Rest in Peace, Alan Colmes

Slate publishes a no-class obituary for their fellow liberal Alan Colmes, a Fox News presenter and Sean Hannity’s long-time debate partner who died on February 23rd. The writer criticizes Colmes for having made a career of playing patsy to conservatives’ attacks on the Democratic Party. I guess you can see the writer resenting Colmes for being their side’s equivalent of a political cuck.

Where is the line between a just vs. a crass eulogy to someone you have strong differences with? I celebrated Ted Kennedy’s croaking with a raised glass, and I will do the same with everyone in my Death Pool when they die. Are professional writers held to a different standards than bloggers, or is it a matter of distinguishing between enemies and merely men with whom we disagree? Or is it something else?

I’ve watched Alan Colmes on Fox every evening from 1999 to 2001 and never saw him arrogant, dishonest, or hateful. He was simply a liberal who treated those he differs with like fellow-citizens. For example, he once interviewed a White Nationalist on his radio show. Even as he pressed her on their philosophical differences, he treated her kindly — maybe because he knew that his professional on-air skills outmatch hers.

We all could live well in a country in which liberals had taken a few lessons from someone who consistently rose above the media’s program of dehumanizing anyone who dissents from their latest ideological memorandum. Imagine a liberal wing of American politics that seeks to persuade in good faith, rather than make war on core Americans. Such an approach would look like that of Alan Colmes.

Rest in peace.

ac1

Image source: FoxNews.com

Advertisements

75 thoughts on “Rest in Peace, Alan Colmes

  1. As PA mentions, civility is not exactly an excessively held liberal virtue, but that is understandable considering they control the Cultural Main Narrative, and are struggling to hold the giant anaconda of a submerged Alt-Right in their palsed, feminine hands. If not for their cries of “racist, racist!” the border walls of immigration would have been (rightfully) locked years ago.

    The liberals are fools and deserve an Auschwitzian fate as a political-class. They are mandarins at best, rulers hardly worthy of the name.

  2. I’m sort of surprised by your tone in this post; i’m guessing you’re a bit sentimental here because the Hannity-vs-Colmes were part of your political formative experience….. RE. the article that Cam cited; I too was struck by its no-class creassnes, but even moreso by its overall ignorance; he kept implying Colmes was some dupe who took the pay over maintaining his convictions, as if these on-air personalities were political convictions personified.

    People have no idea how commodified that world is: For instance, Hannity is an iconized multinational brand and media force that is worth several-hundred million dollars while its star iconic for himself alone is worth over $100 million dollars and whose working perks include personal jet and a expense budget to match his yearly salary. Colmes probably made one-quarter of what Hannity did, but that isn’t small cheese in national cable-news broadcast climes; i mean Holmes $2or $3 million per week is not much compared to Hannity and perhaps O’Reilly, but that is still over $50,000 a week, which is better than the talking heads at MSNBC pull in.

    My obsessing on the Benjamins here is folk need to get off this notion tat cable-news figures are journalistic fact-finders and have largely capitulated to pure on-air entertainment roles;Fox was the first poli-news cable station to make the format more inclined toward spoof and chaos

  3. Pingback: Rest in Peace, Alan Colmes | Reaction Times

  4. He had David Duke and Jared Taylor on his radio program multiple times. Always respectful and gentlemanly.

  5. — I’m sort of surprised by your tone in this post (Nikcrit)

    In Welcome to Hell, Stray Labs, I wrote “When you humiliate a man, he remembers it forever.” There is a flip side to that: when you treat me honorably, I’ll remember it. Plus as I noted above, he came across as a good guy despite the differences.

    — i’m guessing you’re a bit sentimental here because the Hannity-vs-Colmes were part of your political formative experience

    My formative political experience was in 1978 in Warsaw when my mom told me: “every patriot has to know this, and I think you are now old enough. Just remember, you can’t say any of this to your friends. What happened at Katyn was…” My formative American political experience was watching the Reagan-Mondale debates in 1984. My formative political experience as an adult was the Bush-Dukakis election.

