A Pretty Face In An Ad

The photograph touches the archetype of motherhood. Your own hazy memories perhaps, or the sight of any girl’s cooing at a toddler. Is it right to give a beautiful young woman’s ephemeral light to strangers?

mtr-3

PS: It is difficult to imagine a world in which we give very little or nothing to Others because we are so used to having so much taken from us. The entire operating model of liberal West is best understood as a one-way transfer of social capital from Whites to muds. The more you think on it the more you see its obscenity. It’s Satanic. Last summer I mentioned how I dropped by a grocery store one evening and enjoyed the atmosphere of upbeat music and friendly White cashiers. And then I saw a fat ‘boon with a scowl on her mug waiting in line, and realized that she is not just drawing from the same limited common store of social wealth, but she is also contaminating it. That non-event anecdote scales up as metaphor for liberalism.

The photo above shows a White woman representing the best of our kind, a radiance that is uniquely ours. And she is on a billboard that advertises altruism for strangers, something that if someone insists on championing should at least be done by old nuns. In our peoples’ growing rejection of liberalism as an epic swindle, we have to have our eyes wide open to any act, any gesture that gives comfort to those who should be drawing it from their own pools, and censure it.

Advertisements

66 thoughts on “A Pretty Face In An Ad

  1. Well, i sure wouldn’t want Rosie O’Donnell’s mug on there, that’s for sure.

    In all seriousness, we all know that sex sells, but even deeper than that – people are repulsed by ugly-ness. When they see a cutie on an ad, they’ll take notice, because of the cutie. I know that we all know that. In answer to your question, yes, it’s okay to share beauty with strangers. It may be the only beauty they will see today.

  2. These days, if they don’t put her next to a black guy with obvious sexual implications, then I’m reasonably satisfied. Though this is just more feeding into the “save the world one niglet at a time” psychosis of the modern American female.

    Interesting imagery using the apple. You know, Garden of Eden, snake, etc. Humanity being cast out of Eden because Eve fell for the Devil’s false knowledge. Pretty accurate depiction of the American female ruining the nation based on false knowledge, even if we have to guess at who the (((devil))) is.

  3. Ha, the marketers understand a bit a HBD, even if they don’t like it.

    In the background are a gook and nigger, but they know the blonde is more pleasing.

  4. There is the timeless ‘sex sells’ and I like beauty on that level. There is something else they’re selling though. She’s volunteering at a food pantry and cooing over something that isn’t hers.

  5. Pingback: A Pretty Face In An Ad | Reaction Times

  6. My church serves dinner at a homeless shelter ten times a year. I’ve gone along a few times and enjoyed it. As long as she value her own children’s welfare first and foremost, I don’t see anything wrong with occasionally helping out needy people. Most of them are grateful for a hot meal.

  7. Howard Stern has said Trump will not be able to handle ostracization by Hollywood. My guess is when a huge percentage of the United States supports you, you’ll be able to handle the animosity of a few entertainers. There is nothing more a Hollywood person wants than the adoration of average people.

  8. The white females of the West DO NOT POSSESS a surplus of resource able to handle the exponentially increasing demands of a growing nonwhite world.

    “I’m so tired” is the dominate mantra of modern Western female and such expression is an explicit recognition of her dwindling internal resource.

  9. I used to listen to Howard Stern.

    Then, I heard that when others made fun of him, as he has made fun of others, he got all uptight. Especially about his hot shicksa white. He’s a typical NYC jew.

  10. “Is it right to give a beautiful young woman’s ephemeral light to strangers?”

    I think opening the Barnes Collection up north to the public boiled down to something like this. The foundation began as a demanding school instead of a standard museum. In the context of advertising, I’d say “very rarely.”

  11. It is difficult to imagine a world in which we give very little or nothing to Others because we are so used to having so much taken from us. The entire operating model of liberal West is best understood as a one-way transfer of social capital from Whites to muds. The more you think on it the more you see its obscenity. Satanic, to be frank. Last summer I mentioned how I dropped by a grocery store one evening and enjoyed the atmosphere of upbeat music and friendly White cashiers. And then I saw a fat ‘boon with a scowl on her mug waiting in line, and realized that she is not just drawing from the same extremely limited common store of social wealth, but she is also contaminating it. That non-event anecdote scales up as metaphor for liberalism. The photo above shows a White woman representing the best of our kind, a radiance that is uniquely ours. And she is on a billboard that advertises altruism for strangers, something that if someone insists on championing should at least be done by old nuns. In our peoples’ growing rejection of liberalism as an epic swindle, we have to have our eyes wide open to any act, any gesture that gives comfort to those who should be drawing it from their own pools, and censure it.

