Unlike during the French and the Russian revolutions, modern Communist vanguard has difficulty finding its competent cadre of butchers. The immigrants and native blacks can’t be counted on for discipline. Antifa is a joke.
But what about the feds, the police, or the armed forces, who haven’t shown themselves averse to killing civilians? Certainly, as long as their paychecks clear, I wouldn’t count on any mutinies when ordered to kick in patriots’ doors. But it heartens me that Globalists doesn’t trust them either.
Can Leftists recruit competent muscle from the White working class, specifically from its renegade anti-Trump voters? The doughy faced 66-year-old rifleman James Thomas Hodgkinson fired what may be the first shots in a civil war between the Nationalist and Globalist halves of the U.S. civilian population. A commenter at Occidental Dissent writes:
I know a lot of these type anti-Republican, pro “Working Man” democrats. They are going to be some of our most formidable enemies. […] They adopt every extreme left wing position Democrats have come to represent. […] They will never be on any Nationalist political and white racial movement side.
Maybe he has a point. There are crazy “salt of the earth” Leftists, we just haven’t seen a competent one yet. Unlike Right wing action heroes, who shine in terms of youth and skill in execution, Hodgkinson was retiree-aged and a poor marksman. If the Left finds its great White paramilitary hope, we will recognize him by a profile that includes some of these points:
1. Vintage Populism. The working class Leftist is angry with the Right as he sees it, for destroying the country’s labor class through union-busting and other Reaganite acts; he has internalized “What’s The Matter With Kansas.”
2. Class Anxiety. He embraces Social Justice either because he finds Leftist classes aspirational or to defect from the working class on whom the system is waging war.
3. High Disgust Threshold. He is tolerant of, maybe outright enjoys, the dissonance of vibrancy and the thrill of cultural degeneracy.
4. Low Intelligence. He will better relate to blacks and identify with their political agenda. (Aside: this is another example of the corrosive effects of diversity — when humble Whites relate to their White peers, they still transmit our culture; when they start living around blacks in a similar socioeconomic position, some take on the elements of black culture).
5. High Intelligence. Alternately, an above-average IQ combined with their sub-middle class station in life embitters and radicalizes them, ordinarily to the Right but sometimes in a Leftward direction.
6. Mentally Unstable. Common in Left wing terrorism. Includes types who are drawn to violence for its own sake.
7. Veteran. Of the generation that had served in Bush’s wars, a few will blame conservative society for having sent young men to die or come back damaged.
8. Single. Those with skin in the game have a lot to lose. But if you corner the risk-averse, he flips into total-war mode to protect his own. This is why nationalist movements are rising while Left wing radicalism is a single man’s game.
9. Gamma. As the Left has evolved into the anti-White, anti-male, fat-acceptance absurdity that attracts life’s most feeble specimens, and since Prog rites of passage no longer lead to status and material security, a commitment to the Left offers healthy men nothing.
10. Government Employee. Some develop institutional loyalty that leads to a hostile us-vs-them mentality toward the fellow-Whites who resent the government.
(Remember, this isn’t a post about what makes someone a liberal. It’s about a hypothetical working class White person becoming a competent Left wing militant.)
Street paramilitary — the Left:
… vs. the Right: