is gross self flattery on his part to think its because we somehow can’t see beyond it. I guess you take what you can get if you’re a moron pretending to be smart.

  78. Never known it to fail… the puppies who have nipped at Eliot’s ankles over the years just can’t help themselves to carry around the grudges and butthurt of being slapped down when they tried to snark their betters, and so they keep comin’ back with the same-ol’, lame-ol’ whiny little “Eliot et mah ice cream” bitchiness.

    And of course, all the verbiage about how they don’t really care, go figger.

    Keep getting smacked around, you fairies. Everything you complaint about others you’re guilty of yourselves five-fold.

    And will you geniuses NEVER learn that if you don’t start no shit, there won’t BE no shit?

    Or just keep showing everyone why we lose. (((shakin’ mah haid)))

  79. Its why I don’t come here much anymore.

    Except, of course, to comment about how Eliot’s comments are lame.

    Wake up to yourself already.

    If my commenting has curtailed your appearances ’round chere, then I’ve done the board a service.

  80. This is an astute observation on your part. I notice this as well. One problem though is I see less of them as I used to. I had one experience recently where I was at my local Wawa waiting on a sandwich, surrounded by the usual brown horde. All of a sudden the doors opened and in a epiphany of light, came in 15 teenage white boys from the local catholic school. They were on a bus heading to a sportsball game. All of them were tall, handsome and had good hair. I have been focused on hair recently because that seems to be the big differentiator I notice now between us and the brown caste. The comparison to what I was surrounded by initially was stark and everyone did turn their heads as these boys walked through the store. It was an implicit understanding among the Wawa patrons that these boys are the future.

  81. ” It was an implicit understanding among the Wawa patrons that these boys are the future. ”

    The ” future” in what context ?

  82. “then I’ve done the board a service”

    I’ll be the judge of that.

    If you don’t want to police your own board, but instead encourage sock posters coming out of the woodwork just to bitch about Eliot, then that’s your problem, alt-R ally.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s