    UPDATE: I added this comment to the original post.

  12. “The photo above shows a White woman representing the best of our kind, a radiance that is uniquely ours. And she is on a billboard that advertises altruism for strangers, something that if someone insists on championing should at least be done by old nuns. In our peoples’ growing rejection of liberalism as an epic swindle, we have to have our eyes wide open to any act, any gesture that gives comfort to those who should be drawing it from their own pools, and censure it.”

    I don’t understand your presumption of cultural and ethnic ownership —— you’re presumed ‘aesthetic endowment,’ if you will.I mean, the handsome women in that ad you cite, she could be one of my maternal cousins, in their younger days, or perhaps a niece or two in several years; and while their acts of social grace and largesse, like your girl in the ;poster, are rendered without conscious, deliberate and partial awareness of who they are servicing; i.e., they’d extend their kind gestures to whites, blacks and whomever.

    IMO, your point is relevant in terms of an overall imbalance of ethnic goodwill and resource; but I don’t think it’s valid to appraise and assert absolution on a case-by-case basis, per your renderings above —- NOR to stipulate that she should extend ONLY to fellow-whites and some figurative sightly black woman ONLY to fellow-blacks, The degree of partiality in extending service may occur in line with that woman’s comfort and ability but it’s not in and of itself something to base judgement on IMO.

    IOW: You can find and have the limited partiality of generosity where you find it. But why theoretically demand it of others? How is that within your moral jurisdiction?

  13. I don’t understand your presumption of cultural and ethnic ownership —— you’re presumed ‘aesthetic endowment,’ if you will

    Wow, if you tug on Superman’s cape he will assert his own genetic rights as having the same heritage and say in all matters white!!

  14. IMO, your point is relevant in terms of an overall imbalance of ethnic goodwill and resource; but I don’t think it’s valid to appraise and assert absolution on a case-by-case basis, per your renderings above —- NOR to stipulate that she should extend ONLY to fellow-whites and some figurative sightly black woman ONLY to fellow-blacks, The degree of partiality in extending service may occur in line with that woman’s comfort and ability but it’s not in and of itself something to base judgement on IMO.

    It is a question of who belongs in this Society.

    And that is the unresolved question.

    If this society belongs to everyone, then that’s one situation. But that is the situation that White Advocates are not partial to.

    White Advocates want their own society, where the grace of their women is not expended on others.

    If people are allowed to sort themselves out into societies in which they are voluntary, then this problem will be solved.

  15. “Wow, if you tug on Superman’s cape he will assert his own genetic rights as having the same heritage and say in all matters white!!”

    Damn straight I will! (Baby, I got connections ALL over town…!)….

    But seriously, i would make the argument that there is a category that is multi-racial and that is not just a sanctimonious title or front but a societal element and faction that would suffer if civil society was a strict either/or in terms of white or black graciousness and/or hospitality in the way PA’s initial remark exemplified it.

    I don’t mean it in any type of sanctimonial cry or warning, but: The racial dichotomoy is not an omnipresent ‘given’ for everyone; it just isn’t. And from there i contend that it is quite possible to live your mono-cultural and/or mono-ethnic civil culture within that larger variety of cultural give-and-take.

    The problem is that, given the p.c. era we live and debate in, any such suggestion can only come off as some degree social piety or warning, which is unfortunate but should not be a inevitable ‘given.’

  16. White Advocates want their own society, where the grace of their women is not expended on others.

    A lot of people simply cannot imagine a lot of the violence, headache and cost on the way with recent Muslim immigrants fighting tooth and nail to prevent their daughters from being Westernized. Muslim fathers just won’t let their daughters go out and shag the world, pick up new ideas, disrespect their roots, dress like whor*es.