    — He had David Duke and Jared Taylor on his radio program multiple times. Always respectful and gentlemanly. (Samuel Nock)

    I did not know that. Respect.

  6. Even when I posted the link I didn’t realize that Colmes was the “liberal view” on Fox. I was just shocked at the general negativity that rolled so easily off the tongue of a liberal Website that is supposed to regarded with some degree of seriousness.

    Also, I tend to watch Fox with the sound off, for obvious reasons.lol

    And Fox always seems to have that one issue that they obsess over for (literally) 20 hours per day, like Benghazi or the email server. Both of those are pretty egregious incidents, but let’s spread the coverage around a little, ok…

  7. I didn’t follow Mr Colmes, but topically it can be said that he has a goofy looking if good-natured face.

    To the point where how does that face end up on television? He must have been a helluva talker.

  8. “I didn’t follow Mr Colmes, but topically it can be said that he has a goofy looking if good-natured face.”

    From the get-go, FOX more than MSNBC or CNN intentionally went out of its way to ham things up, to make the lib-vs-con on-air debates more entertainment than policy coverage; as early as ’82 or so FOX’s news panels contained strong elements of parody and schtick; as for Colmes, i’d say they gave him leeway and pride, he didn’t have to stoop down in his role; yet they sort of used him in that they made him the sorta ‘Cold War liberal” stereotype —– that sour heeb face, tirelessly earnest as he plods through all the predictable liberal stances of the major policies of the day. He was smart but certainly was consigned to being the punching bag to, say, Hannity’s and Coulter’s more iconically hysterical rants.

  9. I have drank to the death of some of our political enemies, and I have briefly mourned the loss of some of them that I respected.

    I wonder if Stalin or Mao ever paused to think about their enemies? Ceasar claimed to, MacArthur may or may not have, Ariel Sharon didn’t, Churchill did.

  10. “This Oscars mix-up thing couldn’t have happened to a nicer bunch of people.”

    I hear La-La Land was a total bore but I do think that Ryan Gosling is a good actor. He did a good WN-thematic movie called “The Believer,’ in which he played this real-life New York character, Danny Burros, a Jewish kid who took his punk-rock posing too far and became a true-believer ‘neo-Nazi’ who led a bunch of other wannabe thugs; eventually, he got caught and sentenced for taunting an old Jewish Couple and through his mandatory therapy had a mental turnaround. Eventually, via cinematically melodramatic dollops of guilt and shame, he kills himself.

    The story of course was a bit contrived but there was this great pair of supproting actors, Theresa Russell, I believe, and a male actor whose name i don’t remember who played a couple of wealthy parlor fascists who get drunk and provide nightly mentorly proverbs to Gosling and his fellow loutish friends. Good stuff.

  11. I’m usually not a fan of conspiracy stuff, but you know the Oscars committee must’ve been getting tired of apologizing every time black people don’t get the awards they want – this could buy them some time and also increase the buzz around a move that has only made around $22 million so far

  12. RE: Oscar misstep: “What’s the probability that this was staged for ratings/relevance?”

    First thought that entered my mind upon its happening. What annoys me is: so what if this incident WAS totally happenstance and true. Why is it so endlessly ruminated upon after the fact. Who gives a fuk?

    incidentally, I’ve been to a few Grammy awards ceremonies but never the Oscars; i was at the famous, ’98 I believe, Grammy’s in which Billy Ray Cyrus went into his famous rant over “Achy Breaky Heart” not receiving its due kudos because of all dem ‘God-damn crit-ics.”

  13. “this could buy them some time and also increase the buzz around a move that has only made around $22 million so far”

    In general, those are very much the kind of motivates that drives Hollywood’s production end. ALWAYS look for the bottom-line benefit, and there you’ll have the scandals y’all so often seek.

    So many of your racial-engineering theories are meant to cement a soulless bottom line. Speaking of, did you notice how Mel Gibson was flexing at every camera opp to appear positive and proggish, clapping along to every half-assed social call-out last night?

