How America Can Be Made Great Again

By restoring the country’s ethnic balance to what it was before 1965. Those who came here since the signing of the Hart-Celler Act would have to go home, details to be hammered out. Yes, this could include me. Wait — someone’s calling. It’s the Momentum of History. She’s asking if my feelings would be hurt. I tell her “No.” “Terrific!” she says, “then I’ll just plow ahead.”

That superficially assimilated Somalian girl with the Valley Girl accent and a White boyfriend — yeah, she’d be going home. Don’t feel bad for her though. She does not vote in line with your interests and once awake to the deportations, she’d show her true allegiance. Every alien is capable of acting friendly so long as you don’t scratch his ethnic pride, and as long as you keep on with the “give” end of your give-and-take agreement and never the “take.”

For historical perspective, there were many fine Germans who nevertheless had to leave in 1945. Some were put into westbound freight cars after being stripped of every material possession, even their photo albums.

Legacy Blacks of course would be grandfathered in, but only under either full subordination to White norms within integrated spheres or autonomous under segregation. In the Eisenhower era, America’s racial protocols were framed as an international embarrassment. But in the age of Twitter and global muh dik, it is the Westerners’ filicidal tolerance that makes the world laugh at us.

America is in a transitional period. What’s going on is neither stable nor permanent. If you’re not White, then you have no idea how much we hate this multikult dictatorship. How it feminizes our character, stunts our freedom-loving spirit, and how sour it feels, under current political dictates, to see one of you walking freely within two hundred yards of our home. How the sun shines brighter and the sky is more blue when every face we see is like ours.

In short:

Blacks would stay, but they had their shot at equality and they can’t handle it. They are what they are, no less the crooked timber of humanity than anyone else. Whites don’t have to live like this, is what it would come down to.

And those who came here after Hart-Celler and their descendants would go home. Given that the Constitution of the United States was written for the posterity of those who were here before 1787, consider the 1965 cutoff date a bicentennial amnesty.

And then it’s on to greatness: walk on Mars, cure paralysis, extend a hand of friendship to the Afrikaners, and once again become who we are.

Advertisements

202 thoughts on “How America Can Be Made Great Again

  1. Hi PA,

    you told me you enjoyed our exchange the last time so I’m not gonna be gentle this time around. Hopefully you’ll put up with me and understand I came here in good spirit.

    Before I answer your post I will give a brief introduction of what I think: Trump has a historical opportunity in its hands, and he doesn’t fucking understand it. It seems to me no one understands what is happening now in america. There is a slight breach, “un ratito” as the Spanirads say, through which the world can now enter and avoid LITERALLY millions of deaths and half a century of misery for the whole world. I feel deeply alone that no one sees things as me…

    Now its time to comment. My purpose is that we, humans on this planet, can achieve two great goals with “the breach opened by Trump (the Breach)”:
    1) Prevent the deaths of millions of people and a prolonged period of misery worldwide (or just in most of the world), an “event” which comes also with huge unlikely, unthinkable and unforseeable consequences (the worse of each would be the extinction of human life).
    2) The continuation of European civilisation and European peoples in the Americas. I can only assume that its annihilation in the Americas would logically incur that the same forces would work to annihilate it in Europe, and those forces would probably be, by then, “rather formidable”.

    I think its fun you used the conditional term in your post, “would”. Really? What about what *IS*? That is all that matters…

    “How America *CAN* be made great Again (…) *WOULD* … ”
    That is just wrong. We can only focus on what it is we can do.

    Concerning the return to the pre-65 ethnic balance and expel all who came in the last 50 years and their descendants, that is just impossible. Good luck having a president elected to do just that. It will not happen. However, the Breach allows us now to fight in that direction by other means: 1) Restrict immigration severely; 2) Build the great wall of Trump; 3) Destroy the “hispanic” idea, and therefore their ethnic solidarity and voting patterns; 4) Expel the most meso-american (Mexicans and Central Americans) people you can as soon as you can, humanely. 5) Fix the country so that it is fashionable and affordable to have white babies; 6) Bring more people from European countries – think for instance poor Ukrainians doing your low paid jobs instead of meso-americans.

    I truly feel bad for non whites in america right now. They may be more or less parasitic, they may understand or not that they are anti white and anti american but… the truth is, they were tricked. They are the first victims of multiculturalism and the evil democratic party. Don’t lash at them (unless they are asking for it, of course), DESTROY THE CURRENT DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND ITS IDEOLOGY. They are a satanic bunch bent on destroying america, they are the new soviets. And establishment republicans don’t care much, it seems.

    I do not think black people are a problem. They are more like ill trained dogs than a true menace. Once America is back on track they will behave in whatever manner america will want them to. And, look, the black vote does not really matter in any state per se. Except in inner cities of course. So, blacks will only be politically dangerous when they are a majority in Georgia or Mississippi, but then, also, only if they realise they can win it. The real drama is that such a thing is near (10, 20 years max). African americans, like Obama illustrated, behave the way they do now only for a reason: “Yes, we can”.

    I don’t think the world laughs at America. Europeans will laugh with america to their deaths, therein lies the real danger of america’s follies. An american clown is a fashion across most of the world.

    Personally, I am making the following suggestion to you: Don’t go sour over the non whites in the street. They are peasants, they are paws of the democratic elites and ideologues. The ones spewing the hate are the ones who shall deserve your hate.

    About Afrikaners, forget about them. They lost their country. I don’t see you worried about white Cubans, white Venezuelans or Serbians in Bosnia. Why is that?

  2. “Concerning the return to the pre-65 ethnic balance and expel all who came in the last 50 years and their descendants, that is just impossible. Good luck having a president elected to do just that. It will not happen. However, the Breach allows us now to fight in that direction by other means: 1) Restrict immigration severely; 2) Build the great wall of Trump; 3) Destroy the “hispanic” idea, and therefore their ethnic solidarity and voting patterns; 4) Expel the most meso-american (Mexicans and Central Americans) people you can as soon as you can, humanely. 5) Fix the country so that it is fashionable and affordable to have white babies; 6) Bring more people from European countries – think for instance poor Ukrainians doing your low paid jobs instead of meso-americans.”

    I’ve said something 90%+ similar at least a half-dozen times here and on the blogs 28sherman, GLPiggy and OneSTDV; i.e., “when one becomes fatalistic, remember how positive were scenarios during the I.T. boom only 15-20 years ago, and much can be revived if we: “stop the underclass from growing in size, stop all illegal immigration and do our best to repatriatize the most egregious-behaving illegals….one might also add, a bit wishfully, to stop ALL immigration for a period of five-to-ten-years, and/or allow a flow of exclusively western-European immigration to compensate for a disproportionate flow of non-whites since ’65.

    There is nothing that outrageous in such a particular social prescription. It’s all doable; reviving pre-’65 demographics may be unobtainable, but the demo as late as, say, 1989, were still agreeable, with the country about 80% European; actually, if someone wanted to get very technical about birthrights here, one could say that it should be contained to founding stock blacks and whites.

    My familial roots here go back to the early 1800s on both ‘sides.’

    Can y’all be saying the same now?’ ……lol!!

  3. PA, your plan is not extreme enough. The USA ***was**** the white ethnostate.

    We had bans on interracial marriage. Song of the South and Cheech and Chong. We had full segregation. It all failed.

    There is no “moderate” extremism. Only the extremists will perform the purge even your plan demands. They will not be satisfied with your reasonable solution. To take the risk that WS demands, we’d like to be paid the full return.

  4. Pretty much agree with Alfonso and nickrit here. Again I will repeat my position for a sort of soft segregation of white “safe spaces” (thanks SJWs!). I truly believe these would be the keystone towards political power and racial renaissance through non violent means.

    The black issue is an interesting one. On the one hand, they have been a thorn in the nation’s side, but one the other hand they have been a part of this country since the beginning in almost all of its ways. Furthermore, in a multikult amerika, I think most whites see a certain type of black as a fellow traveler and citizen much more so than most hardworking and law abiding Hispanics and Asians. This type of black is the “Willie” stereotype, of a hard worker, jovial, proud and NOT self deprecating Uncle Ruckus. Despite our racial and cultural differences, if this was the aspirational ideal for young black males instead of Tyrone gang banger, then I think come hell or high water whites and blacks fortunes would be intertwined on this continent in the next century. The only way I can think of doing that is to roll back the welfare state. However, if Tyrone continues to be the ideal, then secession with mass removal of whites and blacks into their respective ethnostates is the only viable path going forward.

  5. Ryu likes to say…

    “No solution, no problem.”

    And if radical autonomy has taught “us” anything, it is “nothing” is impossible.

    Three Nation Solution > Two State Mandate > New World Order…

  6. Pingback: How America Can Be Made Great Again | Reaction Times

  7. And meanwhile, Vox Day still doesn’t recognize that a resurgence of great white men IS the resurgence of the white Supremacists, Richard Spencer’s nationalist* SOCIALISM, notwithstanding.

    *We old stock have already been infused with the Nazi substance which came in around the same time as the Jews did. Hint hint… Global communist slapping around state socialist means what exactly to a white Supremacist? Get on the side of state SOCIALIST. GTFO.

  8. — I think its fun you used the conditional term in your post, “would”. Really? What about what *IS*? That is all that matters… […] That is just wrong. We can only focus on what it is we can do. (Afonso)

    Very perceptive. In fact, I wrote the first draft of this in simple present but then decided that conditional makes more sense for a number of reasons.

    — 1) Restrict immigration severely; 2) Build the great wall of Trump; 3) Destroy the “hispanic” idea, and therefore their ethnic solidarity and voting patterns; 4) Expel the most meso-american (Mexicans and Central Americans) people you can as soon as you can, humanely. 5) Fix the country so that it is fashionable and affordable to have white babies; 6) Bring more people from European countries – think for instance poor Ukrainians doing your low paid jobs instead of meso-americans.

    All of those I agree with, except (6). I prefer to avoid going on a tangent of policy regarding poor or unstable European countries at the moment, but my general view is that Europe does not have the bodies to spare; any immigration of Europeans would make the U.S. a vampire on the source-country’s youth and talent. And from the standpoint of U.S. interests, this is no time to further dilute its culture, even if it’s with fellow-Europeans.

    — Don’t lash at them

    It’s best to treat my original post as a contemplation of a scenario in an impersonal way: what would make America great? Lashing or not, there are many ways of deporting large numbers of people, with many scenarios being humane (ie, not involving first-strike bloodshed). They all came here to find a better life, but they did this at detriment to the people who were already here.

    — I don’t think the world laughs at America.

    The world laughs at the West as a whole, sees it as a bitch. Muslims may be most blatant about it with their braggadocio but they are not the only ones.

    — About Afrikaners, forget about them. They lost their country. I don’t see you worried about white Cubans, white Venezuelans or Serbians in Bosnia. Why is that?

    I named only the Afrikaners because that is a writing technique for a post that’s only one page long. Similarly, I only mentioned landing on Mars and curing paralysis but not the myriad other scientific or medical frontiers before us.

    I’ve written sympathetically about Serbs and white(ish) Persians. White Latin Americans haven’t been my focus mostly because I have not had much contact with them. I did travel to Miami on business not too long ago. White Cubans impressed me as good people, I enjoyed meeting them.

    — PA, your plan is not extreme enough. (Ryu)

    I aimed to answer the question “how can America be made great again?” Yes, all kinds of scenarios can be considered, from very moderate ones such as nothing more than deporting illegals and bringing back manufacturing, to radical ones such as a variety of final solutions.

    In this kind of thinking, it is tempting to seek a permanent end to all conflict. Gas everyone darker and everyone to the left of me, and we’ll have our paradise. That temptation, as you noted about past anti-miscegenation laws and such, comes from having been burned once. But I intentionally avoided going there for a number of reasons, and I’ll state two: (1) the scope of the post is making America great again, nothing more and nothing less. And (2), I always have an unknowable “future conflict” in mind when engaged in this kind of writing. Post WWII, our civilization’s chief problem has been demographic degradation. But who knows what a future existential peril may be — for example some monstrous advances in trans-humanism and sterilization of all who wish to opt out?

    I wrote a post titled “What Have We Learned” last December, in which I grappled with ideas for securing a future for our nations in yet-unknown future struggles.

  9. PA…

    A Three Nation Solution provides answers to ALL the vexing issues…

    Separation versus annihilation/eradication…

    Desire for white Supremacy…

    Desire for radical autonomy (liberated cucksters)…

    Desire for a Southern Monopoly…

    And imperial ambitions all around…

    Plus… You need not leaves the Americas.

