What Is White Trash

But first, what’s not White trash? It is not White people who are:

  • Alcoholic
  • Criminal
  • Druggie
  • Fat
  • Illiterate
  • Irresponsible
  • Knocked-up
  • Lazy
  • Loud
  • Poor
  • Resigned
  • Rude
  • Slovenly
  • Smokers
  • Stupid
  • Tatted
  • Ugly
  • Uneducated
  • … or any combination of the above.

Such people are what the words above already describe them to be. I’m with vintage Donald Trump on that expression:

“What does that mean? You don’t joke about being White trash… that’s a pretty stinkin’ statement. I don’t like it as a joke. You shouldn’t use that expression anymore either. How stupid can you be?”

One exception. With its historic origins in the U.S. South, today that expression fits one specific failing of character. Here is an example of White trash: I see a little girl, like an angel, maybe five years old, running free with her golden hair in the sun. And running with her is Diversity.

White trash is that little girl’s negligent parents, who are imprinting her with intimacy with other races. White trash is a person who shits on his European heritage.

Advertisements

91 thoughts on “What Is White Trash

  1. I remember growing up in York, PA, back in the 60’s and 70’s, the nun’s were teaching us that the KKK was the biggest physical threat to us little Catholic boys, even while the city was in the midst of racial riots filled with black and puerto rican criminality.

    I used to go to sleep at night scarred to death some hooded Klansman was going to climb through my window and set me on fire. Funny how I never saw one Klansman, but my siblings were crushed by black violence that dared not be spoken about.

  2. The way jew dikes talked about STR8 White Church Going Christian Men you would think they are worse than moslems.

  3. “I was taught to be terrified of the KKK also. I still haven’t met one”

    These morality tales (KKK, Neo-Nazis, Hitler, Emmett Till, etc.) are so antiquated and far removed from American life in 2017; I don’t know how they can possibly resonate with anyone beyond the boomer generation.

  4. I’ve met two KKK members, both in the early 1990s. One was a middle-aged alcoholic fuck-up, but also highly intelligent and an interesting man. He was from coastal Virginia. In his situation, it was probably more of a case of the Klan taking him in out of pity; he earlier thought he’d “find himself” in the Mormon church but dropped out.

    Another Klan member I met was an impressive 20-year-old man from Oklahoma. I met him on one my training tours while in the Army. He and I hit it off, and he told me stories about life in rural Oklahoma, how he and the people in his community walked armed patrols and challenged blacks who wandered too close to Whites’ property after dark.

    The Klan itself was driven to bankruptcy some decades back by coordinated lawsuits. I have no idea of the state of the organization now. It is also reputed to be heavily infiltrated by feds. There is a joke: “How do you take out 100 agents at once? You b*mb a Klan rally.”

  5. Pingback: What Is White Trash | Reaction Times

  6. dah Lucius wants to take credit for mainstreaming Donald Trump’s “White Trash” firing rant into the Alt-Right consciousness:

    https://luciussomesuch.wordpress.com/2015/11/29/donald-trump-on-white-trash-its-a-terrible-expression/

    I’m not sure if I really did or not, but apparently at the juncture above I had dropped it in the comments at the chateau, and soon after Renegade Broadcasting took it up, and then later Heartiste wrote about it, so . . . maybe other people remembered it on their own, but it MAY be that after all my peevish memory actually helped meme this thing into the campaign stream.

    Which campaign I HOPE will still produce great new things.

  7. I got around to my panicky, polite but firm email to the White House last night (the ones they deliver on a silver platter straight to the President in the Conference Room), what with kausfiles and Coulter’s twitter putting me in a scare.

    From his NRA speech today: “You need that wall to stop the human trafficking, to stop the drugs, to stop the wrong people, you need the wall,” Trump said. “We’ll build the wall. Don’t even think about it, don’t even think about it, don’t even think about it. That’s an easy one. We’re going to build the wall. We need the wall.”

    And he took shots at Pocahontas (by that name) too. Well, at least he appreciates the need to beef up morale around here. For my part, it’s been hard a couple of times not to let loose with a “fire Ivanka” remark– but we can’t get uncivil to the man’s face like this. Though maybe Wilbur Ross or somebody should quietly say something.

    Paul Ryan counts as trash, doesn’t he? lolz because it’s true

  8. I’ve met two KKK members, both in the early 1990s. One was a middle-aged alcoholic fuck-up, but also highly intelligent and an interesting man. He was from coastal Virginia.

    Coastal Virginia couldn’t have been fun in the 90’s for a KKK-leaning person since that’s the blackest area of that whole state outside of the VA part of eastern/Southeastern Washington DC metro.