    Given global film distribution, you really can’t do the things he (Gibson) did and survive in the game anymore; at some point, you’re going to run into Jewish or Asian or heavy white liberal resistance at too high a level; plus, I wonder what percentage of overall movie-purchasing consumers are minority of some sort?

  14. Ah, so he still believes in white genocide….

    …in a “gentlemanly” fashion. Maybe he’ll give us a shot of novacain before shooting us in the head. How kind of him.

    We need nationalists who will crush their enemies’ bones into the dust, and do what is necessary. Hitler was too moderate.

    There’s no middle ground between white supremacy and white genocide. The jews and liberals will not give an inch.

  15. Hipster Racist has made compelling arguments about how seemingly spontaneous fracas are staged, sometimes serving as guerilla advertising. As one example, several years ago there was a video showing a group of young anti-abortion Christians get harangued and assaulted by a stout prole’ish girl in a Burger King uniform.

    HR’s argument was that this was all staged with BK’s oversight to appeal to a young left wing activist demo. Sure, it’s speculation with burden of proof on anyone who didn’t see it as anything but an ordinary SJW vs Christian confrontation.

    And yet… something that seemed off to me even before reading the conspiracy argument, was the gay inflection in the young evangelical sign-holders as they argued with their feminist assailant.

  16. Blacks probably prefer movies about black people. Over on Very Smart Brothas, they really do not seem to care for La La Land, and were not happy about Emma Stone’s and Casey Affleck’s awards. It makes sense. Those movies probably just don’t appeal to them. They love this new movie Get Out. Do you want to see that Nikcrit?

  17. — There’s no middle ground between white supremacy and white genocide. The jews and liberals will not give an inch. (Ryu)

    True.

    Liberalism is part of our psyche. Under most circumstances and when in balance with other impulses, it’s an adaptive trait. Its excesses are blocked by our equally innate honor code and intelligence. You can’t eradicate liberalism in us any more than you can eradicate our love of nature. You can only eradicate those who weaponize that quality against us.

    Objectively, Colmes was a modern liberal and his worldview leads to White genocide. Unlike most libs though, he played it clean. He gave WNs a platform on his show. A modern liberal is objectively wrong therefore in a forum of open debate he will always lose. This is why Colmes always lost to Hannity, who as a Right-lite was still closer to truth than a liberal. Liberalism does not withstand scrutiny, so its proponents only win dirty. Unlike Ratface Liebowitz, Colmes didn’t play dirty, which is why libs say he was a pasty.

    By my limited familiarity with Colmes, he valued truth. It’s not unheard of in wartime to recognize an honorable captured or dead enemy soldier.

  18. “A modern liberal is objectively wrong therefore in a forum of open debate he will always lose. This is why Colmes always lost to Hannity, who as a Right-lite was still closer to truth than a liberal. Liberalism does not withstand scrutiny, so its proponents only win dirty.”

    I’d disagree but say, in the grand sweep and epochal view, liberalism and conservatism rest upon opposite sides of a axis in which one holds sway over the other.

    In the grandest sweep of measurable time, liberalism prevails——- change historically has been constant; even allowing for the cyclical swings over the civilizational history, change ultimately prevails, pushed by technological as much as social innovation.

    New abilities, relationsihps, life forms come and go —— and new leaders and punditry and forums arise to sway the people to abide or abdicate to these new rules and rulers.

    Having said that, Sean Hannity ideologically beats NO ONE. LOL!! Biggest jackass in telepunditry.

  19. Western liberalism is a luxury that can only take hold in highly wealthy, stable and secure countries that have a surplus of bored, busybody women. Less than 550 million of the world’s 7 billion people live in places that fit the profile.

  20. — liberalism and conservatism rest upon opposite sides of a axis (Nincrit)

    I didn’t have conservatism in mind as the opposite of liberalism. Conservatism in its American sense was a Cold War era watered-down placeholder for stronger right wing stances. I never related fully to it, except to some of its folksy sentimentality. Conservatism rested on its own falsehoods, which were basically compromises with liberalism, and that entire movement degraded to contemporary cuckservatism.