    One way for Islam to control its women sees Imams and Mosque leaders in the West to whip their congregations in to a frenzy with anti-Western rhetoric, as you’red seeing in the “NO GO” zones in France and Belgium. This is why you see a lot of the terrorists in the USA are actually 2nd generation that were born here – Omar Mateed, Syed Farook, Nidal Hassan. They’re responding to some inner cultural malaise they feel in their own crazy, Islamic way.

    And of course nothing is funnier than to hear worldwide Muslims constantly decrying the USA “killing Muslims” and intervening in various countries. But when there’s 80,000 Syrian refugees looking for somewhere to go those 49+ majority Muslim countries aren’t so vocal all of a sudden.

    When that machete-wielding stabber was taken down in front of the Louvre yesterday he ran right at a group of at least 50 police while swinging the blade and screaming “allahu akbar” – so now we have need fifty policeman to secure the front door of a Museum.?

    Crazier times are coming.

  17. We have gotten used to the ubiquity of images. Encountering a handful of otherworldly-beautiful women — the kind that can launch 1,000 ships or inspire Don to be Quixotic (Dulcinea) and Dante to seek Paradiso (Beatrice) — is what our unevolved medieval village nature can handle, especially our masculine nature. We are receptors of pure beauty in limited, filtered form and never directly, like the Beatific Vision. We are not made to drink the optical cataract of infinite internet imagery.

    With every technology our nature and social custom have to play catch-up through years of trial and error. We are suffering through communication overload for which our minds, souls, and social dynamics were not made. The urban wallpaper of Gomorrah has become costless to manipulate and duplicate. The ubiquity will overwhelm our souls into numbness until we teach the generations to voluntarily slow the fire-hose to a trickle.

    Even now an instance of visual poetry will capture your eye and stagger you, reminding you of the importance of its rarity. With so much simulated pulchritude everywhere, we have subconsciously learned to turn off our attention lest we become permanently hypnotized. That’s where an ad girl can intrude and cast a spell when we are least ready.

    The solution isn’t iconoclasm, like Quakers and Muslims, but rather to collectively remember the power of the image and the need to treat it like nuclear fission. The face of every young woman is our quotidian Magnificat: her beauty magnifies the Lord.

    Matt

  18. Just like Saruman, his cape of many colors is doomed.

    And there’s also a “traitor” reference here in invoking Saruman the White.

  19. — We are receptors of pure beauty in limited, filtered form and never directly, like the Beatific Vision (Matt King)

    This scene with Julie Delpy:

  20. It is difficult to imagine a world in which we give very little or nothing to Others because we are so used to having so much taken from us. The entire operating model of liberal West is best understood as a one-way transfer of social capital from Whites to muds.

    It took me years of deprogramming to even entertain a thought like this. What hope is there for the majority of whites? We need to find a better way to reach them

  21. I don’t mean it in any type of sanctimonial cry or warning, but: The racial dichotomoy is not an omnipresent ‘given’ for everyone; it just isn’t.

    We get it nikcrit. You’re not telling us anything we don’t see day in and day out.

  22. “This scene with Julie Delpy:”

    Well, the alabaster beauty is now more a force behind the camera —– but she can still entertain the masses, as this story duly notes:

    https://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/jan/22/julie-delpy-hollywood-i-sometimes-wish-i-were-african-american-diversity

    Actually, depending on the trajectory of interpretation one wishes to indulge, she could be making a point that is often put forth in alt-right circles: that the social realpolitik in the west is not only p.c. but ironic —– that blacks and other ‘P.O.C.’ have the most creative and social leeway to say whatever they want about gender and race politics.

    It’s still sort-of funny to witness her relative naivete re. p.c. topicry; you see the sorta mixed-reaction among the other male actors on the panel.

  23. Trickin, before you pair an “alabaster beauty” with some reference to blackitty-black and then hide behind disingenuous verbosity, ask yourself: “will this be seen as passive-aggressive?” Answer: it will.

  24. Speaking of race in advertising.

    Is it cruel of me to chuckle every time I see a black person on those Ancestry.com ads on TV? I swear those ads are like 80% black. You can see they are clearly pained by the idea of putting a standard Anglo-Saxon on there.