    Hampton Roads/VA Beach metro is part of what is often called “tidewater”, running south through mid-eastern NC, and is also actually the farthest northerly reaches of the “Black Belt”. It runs from there through the Carolinas always just southeast of the uplands/mountains (which blacks avoid like the plague) through Georgia and on to cotton country and eventually to the Mississippi Delta, then up towards Memphis.

    NC is about 27% black, SC is over 30% black.

    The high black population there is a relic of the highly labor-intensive agriculture there from the 17th to 19th century – rice, tobacco, cotton, hemp, peanuts, soy etc.

  9. Despite what Trump or others may say there is such a thing as “white trash” and it exists outside of the issue of race mixing.

    It’s a household headed by a severe layabout white man who refuses to get a job, where the lady works multiple low-end jobs (they’re not married) and he sits around the house all day but still does virtually nothing for the kids or household. And the family uses the government dole unabashedly.

    Many of you may have never encountered such a household of such white people, I saw a not insignificant number of them growing up down south. It’s a household run by a “black white man,” for lack of a better description. Naturally, the kids grow up into all sorts of “at risk” outcomes, miscegenation being one of the major ones as there’s very little class/moral divide between them and the bulk of blacks.

    If you ever come across such a man you will never forget it.

    Think of the family from Honey Boo Boo, if you remember that show. They were big Obama supporters.

  10. — it exists outside of the issue of race mixing.

    Yet as you say, that road somehow always leads to that particular Rome.

    You are right, in that I never really came across “nigger-White” males. I’ve come across PLENTY of garbage white females, but women without male authority will always be self-destructive or otherwise screw up. One thing sticks in my mind was a single mom with a (White) little boy telling someone else “I don’t need no man, my son is all the man I need” and I wanted to whip her.

    I listed in the post the kinds of dysfunctions that I believe speak for themselves, without the need for a ‘White trash” label because there’d be a kind of redundancy to calling someone both “criminal” or “druggie” and “trash.” And I guess in a generic sense, most of the things in my bullet list are inherently trashy.

    “White trash” specifically though, takes on a political dimension, in that there is something that drives such an individual toward mixing. If they lived in an environment in which there are no blacks, their dysfunction would be halted at a point that limits the damage. There is something depraved on a whole different level about Whites race-mixing — especially if they inflict it on innocent parties such as a girl who runs around with black kids who teach her ass-twerking and sex-talk — that goes beyond just being a low-end layabout.

    Those low-end Whites (to borrow a concept from a RECENT POST) never had the military — or prison, or a Russian Mannerbund ass-kicking, or a fucking healthy culture with a social structure and purpose — get a hold of them.

  11. There is something depraved on a whole different level about Whites race-mixing — especially if they inflict it on innocent parties such as a girl who runs around with black kids who teach her ass-twerking and sex-talk — that goes beyond just being a low-end layabout.

    One way to think about it:

    European Society – historically highly complex, with a huge amount of social mores and resrictions – one reason that Europe has lower crime and more law abidingness than the 3rd world is because the complex societies were also highly repressive in an objective way, and those that couldn’t follow rules/laws were winnowed out of the gene pool

    African society – not complex, extremely insular, few rules, no removal of those with bad/wild demeanor from the gene pool – all metabolic effort is concerned with one thing – competition for reproduction

    Now what happens when you remove Christianity, hierarchy and highly demanding social rules from whites lower on the IQ scale? After that there’s very little to distinguish them from blacks, and they will accept the black status quo.

    Even amongst miscegenating white women one rule always holds – white women generally don’t choose mates that are significantly lower than them in socioeconomic status. The old cliche of “stooping to their level” comes into play.

  12. Poverty changes you. I myself have both had money and not had money, and you can tell the difference even in your decision-making. In your perceptions.

    You notice things like Starbucks when you can’t afford to go in and buy their overpriced drinks. In Downtown Toronto, on University Avenue, there were affluent office workers buzzing in and out of the Aroma Espresso Bar, and I used to marvel at their easy, natural-seeming lifestyles — but theirs was only possible because they jumped through social hoops, padding their resumes, building up references, keeping their credit scores nice and shiny.

    When you’re poor, everything is a stick in the eye admonishing you.

  13. I agree: money changes things immensely; and the absolutes of wealth and poverty don’t matter; it’s really about how rapid an increase or decrease you endure relative to YOUR personal history. One of the most emotionally rocky periods of my life was prompted from me going from grad student nice-five-figured professional within a matter of months; in the grand scheme, that was peanuts, especially compared to many of my college peers, but it was for me.

    nikcrit’s humble opinion has it backwards.

    OK, it’s a matter of opinion. But one clarification: I didn’t mean to imply that Klan infiltrators are worthy; nor was I making a statement about how accurately the media has represented its true numbers and activities.