    I placed liberalism (leftism) in opposition not to conservatism, but to Western tradition.

  21. “Do you want to see that Nikcrit?”

    I’d be curious; if it was on, i’d probably focus on watching it. I can’t see me today going to buy a ticket and see it at the theater; I don’t do many movies or concerts since i ended my reviewing days.

    What I’d likely enjoy most is some blog post on the movie replete with clips detailing the racial points being made. To me, that would be more edifying than would having to watch the basic plot unfold and judge whether or not it was artfully done, I would be intrigued by the racial INTENT of the screenplay and its director, not its narrative plausibility or enticement.

  22. I never related fully to it, except to some of its folksy sentimentality

    A less unjustly-dismissive way of putting it would be “right wing populism.”

  23. “Moonlight” was half my high school. Seriously. Why is it so “poignant” to see these folks so ill-suited for orderly life in the West?

    I saw that move from ’91 to ’95 and could already tell you which brothers would go to jail and which ones started out seemingly thoughtful and smart then ended up getting gold teeth and putting on a persona they got from Hip Hop albums. And pretty much all of them have downlow potential.

  24. Lara sayeth: “They love this new movie Get Out. Do you want to see that Nikcrit?”

    “Get Out” is race mixing propaganda, where the funny looking, ugly black dude has a hot, super white girlfriend (Marnie from “Girls”). Nobody who reads PA is permitted to see that film, I hereso decree. The writer/ director is a funny looking, ugly black dude who has a real-life semi-hot white girlfriend (Chelsea Peretti).

    Nik sayeth: “ALWAYS look for the bottom-line benefit, and there you’ll have the scandals y’all so often seek.”

    No, no, no. How many times do we have to go through this? Jews are more than happy to lose money, or make considerably less, in order to promote anti-white propaganda. Here is a very good look at this dynamic in black-on-white porn. Warning: it’s a pretty disgusting read and may cause anger.

    http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/02/interracial-porn-isnt-profitable-its-political/

  25. Reading Nikcrit’s comments, I wonder how well white-themed movies would do at the box office.

    Would alt-right movies make audience pull? Would even non-alters come to see them?

    I have this vague notion of someday making films that essentially entirely starring white-males: Even on street scenes I would use CGI techniques to turn all crowds into gray stick figures, deleting gender and ethnicity except for those white males in the prime roles.

    Hollywood is so politically oriented to the left that the market space is entirely vacant. White male films for general enjoyment. I think it could work.

  26. “Jews are more than happy to lose money, or make considerably less, in order to promote anti-white propaganda. Here is a very good look at this dynamic in black-on-white porn.”

    OMG. peterike, you’re losing your rationality; I don’t know exactly where to start when you cite a website a bit to the right of stormfront to ‘prove’ your claim that race propaganda beats profit in the pop culture.

    First of all, that article is very, very dated when it comes to citing the porno actresses it notes; between ten and twenty years late; at that time, i was working a lot in L.A. and actually had passing acquaintances with executives in the adult industry, which i’d reference on occasion in comments at OneSTDV and GL PIggy; I knew the guy who owned controlling share of Met-Art, a supposedly ‘sophisticated’ porn aggregator and branding name, whose sole Euro connection was nothing but mist and owned primarily by a guy who was a wholesaler pool salesman in New Jersey before he moved out west!

    That article is utter nonsense! Citing 6% to 8% differences in black-vs-white-male body fat averages is a redress of racial sexuality and miscegenation? Quotes from Nat Turner to imply that for-profit whoring by female porn stars is the modern-day equivalent of black-on-white rape!!!!!!!!!!!! That article is just over-the-top nonsense.