  25. Someone at CH threw out an idea about writing pro-Trump Rush lyrics. My contribution:

    I strip away th’ cuck GOP
    That hides a shining star
    A brilliant God-Emperor
    For tomorrow’s golden time
    We’ve fired up the ready nation
    Arising with a roar
    Patriots shining marvel
    We commit to Donald Trump

    Wind
    In my hair
    Winning and winning
    American music!
    Liberalism purged!

  26. Speaking of race in advertising.

    Is it cruel of me to chuckle every time I see a black person on those Ancestry.com ads on TV? I swear those ads are like 80% black. You can see they are clearly pained by the idea of putting a standard Anglo-Saxon on there.

    If SNL were funny and not jewish (in other words, if the world were not what it is) — there would be a skit or two in that.

    Like i said to my mom after she got back her 23 and Me: We’re white, that’s all that matters.

  27. You can see they are clearly pained by the idea of putting a standard Anglo-Saxon on there.

    It is obviously too hot-button (of an issue).

    Others such as SoBL have pointed out that Now is a great opportunity for branding, for businesses to throw off the PC shackles (and win some shekels) on the rising tide of implicit White identity.

    23 and Me is just too obviously right in that matrix.

    Ten 20 years ago, maybe most people wanted the results to come back mixed — but what about now?

    Stupid Hollywood celebs aside, people are bragging on their results coming back clean — and not just in the Alt Right.

    Or at least that is my perception. Is that a biased perception?

  28. I’m surprised Nikcrit has not yet put up pictures of black football players with their white wives/girlfriends.

  29. MGE’s response at 9:49 pm was to the point.

    We get it: Not everyone is White. And not everyone wants to be.

    And trickin’s efforts aside, this is generally not the place where their interests and concerns are placed front and center.

  30. Comedian George Lopez had a brief late night show for a while – one running piece is that he’d bring on celebrities and have them do DNA tests. I think both Jessica Alba and Eva Longoria were absolutely, positively upset at not having a lower percentage of European genetics:

  31. Ashkenazi Jewish genetics often get mixed up with Native American genetics for some reason. That why Larry David got those results.

  32. I have a family member, through marriage, who has similar genetics to Eva Longoria and Jessica Alba. She has major anti-white chip on her shoulder.

  33. I was all set to watch Kieslowski’s Trois Couleurs Trilogie on Hulu when they yanked their impressive Criterion Collection streaming library. Fortunately before the discontinuation, I had caught Éric Rohmer’s Claire’s Knee, which was excellent and très Roissy, complete with an older man’s philosophical, non-creepy celebration of a 16-year-old Beatific Vision, specifically her knee, perhaps the least sexualized part of the body.

    I was looking forward to boning up on the Decalogue among other cinema classics that escaped the universal poz. Of all places, Hulu had been a secret passage away from the suffocating cultmarx takeover of entertainment, but of course it couldn’t last. Criterion seems to have opened up its own streaming service, however.

  34. I didn’t detect disappointment in Alba’s reaction but something rather opposite, like forcibly concealed pride. Her mystery meat mischling beauty always confounded me, so maybe I am projecting my own relief into her response. At first I thought she was some kind of oriental roundeye, then I found out she was “hispanic,” and now we know she is pushing 90% white. No mystery in that meat.

    She is the mark in what remains my favorite instance of game caught on camera — the superstar 10 gradually yielding to the charms of a naked nobody (before Dax Shepard got a career):

  35. 23 and Me results are fishy and politicized for sure, and they go into a google database.

    Part of it is legitimate ambiguity in how they can be interpreted and displayed. And part of it is probably tailored toward what they think the market wants.

    It would be a fascinating story, for someone who knew the inside scoop, and could tell it from a White and AR perspective.

    I didn’t think that Jessica seemed displeased with the results. Her father (in the audience) certainly wasn’t. But she had to act like she was,

    But does Spain count, because like, Alba comes from Spain?

    Jeez i dunno let’s ask George Lopez!

  36. This family member of mine also did 23 and Me. She said that her results stating she is mostly of European ancestry explain why she was referred as a white person back in her South American country. I also talked to some of her shorter, darker relatives who made reference to her height and light skin. They were also nicer than her and seemed less anti white to me. They live in Texas which could be why.

  37. “Trickin, before you pair an “alabaster beauty” with some reference to blackitty-black and then hide behind disingenuous verbosity, ask yourself: “will this be seen as passive-aggressive?”