    Being vested in ‘both sides,’ I just think it’s pitiable that these orgs and what they symbolize are still bandied about in what’s supposed to be serious discussion; IMO, the Klan is a symbolic bogeyman that’s fashionable and daring to acknowledge without disparagement in the face of p.c. hypocrysy and double-standards in acknowledging European culture and history.

    What can I say? I wish for something better for all of us.

  14. I salute white trash.

    They are the only ones who can destroy the enemy in the streets. Not one DAA of ours has ever been rich.

    It takes desperation to grow a pair. All of our best soldiers are poor and have nothing. Give me a white trash man with some hate in his heart. He is worth 10 sympathizers who can’t even write nigger or spik on the computer.

  15. I think Nikcrit is right. The Klan is so marginalized only people on the margins of society would join. Policing and protecting your own neighborhood is good. That is not what people think of when they think of the Klan.

  16. I have no idea if the Klan still exists. I know very little about them. They do have a web page, but it has an amateur layout from an era when race forums were just coming into the fore on the internet. I suspect that Southerners who would have joined the Klan in the 1920s or even the 1970s stay clear of it today, given how monitored it is. Going to a Klan meeting today would be like walking into an FBI field office.

    People in the more out-of-the-way parts of the South, I assume, keep things like neighborhood integrity and dating hygiene more “under the table.” There is a very credible-sounding rural Southerner on another blog who laughed at Yankee commenters who claimed that the South is now all-whigger, all-mudshark, telling them: “you … have no idea.” He added that there are defacto sundown towns and segregated places, which both Whites and Blacks are happy with.

    Any opposition-organization that is implicated in violence has a big target on it. You have to either keep it quiet and off-line, or keep things purely political/academic such as AmRen or CCC, or be straight-arrow lawful like the Oath Keepers.

    All that said, the Klan has been smeared for decades as stupid and brutal, and I am not one to trust (((their))) caricatures. A more realistic view of the Klan is that they were an effective and very necessary security organization in their time. Without them, Reconstruction-era South would have seen Haiti-style bloodbaths. The ghostly uniforms and Celtic rites spooked the superstitious blacks, psyops so that the Klansmen wouldn’t have to resort to actual violence. Lynchings, as I am inclined to understand those things, were justice against the guilty.

  17. — All of our best soldiers are poor and have nothing. Give me a white trash man with some hate in his heart.

    I don’t call those people White trash. Maybe I’m not using the expression like most people do, but I make it clear in the post as to who is and who isn’t White trash.

  18. White Trash is a dated term and it was a regional slur against White Southerners. Or at least that is how it has been used around here in the Midwest.

    In these parts the equivalent term for “those people” would have been trailer trash.

    But nowadays in these sensitive and unjust times it is an Ugly slur on White people.

    Even so, some White people are happy to describe themselves as such, and such people are not necessarily mixers, nor are they trash.

    I knew a guy through AA who was happy to call himself and his family Oilfield Trash, which phrase was new to me, but apparently is common parlance in Wyoming etc. He wasn’t happy unless he was outside welding in 20 below weather.

    But race politics and legitimate grievances aside, it is a colorful put-down and a descriptive phrase. Black Trash is an effective rhetorical tactic in referring to niggers, for the obvious reason that, who can object to it? and it calls out the double-standards.

  19. The term these days, like a lot of things, is ironic.

    Because it used to have more clarity in its designations, and more sting, and more hurt and more meaning.

    These days, who exactly is white trash? As the original post makes clear, no one really knows.

    Middle Class. It’s the new Upper Middle Class. — yours truly, speaking to you-can-guess-who, as she was buying me lunch

  20. @nikcrit — I am not (deliberately) singling you out for insulting.

    It is just one of those lines that writes itself.

    Mixed-race Kids, the new niggers

    That is Episode One for my series. (or perhaps yours)

  21. I can’t stand the term “redneck”. So when I hear people refer to themselves, or others, as one I remind them that I think “rednecks” are some of the most confident people I know. Especially when they are reconditioning ordinary items for other uses.

    And doing it well.

  22. Mixed-race Kids, the new niggers

    That is Episode One for my series. (or perhaps yours)

    Yep, it’s a minefield of martyrdom —– to be either falsely feted or falsely vilified, everywhere you turn…

    (No wonder we’re so self-absorbed, eh?)

    —————————————————————————————————–

    I agree that while ‘trailer-park trash’ and ‘white trash’ are often treated like synonymous phrases, you’ll hear the former more in the Midwest and i believe ‘white trash’ has a more southern provenance. Perhaps there are more trailer-park developments in the Midwest as opposed to the south.

    One thing I definitely noticed in working-class black neighborhoods down south; outside of Birmingham in my case, you’d see a fairly decent home and yard next door to a total shotgun shack on a uncared-for yard; next door could be an almost suburban-level home with, say, Georgian columns decorating the entrance. Total incongruity in terms of exterior and upkeep thematics.