    Dude, I hate porn; i think it’s the seediest underbelly of L.A., a city I consider to be one big porno set in terms of how it uses and abuses bodies, talent and creativity and ability. But the city is a magnet for whores and whoring —– NOT some Jewish cabal headquarters in which they deplete resources to humiliate besotted Goys; pussywhipped goys are the ones who buy that shit. Another guy I know who was once in a band but got into porn executive life about fifteen years ago would return every summer; we would talk about this topic, with me even sometimes citing allegations and other half-ass claims from those aforementioned blogs we participated on re. the subject of porn (guy white, OneSTDV, GLPiggy, etc.. Cuck porn is produced and exploited by disproportionate Jewish financiers and producers —– BUT IT IS CONSUMED BY PREDOMINANTLY WHITE MALES; they totally drive the demand; you think black males are buying shit from sites called ‘watching my mom go black’ and other cuck sites? It’s disgusting but it’s totally a white urge and one that is sated because of its profitabilty; this guy went on to tell me two summers ago that an interracial site called blacked (dot) com is actually doing so well that it’s considered a revivalist of website-membership porn, which had fallen to the market wayside in recent years.

    But none of that is true because a racist white nationalist website says jews, those indifferent tribesman to financial gain, produce interracial porn to vilify white christian males, profits be damned. LMFAO!! then your source goes on to vouchproof its claim by citing Eldrige Cleaver’s ‘soul on Ice?” A book that was written nearly 50 years ago by a now-dead member of the Black Panthers. (And a book that, btw, was considered by some to be anonymously authored by Jewish propagandists, which i’m more inclined to believe than i do peterike’s whopper of a claim today.

    what world do you live in? for over ten years form the mid 90s to 2005 or so, L.A. nightlife is a testament to the truth of that world: all those models in music videos, from rap to metal? All of ’em dancers at strip clubs likie Crazy Girls and other Hollywood grindhouses—- all interchangeable in whether working for white rockers or rappers, and afterhours whoring with black or white males. Everywhere.

    “Everywhere,” you say?
    “Yeah, everywhere —– I even read it in the National Vanguard!”

    JFC. I give up. peterike, i’m going to keep it to music and poetry from now on when it comes to discussions between you and I. LOL….

  27. If someone gets beat up, what does it matter to that person whether or not the person who did it was motivated by money?

    On the question of the jews’ motivations, whether or not they are motivated by money is a secondary concern, or even you might say irrelevant.That money is to some extent involved is a distraction from what they are doing. It is used as an excuse: as if venal motives are exculpatory.

    If they are motivated by money and demeaning white people: they are demeaning white people.

    If they are not motivated by money and they are demeaning white people: they are demeaning white people.

    Pretty simple logic, really. It is a good thing my 149 iq is at your disposal.

  28. The actions of the jews and Hollywood are so in your face that they are what they are.

    It is funny financial motives are considered as a reasonable excuse.

    If i go around abusing people (hey that might be fun), can i tell the judge that i was getting paid to do so and expect understanding and leniency?

    That money is considered a valid excuse for actions that are malicious in their effect, is curious, to say the least.

    Whether or not money is considered as a primary motivation might go the question of intent, i suppose. But at this point the questions of ethics become philosophical, and as i already said, irrelevant.

    *******************

    But if the topic is specifically black-on-white porn, and the claim is that demand for it and from a white market, exists: then whose fault is it for supplying that demand?

    The porn market in that regard might be compared to the market for drugs. Should drug dealers be given a break because they are motivated by money?

    But that aside, the racial animus that the jews demonstrate in their media product is so widespread, that anyone denying is not worth arguing with; certainly not on this blog.

    Is nikcrit arguing that the jews’ racial animus (toward Whites) is not in evidence in every bit of their media product?

  29. I am repeating myself now, but the larger point gleaned from the above, is a good one.

    How is it that money is considered a (valid) excuse for media products produced by the jews, that are consistently demeaning of their White ethnic rivals?

    Whether or not, or rather to what extent, their actions are motivated by money and as opposed to animus — is irrelevant.

    And it is telling and indicting of anyone who is willing to regard that excuse as reasonable and valid.

    Since when is the morality of anyone’s actions dependent on how much that person is paid?

  30. Nikcrit’s personal acquaintance with the industry is valid and interesting reading, but Elk is making damn good points. The nahzees at the Nuremberg trials should have said they were making money instead of following orders.