    [as far as territorial break-up goes, I am partial to the one as shown on the map from my May 19, 2016 blog entry. But yours has a strong appeal too — PA]

  10. “And those who came here after Hart-Celler and their descendants would go home.”

    So my wife, whose mom was born in Hong Kong and immigrated after 1965, would have to go back to Hong Kong, along with her mom and her sister? Would my children then have to back to Hong Kong too? No thank you, your plan is crazy.

    [By an absolute implementation of my proposal, I would have to leave, as would all of Donald Trump’s children except Tiffany. Notice that I wrote “details to be hammered out.” Take it as an opening to an unprincipled exception for my benefit, or as an acknowledgement that there would be priorities with regards who has to go because it might not be practical or necessary to evict absolutely everyone. Nonetheless, the question is “how to make America great again.” In my opinion, America cannot aspire to greatness if the aggregate effect of the past five decades of Asian (and other) immigration isn’t reversed and the pre-65 ethnic balance is not restored. — PA]

  11. “How the sun shines brighter and the sky is more blue when every face we see is like ours. ”
    This is why I love skiing. Put a few beers and steaks in the backpack, enjoy the beauty of the outdoors, and at the end of the day grab a picnic table to bath in the relaxing milieu of your co-ethnics. No subconscious stress of anticipating the inevitable dyscivic behavior of the other

  12. “America cannot aspire to greatness if…..the pre-65 ethnic balance is not restored. — PA]”

    That’s not absolutely necessary, which is good because it’s not very practically possible; if you restored ethnic proportions of the late ’80s—- coupled with a known, understood and thus respected policy of border enforcement and active repatriazation——- you would have a majority European majority and sobered and thus more patriotically directed NAM populace, though I prefer to think of such a minority as prudent and focused into and upon evident wisdom more than it being culturally coerced.

    When the various components of a pluralistic democracy are respected and the leadership class on down is focused and not ailing, the more foundational and pragmatic elements of that pluralism are accordingly that much more focused and self-directed as well.

  13. DN Poolside: I feel that way about camping. Loved that Russia twitter link you left yesterday, by the way.

    Nikcrit: setting the mark at the late 80s would certainly make America better than it is now. Curious though, why do you hypothetically concede reversing the effects of the past 30 years of immigration but not the preceding twenty years?

  14. As someone currently obliged to soon become an expatriate (profession related), I hope that I will ultimately return to an America stripped of Google(s), female cage-fighting, Walmart, and cafes stuffed with young’uns plunging their mortal gazes into the bleary, rectilinear religion of the Display Monitor. Make America Alive Again.

  15. “Curious though, why do you hypothetically concede reversing the effects of the past 30 years of immigration but not the preceding twenty years?”

    Just thinking what would be tolerable along the curve of what’s feasible; I of course don’t have some nuanced rule-of-thumb in mind, but i’d say a 80-20 W/B breakdown nationally is ok and workable for all involved.

  16. however, i do feel that i have never gotten a suitable answer to this among the alt-right political manifesto set: Why would globalist elites assist on race replacement when their economic imperatives can work in both racist and ‘raceless’ countries?

  17. Without looking it up, I don’t think Blacks ever cracked 15% of total U.S. population, even in colonial times. In our lifetimes I believe they peaked at 12% and have since been overtaken by Hispanics (mostly Mesoamerican Mestizo?).

    As to “why would globalist elites [insist] on race replacement,” there are volumes of literature on this, going back decades. In a nutshell, it’s not economics, it’s power. The theory goes that their goal is one-world government, and Christianity plus European nations pose the most formidable obstacle to the realization of this goal. Or as the quip goes, White men hang tyrants; muds stab each other over sneakers. An extension of this model makes any coherent nation that has its own morality and frameworks of in-group loyalty marked for destruction. Any wonder why I look forward to the whole lot of the globalist scumbags swinging from lampposts?

  18. “Or as the quip goes, White men hang tyrants; muds stab each other over sneakers.”

    Lol!! Yeah, I happen to know the etymology of that quip —– because i was in the conversation when YOU came up with it!

    Nope. Amusing, yeah, but no go, because the very global elites you lament are for the most part white, although many of the you-know-who higher-ups among them you don’t consider whites because they ain’t ‘goys.’

    And there aren’t volumes that address the question; there is a lot of smoke on the issue, and I contend that is because the reality of the situation is that globalism is a separate issue from race-replacement and pro-white racists would like to fold their pet-peeve into a more noble and nationalistic cause (anti-globalization). But the fact remains: globalism works in racist and anti-racist countries and either’s effect is negligible in terms of globalism, proper.

    [ok. you asked, you got your answer, you disagree with the answer. carry on as you like — PA]

  19. I hear ye; i’ve certainly asked that question many times in past threads; if you noticed I myself have not broached the subject in quite a while.

  20. “As someone currently obliged to soon become an expatriate (profession related), I hope that I will ultimately return to an America stripped of Google(s), female cage-fighting, Walmart, and cafes stuffed with young’uns plunging their mortal gazes into the bleary, rectilinear religion of the Display Monitor. Make America Alive Again.”

    IMHO, fat-ass chance of that happening; I see the impoverishment too —– but i just don’t see it going away, however much I’d like it to.

    I’m a bit surprised you’re so tuned into this; given your hints about your relatively young age, whatever era have you ever known that wasn ‘t a digital era?

  21. Well I think we could split the difference between nikcrit and PA and agree that the further up you go on the economic ladder, the less importance one places on kith and kin. So while the majority may not have a sinister intent in their dissolution of racial or ethnic bonds, it is the “globalist elites” who cause a great deal of social chaos downstream in their pursuit of material acquisition. That alone is good reason to oppose their agenda. At best, they are indifferent. At worst they are like George Soros, who has a very obvious axe to grind.

  22. if you restored ethnic proportions of the late ’80s—- coupled with a known, understood and thus respected policy of border enforcement and active repatriazation——- you would have a majority European majority and sobered and thus more patriotically directed NAM populace,

    Just curious how you would sell that vision to your liberal or cuckservative friends and family around the dinner table on Thanksgiving? 🙂

  23. ” how you would sell that vision to your liberal or cuckservative friends and family around the dinner table”

    Tell you the truth, I think many of my friends already agree with me and see things as I do; they just are behind-the-times in terms of the public branding, and think in a sort-of vaguely pop-assortative way that ‘liberal’ or ‘prog’ is ‘cool’ and that conservative is behind-the-times and stodgy; they just blindly accept a lib-vs-con dichotomy that is at least 15 years behind current times and that much worse for wearing.

    That’s really a big part of it IMO; conversely, I think a lot of alt-right ‘shit-lords’ or whatever the hip and current parlance, have seen the light and well-make their case, and are able to appreciate all people on their level and without deluded expectations, But they are afraid of brandishing their humanity because they too are locked into their dichotomous postures; I see evidence of that all the time.

  24. O.T.@PA,

    I know a former media-relations employee for a record label who’s now working as a publicist for HBO; she got put in charge of this series; (no reason to presume hard anything just because of the nationality involved, but i wondered if it just might pique your curiosity….. i know mtv too does a lot of nation-specific production and targeting.

    http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/hbo-europe-orders-new-drama-poland-continuing-push-originals-950416

  25. “I’m a bit surprised you’re so tuned into this; given your hints about your relatively young age…”

    Past forays into anarchist literature broadened my outlook. I have older friends that are something of cultural critics who have enlightened me about a more screenless society. Really have always had one foot out the door in this Digitropolis. Refurbish my generation’s raison d’être, and there will naturally be some Luddism flowing through their limbs. As a critic/journalist, it’s a damn shame that you seem intentionally estranged from any ‘unrooted future.’ Taking a step up and psychologically separating from the machine might really do wonders for your societal perspicacity.

  26. Well I think we could split the difference between nikcrit and PA and agree

    PA: Pre Hart-Cellar America: 90 % White

    nikcrit: 1980s America: ~ 80 %

    –> ( 90 + 80 ) / 2 = 85 % White

    All on board.

  27. Considering that Americans under 5 years old are less than 50 % White, we have a problem.

    What is the over / under, for the age at which half Americans are not white? 6, 7, 8, 9, 10? 12?

    Is that a blackpill or what. Considering that, one has to say that America’s goose is cooked. Even with Trump, those numbers mean that the demographic “transition” is sealed and done.

    *************

    Speaking of the demographic “transition”, the correct term has always been Replacement, from the French, The Great Replacement.

    It is often referred to as a “demographic transformation” but that is a mistake because transformation has positive connotations, as if we are becoming something new and improved. It is a Replacement.

    There have to be proactive measures. Incentives. Payments. Preferential treatment for core Americans.

    Most of those not white youths are in the cities, so they will be not will positioned if and when the economy descales into something more local.

  28. As a critic/journalist, it’s a damn shame that you seem intentionally estranged from any ‘unrooted future.’ Taking a step up and psychologically separating from the machine might really do wonders for your societal perspicacity.

    That is some constructive criticism, in my humble estimation. Trickin offers a lot of personal ‘suggestions’ to the players here, but right there is some for him.

    However, the suggestion begs the question, of why he is where he is.

    The very existence of many persons, is sprung from the conditions that the AR would work against.

  29. My mid-sized hometown in flyover country was once known statewide for the beautiful women it produced. Growing up you would see them at grocery stores, the gym, coffee shops, sporting events, at stoplights, church activities, everywhere. Everywhere you went you would see beautiful white women, young and old, across the socioeconomic spectrum. It was amazing.

    Today, in this boring town far from any ports or international air hubs, in all those same locations listed above, it is mud and slime from every corner of the planet, where they have absolutely no legitimate business being.

    Nowadays, running errands about town fills me with rage. I glare directly into the cowardly parasite eyes of the mudslimes, grown or juvenile, and make it clear that they are not welcome here.

    I want my fucking nation back.

    After Trump officially takes office, anyone still quivering like a little bitch about muh optics is loudly signaling that they are not leadership material and should just be kicked aside. All that matters now is waking and preparing, by any means necessary, as many whites as possible for the very ugly business that lies ahead.

    Dust Bowl Rabbit Drives

  30. — Considering that Americans under 5 years old are less than 50 % White, we have a problem.

    I wouldn’t even call that black pilling, as that’s a well-acknowledged fact. This is why, if you want to have an America, demographic restoration has to be implemented. People who strike race-blind postures (cuckservatives) posit that it’s nothing to worry about, that we’ll have everything we have now, just with more brown faces. They are wrong; what we’ll have if we allow this demographic trend to realize itself is a complete breakdown in civilization. It’s not even a matter of muh IQ — it’s also elementary things like trust and incentive. Part of why America was great was its core population’s civic investment. Nobody will give a fuck about investing in a place that looks, literally, like shit.

    America is too big to allow it to decline. If broken up or sufficiently degraded, it’d be too tempting a colonization target for rival powers. For that reason, there will (are) plenty of responsible parties who will take measures to reverse things.

    There has been too much pity-party conditioning in our education and mass culture, so there are the knee-jerk reaction to pity for that superficially assimilated Somalian woman who’s gonna be deported. That sort of pity-party is a luxury of residual illusion of the permanence of our past stability. The empathy quickly flips polarity in favor of our own people, with commensurate hate for anyone who would erode their future.

    The word/concept “Replacement” is a bit misleading, because this is not a case of one national group replacing another. It’s a case of polluting a previously stable and coherent whole with lots of disparate and mutually hostile explosive — and essentially parasitic — elements. The future is not an ever-browning steady state. It’s one of a series of other scenarios, among which is a hyperviolent reaction.

  31. I would also return to this paragraph in the original post:

    America is in a transitional period. What’s going on is neither stable nor permanent. If you’re not White, then you have no idea how much we hate this multikult dictatorship. How it feminizes our character, stunts our freedom-loving spirit, and how sour it feels, under current political dictates, to see one of you walking freely within two hundred yards of our home. How the sun shines brighter and the sky is more blue when every face we see is like ours.

    The cucks, in their head-in-the-sand posture, are not anticipating a change in how Whites themselves relate to America. For one, the era of the nice white person will end. Just like Communism failed because its economic theory rested on the premise of No Private Ownership, so will multikult because it too rests on a variant of No Private Ownership.

