The Moral Right To Say “No”

We have not exploited the countries from which these refugees are coming to Europe these days, we have not used their labour force and finally we have not invited them to Europe. We have a full moral right to say No.

From last week’s speech by Jarosław Kaczyński, chairman of Poland’s ruling Law and Justice party. Each nation’s circumstances are different. In Poland’s case, Kaczyński is absolutely right: there is no basis, in a liberal moral system, to hold Poland and several other European nations accountable for their past entanglements with third world peoples.

Does this mean that countries that did have colonies and had invited non-European labor into their homes are morally obligated to take in immigrants? Of course, not. That’s because the liberal moral system is not a legitimate guide for Western nations — it is alien and opportunistic rather than traditional and idealistic.

However, attention to the liberal moral system is indicated because its protean premises and logic are necessary, at the present, to validate any political act undertaken by a Western nation. Whites have always derived legitimacy of action from the alignment of their motives with universal morality; that, in my view, is innate to us and this is why we are seen as the only race that possesses moral agency.

Our universalist thinking predates Christianity, whose tenets, from a secular point of view, are aligned with our a-priori impulses. The modus operandi of Leftism was to subvert our relationship with Christian morality by keeping its language but replacing its spirit with their own unclean breath. The Cultural Marxist usurpation is not historically unique in that regard, except that has turned our own nature against us on an unprecedentedly self-destructive scale.

Kaczyński’s above-quoted words parry one Marxist argument (“Europe must take in refugees because racist debts”) with another (“Poland has no such debts”). His speech effectively rebuffs false-premise dialectic on its own terms.

Every mainstream populist leader in Europe understands that, at the moment, his public address is constrained by the captivity of the Western mind — the West’s voters and national institutions — to the false morality of Marxism. This is also why Viktor Orbán’s speeches include appeals to liberal values such as tolerance and female equality. To win, you play the game by its present rules, until your audience is ready for you to discard present rules.

A genuine Western moral system — as codified by Christian doctrine and in harmony with natural law — was never killed by Jewish Marxism, and never will be as long as we live. Our legitimate morality is submerged under impostor-morality. Listen to your own mute voice and hear your own thoughts:

Even the lowest bug fights to live.

Thou shalt not kill, another or yourself for illegitimate reasons. In other words, no nation is obligated to snuff out her own posterity. Yet this is being enthusiastically carried out, not only in the case of Western Europe’s post-war waves of immigration, but in an even more influential example — the United States and her blacks. From the standpoint of liberal morality, the case for absolute black equality is incontrovertible: slavery and segregation were sins to be atoned for, with damage to be ameliorated. So Americans did that… and created a low-grade beast that begs to be put down.

Language, no less so the moral language behind the hissing for White Genocide, is “words, words, words,” per Shakespeare. And so are any retorts on the political stage. But the soil from which the words spring — either as cultivated roses or as poison ivy — is real. It is time to eradicate (to pull up by the roots) the false morality of Marxism and let legitimate European morality again flourish so we affirm that our nations have the full moral right to say “No” to being replaced, and then to act in accordance with this imperative to live and not die.

To independence!

ovps

Advertisements

29 thoughts on “The Moral Right To Say “No”

  1. –I already had this up in one window and Sailer’s UN population projection All Graphs Ever post in the other, and I was going through the comments and already grousing before I saw that you had commented there to, and since I was already about to vent–

    I agree with Massimo Heitor– what is Steve really up to with this? Many a time I feel like he has outlasted his usefulness, at least on Big Picture stuff. The idea of a 15,000,000,000 pop Africa is so obviously outrageous, to even pretend to humor it is to venture off into aspie fantasyland– it’s like an anti-Trantor. Maybe 15 billion Ice People could populate the Earth, maybe not; 15 billion blacks or part-blacks, even if “allowed” to have it, will absolutely meet their die-off in the most extinction-level way.

