Minnesota voted in Keith Ellison, a black Muslim, for attorney general. And if anyone here has a black or brown friend, he’s convulsing with delight at that news. And he’s not even Muslim! So please don’t invite him to implicitly White places and events.
Ok. Why do I keep beating on this.
Because it’s true and because many Whites, in their ego and niceness, won’t face up to the fact that things are tribal — racial. “I know a good one.” Fine, express some pro-White belief to him, especially one that has a basis in racial exclusion. Tell him that you don’t like seeing Africans in Denmark. And see his reaction. Ask yourself if he’s using you and White society in general as a bag of goodies. Ask yourself how deep is the veneer of Nice in your relations. Ask yourself, what sorts of impulses fire through his brain when he sees the most vile thing for us to process, a White girl with a brown baby.
I’ve observed things decades earlier that have contributed toward my belief that non-Whites harbor a Biological Envy that drives them to long for our unhappiness, fall, and total disappearance. My experience with blogging, on other blogs and here, has provided me with the final pieces I needed to be wholly confident in asserting this.
Suburban_elk brings a sharp analytical eye to the above:
I agree with the premise, that the members of a race group like to see their competitors suffer and fail.
As I recall however, the premise has been expressed at times in absolute terms, as in “every black American likes to see White people suffer and fail.”
For the sake of argument, consider that a Fair Summary.
Much of the difficulty and contentiousness of the argument around that premise, is of course in its inclusion of “every member” of group X. So said argument could be refuted with a simple NAxALT.
And in fact that’s where most people will contend it.
In support of the premise however; consider Suburban_elk’s soon-to-be famous axiom, that every single individual is but a fractal expression of his group AND AS SUCH, benefits or suffers as with his group and inversely his group’s competitors.
I find that to be a strong argument. Even if good-hearted blacks — and let’s not froth at the mouth and pretend that they don’t have their share of good hearts — don’t drink a toast to the anniversary of Newsom and Christian, they still benefit from their group killing out members of their competitors.
Actually though at some point they don’t benefit from that, because their competitors respond back and with force.
And so we learn that whiteboard Reasoning on such a broad problem as competition between population groups, doesn’t reduce to neat axioms. Who knew?
Another difficulty in the original premise, is in the meaning and understanding of “like”, as in blacks like to see Whites suffer and fail.
The way that people characterize and categorize their own reactions and thoughts and feelings about things, is often secondary to how those things affect them. For example, I won’t necessarily “like” to see every black in America inexplicably die in six months of tuberculosis but on the other hand it would be great.
So this thing I’m saying about their ill will, is this supposed to be some kind of a revelation? Or just a belaboring of group competition and ordinary Schadenfreude?
It’s a revelation to those who blind themselves to the reality of group competition. Anti-racist conditioning relies on Europeans’ historic tendency to idealize blacks as faithful dogs. This tendency leads to cuckish habits of mind when political fortunes reverse the master-servant dynamic and metastasizes into a “refugees welcome” general hysteria. The world happily exploits those who operate under the delusion of fraternity, with collateral damage to cucks’ neighbors.