  23. People in the more out-of-the-way parts of the South, I assume, keep things like neighborhood integrity and dating hygiene more “under the table.”

    In the South you only have “neighbors” if you are suburban and live in a sizable town.

    Otherwise, real Southerners don’t want to live that close together, they want lots of space in between the homes.

    The one rare exception is the very, very old money upper crust Southerners in a place like Charleston or Savannah or similar who may still occupy the very quaint, expensive, 300 year-old neighborhoods that you see in Better Homes/Gardens and such.

    Otherwise, whites down south aren’t urban. And the more Southern you are the more isolated you want to live.

    For instance, at my brother in law’s house in the swamps of Eastern NC I can walk off the back porch and start firing target practice at the berm he’s got sitting there 100 feet into the yard.

  24. White trash is someone who has no morals in poverty. They will sell drugs to get buy. Not pay their rent because they need money for cigarettes. They will spend money on cable when they can barely afford the fee, even though books are cheaper. Poverty is a blessing in disguise that teaches discipline and solitude. White trash escapes this stress by succumbing to drug use rather then embracing the stress for growth.

  25. The Realist Report and its American host John Friend offers us up the following white pill,

    http://therealistreport.com/the-realist-report-alfred-schaefer-2/

    wherein is interviewed German “thought criminal” Aflred Schaeffer.

    It starts out slow, but hits its stride. Schaeffer offers the (good) jews an out:

    The thing is, the jews have maneuvered themselves, painted themselves into a corner and they don’t know how to get out.

    They are on the stage and they don’t know how to get off.

    We have to try to open a door for those jews who are not the culprits themselves, to come out from this construction of lies, because these lies are over, they have no future.

    And if they choose to try and exploit these lies at our expense, they will have some explaining to do, when the Mob comes and looks for Justice. Which it will.

  26. For the common Jew, it all starts with a simple, but profound declaration…

    “I am an anti-white Supremacist.”

    Now, how does the common Jew begin to make amends?

  27. Kevin MacDonald has come closest to explaining the evolutionary cause/effect of operating by “any means necessary” for a SELF-AWARE PEOPLES. In the 21st century and on the “brink of annihilation,” the nascent wS operates by “many memes necessary” including “terminable without consent” WHICH represents the concrete antithesis to those who operate by “any means necessary.” So in the Hegelian formulation, the “variables” are “any means necessary” versus “many memes necessary where a BLOODLESS synthesis is separation.

    God-ordained free will is the X factor.

  28. What are the mechanism(s) for operation by “any means necessary?”

    Being DEVOID of God-ordained free will AND possessing a “brink of annihilation” psyche.

  29. To quell the cognitive dissonance in those who operate by “any means necessary” and profess both belief in God AND are not, in fact, on the “brink of annihilation,” one SIMPLY CONCEIVES OF and “worship” a radically autonomous “god” CONTRA The Perfect God AS REVEALED to a degenerate mass as The Perfect Man.

    This is basic HBD, white pill, alt-rite Race Realism.

  30. The schism is 3 be…
    Believers in Christ
    Believers
    And non-believers
    The chasm is 3-D
    Degenerate
    Die
    Six feet deep
    The spasm are “creeps”
    Memes seep
    Rinse and washed
    Repeats
    “All the right moves”
    Memetic anti-defeat
    THIS Psychological WAR
    BE AT YOUR FEET…

    Young white Supremacy…

    You are a soldier for Won…

  31. If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery then white Supremacy CANNOT MIMIC the Jewish oligarchy.

  32. I always understood the term “White trash” to be a derogatory term that Whites originally applied to other Whites who were failing to live up to the social and moral standards demanded by White culture. Successful cultures strive to enforce high standards.

    I think at some point in the 1980s, however, the term “White trash” was weaponized by the (((media))) and more broadly applied to rural / lower-class / working-class Whites. This was followed by a type of “slur reclamation” by such Whites, similar to how such Whites turned “redneck” into a badge of honor, but it’s only partly successful at taking the sting from “White trash.”

    I think that any use of “White trash” is detrimental and demoralizing and should be avoided today. We are locked in a death-struggle with Jews and non-Whites in our ancestral Europe and its progeny nations in North America, and we need to bolster the flagging spirit of even the most fallen members of our People in the face of massive Jewish cultural and racial poison.

    Anecdotally, I’ve come to know a young twenty-something White girl from North Carolina — a genuine Daughter of the Confederacy old-South type — who recently confessed to me that she had grown up trying to erase her Southern accent because as a kid she always saw Southerners portrayed as stupid/evil on TV and in movies. This girl’s parents are divorced and she mostly grew up without a strong father figure; she’s half my age and I guess she sort of sees me that way. After about a year of exposure to my shitposting, race-realism, history lessons and counter-semitic deprogramming, she told me that now she feels proud of who she is and where she came from.

