We are all familiar with Steve Sailer’s perspicacious First Law of Female Journalism, which he coined in 2009:
The most heartfelt articles by female journalists tend to be demands that social values be overturned in order that, Come the Revolution, the journalist herself will be considered hotter-looking.
Researching the subject, I discovered that someone had already come up with a Second Law of Female Journalism:
The types of sexual relationships advocated for by female journalists tend to follow closely with the sort currently purchasable by their sexual market value.
I will now humbly submit the third law. It occurred to me while reading an article titled “Why these professors are warning against promoting the work of straight, white men,” which cites this bit of heavy breathing:
doing so also perpetuates what they call “white heteromasculinism,” which they defined as a “system of oppression” that benefits only those who are “white, male, able-bodied, economically privileged, heterosexual, and cisgendered.”
Ever notice how women’s genuine expressions of racial aversion, across different cultures and eras, usually diminish the object-class of scorn with words of ridicule and disgust, while feminists’ anti-racist language echoes Sylvia Plath’s ode to masculine heft?
Every woman adores a Fascist,
The boot in the face, the brute
Brute heart of a brute like you.
The Third Law of Female Journalism:
Hostile writing by women about White men as a category tends to be an expression of their yearning to be ravaged by one, compounded by their frustration over remaining unnoticed as an object of such desire.