  31. Elk, your 149 IQ should duly note that if profit more than ‘jews’ are determining membership rates by white males at cuck sites, then that is a non-negligible fact to consider when calculating the collective sexual health and libido of that aforementioned collective white male…..Btw: Levin and TMZ picked up for a day a cause celebre “will she or won’t she?” Fuck black-for-bucks story for a day or two and then moved on to J-Lo’s auctioned off unused diaphragm; it was hardly some ABSCAM-level investigative piece! Lol!!

    You guys are in childlike denial about white female desire and Eros across race lines.. there is a lot of it, much of it neurotic and much of it of a ho- him bourgeois course. It’s not all plotting and cover-up by those evil, sheisty herbs.
    Peterike: shame on you for citing National Vanguard as a source of investigative reporting. Lol

  32. Elks money versus malevolence riff is interesting but ultimately beside the point. My point is this: if the market market wasn’t there and ready with goys having their wallets open, we would see no such interracial product proliferating the market and the culture, period.

    Own your shit, white man. Quit scapegoating. You have plenty to be proud of so accept your darkside….. The Jew is your shadow self, says Dr. Freud! Lol

  33. Black man/white woman porn is probably consumed mostly by black men and white men who wish they were black. There are enough men in these two groups to make it profitable. If you don’t fall into either category, I don’t know why you would watch it.

  34. — You guys are in childlike denial about white female desire and Eros across race lines

    I got your “childlike denial” right here, holmes.

    — Own your shit, white man .. The Jew is your shadow self

    The 109 (and counting) expulsions are evidence that the White man and others eventually do come around to owning their shit.

    — Black man/white woman porn is probably consumed mostly by … white men who wish they were black.

    It’s not my thing so take this as purely a guess — white male viewers of such p0rn get off on the quasi-bestiality degradation of the female.

  35. Did you guys see the story about the man and the woman who are getting 27 and 28 years in prison for driving past a black party with confederate flags? These people are losers, but that is a very harsh sentence for never laying a hand on anyone.

  36. It’s hard to stop thinking about those stiff sentences. This is the kind of thing you see in an occupied country whose people are rounded up and shot in reprisals. I hope there is an appeals process that reduces their sentences to time-served on the sheer weight of their absurdity. How many years did the nigger who shot a White baby in the stroller get, also in Georgia?

  37. Yes, those sentenced are clearly very symbolic and politically motivated. And all the more outrageous given the defendants formal declarations of remorse and the victims stating their forgiveness.

    But is that current judicial folk influence? Or some nefarious top- down decree of legal avengement? I don’t know…

    I do know this: the world we be a much more balanced and harmonious place if the halfrican ubermensch was presiding czar of the universe!

  38. Re. The baby murderer: I hope he’s on death row & brutalized every day by outraged fellow inmates….. I’m on portable media, thus research capability limited at the moment.

  39. “I skimmed through Peterike’s National Vanguard article. It reads as credibly as any social commentary.”

    No, here’s the problem with peterike citing that story in the manner that he did: He DIDN’T put it forth as ‘social commentary,’ or even as the highly inflammatory and admittedly partisan social commentary that it was.

    Rather, he put it forth as investigative reporting to make a social and cultural contention: that Jews with malice and intent sacrifice financial gain and other known self-interested aims proven over history in order to defame and humiliate white goyim. And with that intent, his vouchproofing with highly biased and partisan opinion and marginally relevant statistics made the piece laughable, IMO; JFC

  40. cont.: at one point the article even quotes some antebellum south words and wisdom and motivation of Nat Turner to explain 21st-century b-w eros sociology;then its devolving into relative b-vs-w bodyfat percentage and other physical stats just iced the fukin’ cake.

    No one’s moralizing over the racist content or the comically biased conjecture used to characterize the WN’s contemporary hell of a social landscape —— but it’s not convincing scholarship, nor even casual punditry, to use such pre-loaded nonsense and emotional anecdote to then ultimately produce an academic argument about racial cause and circumstance.