    She never used the term “White trash” (other than to describe to me some Southern dessert that I think involves popcorn) but I think the shame of that term has seeped into the consciousness of many rural Whites who are more connected to and influenced by modern (((culture))) but not yet completely lost to it; girls especially. No girl wants to be associated with the term “trash”.

    So do what you can in your own life to counter the damage that the term “White trash” has done to our People.

    Of course, there is no black equivalent to “White trash” because “black trash” would be redundant — blacks are not held to anything but the most base standards, by themselves or anyone else. With blacks, the inverse situation arises — outlier blacks who rise above their average co-ethnics are the ones with a special descriptor applied to them: “talented tenth” or “White-acting” etc. The rest of them, the true trash of humanity, are simply “black.”

  33. “A new Emmett Till movie is in the works.”

    Why does this unremarkable story from sixty years ago have such traction? I guess it pushes the trope that racism is a result of White men being sexually threatened by blacks in some way. I never understood this thinking.

    Male revulsion to their females procreating out of group is a universal trait, and for good evolutionary reason. For whatever reason, White men have been singled out for this and are constantly bombarded with stories and images of their women being taken.

    Racism is another universal trait that only White men are single out for; but that’s simply we have things other people want, and they’ve discovered calling us racists is an effective tactic for rent seeking. People in Africa or India are far more racist than Whites, but nobody gives a shit because they live in squalor and have nothing to offer.

    Along these lines; I was catching up on the previous season of Better Call Saul recently.

    In one episode there’s a flashback of Jimmy as a child (already very astute) working in his father’s convenience store.

    Anyway, some con man comes in with a fake story about needing money. The father—who can’t conceive that some people are bad, and assumes everyone is honest like he is—gives the grifter the cash.

    Jimmy points out that his father has become the mark for every crook in town because he falls for their bullshit every time.

    Jimmy’s father is a good parable for what Whites have become.

  34. There’s supposed to be THREE more Emmitt Till movies in production.

    You can look for a bunch of copycat black “horror” movies that try to copy the “Get Out” formula.

  35. Why does this unremarkable story from sixty years ago have such traction? — Corvo

    Because beneath the slimy underbelly of AffirmativeAxe’m is the demonic dogma of “equal suffering” and the rationalization and justification of the nigger operating by “any means necessary.”

  36. On Emmett Till, from Infogalactic:

    [21-year-old married White woman Carolyn] Bryant testified during the murder trial that Till grabbed her hand while she was stocking candy and said, “How about a date, baby?” She said that after she freed herself from his grasp, the young man followed her to the cash register, grabbed her waist and said, “What’s the matter baby, can’t you take it?” Bryant said she freed herself, and Till said, “You needn’t be afraid of me, baby,” used “one ‘unprintable’ word” and said “I’ve been with white women before.” Bryant also alleged that one of Till’s companions came into the store, grabbed him by the arm, and ordered him to leave.

    A healthy man’s blood temperature rises as he reads that. In response, her husband, with the help of other men (including definitely one and possibly two who were black) tracked him down and killed him.

    The incident was chosen to become national news because a number of things, such as Till’s young age of 14 and even his diminutive-sounding first name, were suitable for crafting into a narrative-shaping story. You have to remember that ALL Americans watched the same news then, and journalism enjoyed high levels of trust. There were no alternatives for presentation of facts or spin/analysis. The (((media))) had godlike powers of shaping public opinion.

    Why is this event so significant? Because White men always lived and thrived, even as a minority, on an honor code. We are unstoppable when we follow it. Roy Bryant (Carolyn’s husband) did what honor required him to, starting with his obligation to protect his wife, who in turn was also expected to live up to honorable female behavior.

    Elevating Till’s killing to national morality tale was a coup against White honor tradition. Maudlin pity for Till is what replaced masculine justice. I hope that short analysis gives a clearer idea of the the incident’s role in emasculating America.

    ***

    Sixty years later they tried to reboot the narrative with Trayvon Martin but they were no longer in possession of the power of shaping public opinion they once had. They got sloppy, going with the misleading incidental facts of the local police blotter they used to find some incident to freeze and polarize. They assumed that Zimmerman was White and that he lived in an expensive gated community. I still consider July 13, 2013 — Zimmerman’s acquittal — to be the day that the Narrative died.

    The effort they’re putting into reanimating the corpse of Till in the upcoming movies speak to their loss of control over the narrative.

    If you read the Infogalactic summary of Emmett Till’s killing, always remember what he did to set off those events. Sexually assaulting another man’s wife is a death sentence in every civilized as well as every barbaric society; in other words, in any society that abides by objective codes of honor. It was an honor killing. The ordeal of Christopher Newsom and Channon Christian, in contrast and as a direct result of the triumph of the Emmett Till myth, was subhuman savagery.