    Looking up at the quoted paragraph, you really have to be of full European descent to comprehend the fact that we have a visceral disgust with any social context in which brown faces are a feature of the landscape of our home and on an equal footing with us. Further, equality itself is an unstable proposition because that’s not how people behave; someone will always seek to assert supremacy. We can visit a brown country as tourists or colonists and quite enjoy ourselves but if our home is invaded, visceral responses kick in.

  32. “Looking up at the quoted paragraph, you really have to be of full European descent to comprehend the fact that we have a visceral disgust with any social context in which brown faces are a feature of the landscape of our home and on an equal footing with us.”

    You’re doing what any warring segment does: assuming everybody feels exactly the same as you. But not all whites are acclimated to an all-white environment; that likely does or does not hearken back to what one personally experienced coming up.

    I imagine lifelong native Spaniards sometimes feel most natural when around solely Spaniards; I imaging lifelong Americans feel most at home around the various Europeans that make up American population; I imagine Americans who grew up in mixed neighborhoods racially are most ‘at home’ in such an environ, and so forth……many Europeans grew up alienated to other Europeans; when America began, it was considered radical to have such a motley mix of Europeans sharing social space and capitol.

    You never consider one’s personal experience into your ‘white universalist’ declarations; I would add that you also never leave room for the ‘unknown X-factor’ that Euro-created technology and other innovative game-changer developments routinely bring about.

  33. If you’re not White, then you have no idea how much we hate this multikult dictatorship. How it feminizes our character, stunts our freedom-loving spirit, and how sour it feels, under current political dictates, to see one of you walking freely within two hundred yards of our home. How the sun shines brighter and the sky is more blue when every face we see is like ours.

    Beautifully put. They have no idea. They have no idea how much rage we feel when we see them making themselves at home, here, in our home. I’m so looking forward to sending the scum back.

  34. Nikcrit…

    Do you honestly believe any of the forces of anti-wS can put forth a persuasive argument against radical change? Lol!

    Come on man…

    You are now an absolutely arbitrary figure in the shadow of a “man’s” neat trick who nonetheless has himself as a very particular “halfrican Superman” amongst a loose collection of lone white wolves and scattered “white” sheep.

    Are you bouncing around here or just staticky detesting everything?

  35. ALL OF North America should be under the auspices of white Supremacy with The Land of white Supremacy recognizing a special singular sovereignty in The Southern Monopoly coupled with a joint contract to “restrain” The Liberated Cucklands in its “radical autonomy.”

  36. Thor,
    Once more, not at all sure what you’re getting at; I posted that article on Trump’s son-in-law, because i thought it was ominous and funny; it also shows more than a coincidental likelihood of certain common political-business alliances; it’s really beyond a joke, when you think about it. But what isn’t these days.

    Here are some choice passages of outrage —– if one cares to be outraged, that is:

    “Kushner denied that he personally pushed out the governor.

    “Six months ago, Gov. Christie and I decided this election was much bigger than any differences we may have had in the past, and we worked very well together,” he told Forbes in the only interview he has given about the campaign. “I was not behind pushing out him or his people.”

    Exactly how Christie’s downfall came about remains shrouded, but Kushner’s ability to achieve goals without leaving obvious signs fits his pattern.

    “There are a lot of personalities in politics that when you cross them, you know it immediately. Jared won’t show it,” said Orin Kramer, a hedge fund executive and Democratic fundraiser who met Kushner through New Jersey political circles. “But I wouldn’t cross him.”

    Kushner was only 24 when his father went to prison, but had already been groomed for the political and real estate worlds. Former U.S. Sen. Robert Torricelli (D-N.J.) remembers him as a middle school student tagging along with his father to meetings with elected officials.

    “He was interested and willing to come to meetings with people far older to talk about seemingly esoteric subjects like the economy or foreign policy,” Torricelli said.

    Kushner’s father also paved the way for him to attend Harvard, pledging $2.5 million in donations, according to “The Price of Admission,” a book by Daniel Golden about how the wealthy can buy their way into elite institutions. His favorite extracurricular activity, Kushner later told the New York Daily News, was buying and flipping apartment buildings nearby.

    He started making political contributions in his own name when he was 18. Since then, he’s donated $44,400 to New Jersey politicians and $135,450 to federal campaigns, according to reports filed with the government. With the exception of former New York Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani, almost all of the money went to Democrats, including New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker and Hillary Clinton.

    At an age when many are hunting for their first jobs, Kushner was entering the upper levels of New York society. He purchased the New York Observer, a Manhattan-based newspaper known for its elite readership, and a downtown office tower that became his company’s base of operations.

    “He looks young. But he doesn’t act young,” said Kathryn Wylde, president of the Partnership for New York City, a prestigious business group. “I’m double his age, and I take him very seriously.”

    Kushner married Ivanka Trump in 2009 — the ceremony was held at her father’s golf course in New Jersey — and they have three young children.

    “If Jared is going to call you in the morning, it won’t be before 9 or 10 o’clock, because he always has breakfast with his wife and kids,” said Williams, who advised former Republican candidate Ben Carson during the presidential primary.

    Despite overseeing the purchase and sale of billions of dollars in property over the last decade, Kushner is the kind of person who cleans up after meetings even when they’re not in his own office, said Asher Abehsera, a fellow real estate executive.

    “People get caught off balance,” he said. “That’s really how he is.”

    Kushner worked with Abehsera on transforming a series of Brooklyn buildings formerly owned by the Jehovah’s Witnesses into a campus for technology companies, including Etsy, the online marketplace for craft products.

    President-elect Donald Trump kisses his daughter Ivanka. Her husband, Jared, right, helped steer the winning campaign.
    President-elect Donald Trump kisses his daughter Ivanka. Her husband, Jared, right, helped steer the winning campaign. (Getty Images)
    His eye on the tech world would later serve Trump well. Despite turmoil within the campaign leadership — Trump cycled through a succession of top advisors before settling on a winning team — Kushner reportedly helped create the online fundraising and data analysis operations that helped achieve victory.

    He became known as a trusted, behind-the-scenes power broker.

    “I helped facilitate a lot of relationships that wouldn’t have happened otherwise,” Kushner told Forbes.

    One of Kushner’s only previous public comments about the campaign came in a column in his own newspaper. Although Trump has attracted support from white nationalists and anti-Semites, Kushner defended him against charges of prejudice.

    “The fact is that my father-in-law is an incredibly loving and tolerant person who has embraced my family and our Judaism since I began dating my wife,” Kushner wrote.

    It was yet another display of loyalty.

    No matter what, Williams said, “he watches his father-in-law’s back, like a hawk.””

  37. “You are now an absolutely arbitrary figure in the shadow of a “man’s” neat trick who nonetheless has himself as a very particular “halfrican Superman” amongst a loose collection of lone white wolves and scattered “white” sheep.”

    Thor, do you sincerely believe that I or anyone else here knows what that means?

    Let me ask you: what did you think of that professional resume of Kushner’s, as run down in that LA Times article; I think i recall being at some kind of fundraiser or promotional event in Chicago a few years ago in which Kushner and Booker were together and in attendance.

    What do you make of that resume? Curious what other regulars here too think about it. Cam? peterike?

  38. Nikcrit…

    I was referring to your pre-1965 angst versus your period 1980 preference and its total arbitrariness IN RELATION TO A DEMAND for radical change.

    In terms of radical change, you are the statist… The conservative. PA is much more radical BUTTJEW do not possess ANY PERSUASIVE ARGUMENTS against his greater desire for more radical change. You possess personal preference. And “feasibility” as pure cuck-clicking.

  39. Kushner is another Jewish ethnic driven by a desire for relative “supremacy” even as he would undoubtedly deny being a Jewish Supremacist and invariably denounce white Supremacy.

    Ergo, Kushner is a radical Jewish autonomist.

  40. Nikcrit…

    Could anyone here articulate your first principle? State your metaphysical truth? Define your core religious belief? Identify your race with certainty?

    No, no, no and no are my answers.

    Do you understand what I’m getting at?

  41. My race is black. That’s what consensual American realpolitik would say. So since I don’t particularly get offended by that designation, guess I would defer to that.

    What TD said

    Explain to me what TD said. Please…

  42. The 1965 definition of this team versus that late eighties acquiescence, was based entirely in practicality not in what I was personally feeling. Truth be told, I think an 80/20 split really would be ideal, given the historical contributions and concessions of the parties involved.

  43. ThorDaddy, your accusation presumes personal advocacy, not simple acknowledgement of my biological reality, which is the vein that I proposed my reply to you.

    That’s an understandable mistake on your part.

  44. @ Nikcrit,

    Weather it is 1965 or 1980… it does not matter which “ethnic balance” you want to go back to. All that matters is which “ethnic balance” will be realistically possible by 2020 or 2030.
    And by realistically I mean which steps are likely to be taken if there is political will.

    I find it funny but mostly sad that you seem not to realise that young people today will probably look fondly to a 50% america in the future. Most white americans are not founding stock. 3 million ILLEGAL aliens were eligible to vote in California ALONE. Stop fantasising about how white america would be ideally because it is imperative to make america just white enough so that it is *not* impossible for Trump to win in 2020.

    I like that you say that it is not outrageous for our shared idea to be implemented. Then why is it not? 2 months ago we were all fucked because there was a true possibility that america would never elect a Republican president again – at least that was what I thought. Trump was elected, do not assume something like this will happen in the future.

  45. @ Anonymous Bro,

    “I will repeat my position for a sort of soft segregation of white “safe spaces” (thanks SJWs!). I truly believe these would be the keystone towards political power and racial renaissance through non violent means.”

    Look how West Virginia is such a place. And how it is not.
    Whites need to dominate the cities. I know that there are white liberals and that they are more pro-eminent in the cities but it is as much true that american cities have become literally anti-american hot beds, if you equate american to the traditional white american *culture* or *ethnos*. They are truly anti american, that is what the democratic party is now, anti american… and I am shocked that no republican has had the balls to name it just like it is.

    Imagine if people, liberals and conservative alike, would think of the anti-american party in the same way they think about crooked Hillary…

    “Even if I support her… it’s true she’s kind of crooked”. A policy like this would be so easy to implement and it would be extremely effective.

    What great american city can be recognised as american?
    New York? Nope;
    Los Angeles? Nah;
    Chicago? Too many violent blacks too few normal americans…
    It’s probably Minneapolis. Think about it! If America had a natural capital nowadays it would probably be Minneapolis. Or Pittsburgh. Or Nashville…
    At least try to make Dallas great again!

    About blacks:
    Why do they behave like animals? Because they can and are legitimised and stimulated by the democratic party. They will rather destroy their neighbourhoods than being told what to do. Once the democratic influence on blacks vanishes and whites are willing to make them behave, to draw the line… they will simply comply or face the consequences.

    If white americans see law abiding and well behaved blacks as some kind of americans, then all is good. But I think it is an error if they see blacks as more americans than italians, or irish or, yes, most europeanised hispanics. White or white-ish hispanics have a similar outlook as americans. They are colonisers, new worlders, whatever… and can be Christians and have values. If they go to america it is because they see something of value in it. If they are more *relaxed* or *loose* its because the tropics can go to your head and bring out the most basic instincts of humanity; if they don’t attain the excellency that traditional america attained, its because their societies are not as ethnically clean and their ideals at independence were not as pure and clear.

    Be aware, I’m not talking about half black or half native “hispanics” here, nor do I mean those who are used to violence on a daily basis. I am not talking of meso-american peasants but more of Cuban upper middle class refugees.

  46. PA, various thoughts:

    “I prefer to avoid going on a tangent of policy regarding poor or unstable European countries”

    Fair enough.

    “Europe does not have the bodies to spare”

    Although true, it is wrong. Why? Because America has the ships to spare.
    America is the worlds greatest power, chiefly, military power. It has 100 million more white people than the largest European power, which is Russia. Do you really believe that what america wants is not imposed on European countries, by force if needed be?
    The United States of America is the greatest threat to European Nations. An anti white America with its military and nuclear capabilities is formidable, even if its soldiers are not that great.
    The fight for EUROPEAN Civilisation will be fought (is being fought, actually) in this post-European America of our times – even though Trump has allow us to breathe or something.

    Every single cancer to European Civilisation after WWII, in either side of the Atlantic (and in Brazil, Argentina or Australia), has spread out of the United States. The United States was a great country that is becoming a great cancer. Europeans must not be neutral to what is going on in America although we are forced by America to bow down to the satanic, anti-american ideology of the democratic party.