    So you have people blackpilling like commenter “neutral”, with this drivel:

    “Assuming that those numbers really do continue on that trajectory, then obviously Europe will be overwhelmed, the same for North America, however could the remaining world resist such overwhelming numbers ? I am guessing that most would say that China/India/Russia/Japan could easily resist this, but I am not so sure. If Africa, Europe and North America have become mostly black and blacks make up a the majority of the worlds population then the sheer numbers and the vast areas controlled makes me think that nobody could resist this.”

    Blahblahblahblahblah have these people never heard of a Maxim gun? “I am guessing” that China/India/Russia/Japan have nukes, warplanes, cruise missiles, barbed wire, 30mm autocanon, capacity for land and sea mines, submarine patrols, torpedoes, coastal batteries, mobile howitzer batteries, multiple rocket launchers, biological agents, factories to make gas, space programs to launch nukes from orbit . . . Gee, come to think of it, Europe and North America do too! Hey Gus, you don’t think those Europeans and Americans might ever use those resources too? Oh but wait, “such overwhelming numbers”, overwhelming numbers of uglyass simpering starving shirtless nignogs who can’t swim . . . what can we do, what can we do? Just think of the “overwhelming numbers” at the Somme or Stalingrad– unstoppable human masses! Even if they WERE encumbered by shirts and heavy weaponry and tank divisions and hundreds of Stukas howling overhead!

    lolzolz “vast areas controlled”. As a late friend of mine liked to say, “African Empires!– some of them spanned FIFTY MILES!!!”

    Nigguhs cant “control” shit, and they won’t. Sick to death of these useless wimpering Unz commenter buffoons– and frankly, Steve’s wide-eyed “but I’m a normie” schtick too.

    And, damnit all, why does Ron Unz have to personally ask Steve Sailer to put all these graphs in one place? Steve is not the damn PhD chair of Statistics at the University of Edinburgh. Good info to know, but it wearies me to see his genius coddled for turning in 8th grade homework! “Congratulations, Steve, you just blew the lid off collating bogus UN line graphs for the masses.”

    Well, as you see, I am self- (and probably other-) exiled from commenting at isteve a long time ago . . . .

  2. –Anyway, ~40,000,000 nignogs have “succeeded” in all but destroying the world’s most powerful nation. A similar dispersal of Africans, even sans genetic contamination, will likewise ruin Europe or any other zone into which they are introduced. 13% blacks in your population is 13% too many, but even if one nursed the sick desire to shelter the shucks the fact remains that this proportion is breaking the world’s strongest back. That is a baseline empirical truth which, I think, should become the standard rallying call of all missives to Congress or “mainline” conservative commentary.

    The East European bloc is in a treacherous position, but thankfully Pres. Trump is strongly signaling the green light to go ahead and “defy” the EUSSR. All the talk of “making NATO pay its fair share” (which has since the campaign even been grounded in overt allusion to the obsolescence of NATO) is a clear diplomatesse invitation to walk out– in fact, for us to helpfully push them out, by giving recalcitrant voters and politicians the excuse–“you see, we just love NATO but that tightwad Trump wasn’t going to pay for our defense anymore!”

    Trump is helping the satrapies of the globohomo empire get their freedom back. Hopefully Eastern Europe, Korea, and Japan can lead the way and the decadent EUcrats will succumb.

    The arming of the Czech population–stock up, friends! Seal those borders like you did in The Living Daylights. Nothing in!

  3. –Our neighbor “Priss” DID wax ironic about the 10,000 word count of that Christian PhD’s essay at Unz–I’ve seen her/him leave 10,000+ COMMENTS at Unz, so I was so tickled I think it’s infected and unloosened my tongue.

    –And SPEAKING of “neighbors”, nancy may’s been linking chateau readers to salon(dot)com!

    I guess ole nancy just wants to remind us to get a (((broad range of views)))– it’s what a (((smart))) gal would do . . .

    [NB: I’m not categorically saying that old fart Hersh is without his employable points at that– broken clocks in powerful corridors–but the solicitous way she siddles up to these subjects–“You know, I’ve been doing a lot of thinking . . ” and oh-so-qualifies herself is so scrumptiously telling. I mean, it’s one think to gander at a Hersh piece once in a blue moon– but to TELL people about it! lolzolz . . .]