  37. as predictable as a Dwayne Johnson movie.

    You embarrass and insult those who in good faith try to engage you; to me, that’s less egregious bad manners than merely being predictable, whatever the overly familiar tangent of Johnson movies; (guess I haven’t watched too often or closely, freakazoid)

  38. I still consider July 13, 2013 — Zimmerman’s acquittal — to be the day that the Narrative died.

    But the whole Michael Brown and Ferguson thing happened after Martin. And I thought Ferguson was a much more flimsy premise for social and personal martyrdom; I think it’s crazy that HRC used Brown’s mother as political capital, with her hugging her on stage during the Dem convention and all that.

  39. I still consider July 13, 2013 — Zimmerman’s acquittal — to be the day that the Narrative died.

    The narrative’s noontide “peak” existence started with the Duke Lacrosse case and ended with the Zimmerman acquittal. After that point it was unmasked as what it really is – anti-white sentiment.

  40. — This girl’s parents are divorced and she mostly grew up without a strong father figure; she’s half my age and I guess she sort of sees me that way.

    Great entire comment, Corvo. You’ll find divorce during a kid’s sensitive adolescence years to be at the root of many cases of tragedy and avoidable dysfunction.

  41. I doubt Johnson had any idea what he was unleashing with his Great Society and the Welfare State. He personally grew up an incredibly ambitious child of the Texas Hill Country, and for whatever reason, concluded that the Northern Elites were his natural ally. It’s unclear if he thought they were the natural ally of his “people”.

    PA, how much personal or professional experience do you have dealing with the White underclass?

  42. “Next to none.”

    I guess it also depends on what you mean by White underclass. I am no stranger to non-criminal White disfunctionality as listed in the bullets in the main post.

  43. Why is this event so significant? Because White men always lived and thrived, even as a minority, on an honor code. We are unstoppable when we follow it. Roy Bryant (Carolyn’s husband) did what honor required him to, starting with his obligation to protect his wife, who in turn was also expected to live up to honorable female behavior.

    Elevating Till’s killing to national morality tale was a coup against White honor tradition. Maudlin pity for Till is what replaced masculine justice. I hope that short analysis gives a clearer idea of the the incident’s role in emasculating America.

    No, you’re making a astute observation about trickle-down morality in an ideal civil society —– but you’re not acknowledging the gross over-reaction, the absence of reasonable scale applied, in this particular murder; it doesn’t matter that Till was a noxious and insufferable asshole in properly assessing the moral impoverishment of his murder. Your rationalizing here could just as easily lead to a gross reduction and valuing in protecting white lives. Mourning the person and, more important, the moral mayhem involved is in no way “maudlin.” One’s personal aesthetic distaste is separated from one sense of communal civic duty for good reason.

  44. Maudlin pity for Till is what replaced masculine justice.

    I would in fact argue that the out-of-scale response to Till’s digression did FAR more damage to collective “masculine justice” than did the rightful mass disapproval over his lynching.

  45. The White underclass is sad. Because we have been atomized for so long, there are effectively no restraints on the most degenerate* womb meeting the most degenerate* sperm donor. Accordingly, the offspring aren’t going to know anything else growing up. Their “parents” will be a constant kaleidoscope of different faces with no emotional investment, I’ve seen quite a few of these cases. If they are lucky enough to go to a “Good school” the School will have no interest in them unless they’ve been pre-selected for some rare talent, they will be without real guidence, and they will be taken into the only “culture” that will take them in.

    And the Empire of Nothing likes all of it, because that means more business, and people with none of the pesky cultural and personal ties to each other.

    Left for another day is how the same dynamics work against anything uplifting.

  46. And the Empire of Nothing likes all of it, because that means more business, and people with none of the pesky cultural and personal ties to each other.

    OK, assuming the “Empire of Nothing” are global economist corporate elites that wish to deracinate western countries, why would that multi-kulti underclassmen you posit above be more attractive to said overseers than a plain ol’ American WASP of lore? Just how would the former “mean more business” than the latter? Don’t the latter already fall into many existing capitalistic demos and markets, as opposed to all those ‘mystery-meats’? And how do those ‘pesky cultural and personal ties” affect their consumer-unit potential either way? If I had to choose, I’d think the more fully evolved ethnic would have MORE market yearnings than would one of these hypothetical deracinated 21st-century newbies, no?

    You hear this line a lot in AR deconstructions; but let’s break this down for once..

    [are you trying to break a personal record for comments per hour? — PA]

  47. No, just have a easy schedule today —– i’ve been writing personal assessments and am using a desktop over my laptop……

    Geez, this morning’s output was nothing; I already wrote a 12-page assessment report since just before 9 a.m., on top of the commenting. Lolzz.