    You say the immigrants came to america at the detriment of the people. It is not the whole truth for the representatives of the people, weather republican or democratic, but mainly the later, have gone out of their way to repopulate america with their brown new electorate. I see them more as tools than agents. A good part of white americans see the peasantry of Guatemala as more American than flyover country.

    “this is no time to further dilute its culture, even if it’s with fellow-Europeans.”

    American culture is dead. Look at pop american culture, look at its elites. America nowadays is controlled by the democratic party culturally and intelectually. White it is submerged under Jews, Africans, Meso-American Indians, faggots, whores and cucks. It is impossible to dilute it further. Anything from North of the Mediterranean and West of Turkey can only regenerate it, if the vessels are not already degenerate, that is. But I like your attachment to the beaten culture of yesterday notwithstanding.

  47. Yeah, I find myself building up Minneapolis to when I come up with hypothetical leading cities. Yeah I do see the sadness in having to do that.

    Is it a great City? Yes.

    Is it a national leader? No

  48. Alphonso…

    The sexually degenerate “elite” did not originate in nor disperse from America. And all the self-annihilating ideologies bombarding the West find their genesis in Europe.

  49. Nikcrit..

    I didn’t accuse you of personal advocacy. I accused you of not personally advocatIng anything more particular than a general arbitrariness.

  50. Thor,

    Where did multiculturalism originated? Who has enforced it across Western Europe? Who bombed the Serbs because they were “attacking” precious moslem minorities? Who enforced the independence of Kosovo?
    Where did the idea of spreading democracy come from? Yes, especially to muslim countries?

    Honestly, I agree that the (((elite))) is not all american. What you cannot deny is that the traditional american elite allowed (((them))) to reach their current position and hegemony.

    I will try to illustrate my point:

    2000 something -> America creates a new moslem Nation in traditional Serbian lands, Albanian Kosovo.

    1990 something -> America goes to war against an European nation in order to protect moslem interests, it creates Bosnia a moslem minority but moslem ruled artificial country in Serbian and Croatian land.

    Fall of Communism -> America is the sole super power. It rapes or sets its (((rabid wolves))) to rape Russia. America keeps NATO as the Warsaw Pact desintegrates, it still does not end its military occupation of West Germany and still prevents Germany to have an army. It’s NATO moto is still to keep Americans in, Germans down and Russians out.

    1956 -> America re-brands European nationalisms as bad as it humiliates its allies France and Britain in the Suez crisis, standing with the third world against “colonialism”, European colonialism, that is.

    And let’s not forget the war with Spain and the Monroe doctrine that actually prevented European powers to engage with the Western Hemisphere properly.
    Let’s not forget how the America has always supported republics against European monarchy, how america supported the independence of Latin American countries and how it accepted the liberation of Jews, in Europe, after Napoleon. No one polices the world against anti-semitism as well as America, not even Israel.

    If the degenerate ideologies start in Europe – which is disputable – then they only get relevant after being supported by american muscle.

  51. Nikcrit asked: “What do you make of that resume [Jared Kushner’s]? Curious what other regulars here too think about it. Cam? peterike?”

    It’s not something I’ve thought about, but at a quick glance he seems like just another New York Jew (well, New Jersey) on the make. Polish Jews (his grandparents) arrive in America after the war, start a construction and real estate business. Father takes it to new heights (with a lot of illegality along the way; illegality of a very Jewish kind, playing the role of fixer). The kid, Jared, grows up wealthy. Etc. etc. A story that’s played out a thousand times in this area.

    But in the context of Trump there’s something important here. The Kushner clan, in addition to being religious Jews, seem also to be prole Jews. As people in construction and apartment management, believe me, they totally understand the nature of their non-white workers and clientele. They have no illusions about any of it. They know that ALL the non-whites — not just blacks, but Hispanics and Asians — will avoid paying rent as much as possible, will not take good care of a property, will complain about every stupid little thing, and so on. My guess is that at the family dinner table Jared heard PLENTY of “those damn sp***s” and similar talk from his father.

    In other words, while he’s smart and Harvard-bred enough to avoid making stupid comments, he’s pretty woke for a Jew. At any rate, he’s not some grievance studies professor or radical feminist or gay activisit or beholden to any of the many other culturally wrecking things Jews like to get up to.

    He also seems to have genuine affection and loyalty for his father-in-law.

    All that said, he’s also a Jew, so I’m sure he can be completely ruthless when he needs to be. But if he’s on Trump’s side, then good. It’s not the worst thing to have a savvy Jewish consigliere as long as he’s not going to try to soften Trump’s views.

  52. I lost my reasoning in a prior comment. I meant the following point(s):

    Whites need to dominate the cities. I know that there are white liberals and that they are more pro-eminent in the cities but it is as much true that american cities are rarely 75% white. There is usually a big non european influence in most major cities. That screws up things.

    If normal white americans are 60% Republican, then, and only if whites living in cities are as conservatives as normal white americans, which they are not, THEN, ONLY MORE THAN 15% NON WHITE AMERICANS MEANS THERE IS A DEMOGRAPHIC DEMOCRATIC MAJORITY!!!

    (Assuming non white americans vote overwhelmingly democratic => Imagine a city: 85% are white americans, of which, only 60% are Republicans => 60% of 85 = 51%.)

    I assume that any place less than 85% white means white voters will be severely affected by “others” as in order for the white majority to get its way, it will need 3 fifths rather than half the electorate.

    I also assume that any place below 75 or 74 percent white is hardly white anymore as major concessions will have to be made to a quarter of the population. European like civilisation and rule of law will only be granted to those who have enough money to isolate themselves and the white lower and middle class will suffer severe influence from “others”.

  53. Peterike –
    In other words he’s a perfidious rent seeking Jew but at least he’s OUR Shylock, right? My predicition: as Trumps Grima Wormtongue he will ensure at least 8 years of Middle East misadventures in the service of Israel and Federal Rerserve backed wealth transfers to Goldman Sachs. Paul Krugman can rest easy, his shekels are protected with Kushner whispering in Trump’s ear. On the bright side, Kushner is an observant Jew, which means he will most certainly align with Trumps kebab removal policy.

  54. Alphonso…

    Underneath all the vitriol is an ethnic “European” waging psychological war on white Supremacy.

    What did not originate in America was…

    Multicult
    Commie
    Fascist
    Socialist
    Racist
    Homo
    Dyke
    Jew
    Nigger
    Migger
    Jihadist
    Catholic
    Protestant
    Orthodox
    Ashkenazi…

    What DID ORIGINATE IN America is…

    white Supremacy.

    And the high IQ “white” male has failed spectacularly to author the above into the Narrative while slimultaneously refusing to rebut all redoubts to this unassailable truth.

  55. The Semitic races are, at bottom, matriarchies where steep collusion and deep paranoid delusion find coherency in radical sexual autonomy.

    Any healthy-minded white man can instantly grasp the necessity of expelling with extreme prejudice all advocacy AND implementation of radical sexual degeneracy under the guise of religious matriarchy.

  56. I want to extend kudos to Ryu for mentioning Cheech & Chong, regardless of however much irrelevant and bewildering was that mention.

    The thanks is for the hearty laugh i had over hearing ‘Earache My Eye!” again, a pleasure i’ve not indulged for at least ten years. Me and my high-school buds actually played that song at a few basement house-party gigs; i say it stands the test of time!

  57. Camlost….

    It does even IF you only possess a minuscule of jihadiphilia’s inking for the equality of white man’s “patriarchy” for Arab’s “fakriarchy.”

  58. “Ryu’s point was that we used to have cultural safeguards such as racist pop humor.”

    I didn’t glean that from his comment; even now I can’t say I agree because I don’t think there is a dearth of ethnic or ‘racist’ humor compared to ‘back then,’ which i believe was the mid-to-late 70s (that song and others by those two were already nostalgic suburban-party-hardy lore when i was in high school).

    I mean, to use a common reference that most everyone has seen and comprehends (a rare feat in today’s atomized niche entertainment market) take that Dave Chappelle skit in which he spoofs Rick James in all his ghettofabulous arrogance; Chappelle most certainly engages in extreme racial stereotypes; it would easily warrant the left’s caterwauls declaring ‘that’s racist! But at the same time, I think there’ s also a consensus that there’s some innoculation effect in the humor, and that it can serve as a catharsis for otherwise more problematic racial conflict and confrontation; i.e., while Chappelle’s skit may still be ‘controversial,’ we’re past a time where someone merely citing it could be heavily punished for doing as much, such as losing their job or being socially ostracized, etc.

    But enough academic deconstruction of cutting-edge NAM comedic cog-dis; rather, take in the literary artistry and majesty of this profound verse, an excerpt from ‘Earache”:

    “My momma talkin’ to me tryin’ to tell me how to live
    But I don’t listen to her ’cause my head is like a sieve
    My daddy, he disowned me ’cause I wear my sister’s clothes
    He caught me in the bathroom with a pair of pantyhose
    My basketball coach, he done kicked me off the team
    For wearin’ high heel sneakers and actin’ like a queen
    The world’s comin’ to an end, I don’t even care
    As long as I can have a limo and my orange hair
    And it don’t bother me if people think I’m funny
    ‘Cause I’m moving up the charts and making lots of money”

    Touche!

  59. Chappelle most certainly engages in extreme racial stereotypes; it would easily warrant the left’s caterwauls declaring ‘that’s racist!

    Blacks can say whatever they want about other blacks and it will never be called “racist.”

    The most accurate stereotyping of blacks you’ll ever see is by black comedians in standup comedy, try watching “Comic View” on BET sometime.

  60. Btw this whole election recount gambit is just more Soros and company shenanagins, the sole intent being to sow more chaos and division. Can someone just shove that disgusting grendelesque kikeleh in an oven already and be done with it?

  61. that Merkel piece Cam submitted is pretty amazing. I have to say: PA, Camlost and a few of the other regulars given more than others to ‘pundit-izing,’ y’all are going through a sweet spot in which your premonitions are really ringing true and sounding resonant rings with the hum of msm memes; you’re anticipating the zeitgeist to the point where certain phrases in msm are reminiscent of thoughts expressed here and other AR blogs in recent years.

  62. I believe she’s up for reelection so from that standpoint, feints toward deportations might be viewed cynically. Nonetheless, at least it’s a concession to reality on her party’s part. Nonetheless, all of them need to go home. Every last one of them. And that’s just for starters.

    There are still many Germans in jail, jobless, or fined for anti-immigration speech, kids raped, there was a story I read at the onset of the invasion about how some man carrying his three-month-old daughter was chased by the animals into a river in which she drowned.

    I see nothing less than a Ceausescu-style summary trial for Merkel, followed by an immediate capital punishment as justice. And that’s for starters

  63. Population numbers and percentages in the USA were not A-OK in every instance before 1965. The South didn’t have consistent white majorities until after 1970, when Northern Whites were able to start moving south in decent numbers due to the advent of air conditioning and the national interstate system, amongst other reasons. Here’s how the percentages look in 1865:

    http://www.civil-war.net/pages/1860_census.html

    At some points SC and Mississippi had populations were slaves/descendants outnumbered whites by as high as 3-to-1. This is another of the reasons that southern Whites have always had a more naturally activist outlook about racial relations, even though modern Southerners themselves don’t even realize it.

  64. I see nothing less that a Ceausescu-style summary trial for Merkel, followed by an immediate capital punishment as justice. And that’s for starters

    I’d love that, too but this generation of Germans is far too cautious and circumspect to do anything rash while they still have a stable and healthy economy.

    However, this clearly shows that Merkel is feeling the pressure from the Brexit, from Trump, from the intransingence of the small central/Eastern European states (Orban, Switzerland and Poland) and from the continued rise of the National Front in France. (Le Pen).

    And I think Poland’s new government is holding fast to their much-criticized decision to renege on an earlier promise to accept 10,000 refugees from Syria and Africa. I just googled that but it seems like no news recently means good news.

  65. — And I think Poland’s new government is holding fast to their much-criticized decision to renege on an earlier promise to accept 10,000 refugees from Syria and Africa.

    Poland’s previous ruling party (the pro-EU party named Civic Platform) made such promises and for that and other reasons, they were thrashed in the election of October 2015. They are best understood as a GOPe-style cuck party. They were replaced by the much more right wing Law and Justice party in that election, which supports Orban and whose incoming president immediately reneged on accepting the refuges.