  4. Pingback: The Moral Right To Say “No” | Reaction Times

  5. If you spend to much time appealing to the shibboleths of the enemy in your reasoning, it validates those ideas. It tells the leftist that you recognize his morality as valid, which makes your refusal even more egregious. It keeps the proles thinking in the same way, instead of providing them with an elite-approved alternative.

    It can be useful to tear apart the priors to show that the argument is a lie, but that is as far as it should go. After that, all you are doing is reinforcing their authority to make moral pronouncements.

    The Shadowed Knight

  6. — If you spend to much time appealing to the shibboleths of the enemy in your reasoning, it validates those ideas. It tells the leftist that you recognize his morality as valid, which makes your refusal even more egregious. It keeps the proles thinking in the same way, instead of providing them with an elite-approved alternative.

    I’m curious about the process that leads to ultimately invalidating the leftist morality. The speeches of mainstream nationalist leaders, to include Trump, Wilders, Orban, seem to be passing through a “gradient” that begins at leftist morality and then heads rightward toward the complete repudiation of leftism. Even Pat Buchanan’s famous 1992 “culture war” speech praised immigrants.

    Why do they do that? Some possibilities — assuming they all speak freely and without some globalist omerta hanging over their necks — include that they themselves are growing out of their liberalism.

    Another possibility is that, as successful political players in a hostile environment, they know the score, but they also know what they are doing: maybe they feel like the public is not ready for the kind of language that David Duke (for example) would use. There is the mainstream, and the right wing vanguard. It’s possible that their political instincts instruct them to pace themselves by speaking a bit right-of-center, else they marginalize themselves.

  7. Blahblahblahblahblah have these people never heard of a Maxim gun?

    Indeed, but that was the premise behind “Camp of the Saints.” Of course Europe could have sunk the third-world flotilla in the ocean: but they didn’t. Then they could have shot them as they walked ashore: but they didn’t.

    Having the weapons is one thing. Having the will to use them is another thing entirely. Western Europe has no will. Of course they could sink the migrant boats, but instead they tow them to shore — in Italy! And all it would take is to sink one or two of them, and then the rest would stop coming. But they won’t do it.

    Similarly, we really don’t need a Wall. We need troops stationed at the border with orders to shoot to kill anyone crossing over. How long do you think they would keep crossing once we shot a few? Or if we captured them, strung them up on ropes as you would an invading army? If Visa over stayers were executed, you’d see an army of Chinese and Indians departing.

    Most problems are easily solved if you have the will power to do it.

  8. “Moral rights” are a white concept to begin with.

    Even the idea that white survival is negotable is white. No other race would debate this topic. They’d just do what they need to do and be done.

    “Thou shall not kill” is a joke. God knows that. He has killed many, many people. He has broken all of the 10 commandments. Laws for us, but none for Him.

    It will take a liberal WN to take an anti-white liberal down.

    Take liberals at their word. WHite men did enslave the niggers, stole half of Mexico from the spics, and forced our women in the kitchen. But why? Because we are superior.

  9. Indeed, but that was the premise behind “Camp of the Saints.” Of course Europe could have sunk the third-world flotilla in the ocean: but they didn’t. Then they could have shot them as they walked ashore: but they didn’t.

    It would be pretty easy and fairly cheap for the EU to patrol and interdict the North African boats before they even leave Libyan waters, still within the 12-mile international limit if necessary.

    The new type of Obama liberalism is absolutely insane with “never say no” to any sob story or charity case, a future liberal Democratic regime in office in the USA would (literally) give the ok for tens of millions of Africans to be airlifted here without even a second thought.

    We will never really know a lot of the immigration damage that Obama did. A huge number of Haitians and Central Americans were emboldened by his steadfast preference for the foreign and just walked across the border. He literally couldn’t stop flapping his fat lips about his “Dreamer” program, and that caused yet another surge of illegal immigration as Latin Americans were (literally) just postal mailing their children across the border.