  48. OK, assuming the “Empire of Nothing” are global economist corporate elites that wish to deracinate western countries, why would that multi-kulti underclassmen you posit above be more attractive to said overseers than a plain ol’ American WASP of lore? [ … ]

    You hear this line a lot in AR deconstructions; but let’s break this down for once..

    Their motivation is primarily ethnic and racial. Economics are entirely auxilary to that.

    It is well known, in the AR, that “economics” is a smokescreen for the motivations and realities that are more primarily at play.

    It’s not all about the money. The AR always been clear on this. So your first paragraph is something of a misrepresentation.

    Yes, global economic elites do want to de-racinate Western countries; but NO, an “economic” explanation is shallow and doesn’t do the trick; and further the AR has ALWAYS been opposed to that shallow explanation.

    Thanks for playing.

  49. OK, assuming the “Empire of Nothing” are global economist corporate elites that wish to deracinate western countries, why would that multi-kulti underclassmen you posit above be more attractive to said overseers than a plain ol’ American WASP of lore?

    Actually, though question answers itself.

    The economic elites wish to de-racinate Western countries AND THEREFORE multi-kulti underclassmen are better (to them).

    Also, it is not, at this point, and un-warranted assumption, what are their goals.

    Their goals of transforming Western countries into brown people places, have been stated, in so many words or not, a million times.

    Those goals are the water that we swim in. h/t Linder

  50. The economic elites wish to de-racinate Western countries AND THEREFORE multi-kulti underclassmen are better (to them).

    You don’t explain why they would want to deracinate;

    [White men hang tyrants. Muds stab each other over sneakers. — PA]

    usually, it’s pesky outsiders like me who challenge AR dogma

    [have you thought about doing that on your own blog?]

    —- soo, you just sit back, revel in the group think, and say stuff like “that they do so has been stated, in so many words, a million times,” etc.

    But evasive but repeated reifying dogma is not an answer to the question: why do global elites want to deracinate? For economic reasons? I’m unconvinced that global economics works better in an anti-racist vs. racist clime; i say it’s of no consequence either way to econonomic output.

    [Elk just done did tell you it’s not solely about economics]

  51. Didn’t PA just put up a thread not that long ago whose roundabout topic was “what motivates liberals”?

  52. [Elk just done did tell you it’s not solely about economics]

    I don’t believe powerful international corporates would deracinate solely for ideological reasons.

    But you’re right; i’ll take the hint; you want me to challenge that stuff elsewhere; IDK, WordPress seem to think I have more brand name and value as a commenter moreso than as a blogger —- though that was back at the tail-end of the GL Piggy days and was in light of the fact that ‘my blog’ was vacant and established solely so I could file posts on Guy White… I’ll shut up about it.

    I best do something soon though; In a month, I’ll be off work for six-to-seven weeks with that much more free time. 🙂

  53. Nikcrit, as I have already pointed out:

    It was in your comment, dimwit, that you posited the assumption, that economic elites might would want to de-racinate Western countries.

    And you follow it up with,

    I don’t believe powerful international corporates would deracinate solely for ideological reasons.

    If that is your “belief” then feel free to advocate or back it up. But you are stating your beliefs, and that after asking someone else to justify assumptions that you make.

    Your thinking can be very, uh, shall we say, convoluted.

  54. In any case, you have stated your beliefs that elites are not motivated racially. And then you describe the contrary position as an assumption; which assumption you grant.

    In logic 101, you have stated your beliefs, and challenged nothing.

    All the while proclaiming that you are the one challenging assumptions.

    Sorry Charlie. You have stated an opinion. One that has been debunked by the AR since about 2001.

    It’s tedious, and if people don’t want to go over it for the 5,000th time, is that a surprise.

  55. Nikcrit suggests, that “pesky outsiders” such as he are challenging AR dogma, by suggesting that elites are motivated by economics, and not race and ethnicity.

    There is not a better example than that, of basic bitch conservatism.

  56. But evasive but repeated reifying dogma is not an answer to the question: why do global elites want to deracinate? For economic reasons? I’m unconvinced that global economics works better in an anti-racist vs. racist clime; i say it’s of no consequence either way to econonomic output.

    Global economics does not work better in an anti-racist clime: which is why it fails as an explanation. (for the 5,001st time)

    Again, thanks for playing.

  57. Trickin is also a lot more concerned with the AR’s image than the actual AR is itself. And it leads him to the bad habit of conflicting the AR with what the NYT says about the AR.

    And also leads him to crazy assertions like “Trump is going to make Omarosa his VP!!” 🙂 🙂

  58. It was in your comment, dimwit, that you posited the assumption, that economic elites might would want to de-racinate Western countries.

    No! That was the foundational AR contention that I was challenging; THAT, in fact, is the dogma from the AR that’s been repeated a “million times,” as you said about something else; in this case it was was Ulrickerensky, or whatever the handle, whose text I italicized and prefaced before my remarks.