  66. “I see nothing less than a Ceausescu-style summary trial for Merkel, followed by an immediate capital punishment as justice. And that’s for starters”

    Question: Was Cesauaesacu at all popular within the electorate in the year or so before he was sentenced and executed? If he was, is that common in eastern Europe to be electable but criminal in the eyes of your political opposition? In that link Cam posted, the Yahoo news one about Merkel’s about-face on accepting refugees, her quotes and the inferences by the reporter suggest that Merkel is capable of re-election still at this point. Is that feasible?

    And are you speaking hyperbolically or do you think Merkel is truly a candidate for tribunal sentencing and executing—- in the eyes of the general public and her authorities, if not your own eyes?

    I’m sincerely asking; i’m not up on eastern European political sentement, systems and social realpolitik; In fact, I get what i do know on those matters pretty much solely from you….lol.

  67. Ceausescu was a communist dictator over decades, the most brutal one in Europe outside of USSR-proper. As to Merkel, the turning of events on a dime to make charging her with treason or genocide and suitable punishment — is something I rationally believe to be within the bounds of reasonable possibility.

  68. I can’t believe there is serious consideration of making Romney Secretary of State; it seems like a lose-lose for the two: Romney personally insulted him at length and with mediated ceremony: he called him a ‘fraud’ and a ‘con artist’ and a ‘phony.’ That’ s not merely ‘refused to endorse his candidacy.”

    Being appionted would make Romney look like a shameless cuck, and would make Trump look stupid too. Things got too personal; i don’t see how the negative fallout that would come from that would alleviate or justify a move to ‘bring in traditional GOPs, which Romney supposedly represents.”

    Romney is not that experienced an overseas diplomat; he’s just another moneyed GOP who’s chasing the ghosts of his patrimony; he doesn’t care about anything, really, beyond that; certainly, he is not impassioned by foreign diplomacy.

    I cannot see Trump being that self-insulting.

    http://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-trump-kellyanne-conway-mitt-romney-cabinet-secretary-of-state/

  69. Ceausescu was a typical Iron Curtain dictator in that he had a liberal phase where he strayed away from Moscow, was popular and made his own policies toward the West. I don’t remember exactly what happened but they had a big starvation and food shortage issue and he wouldn’t accept aid. He was probably crazy and sadistic for his last 20 years, kinda like Kim Jong Il of North Korea.

  70. Romney is not that experienced an overseas diplomat; he’s just another moneyed GOP who’s chasing the ghosts of his patrimony; he doesn’t care about anything, really, beyond that; certainly, he is not impassioned by foreign diplomacy.

    Yawn.

    Yeah, our last President-SoS combo really cared about the USA and its citizens… and our State Dept couldn’t have been influenced by money at all despite Hillary enriching herself off the Clinton foundation and having to answer to foreign masters/donors/puppeteers like $$ Soros and Haim Saban on weekly conference calls.

    Having an anti-colonialist State Department is clearly the way to go, Trump should just leave it intact without making any changes.

  71. “Yeah, our last President-SoS combo really cared about the USA and its citizens…”

    Your reflexively bad-faith read is misleading you again: I wasn’t implying anything good about HRC or Romney, nor was I implying someone else would be ideal.

    Rather, I was implying that the supposed ‘good perception’ that would come with Romney being appointed was negligible at best; and any good ‘olive-branch’ effect it did convey would be offset and overwhelmed by the cynicism and ‘cuckness’ conveyed in Trump and Mitt forming a symbolic alliance; no can do when you make pageantry of your disdain for the eventual POTUS.

    I don’t like Romney; something personal there, so maybe it’s not rational. But I can’t believe that others here don’t see the particular seediness of a possible Trump-Romney patch-up; consider again the detail in which Romney put down Trump:

    http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/full-transcript-mitt-romneys-remarks-on-donald-trump-and-the-2016-race-220176

    Cam, you keep on insulting me in accord with some person who seems to be a fierce Democratic partisan; why do you do that?

  72. nikcrit,

    One of my relatives is married to a woman who is an immigrant from Romania. Her mother is one of the kindest people I’ve ever met.

    They are partially ethnic Hungarian, which is a group that particularly suffered under Nicolae Ceausescu’s reign. To understand how popular Ceausescu was among the general public one can view the pictures of he and Elena’s last moments of life.

    Decades of suppressed frustration and rage concluded with a national catharsis.

  73. Thor,

    honestly half of those things were in America when it was born. You seem to think that the greatest achievement of America is “white supremacy”.
    You live in a strange world. Look around. Where is the white supremacy? I do not know what happened but it has disappeared. That the United States today is a white country in any meaningful way, besides having a constantly declining white majority, is laughable.

    What you seem not to realise is that your precious white supremacy is probably a symptom of a disease rather than… the founding fathers may have been white supremacists but they never identified as such. Why? American made more sense, they did not need white supremacy… Them being American was the vessel to supremacy, not being white. (I’m saying American was then a concrete, not meaningless, “ethnos” inside white)

    It seems like you and white supremacists in general have lost that american heritage. But then again, which founding father would identify with Thor? What kind of Englishman or German would? Yeah…

    White supremacists have problems with their identity and their place in European civilisation. I don’t care about it. What I care is that Donald Trump has been elected and the alt right, instead of “cleaning the bush” is too busy throwing roman salutes, shouting hail this hail that, and, generally, is just happy because it can not understand

    1) That Trump is not alt right at all.
    2) That the problems that affected America under Obama have not gone away

    I am not against white supremacy, whatever that means. I just think that it must be substantiated. You have to first achieve supremacy to be a supremacist, otherwise it’s just another leftie feel good kumbaya. And yes, a matriarchal one.

  74. Btw this whole election recount gambit is just more Soros and company shenanagins, the sole intent being to sow more chaos and division. Can someone just shove that disgusting grendelesque kikeleh in an oven already and be done with it?

    That is my take on it as well.

    Repulsive behavior from Stein, makes everything she is associated with look like troublemakers — jews, the Green Party, the candidacy of an emotional woman.

    Somewhat relatedly, was Hillary’s bad form in not conceding on election night. Someone made the point of how disrespectful that was, to her supporters especially. That such a speech would serve as closure to their efforts and campaign.

  75. Cam, you keep on insulting me in accord with some person who seems to be a fierce Democratic partisan; why do you do that?

    No, I don’t insult you, just your ideas regarding Trump. Your screech factor is high regarding him, it’s unmanly and unbecoming of someone as intelligent and as “seasoned” as you are, lol. You’ve kinda cried wolf at every stage but he just keeps trucking along and the sky hasn’t fallen yet.

    And of course no one likes Romney.

  76. Somewhat relatedly, was Hillary’s bad form in not conceding on election night.

    She was stone drunk and on pain killers, some are saying she just passed out at some point. She surely threw some things and cussed out staffers.

    Yesterday Obama made some statements against a recount, that should be enough to get that movement shut down. Part of Jill Stein’s complaint is that there is possible Russian “hacking” of the diebold poll machines, even though they’re not connected to the World Wide Web – they’re only networked to each other, lol.

  77. “…the founding fathers may have been white supremacists but they never identified as such.”

    Jefferson was obsessed with picking up/preserving obscure American Indian languages. Many autodidacts among The Fathers. One’s interest and knowledge in other ways of life (not necessarily participation) will generally serve to reinforce your own. I’ve always thought that explicitly saying one is a “white supremacist” ad nauseum was rather miserly. Brings to mind the plebeian Black Panthers. It’s something which must be boldly substantiated, making the direct saying of it expressly superfluous. Leaving that to ballad-and-song is the classier, more ‘supreme’ route.

  78. “…the founding fathers may have been white supremacists but they never identified as such.”

    Exactly.

    And the country would’ve been way better off if they had been classical White Supremacists, it was Lincoln’s idea to keep repatriating blacks to Africa, but Southerners didn’t want repatriation as their business class needed the continued cheap labor and no one envisioned a time when blacks would be able to vote and experience full citizenship.

    Even the act of passing a “white America” policy (like Australia once had) would’ve been huge for today’s demographics. Our leaders have never even thought it necessary to make English our official language.

    When the Boers and English moved into South Africa most of their areas they traversed were quite empty of any Africans at all, they could’ve set up a Whites-only state and kept blacks away completely. But of course the Bantus followed them around in a rabble of riff raff zombies for access to menial jobs and the whites mans’ technology and manufactured goods and white planters were eager to have low-level laborers.

  79. “Yesterday Obama made some statements against a recount, that should be enough to get that movement shut down. Part of Jill Stein’s complaint is that there is possible Russian “hacking” of the diebold poll machines, even though they’re not connected to the World Wide Web – they’re only networked to each other, lol.”

    Fine with me. But if the parties and respective candidates were switched and everything else was the same —— including the 11th-hour about-face of the long-standing odds and predictions —— the GOP would be screaming ‘”voting fraud” all day and night. The right will always accuse Dems of ‘voter fraud’; while the left will always accuse GOPs of ‘voter suppresion.”

    Personally, I’m to the point where I think that whoever can pull off the technological fete of successful voter fraud, well, they SHOULD be anointed the winner.

  80. “I’ve always thought that explicitly saying one is a “white supremacist” ad nauseum was rather miserly. (…) It’s something which must be boldly substantiated, making the direct saying of it expressly superfluous..”

    Exactly my point; Couldn’t have put it better.

    As I said, I don’t know why Republicans/Conservatives do not have the balls to follow this reasoning:

    1) I’m an American Civic *Nationalist* or any other semi-cuck narrative;

    2) Therefore, I am going to preserve America.

    3) America happens to be a white majority country created by white people.

    4) Therefore, anyone who cheers and conspires to undermine the demographic majority of america or to bring in a new electorate *is* anti-american.

    5) I’ll fight those people.

    6) This could cement an eventual Great New Party after Trump as the de facto American party in the minds of conservatives and liberals alike. It would pierce the legitimacy of the democratic party to the core. And look, all normal (white) americans today know that the Republican party is the American party, they just don’t “feel” it, and thus they see them dems as legitimate in spite of its anti-americanism (which normal americans can see).

    This could also apply to the identity politics of the dem side generally as dividing america, contrasted with a united, kind of conservative majority white america.

    But for this it is extremely important to denounce how *degenerate* liberal americans and feminists are, denounce the Jews, denounce the strategy to bring in a new electorate in the cities, etc. (which the alt right has done rather successfully).

    But it also entails extending a hand for non whites who would not destroy such an america – I’m thinking of Ben Carson – so that they *do not fear genocide, poverty by decree* or any other such nonesense (by now) that they seem to fear.

    I think that more important than creating a white ethno state in America, it is to make it *NOT* impossible for Trump to win in 2020.
    Which the alt right seems to not understand, to my despair.

  81. Camlost,

    “And the country would’ve been way better off if they had been classical White Supremacists”

    I think they pretty much were. It was just not their main identity because it was so obvious. That was my point.

  82. I think they pretty much were. It was just not their main identity because it was so obvious. That was my point.

    But I’d think that classical White Supremacy also coincides with a desire for white separation, and our founding fathers surely didn’t believe in that, partly because they didn’t need to and partly for economic reasons.

  83. Camlost and a few of the other regulars given more than others to ‘pundit-izing,’ y’all are going through a sweet spot in which your premonitions are really ringing true and sounding resonant rings with the hum of msm memes; you’re anticipating the zeitgeist to the point where certain phrases in msm are reminiscent of thoughts expressed here and other AR blogs in recent years.

    Thanks, I’ve always been just a little bit ahead of the curve.

    In other news, the Ohio state terrorist was at one time featured in “Humans of Ohio State,” in which he said “I’m a Muslim, it’s not what the media portrays me to be.”

    http://thelantern.com/2016/11/from-the-archives-ohio-state-attacker-featured-in-humans-of-ohio-state/

    LOL. Oh, the SJW tears just keep flowing. How they nourish me with their salty goodness!

  84. I see nothing less than a Ceausescu-style summary trial for Merkel, followed by an immediate capital punishment as justice. And that’s for starters (PA)

    —-

    A televised summary execution of Frau Merkel is in order. Harsh, I know, but sometimes you need to set an example. I was thinking about this today as I made my way through the long slow moving airport security line. I’m old enough to remember air travel before 9/11, before the shoe and underwear bombs, before the pat downs, the trace chemical detector swabbings and 360 degree body scanners. Before the stench of paranoia and surveillance tainted every aspect of the experience. I remembered one time I was returning home from a trip last year just before Christmas, when someone in the airport breached security. Alarm sirens blared and corrugated security doors rolled down, locking arriving passengers in the terminal like trapped animals while their ground transport circled the airport for hours. Apparently the FBI had to be called in to clear the security threat, a senile old lady who went through a “do not enter” barrier.