    I mean, how would y’all react to me if i made some highly ‘blackity-black’ sociological claim and vouchproofed said claim with a few passages from an issue of the Nation of Islam paper, “Muhammad Speaks?”

    Would that read as ‘rational social commentary?”

  41. “Jake Steed?”

    Yeah, righ..lol….. f-you, dude. So what do you think of the Vanguard News, with its “jews-under-my-bed” theories on every problem in the world whatsoever?

    Maybe there’s a genetic, STEM-driven answer to some of these seemingly humanistic or ‘qualitative’ mysteries; maybe to the extent you are genetically mono-ethnic and monocultural yourself you will find peace and repose in finding a genetic enemy that is equally monoculturally composed but of the exact opposite of your own monoethnic totality?

    By that logic, I would be somewhat genetically innoculated from ever coming down with a bad dose of “jews-under-my-bed” syndrome, while those likie peterike, Ryu and perhaps elk on his more agitated days are more ethnically pre-destined to succumb, no?

  42. Ahhh… we were overdue for a miscegenation thread!

    This is usually about the time when nikcrit brags about the all white women he banged hehe 🙂

    In all seriousness though, if it is true that white men are consuming this “watching my mom go black” type of porn – essentially caricatures of black men with petite white women supposedly representing their moms or wives… or in general, when we are seeing white men dropping out in droves and retreating to video games, weed, SSI checks, anime, etc . . then I think we should see that as a symptom of something askew in our society … and to solve it requires that white men be ABLE TO TALK ABOUT THEMSELVES AS AN ENTITY AND WHY THIS IS HAPPENING! Yet there is no vocabulary to do so that is not deeply stigmatized. As an explanation, I refuse to accept either Jewish conspiracy or white enervation as pat conclusions. There is something humiliating about the plump androgynous office drone who slaves away in a cubicle to subsidize third world fecundity within and without his borders, perhaps bringing home a paycheck to an ungrateful, obese wife. To solve this crisis may require white men to kick over the table, turn off the EBT cards, and focus on ourselves for awhile.

    Idk – I have thought about this quite a bit. Much of my inspiration has come from reading Paglia… like her, I feel like I am looking at the situation from the outside and can therefore see the situation a bit more objectively.

  43. A saying I once heard, “Chicks with daddy issues make the best strippers”. Analyzing the performers of current year LA is almost as productive as analyzing the opium dens of 1800s Shanghai.

    “or in general, when we are seeing white men dropping out in droves and retreating to video games, weed, SSI checks, anime, etc . .” (MGE).

    All things that don’t have risk. Post 1930s US has been very effective at removing or diverting risk seeking behavior, at least in the middle class and above. “Extreme Sports” and Poker are some of the few left with an advertising base. I’d go even further and argue that public risk taking by individual members of society, outside small business creation, is discouraged by society, for any number of reasons.

    And yet we know from our studies, from Sun Tzu, to Mystery, Robert Greene to the SAS, that “He who dares wins”. If the rewards of risk taking outweighed the social discouragement, then at least the disenchanted prospective elites will return to the table.

  44. Jews don’t view blacks as competition the same way they view white gentiles. It’s a totally different relationship. Commenters who obsessively mention Jews can be annoying, I don’t think anyone on here falls in that category. CH has a few on his site.

  45. Hey, P.A.: Happy Fat Tuesday!! (The bakeries here have got lines going down the block with customers patiently waiting to buy there Paczki. 🙂

  46. — All things that don’t have risk. (Ulric)

    Yes, and it’s not as bleak on the family-man end of things as the unhappiest-tier scenarios suggest. The collapse of an entire social framework of support has left many men miserable but remedies have come on the scene in the form of Red Pill wisdom. I’ve been lucky, but I’ve also been smart in doing well on that front. My best and happiest moments involve being a father.

  47. How many years did the nigger who shot a White baby in the stroller get, also in Georgia?

    @ Pa – that “youth” got life in prison.

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/09/12/ga-teen-convicted-killing-baby-in-stroller-sentenced-to-life-in-prison-without.html

    “Jake Steed?”
    Yeah, righ..lol….. f-you, dude. So what do you think of the Vanguard News, with its “jews-under-my-bed” theories on every problem in the world whatsoever?