    Dude, that’s your obsession, not mine. I didn’t even think of doing as much and don’t see how that would follow, comically or otherwise. I just thought it was funny that a successful beautiful white actress and director was playing the sexism card, period, let alone placing her angst and oppression above that of those playing the ‘racism card.’ Can’t say I saw that before; I also thought it was funny to see the pained and galled reaction of the other actors on the panel, the males.

    PA, when you got mad at me the other day, i held my tongue, but the truth is I had no idea in my playing that Sunday Night Football theme song and opening-credits video that there was a cross-current of Underwood and miscegenation.We were into a comment tangent discussing pop formats and how hip-hop was gaining on pop-rock as the mainstream template for fanfares and other highly commercialized cultural products and to highlight my point I posted the vid I did —— of Underwood singing a hip-hopped up “Sunday Night Football” theme song that originally had a sort-of country pop flavor when she debuted it a few years ago.

    That opening segment features her singing, dancing and prancing before a backing film of pre-game activities; the vid shows, at the :03 second or so part of the intro, a black player getting off the team bus while Underwood goes through her routine; the two do not in any way interact and are not even in the same film shot! But you took that pure bit of coincidence, a bit that has played before tens of millions of people every Sunday night during the NFL season, as some sort-of blatant punch of miscegenation to your head on my part!

    I won’t re-post it but go back and look at it again —- and read the comment flow up to that point —– and you’ll see I was clearly making a point about pop-vs-hip-hop production and style re. a show-intro-theme-and-fanfare, rather than making some crude sexual-racial point.

    I’ve told you before that you and the boys at CH’s site sort-of wear your fears on your sleeves when it comes to that subject. But that’s just one black man’s opinion.

    ——————————————————————————————-

    @Cam: y, know, the most painful part about watching all this pre-game Superbowl tripe focusing on the Falcons rather than my vanquished Packers is having to watch and listen to
    the fukin’ Zac Brown Band.

    Yikes!

  38. I have the guilty pleasure of watching the “big match” each year. I have given up on football overall but am still drawn to the SB. However, this year’s ads so far are intolerable. I don’t need Coke preaching to me that we’re stronger together. Just sell your caffeinated sugar water and shut the fuck up.

  39. “Is it the big match this evening?

    Yes, we’re halfway through the big match….. And elk, when I get home tonight, i want to see a pithy yet probing deconstruction by you of Lady Gaga’s performance, as I will be, umm, to full of refreshment to render as much myself.

    I began watching her 15-minute-set but then had to urinate; in years past, i would’ve held it in for the sake of experiencing the zeitgeist live.

    But today, i gave in after five minutes and went to relieve myself, content to let YouTube and other pundits re-create this pop-zeit moment, live 24-7 experientials be damned!

    Ahh, yet another capitulation to middle age…….. so please do pick this one up for me, elk, ok?

  40. @Cam,

    Wow, Overtime. That was one of the most feeble, amateurish demonstrations of clock management and lead preservation I have ever witnessed in an organized football game, certain prep-leagues included.

    If Atlanta actually loses this game that they easily could’ve had iced by haalftime, i think there should be public executions of the coaching staff and certain position players in trusted roles.

    Rescind Ryan’s MVP now!! lol!!

    (i don’t really even like Brady. But i somehow revel watching him make refuse of his lessor here; wow!)

  41. Brady doesn’t seem very political. However, he is successful white man, who is not a flaming liberal, so I guess that’s why.

  42. The insidiousness of the advertisement cannot be understated. Such agit-prop is the “lipstick on a pig” grotesquerie of anti-white Supremacy. On the one hand is the INVISIBLE adult “other” gassing our aether with virulent fantasies of patronizing “white supremacy.” And on the other hand is either a) a bright and beautiful white female lending her inmate resources to those outside her family WITH a beta cuck’s sappy approval or b) a bright and beautiful white female gladly rebelling against the needs of her family and the desires of her husband. Either way, it is the stuff of anti-white Supremacy.

    The “other” doesn’t need our help and “we” cannot provide it for them anyway.

    So the ad is part and parcel to the “make tricks” reality.

  43. Heartiste was just suspended. This comes on the heels of an over the weekend alt-right purge that included Reactionary Tree, who has always been a good goy on Twitter.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s