    Today I set off the millimeter wave detector which required the TSA agent to pat me down, specifically my “groin region”, he tells me. He asked if I would like a private room for this experience, how considerate, but I declined because it seemed all the more creepy. So there I was, a white man traveling freely within my own country, spread eagle in front of a crowd of onlookers as a fucking sand nigger fondles my genitals. Yes that’s right, the TSA agent was a Mohammed, and who cares if he’s one of the “good ones”? The point is, I’m a suspect in my own lands because of people like him, and I’m so sick of this kabuki theater where we have to pretend Islam is a religion of peace, that ISIS has nothing to do with Islam, or that this an entirely normal state of affairs to live under a constant threat of terrorism, necessitating groin pat downs of old ladies on their way to Disney world with their grandkids.

    The entire western world is fucking sick of whining, ungrateful, entitled Muslims constantly bitching that they are misunderstood. No, most of us don’t care to parse the intricacies of the Koran and the Hadiths while their co-religionists suicide bomb their way to their 72 virgins. We accept living in a surveillance state because Muslims live in our countries. We accept having our genitals fondled in the airport security lines because of them. We accept weekly aloha snackbar stabbings and shootings because of them.

    As I was receiving my pat down today, I looked around and surveyed the people behind me as they moved through the phases of the techno-security apparatus. Some I made eye contact with. They had a sour look on their faces; maybe they were hoping to avoid the same fate, but mostly I could see the alienation from the soft horror of what our country has become. I wanted to shout to them “We don’t have to live like this!”

  85. MGE, one way to fuck with them is to say “what” repeatedly when they ask you questions. I always opt out of the scanner. No way do I trust it from the standpoint of health. I also once had an “Ahmed” screening me… in Copenhagen. He pulled my bottle of Tums from my carry-on and barked (yes, barked as opposed to asking me professionally) “what is this?” I drilled him with my eyes and hissed “stomach pills.”

  86. “The point is, I’m a suspect in my own lands because of people like him, and I’m so sick of this kabuki theater where we have to pretend Islam is a religion of peace, that ISIS has nothing to do with Islam, or that this an entirely normal state of affairs to live under a constant threat of terrorism, necessitating groin pat downs…..”

    Here’s my question re. the above scenario: hard as it may be, but putting polemical politics and allegiances aside, and from the purely tactical and practical ‘homeland security’ vantage point: would fully acknowledging that pure Islam and Muslim doctrine IS indeed a call to violence and serves to instigate other incendiary forms of behavior lead to more violence?

    I mean, for the moment, forget any national or ethnic sentiment or ‘side’ you incarnate and imagine your sole goal is to minimize terrorism casualties and attacks.

    Is it possible that ‘ignoring’ or ‘not clearly acknowledging’ or ‘tactically overlooking’ specifically violence-instigating doctrine in the Koran, is a method of containing acts of terrorism and the casualties they produce?

    I wonder if some of this stuff is done for a more practical realpolitik. Because I don’t see how, even in a liberal administration, lying or obfuscating the impetus for acts of religious terrorism is a noble goal — by ANY vainglorious or religiously sanctimonious reason —– yet that is how such geopolitical policy is often explained.

  87. “The new Miss Minnesota, hijab and all:”

    Well, you were a bit vague, or perhaps meant your statement in a “it will lead to this…” kind of way, but: for the record, that woman in the hajib DID NOT win the Ms. Minnesota contest, but merely was declared to be one of its contestants.

    And why shouldn’t she be? Cultural iconry and idomatic change is a constant; I mean, caucasian female beauty of a Scandinavian deference is entrenched and persists to this day—– but it’s not granted some axiomatic birthright in the aesthetical universe. No, it’s a deeply entreneched and I would say well-earned, umm, aesthetic hegemony that persists because people reflexively feel and respond to it, hence, it’s roots that highlight its well-deservedness.

    Yet Ms. Hijab has a legacy and aesthetical ascendancy going-on, too; let it play out and take her where it will. And trust that any rise she attains wasn’t just handed-over to her; her peers (those in the mid-American cultural depositories where such rank international ‘diversity’ is planted and cultivated, any iconic def she gets is reflexively earned and granted. Her charms alone done worked it!

    @PA, yeah she is somewhat ‘comely’ —– but she IS already ‘home.’

  88. And trust that any rise she attains wasn’t just handed-over to her; her peers (those in the mid-American cultural depositories where such rank international ‘diversity’ is planted and cultivated, any iconic def she gets is reflexively earned and granted. Her charms alone done worked it!

    Here you go again with your little issue with the “white female aesthetic.” Sometimes I think you’ve got a Barry Soetoro thing going on where you’re either trying to make up for lost time or assuage the guilt you felt for never finding black women attractive. But as Kanye would say, “lemme stop you right there.”

    8 of our last 23 Miss Americas have been black. If you don’t think that is clear AA going on (“handing-over,” in your words) then you’re more delusional than I imagined.

    And if this isn’t a clear case of AA then I don’t know what is:

  89. — but she IS already ‘home.’ (Nikcrit)

    And that takes us to something that’s more than 10,000 years old: war. This can’t be both her home and ours. Her cousin at OSU understood that.

  90. Asking us to share our home is asking a lot.

    And sharing our home without asking is an aggressive act.

    ***************

    Around here the native blacks don’t like the Somalis. And vise versa.

    And that is pretty much of a rule. Though i am not a teenager in high school in the city, and do not have an insider’s perspective on that question. One would think that eventually they would meld together — BUT HOWEVER, the continuing influx of East Africans keeps that group from assimilating in with native blacks.

  91. East African women are considered the best looking African women. They themselves certainly are of that opinion. Top ranks, in their estimation, go to Ethiopians and Somalis are more common. Many of them have very Caucasoid bone structure to their skulls and faces. This is well known.

    And as i have observed before, their females are open to pairing up with white locals. And further i have noticed that when they do that, the resultant family is brought into their kin group. As with the jews.

  92. One of my childhood friends ended up marrying a Somali.

    This guy i sort of kept in contact with but not really. His white levels were tops and his father was a born again Christian and frustrated athlete who pal’d with minor league players, and my friend could not live up to his father’s expectations on the ball field. Which from my perspective was odd, because he had 10x more talent (at sports) than i did, but suffered from some weird performance anxiety or failure complex. His dad was big into spanking, which is about as weird as it gets. The poor kid lived in terror of the belt.

    But yeah, so the Father Complex pushed him into another culture. That sounds like some cheesy psychology, but the reality is that is what happened. That is a good interpretation for how his life played out.

  93. Like all of us he was circumcised and that would have been part of the father to son frustration and abuse.

    A running joke among the neighborhood girls was that his dad looked like Tom Selleck. I learned later that he a serial “cheater”. Obsessive and compulsive sex behavior, looking for satisfaction that cannot be found.

  94. yeah she is somewhat ‘comely’ —– but she IS already ‘home.’

    That is the issue under contention: Whose home is this?

    Though the liberal mindset is that it belongs to everyone, and that since equalism is their first principle, the question of whose home, is not to be decided on a tribal or ethnic basis.

    Such a mindset runs contrary to history and observed reality.

    It is the mindset of wish-it-were-so.

    Many of dem liberals DO wish it were so, and some are insincere, but many of them really feel that way, and so there is no point in arguing about things, without that fundamental disagreement being addressed.

    Are we to acknowledge that humans have ethnic affinities and that social structures that do not account for ethnic affinities are going to fuck us up?

    But to many people (dem liberals), social structures that account for ethnic affinities are not to their liking because those social structures discriminate against them and their type!

    So what we have is people Of Race versus those who are not.

  95. “Sometimes I think you’ve got a Barry Soetoro thing going on where you’re either trying to make up for lost time or assuage the guilt you felt for never finding black women attractive.”

    Lol…Nothing I said warrants such a response ——which, by the way, is simply “a response” in this situation, but to anyone who has known your online persona for any time would find to be one of your top two or three blog commentary ‘set pieces.’

    I’ll leave it alone —- but here’s one p.c. reminder: Not every black American is either a compromised white-female-peddestalizing liberal Oreo or a room-temperature-I.Q. rabble-rouser, no matter how hard you try to ramrod them into one slot or the other.

    Besides, while I know it’s hard to ‘prove’ anything in a forum like this, I’d think my off-the-cuff blog-commentary dossier alone would be enough to refute your attempts to stereotype me. lol..

  96. “So what we have is people Of Race versus those who are not.”

    OK, I’d agree that that is where the stand-off actually ends up and is unbridged—- but i would contend that the liberal response is theoretically capable and at times DOES transcend the ‘racist or raceless’ dichotomy bind that your above observation consigns racial debaters to.

    Would you agree to that possibility?

  97. Nickrit…

    Neither (white) Supremacist nor Secular Separatist CAN DENY the racially-incarnated state of Man.

    Raceless is faceless and tasteless just as you’d expect to “see” at an Alien Space Fest.

  98. “Such a mindset runs contrary to history and observed reality.”

    See,this here point of yours gets to the heart of my dissent where modern race dialectic usually reaches a stand-off.

    I contend that this ‘equalism’ you speak of IS flawed if it’s presumed that said ‘equalism’ is defined in terms of parameters that are universal. They are not and I contend, without sanctimony, that it is a crisis of spirit and imagination that makes that miscomprehension prevail.

    To cut it short: it’s a lack of universal adherence to a top-down hierarchical evaluation and comparison of racial characteristic and ability; a merits-of-primitivism-vs-merits-of-industrialization mindset that is vertical instead of horizontal. And I’m not speaking of the sanctimony one presumes over the other —- but just the sheer lack of awareness of how that gamut of human compositional elements (intellection to core physical vitality) is often overlooked in its base necessity to human fulfillment, period).

    I somewhat immodestly say we all touched on this argument nicely, if coincidentally, in that “No” post PA filed last winter or so I believe.

  99. “Raceless is faceless and tasteless just as you’d expect to “see” at an Alien Space Fest.”

    I was making that very point —– that a thoughtful ‘liberal’ response doesn’t necessarily REQUIRE an ontological denial of ‘race’—— that it false to think ANY liberal message for racial harmony would require some kind of racial DENIAL of its very existence.

    Yet, you Thor go into hyper “anti-racist’ attack, before you even properly read the assertion being made.

    I’m slowly starting to realize just how hysterical and unprincipled you are in debating racial and sociological principle; your sophistry is a rhetoric of deceit. And the biggest joke of that is the fact that it is entirely unnecessary, as this is the one place of places in which your gut tribal racialism can run free and un-judged!

  100. Besides, while I know it’s hard to ‘prove’ anything in a forum like this, I’d think my off-the-cuff blog-commentary dossier alone would be enough to refute your attempts to stereotype me. lol..

    Au contraire… I just called you out for a small quirk you have with “aesthetics” and white women, even when looks isn’t the issue you have to bang your gavel and make sure that the whole panel stops in its tracks while you take the floor and declaim that the Nordic white look isn’t tops and then you stress that this isn’t just your opinion, it’s just fact.

    How you figure that is “stereotyping” you is beyond me, we’re all very well aware here that you’re not just a standard “The Grio” type of online black liberal commenter.

  101. “you’re not just a standard “The Grio” type of online black liberal commenter.”

    Ok, but i contend that ‘black commenters on The Grio is NOT STANDARD BLACK COMMENTARY in this country!!!!! LOLZZ!

  102. Nikcrit,
    Go see the story of the Baltimore teacher who broke his student’s jaw. Does he look like someone who should be working with children?

  103. Lol… Nikcrit… I don’t espouse a universal race/raceless “equalism” that you have disavowed to my sheer satisfaction.

    Your race is your father.

    A “raceless” society is ALIENS.

    You and I are in complete agreement on the anti-egalitarian nature of reality and our concordant, racially-incarnated selves.

  104. I personally don’t consider Nordic women the best in the looks department. Yes, they have a pretty hair and eye color, but many of them are masculine. I think they have a high percentage of lesbians.

  105. To be Of Race is to make the grade, and to be a part of the positive forces that contribute and participate in the health of one’s Race.

    It is not something that is necessarily felt consciously. Nor is it (necessarily) inspired but it is heroic. It is simply participating in the life and the health of one’s Race.