    And he was very slick to change the way that border encounters were reported, altering the definition of a “deportation” to make it look as if they were way up, when deportations were actually way, way down:

    http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-obama-deportations-20140402-story.html

    Trump has also put heavy heat on countries that refuse to take back deportees compared to the laxity of the Obama administration.

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/may/16/countries-refusing-us-deportees-cut-from-20-to-12/

    BTW, Turkish President Recep Erdogan recently called on all Turkish families in Europe to have at least 5 babies each to grow their political power:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/03/17/erdogan-calls-turkish-families-have-five-children-bulwark-against/

  10. The young WNs laugh at this talk of morals and arguing. That is old thinking. Just mock them and do your own junk.

    They are gonna smoke our enemies easily. They have a completely different mindset:


  11. I gotta agree with Ryu, and I’m not even young. I used to make the argument from history as to why we had a “right” to Texas, the Southwest, California. Surprise! I never convinced the other side. Now I just say, we took it when we were strong, you are invading and colonizing us now because you are strong and we have been weak, but that is changing …
    “Those who want to live, let them fight …”

  12. I doubt many people have the slightest idea how hard it is to move large amounts of willing people. Heck, antifa can’t do it and they’ve had years of practice.

    Mass immigration on this scale cannot take place without a receiving friendly Nation-State. No food, no shelter, no income, etc. These liberal do-goodwrs won’t do it either. Also, food aid to the 3rd world would drop dramaticly without USG’s indirect and direct subsidy.

    The system, politically, economicly, financially, is having serious problems absorbing it, and it’s getting worse. There are growing indications the domestic Intel coverage isn’t there anymore, and the both the street crime and the White collar crime is increasing.

    We havnt quite reached the level of mass black markets yet, but at the rate things are going, we arnt to far off. What happens to all of the imported then?

  13. We havnt quite reached the level of mass black markets yet, but at the rate things are going, we arnt to far off. What happens to all of the imported then?

    The immigrants in Europe are causing a big explosion in off-the-books transactions. That will be coming to America soon, as well. And then even more liberal dreams will come crashing down as tax revenue plummets without enough honest, high income white people left to subsidize the brown explosion. Reasons:

    1. A lot of Muslim men (especially Gulf/Arabs) don’t have any sort of work ethic at all

    2. Europe brought in too many unskilled people at once, not enough jobs for them especially with their reluctance to learn the European languages – the German immigration minister just said that it is likely that 75% of refugees will still be jobless after 5 years

    3. Easier to take advantage of Euro welfare “benefits” if you don’t have a job on the books but can run little kebab and family-run shops for cash – in the USA you can’t collect unemployment unless you’ve actually paid into the fund and had a job but Europe is much more lenient

    4. Migrant “youths” in Europe find it easy to “hustle” and get into petty crime/drug dealing as that business is booming without the competition from blacks that the USA has

  14. The situation must be bad if even a typical Obamist/world liberal like Bill Gates is discussing the problem. I’m shocked he phrased it this way, maybe he was misquoted:

    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/07/04/bill-gates-eu-stem-migrants-overwhelmed/

    Bill Gates: Europe Will Be Overwhelmed Unless It Stems Flow of Migrants

    Microsoft founder Bill Gates has warned that Africa’s population explosion will overwhelm Europe unless the continent makes it more difficult for migrants to reach its shores.

  15. — I used to make the argument from history as to why we had a “right” to Texas, the Southwest, California. Surprise! I never convinced the other side.

    That’s true when you talk about regular people dealing with liberals. I don’t debate them because it’s a waste of time. I certainly don’t debate anything with non-Whites in real life. The post is about heads of state and national-level political leaders, and why they are still operating within the liberal frame.