    @ Jake Steed – I assume that site is one run/founded by Alex Linder?

    There might be some kernel(s) of truth in that article when it describes the 1st generation of skin moguls, but the porn industry changed very, very rapidly beginning with digitization, broadband, then mobile (in that order). Also, a lot of that “cuck” or interracial stuff (and American porn in general) has Asian and White consumers outside the USA, in wealthy places that are extremely homogeneous like Canada, Japan, Hong Kong, the UK, Australia, etc.

  48. I read Peterike’s article. It makes some valid points. There is tons of interracial propaganda in advertising, too. For my part, I just try to avoid those products. I’m not always able to do so, but I am at least aware of it.

  49. Now you done it. There I am trying to finish a long post I’ve been working on and off on since this weekend, when you gave me a perfect excuse to procrastinate on tightening up its last few loose ends. Stand by a few minutes for a post about the NYT article, where y’all can add your thoughts on that subject.

  50. A “break even” porn business is more sustainable than a prophetable porn business.

    Behind the Jew-n-porn is a faggot Jew-n-porn.

    Nigger-on-white porn, as PA alluded to, is about white female degradation.

    “Professionally”-produced “white female degradation” is HBD-evidence for the existence of an archetype “jewhite” faggot breaking even in the porn business SUFFICING his own fantastically-imagined freed meat-“market.”

  51. The consumption of porn is queer. This is the starting frame of wS. All further and deeper analysis would tell “us” that nigger-on-white porn is deeply queer. This particular variant of porn is to satisfy a very dark and devious desire for experiencing the utter humiliation and degradation of the white female. It is, in a nut’s hell, a “jewhite” faggot’s very nature expressed in the modern context.

    Ergo, “jewhite” faggot exists… Nigger-on-white porn is produced.

    The “market” is the “jewhite” faggot himself who only needs “break even” to perpetuate in the business of “white female degradation.”

  52. Boy, I step away for a little while and THIS happens!

    Anyway, much good stuff upthread, but just want to call out my man Nik on this comment:

    “No, here’s the problem with peterike citing that story in the manner that he did: He DIDN’T put it forth as ‘social commentary,’ or even as the highly inflammatory and admittedly partisan social commentary that it was. Rather, he put it forth as investigative reporting to make a social and cultural contention… blah blah”

    Wut? Dude, this is exactly how I “put it forth”:

    “Jews are more than happy to lose money, or make considerably less, in order to promote anti-white propaganda. Here is a very good look at this dynamic in black-on-white porn. Warning: it’s a pretty disgusting read and may cause anger.”

    I didn’t call it an “investigative report.” In fact, when I first read your response, I was wondering what article you read, because it was so over the top (your reply).

  53. O.T.@PA:

    Hey, who would’ve guessed; according to the alt-right’s hairstyle/race preference corollary findings, none other than Scarlet Johanssen’s follicles prove she must be a mudshark. 🙂

  54. I wonder if sociopaths are over-represented among judges.

    … 🙂

    About the 27/28 year verdict, well, a people gets the exact amount of abuse they tolerate.
    If a people don’t know any more they are a people (whites now), will there be a limit to the abuse they tolerate? Every time they are abused, each of them thinks “they are doing nothing to me”.

  55. Great post, that does credit to a blog. Really good to see a post like this here. This isn’t anything like a Slate after all.

    Worthy non-narcissistic people who take Colmes-like stances while being in provable good faith bewilder me; I can’t read their minds, or guess what their reasons might be.
    If I really have to guess, they haven’t had too tough personal experiences, and also project their good heart, lack of passion for power and democratic character onto the others, and come to imagine all people in the world can be together like in a merry go round, with no more struggles and injustice.

    rip

  56. Cam, that Elkins baby-killing case is a template for Thor’s screeds about the total endgame of radical evil. That act is so theoretically unredeemable. The judicial appeal is just sick. It can only serve as some larger depressing point.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s