    In any population, there are going to be those who are part of its future and those who hinder that future. Having children or at least helping to support children is the typical expression of that, and participating in the maintenance and creation of culture also counts.

    I am suggesting that any one individual’s life, can be evaluated on this question: Of Race, FOR or AGAINST.

    Society and evolution must have an organizational principle because it is advantageous to that society. Race is that organizational principle.

    If you are not a part of your Race, you are necessarily against it.

    *********

    This is grandiose, but hey it’s the internet and it’s “free” — but the instinct Of Race is our consciousness of god. It is as close as we get, in this life. We perceive it as truth and beauty.

    Being Of Race is axiomatic, it is the first principle of our social organization, and the guiding light of evolution. It is not, however, a metaphysical resolution, and nor is it an adequate religion.

  106. “Go see the story of the Baltimore teacher who broke his student’s jaw. Does he look like someone who should be working with children?”

    Lara, I think i found the story you referred to upthread, but it wasn’t technically a teacher who broke the kid’s jaw; it was a teacher’s aide, who is different in that they don’t have full teacher power or discretion and the job doesn’t require teaching certiication or even a bachelor’s degree. It’s clear this particular aide wasn’t qualified or even adequately up for the task of dealing with temperamental kids. The ones who do it best are those who develop a natural and sincere indifference to the sort-of low-grade but constant hum of bad manners and juvenile pettiness and who don’t make it personal.

    In a way, i think i’m oddly very well-suited to dealing with that sort-of constant low-grade ghetto insolence day in and day out; it’s because i’m a bit eccentric in my focus and tend to look at that as a sociological experience and something to get personally offended by. I actually enjoy this social atmosphere more than i did enjoy the environment of my last gig, working with educated professionals who were often hard to impress upon or engage with because we were peers who were bored and consumed by petty competition over things we didn’t sincerely care about but were compelled toward nonetheless.

    The fact that I can impart something truly if relatively unique to them and their typical past experience; that there’s an element of teacher-to-mentor exchange inherent in any formal education environment is very compelling to me.

    All that is obviously something the aide who broke the kid’s jaw lacked; i’ve seen it with aides, who are often pretty prole-ish and simply not composed adults with social perspective graces. I mean, i recall special-ed kids with borderline retarded intelligence being able to goad and insult certain aides into getting competitive with such kids, in which the aide actually returns insults to the kid! They get wrapped up in the circumstance and don’t see how foolish their manipulation looks to an outsider.

    All that i suspect came in play re. the incident you mentioned didn’t surprise me; i see such tension all the time, though it’s rare to come to the point this incident did….No, the guy shouldn’t be working with impulsive and crude school kids.

  107. O.T.@Camlost,

    Hey dude; came across this updated wikipedia rundown on your second-favorite biracial pop music critic, and thought i’d post the schadenfreude-worthy segment that you’d enjoying learning about and perhaps even relish; hear ye go…..

    from Wiki: On March 19, 2005, Touré married Lebanese American novelist and pop culture commentator Rita Nakouzi.[51] Rev. Run from Run-DMC was the officiant and Nelson George served as the best man. Touré and his wife live in the Fort Greene neighborhood of Brooklyn, New York.[52] They have a son named Hendrix and a daughter named Fairuz.[51]……..National Review disclosed in 2015 that Touré has nearly $60,000 in tax liens due to unpaid New York state taxes.[53]

  108. “Go see the story of the Baltimore teacher who broke his student’s jaw. Does he look like someone who should be working with children?”

    Remember just last week when I was talking about what happens when blacks take over school districts? Their judgement is extremely poor, they never hold to standards, they will never say that a black male is not good enough, and they will put their faith in people like this?

    Baltimore school aide that broke the kid’s jaw:

    Chattanooga bus driver who screamed “do you wanna die” as he crashed negligently:

  109. What a fool. I’m not sure he should lose his job over that, but he should be forced to scrub it off the building.

  110. This man reminds me of the article in Esquire written by Stephen Marche titled, “Why We Hate Trump So Much?”. I think there is a certain type of man who really hates Donald Trump. I think they see an an undeserving alpha male getting wonderful things in life. Trump certainly has his faults, but I don’t find him despicable like they do.

  111. I’ve never hated apex alphas or sigmas. My inclination is to treat them as aspirational examples where our virtues or talents complement. The type I’ve always hated, without understanding it as such until recently, is a high functioning gamma with an alpha’s power. I’ve despised Bill Clinton from the moment I first heard of him in 1991.

  112. Judging by the bright ascot and his whole countenance, I doubt that particular guy is jealous of Trump’s female conquests.

    I’ve despised Bill Clinton from the moment I first heard of him in 1991.

    Then you had a kernel of alt-right sensibility that I wished I’d had then – I always liked Bill even though I felt mild dislike for his politics.

    But Bill Clinton is cunning and gifted far beyond most people’s understanding. He’s a very skilled manipulator and motivator. He truly is the father of modern liberalism in the USA, but always knew where to draw the line and stay mainstream – in contrast Obama and Hillary have now turned the party into a mass of quivering, oversensitive, campus-style leftists crying about feelings and perceived slights.

    I’m glad that Bill Clinton could only do 2 terms, he could’ve been the one to craft a sustainable, adult form of liberalism.

  113. “…ill-defined collection of internet-based radicals.”

    Sounds more like actual Nu Yorc Bayda Thymez to me. The animate vitality of this nascent movement cancels out the dickless dynamisms of such ingrate outlets. The Times is on its last leg; the public has discovered its lowly fairy tale nature ribboned in taut APA style. Basically calling The Don “another Adolf” before he even takes office. They are the ones exclusively in the service of the mini-screen. The paper will share the fate of long-gone oldtimer NY Atlas — promptly vanished, tail mawkishly b/w legs.

  114. The AR has defined itself a 100 times already. A thousand times.

    Did the new york gay times pay attention or not?

    *****************

    The act of defining principles of a political movement, is inherently contradictory, anyways.

    Politics is modification to the structuring of society, and society is not composed of principles, it is composed of people.

    So with that in mind, the AR can be defined as self-interested White people in their traditional lands.

  115. The principles that make up the new politics that the AR is working toward, is putting the interests of the people who make it up, first.

    Or to be cute: The principles is the Principals.

  116. “…ill-defined collection of internet-based radicals.”

    I am not going to bother with the article: the trickle-down media is not good faith; if that is an accurate quote from the article, it demonstrates that bad faith, because the AR is not ill-defined.

    I have defined it quickly and accurately:

    The AR is White people representing themselves as White people in their traditional homelands.

  117. That said, White people have a lot of work to do, in defining their own interests, and their own identity.

    There is a good thread on MPC about White Nationalism versus Civic Nationalism, where the criticism of WN is that, WN seems to not focus on the primary problem of our social structure, which is a lack of community.

    They call that scale, and it is not an esoteric idea nor a criticism confined to the fringes of the internet. Everyone from the gayest liberal to the most unhinged reactionary, is complaining about the lack of community.

    But the criticism on that thread, of WN and by extension the AR, is that the AR seems to be ok with globalism as long as there no niggers around nor chinks and steezers and dot-heads and camel-fuckers, serving as reminders.

    In my opinion, the problem is white people have failed to maintain “sovereignty” over their communities, but the flip side of that is that the leverage that scale provides is a competitive advantage. So in other words we suffer through this bitch and there is no solution.

  118. I wonder if we shouldn’t distinguish between two things: Alt-Right as a particular moment in history, and Alt-Right as political philosophy.

    When talking about the Alt-Right in terms of the former, then “The AR is White people representing themselves as White people in their traditional homelands” describes it well. As to Alt-Right being the latter, a political philosophy, then it just is, like mathematics. Its tenet are defined in Vox Popoli’s 16 POINTS and can be understood as non-aggressive nationalism.

  119. “…trickle-down media is not good faith”

    These aren’t Hemingways that would take a bullet for their byline. They are maids trained in grammatical prowess rather than courage/integrity. The real journalists are currently ostracized for their lack of functionality (or basic interest) in photoshop etc. Things are upside down across the board.

  120. Speaking of VP and NYT, Vox Day has amusingly referred to that newspaper as “Carlos Slim’s Blog.”

    — Then you had a kernel of alt-right sensibility that I wished I’d had then – I always liked Bill even though I felt mild dislike for his politics.

    May have been my anti-Communist background, if not something more instinctual. My formative contact with US politics was an admiration of Reagan and hate for Democrats because I saw them as anti-Western, socialist, and on the level that I understood it then, anti-White. I first heard of Bill Clinton in 1991; there were posters announcing his local visit and he was described as a Rhodes Scholar and a former anti-war activist. His face struck me as smarmy.

  121. The Alt-Right isn’t an exclusive club. Anyone can claim he or she is part of it, and say whatever they want. If the press wants to make the Alt Right look bad, it won’t be hard to do.

  122. The AR is White people representing themselves as White people in their traditional homelands.

    Well said.

    These flyers have been causing a stir when put up by groups at Purdue and Central Florida, to a predictable response from media and administration:

  123. “The best act of the marvellous genius of Greece was its first act; not in the statue or the Parthenon, but in the instinct which, at Thermopylæ, held Asia at bay, kept Asia out of Europe,—Asia with its antiquities and organic slavery,—from corrupting the hope and new morning of the West. The statue, the architecture, were the later and inferior creation of the same genius.”

    -Emerson, 1859

  124. America will never be great again until the ridiculous reverence for a completely diversified mercenary military is ramshackled into anti-existence.

  125. Philomathean: thanks!

    Thordaddy: similar can be said about you. For all of the consistent logic, rock-solid frame and the occasional brilliant phrase in your writing, it all rests on what to me is a mirage: your undefined premises of “white Supremacy” and “Perfection.” Maybe it’s my failure to take in to the finer points of your explanation but to me those phrases are either (a) intended to be synonymous with Christianity, in which case they are unnecessary neologisms, or (b) something else, in which case you have never properly defined the very basis of the philosophy you’re communicating.

  126. re. Thor: ” or (b) something else, in which case you have never properly defined the very basis of the philosophy you’re communicating.”

    perhaps it’s this quality, which i somewhat dread, because I feel I share it to a lesser degree: a propensity to waste otherwise a raw and good talent. One might say “Being 90% there but never quite arriving is a terrible thing to waste!”

    ———————————————————————————————————————

    Again, I say burnish thyself —– for when you’re time comes, a-plenty are ready to burnish it for ye…

  127. “Slim’s fake news blog.”

    Lol!! Yeah, that is really quite a low blow—– to profile and photograph the trailer-park adherent to the profiled cause. BUt i figured that was coming; it’s now a month into ‘post-election’ period; all the quick-hit news on the election has gone through a cycle or two and now it’s on to the alt-right ‘think pieces,’ or ‘the thumbsuckers,’ as those in the industry say; the long-form Sunday profiles or 5000-word monthly mag pieces where they can be more studied and artful in their caricaturizations. Still, i’m surprised in moments that it’s been as relatively fair as it’s been so far.

  128. This is another main feature in today’s nytimes; while not exactly a ‘companion piece’ to the alt-right profile, i get the strong feeling that this historically revisional assertion came up during that week’s ‘alt-right package’ editorial meeting;…lol!!

    Here’s my choice ‘pull-out’ quote for the hard-copy editions:

    “Through interviews and documents that hadn’t been carefully studied before, he unearthed new details about how soldiers of the Wehrmacht were regularly supplied with methamphetamine of a quality that would give Walter White of “Breaking Bad” pangs of envy. “

    Now that there is some inspired prose!

  129. PA….

    I’ve stated MANY, MANY TIMES that the white Supremacist is the true white Christian such that denial of the former is deconversion from the latter.

    Yet, it is also clear that mainstream “white Christianity” is a mass of self-annihilation per alt-rite critique and simple observation.

    “God is dead” in the mind of the dull mass.

    And Perfection is The Perfect Man, empirically-speaking.

    What EXACTLY is your confusion?

  130. OK, so why do you call it “white Supremacism” instead of Christianity? Also, why “Perfection” instead of “like Jesus”?

  131. Also: you take issue with people rejecting “white supremacism” in its standard usage, knowing that by distancing themselves from racial politics of a particular kind, they are not in any way commenting on their own religious positions.

  132. I’ve also stated time and again that the mass of high IQ “white” males who make for an alt-rite/leftist “divide” are EQUALLY SET AGAINST even the MERE CONCEPT of a perfect (white) man rendering this phony squabble a mutual mass of self-annihilating anti-wS.