    IOW: It’s often stated on alt-right blogs that ‘globalist elites’ want to deracinate whites; when they bother to continue and explain why, the rhetoric usually contends that such deracinated ethnic gruel makes for a more orderly and profitable New World Order, or words to that effect.

    But my oft-repeated counter-contention is that, in fact, an international globalist economic order would work equally well in both ‘racist’ or ‘anti-racist’ social systems.

    If you opt for the economic determinism option instilled by elitists, you must explain HOW such deracination ups profits; if you, however, opt for the social justice explanation for deracination, you must explain why powerful elitists (who are overwhelmingly white themselves, would be interested in leveling their own population demographic when it was inconsequential to their economic goals and master plan. The AR frequently speaks through both sides of its mouth on the issue.

    It’ll all work out in the long run. Don’t you think?

  59. I have always been impressed with trickin’s ability to back up what he says, when he is called on it.

    So I don’t mean to have insulted his intelligence. So let’s drop that.

  60. Trickin is also a lot more concerned with the AR’s image than the actual AR is itself.

    But to be fair, his pearl-clutching concern trolling isn’t limited to the AR. He spends equal critical commenting energy directed at hotep blogs. (lol)

  61. Nikcrit…

    You are asking the question in such a way as to obscure the reality…

    {{{Western elites}}} are not trying to de-race a nation, rather, {{{they}}} are ALREADY deracinated and can simply WILL NOTHING to the contrary.

    Our “elites” ARE SEXUAL DEGENERATES spreading their sexual degeneracy under the mediated illusion of “one-worldism.”

    “We” can’t all be (white) Supremacists…

    But ALL of US can be absolutely sexually autonomous.

  62. This ^^^ is more or less Kevin MacDonald’s critique of the “Chosen Ones.”

    {{{They}}} CANNOT HELP THEMSELVES.

    Where Mr. MacDonald wades into a fatal egalitarianism IS IN FAILING TO NOTE those white men who are possessed of God-ordained free will. Or better yet, the only white men who can possibly be counted on in this “struggle.”

    In sum, our “elites” LACK A TRUE FREE WILL and the Narrative is the elaborated cover story.

  63. A true parasite is a perpetuating self-annihilator and thereby terminable without consent…

    Equaling a race of people to “parasites” takes one into the realm of demonization and thus fraught with potentially deleterious consequence. The least of which is merely the exposure of one’s demonizing act of free will.

    So the defining metric is FREE WILL and the only competitors are those with it versus those without it. And anyone who claims God-ordained free will is an illusion is clearly terminable without consent.

    The question put to the oligarchy of Jewish anti-Supremacy is, “Do you possess God-ordained free will?”

    If the expectant “yes” is made prophetable THEN {{{your god}}} is a radically autonomous “one” very much equal to???

  64. To be clear, it is absolutely right to demonized demons…

    So “parasites” may actually be cuck-speak…

  65. Nikcrit…

    Your Day of Epiohany will be the recognition of your MERE EXISTENCE being a purposeful affront to “white supremacy” and so then how to move in parallel fashion so as to truly reduce the racial friction and the material reality of your procreation by a parents practicing radical sexual autonomy.

  66. MGE: I’m sorry, but what be ‘hotep .’

    As for my alt right image concern? I guess I’m just searching for a level of truth and candor re. racial confrontation that is real & transcends current prevailing pieties but that is not outright, umm, “self-annihilating.”

    But maybe that is not feasible in our current “here and now?”

  67. MGE: I’m sorry, but what be ‘hotep .’

    I’m not really sure that Hoteps actually exist. I don’t believe it.

  68. @ Trickin – BTW, the Packers get an “F” for that draft. They needed offensive line help more than secondary. And a running back in the 4th round?

    The Packers don’t run the ball, that makes no sense. They run even less than New England. They can just pick up any serviceable running back off the waiver wire.

  69. @Cam – yeah, a lot of folk ’round these here parts are scratchin’ their heads over Ted Thompson’s moves of the last few days; I’m not even too on top of what they did, so convoluted all these trades and swaps and stuff. Yeah, i agree on the RBs…. They DO need secondary help but O-line help is more prime.

    ——————————————————————————————————————

    btw: i saw this morning while watching a few mintues of Morning Joe and heading out the door; thought I’d share this heart-rending bit with you fellas here, thinking y’all would really appreciate this 🙂 :

    https://www.ispot.tv/ad/Am2o/ancestrydna-lyns-background

    The best hat I’ve ever had indeed

  70. I highly recommend this documentary, which is available in full on YT.
    These people are what is considered “white trash.”
    As Richard Spencer recently said, even if white people were the lowliest of all races, I would still love them, because they are my people.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s