    They are “pacing themselves” for a number of reasons. No doubt that Marine LePen’s or Geert Wilders’ personal views are much more radical than their public speeches. Trump is starting to send out interesting tweets. Last week he posted an all-White scene form a White House lawn party. Today, he followed up with an all-white-faces “MAGA” orchestral performance. That’s no accident.

    What if he tweeted the 14 Words? It would be exhilarating but for one reason or another, he doesn’t do that. If I say that the public will be “ready” for open WN rhetoric two years from now, what does that mean? Whatever it means, is what guides nationalist heads of states today.

  16. — I used to make the argument from history as to why we had a “right” to Texas, the Southwest, California. Surprise! I never convinced the other side.

    It was us that saved Mexico back in the 1860’s. A huge group of old Mexican aristocrats didn’t like the super liberal government of Benito Juarez and they invited the French to invade, which they did after Napoleon III sent an army.

    They set up a monarchy in Mexico City with Emperor Maximilien in charge. The USA actually supported the psycho land-grabbing liberal Juarez instead of the French and restored Juarez to power once the Civil War was over.

    We coulda and probably shoulda just let the French continue running Mexico.

  17. — Bill Gates has warned that Africa’s population explosion will overwhelm Europe unless the continent makes it more difficult for migrants to reach its shores.

    As someone on Twitter put it, either the tide is turning or they’re putting their masks back on.

  18. On “disappearing,” in 2015 Poland (still under the cuck / Euro-suckup party’s rule then) took in a few thousand Syrian refugees, all of them Christian. Parishes around the country found them homes and basic provisions. As I read it, all — 100% — of those refugees immediately moved to Germany, where welfare benefits dwarf Poland’s minuscule amounts.

    (Maybe they preferred Germany because the language is much easier to learn, and they were enthusiastic about assimilating as rapidly as possible.)

  19. PA, they may be more radical than they put on. They may just be old, and the older ideas have a stronger hold on them than the young. They may be pacing, they may just be following the changing mood.

    If Donald Trump can, in the heart of Empire, clearly state, “America First,” then the Poles should be able to, as well. They are more homogenous, less indoctrinated, and more capable of resistance. Going full 14/88 would be counterproductive, and quite culturally ignorant given their history, but they can say, “Poland is the Poles’ land, not for invaders.” No one owes a debt to Africans or Arabs. If anything, it is the other way around.

    They can lead right/nationalist without validating the arguments that their enemies dream up. “We owe them nothing,” is different than, “We owe them nothing because *we* never had an empire.

    The Shadowed Knight

  20. The “culture” of WN is changing. There’s not going to be a debate at all.

    There are so many good members, and it is hard to keep up with all the material they put out. Like this concept:

    “White Privilege Zone”

    As per the Internet Bill of Rights, you have access to most of the forums here, but MPC is a white privilege zone and you must become white to have a voice. Once you respond to the registration email, someone–no one knows who–must approve your new account. Then your journey across a sea of hurtful words begins.

    The true meaning of diversity arises as each WN specializes
    and develops new weapons against the bugpeople. It is now impossible for them to target one man and hurt us.

  21. I spent a whole week with Trump hating liberals. I refused to engage with them at all about politics, although they didn’t really want to either. They started tearing up Trump Casino playing cards in protest. Nothing Trump says or does will please them or make them like him. He should not bother trying.

  22. “Whites have always derived legitimacy of action from the alignment of their motives with universal morality; that, in my view, is innate to us and this is why we are seen as the only race that possesses moral agency.”

    This reminds me of what I read in Cambria Will Not Yield, a recurring assertion that white Europeans are (or were) the “Christ-bearing race.” I struggled for a while trying to understand that, but it’s become more clear to me.

  23. The white race as a “Christ-bearing race” is a white race striving towards objective (S)upremacy, i.e., (P)erfection.

  24. Would it be OK if I cross-posted this article to WriterBeat.com? I’ll be sure to give you complete credit as the author. There is no fee; I’m simply trying to add more content diversity for our com5munity and I enjoyed reading your work. If “OK” please let me know via email.

    Autumn
    [redacted] @WriterBeat.com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s