  133. PA…

    The zeitgeist is against white Supremacy, UNDOUBTEDLY.

    The zeitgeist is FOR self-annihilating “white Christians.”

  134. Jesus Christ is the empirical perfection, i.e., The Perfect Man, REVEALING a metaphysical Perfection WHICH falsifies “universal equality.”

    Yet… Almost no one understands the implications of the above for white man.

  135. Equality = anti-(objective) Supremacy….

    Equality = anti-white Supremacy….

    Equality = anti-Perfection

    Equality = anti-(white) Perfection.

    Equality = No white man possessing a will to Perfection.

    Come on man, put it together?

  136. “Yet… Almost no one understands the implications of the above for white man.”

    Yet going by the universal masses, as flawed and as imperfect as they are, who do you feel THEY believe is The Perfect Man?

    Jesus Christ or, say, Carlos Slim?

    Yeah, it’s that bad….. Agreed,,,,, But then what?

  137. People who are threatened by white advocacy are going to find ways to pathlogize it. There possibly is some truth to what they are saying, but I have some skepticism. Because white advocacy is so unpopular, the people who openly advocate for it are likely to be outliers. I do think a more mainstream form of white advocacy is coming about. The election of Donald Trump attests to this. I personally would never refer to myself as a white nationalist. I would be socially ostracized. I also have some non white people in my life who I don’t want to alienate.

  138. Nickrit…

    Now “we” are back to who is the man with the most Capital?

    Carlos Slim?

    Or…

    The Perfect Man?

  139. Thor: “Jesus Christ is the empirical perfection, i.e., The Perfect Man, REVEALING a metaphysical Perfection WHICH falsifies “universal equality.””

    Ok, but you need to elaborate on this —— and i cannot help but be inclined to believe that you have not for rhetorically tactical reasons. First, of course, you are indirectly proferring a specifically and indisputably physical type in such an assertion, but you don’t elaborate. Nor do you layout specific intellectual qualities and other mental characteristics. Of course, once you do get more specific, the argument and other disputes will start and probably never end.

    So, given your quote above and its inherent (and I would clam intentional) vagueness, what more can you detail?

    If nothing more, then the above is a eminently empty and useless declaration.

    And you know that.

  140. I told you 5, 6-7 years ago….

    White male must choose “radical autonomy” or white Supremacy.

    He is immersed in the alt-rite now.

  141. Look, let me check the tone of my last comment to avoid some tired and overly familiar tangential debate.

    What I should’ve pointed out Thor’s declaration re. JC lacked is whether or not there were ASPIRATIONAL provisions avalable for one’s pursuit of perfection. And of course, we all know what the snag is there in re. to how obtainable are said ‘aspirational’ qualities.

  142. “White male must choose “radical autonomy” or white Supremacy.”

    There is a third rail; possibly many more than that. Why do you fear that fact?

  143. Alexander III of Macedon’s worldly execution/prowess; Christ’s cosmic audacity; Orpheus’ wizardry; Thomas Jefferson’s Stoic eclecticism. Le supreme White (sW).

  144. Nickrit…

    There is no gag or trick or sleight of tongue…

    You will your way to Perfection…

    Or you just concede to the idea that you possess no concept of Perfection.

    And now “we” are right back to the realization that high IQ “white” male has no concept of Perfection and in fact rejects The Perfect Man AS MERE CONCEPT.

  145. Pure logic dictates The Perfect Man as falsification of “universal equality,” ie., radical autonomy EVEN AS MERE CONCEPT.

  146. Thordaddy, I can’t say “I get it.” I’m with you on anti-egalitarianism and Christianity (and I strive to never contradict those principles) but the idiosyncratic vocabulary and — more importantly — the intrusion of this high-level theology into active threads that aren’t already in high-abstraction register, in a way that comes across as monomania and is written in unusual formula-like way, is the source of our past head-butting. It’s about communication.

    “What’s your plan for me” ought to become a meme.

    A list of supreme contemporary White men would be incomplete without André Rieu.

  147. PA…

    When you cross from “radical autonomy” to white Supremacy, your whole language must change to reflect this.

    You say “equality.” I say anti-(objective) Supremacy.

    You say “anti-racism.” I say anti-white Supremacy.

    You say “racism.” I say white Supremacy.

    You say “feminism.” I say devout dyke “nature.”

    You say “homosexual” is attracted to the same. I say homosexual is attracted to the EXACT SAME, i.e., the self.

    You launder in conspiracies of “Jewish supremacy.” I state that the Jew qua is anti-Supremacy.

    You say “white genocide.” I say “white self-annihilation.”

    You say alt-RIGHT. I say alt-RITE.

    You say capitalism can be destructive. I say YOUR CL AIM is you attempting to gain Capital by teaching anti-capitalism, i.e., socialism.

    You are still in the realm of radical autonomy.

  148. Edit:

    You launder in conspiracies of “Jewish supremacy.” I state that the Jew qua [Jew] is anti-[white] Supremacy.

  149. When you cross from “radical autonomy” to white Supremacy, your whole language must change to reflect this.

    Not being glib, but nobody beside you talks like this.

  150. The Jew-nigger-migger-homodyke-jihadist IS anti-white Supremacy.

    THERE IS NO DENYING THE ABOVE and then standing with even a shred of credibility, i.e. intangible Capital.

    That alt-writers WILL NOT EXPLICITY EMBRACE THE ABOVE FRAME is not just obvious, but ENTIRELY EXPLANATORY.

    And the explanation goes like this:

    Alt-rite is anti-white Supremacy.

  151. Not being glib, but nobody beside you talks like this. — PA

    Because there are literally no other genuine white Supremacists or white males desiring to be so…

    The desire is radical autonomy.

  152. PA…

    IF YOU KNOW THE ZEITGEIST to be anti-white Supremacy before and above all else…

    Why are you not a white Supremacist when you are an TRUE enemy of the zeitgeist?

  153. As I sit and write, sipping my Extreme Shock before a little workout and some bouncing afterwards, a white female from about twelve years ago pulls in front of me at the gym. Our very first encounter was her attempted employment of me into the porn business.

    Bro… I know radical autonomy.

  154. One time I was jogging the bay with a female friend and some black dude stopped us to ask if I would possibly model for his new underwear line. “Is that gay” as Kevin Hart might say?

    Bro… I know radical autonomy.

  155. This is psychological war and alt-writers pen ideological footsie into the Narrative.

    I aim to crush dead “spirits” with words of wound them.

  156. I aim to crush dead “spirits” with words of wound them.

    So where is your blog and twitter account to spread the word, man?

  157. So where is your blog and twitter account to spread the word, man? — PA

    This is like demanding I MINIMIZE my autonomy and pass right over the reality of disciples.

  158. Centralizing is deleterious to the autonomy of the individual ESPECIALLY when spreading seed is far more urgent.

  159. At some point someone has to be the real white Supremacist that the zeitgeist doesn’t touch.

    It might as well be me.

  160. Damn.

    “Our very first encounter was her attempted employment of me into the porn business.”

    T-daddy, have had similar experiences thereabouts myself. Also f*gs unhesitatingly offering “modeling contracts” on the spot at the gym. Basically I know where you’re coming from (apart from some of the dense quasi-metallurgical lexicon) on the subject of radical autonomy.

    I think you may underestimate the tech factor. When everything becomes a simulation of a simulation/parody of a parody, taking responsibility for one’s bona fide situation becomes not only difficult — but a societal infraction.

    Anyway, gin’s on me if our paths ever cross.

  161. There is a HBD argument for an IQ/environmental stimuli threshold whereas one above say IQ 140 not only loses all conception of Perfection, but FIXATES on self-annihilation in that void.

  162. EPG…

    Perhaps a cross poly-nation simply known as The Liberated Cucklands can be our mutual path to infinite repress and the maximization of our Individual radical autonomy?

  163. “Perhaps a cross poly-nation simply known as The Liberated Cucklands can be our mutual path to infinite repress and the maximization of our Individual radical autonomy?”

    What would The Christ say?

  164. EPG: “I think you may underestimate the tech factor. When everything becomes a simulation of a simulation/parody of a parody, taking responsibility for one’s bona fide situation becomes not only difficult — but a societal infraction.”

    Huh? Basically, the above quote of yours sounds like me talking to you about the insidiousness of high-tech and virtual-reality upon our day-to-day classical humanity. Yet there YOU typically accuse ME of overestimating e-Big Brother’s influence, no?

  165. “…overestimating e-Big Brother’s influence, no?”

    It’s there, for sure. I think I’m more optimistic about it as surmountable obstacle. Of course I’ve recognized a few positives in the laminated, abnormally-contagious void. It is what it is. That zen saying “leap and the net will appear” takes a new and splitting form. Stay focused on having more and more ‘skin in the game,’ and that void becomes an invisible stageprop for the playhouse rather than ubiquitous snare. May classicalism vanquish science fiction.

  166. https://eruditeknight.wordpress.com/2016/12/09/not-giving-a-fuck-allows-you-to-focus-on-what-matters/

    The simple fact is that if you give zero fuggs about broken white female, you care not for white female AT ALL… And this follows straight from the PUA/game/MGTOW axiom of “no good (white) women.”

    The Hegelian Dialectic is an EFFECT of the phenomenon known as dull (white) mass. The pathology is not in one’s keen awareness of the thesis/antithesis binary, but his “inexplicable” denial of a synthesis. This pathology is compounded when not only is a synthesis denied, but an obliviousness to the fact that where no synthesis exists, the thesis/antithesis binary IS FRAUD.

    Yet, none of that applies to the dull (white) mass. They are stuck in an endless chaos on the thesis/antithesis side of the equation LARGELY under the “intellectual” persuasion of those who diddle with “synthesis.”

    If you give zero fuggs…

    You give zero fuggs about BROKEN things…

    If all white females are no good, i.e., broken…

    You give zero fuggs about broken white females.

    Such as it is, you are alt-rite… Or rabid anti-white liberationist… Or just plain anti-white Supremacy.

    So the question is what is the synthesis between the white Supremacist and the self-annihilating “white” female?

    Game theory gives “us” few options.

  167. EPG: “It’s there, for sure. I think I’m more optimistic about it as surmountable obstacle.”

    OK, fair enough; but to your specific contention or just ‘observation’: I’m not so much enamored or intimidated by or overwhelmed or whatever with the in-the-moment POWER of digital tech and I.T.; what overwhelms theoretically is trying to gauge it’s ability to re-prioritize and fetishize and prioritize archived moments whose value once was measured greatly by how elusive or rare or marginalized its presence and availability —- but which are now available with a few keystrokes and a click; that is huge, daunting and as-yet hard to tightly quantify in terms of influence.

    Here’s a quick, gutbucket example of what I’m getting at —- one so base that it may even seem a bit ironic, but WTF: I recall in the late 80s/early 90s, right after high school, my friends and I occasionally frequenty this headshop/record-shop that featured a sort-of under-the-table box by the cash register that featured bootleg rock videos of taboo, illegally recorded, not-for-public-sale concerts and other pop events, etc.; anyhow, amongst this store’s secret illicit treasures were copies of the infamous ’72 Stones bootleg film chronicle of their tour of that year, “Cocksucker Blues,” and also a copy of the infamous Hendrix Band of Gypsys Fillmore-east shows, “Band of Gypsys.” At the time, they were selling these horribly fuzzed-out VHS tape versions of those movies and recordings for something like $20-$50 bucks, and they’d be gone in a matter of hours, this rock occultists’ gold; it didn’t matter that it was barely watchable or audible; it mattered that you got your hands on the forbidden goods……. well, to cut it short, put ten-to-fifteen years inbetween then and later and what do you have? Youtube, offering dozens of Hi-definition versions of that Hendrix album (now a legally produced recording for sale) and colorized HD versions of that Stones baachanall, and somewhere between its then-elusiveness to its current mega-availability, something is lost in one’s feeling about the artistic good itself: the plunder is besotten by glut; you literally almost CANNOTA care about it the way you once did; nowadays it’s too….. tangible!

    (One of the reasons i was so intrigued and humored upon coming across that obscure Cheech & Chong song spoof the other day is because it was something from my past that i was moved by but had all-but-forgotten about for almost 15 years —– but in this YT age, I could’ve accessed that tune at any moment during that time with a few clicks on the keyboard, but somehow I didn’t—- hence, my nostalgic charm upon seeing it again.

    But no so for many other once-cherised pop artifacts.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s