TNB

The Diversity Utopia hones our savvy for finding public spaces that are free of diversity. Parks especially, and there is one that is used mostly by the upper middle class families of the surrounding neighborhoods. One weekend afternoon while I’m there, heavy Dindu-rhythms thumping from the parking lot interrupt the peace. I look over and it’s a forty-something Black couple hanging around by their car, all of its doors opened. I give them what feels like an eternal fifteen seconds to kill the noise. Everybody at the park pretends to not hear this. Then I walk over to them.

(Note: sometimes doing this gets the petitioner stabbed or shot but another skill we develop is a keenness for appraising the worst-case scenarios in such confrontations and mine signaled “all clear.”)

So I approach the man and say: “Please turn that off.” He gives me that look and I hold the eye contact. He snarls something face-saving but reaches into the cab and turns the noise off. But it couldn’t just end there; his woman points at me and cranes her neck to her companion: “you gonna just listen to him?” I ignored her and walked away. The park was once again beautiful and full of life.

The title of the post: T stands for “typical” and B for “behavior.” I forgot what the N stands for. TNB is an acronym that radio personality Anthony Cumia popularized to call out the demeanor of entitlement accompanied by loud and rude behavior of many African-Americans.

Here is another example of TNB — one time I was driving through Baltimore…

OK, we can keep piling these on, but each anecdote comes to resemble the other and once you know the score, there is no need to swim in sewage to appreciate that it stinks.

***

Why do they do that?

The churlishness of a toddler in an adult’s body. Different temperaments than ours, different views on interpersonal obligation. An explosive mix of envy and inferiority complex. Non-enforcement of their misdemeanors as national policy. Their co-opted and thus ineffectual Talented-Tenth caste. Incitements to violence pumped out by the schools and the media. Whites’ placating behavior around them. Because they usually get away with it.

How do you deal with it?

First, don’t take unprovoked abuse from someone with sub-90 IQ personally. Accept it as a confrontation between non-equals. Hold a firm inner and outer frame and then do what needs to be done to to peacefully separate yourself from the stink.

Why am I writing about this?

Don’t step in dog shit — walk around it, as the saying goes. It’s a disreputable subject that diminishes whoever touches it. Like fist-fighting with a bum or debating politics with a girl. Yet dealing with this sordidness is a daily reality for a lot of people. We are at the end of the Obama terms and if our political class had its way, humiliating descent to third-world norms would be reality for all of us. So sometimes, keeping your hands clean isn’t a virtue.

Liberated Blacks are willing but unwitting pawns in Globalists’ multi-frontal attack on Western civilization. They have destroyed our cities and burned a twelve-year-old White boy to death with a blowtorch. And then there is this:

nj1

They promised us Sidney Poitier but gave us Michael Brown.

This is my warning to future readers, and it applies not just to Blacks but in extremely varying degrees to every population group in the world (including my own and yours, dear reader), when their members cross the natural boundaries that separate your community from theirs: the less you know them, the more you like them.

So, are they all like that?

From the comments:

I’ll tell you one demographic who DOES recognize these [anti-White] posturings for what they are and it’s encouraging: young poor black kids, especially males; during all those social-studies-class treatises on Ferguson, run by idealistic 25-year-old white females from rural Wisconsin, that i noted, the sole dissenters and those ridiculing the standard raycism attribution were those street-raised kids; they know in their bones what’s up and wherein lies the real threat and malice in this country. […]

Black proles are surprisingly tuned into the American realpolitik; it’s more the mediated feedback loop on races and among varying classes that sites like this take umbrage with.

Yeah, there are good people and perceptive people in every nation. But contact corrupts. Promises of equality even more so.

We live under a diabolical imperative of non-separation. The sixty-year-old system has jammed us up against each other to bring out the worst in everyone. That system has failed, it is unnatural, and nobody believes in its founding mythology. It needs to go.

Advertisements

229 thoughts on “TNB

  1. Good show, PA. The only people I’ve had to confront in this manner recently have been white and asian kids playing music at full volume and drinking in the streets. I swear, I don’t now why you goys still live on the East Coast, the South, and Midwest with their huge populations of hostile Africans.

  2. Here’s a different kind of example from two years ago; in-group but out-gender.

    First of all, we have a glimpse into why SWPLs love to signal that they adore public high speed train projects – even to the middle of nowhere California desert – but don’t actually like taking the bus (practically anywhere) or the metro (in some cities) very much. See also: Uber’s rise; enthusiasm for self-driving cars. The end of the video shows some of them politely and silently booking it out of there.

    But second of all, what explains the toddlerish abusive ‘High-T thuggette gurl gang’ behavior in the first place?

    Perhaps it’s possible that they were also emboldened by the expectation that even big young male athletes would be reluctant to strike back when, as in this case – an almost ideal circumstance of self-defense against thugettes, caught on video, with no apparent serious injury – the guy still spent four days in jail before charges were dropped.

    It’s almost like the state fills the psychological niche of the ‘Big Man’ in this woman’s mind, and is perceived as such an enormous man, one that everybody knows is so powerful, that no one would dare attempt to risk conflict with her, no matter how just, because (metaphorically, but real enough in psychological terms) Unstoppable Pimp Tyrone has her back and is going to come by and slap them even harder and then shackle them up.

  3. “It’s almost like the state fills the psychological niche of the ‘Big Man’ in this woman’s mind, and is perceived as such an enormous man, one that everybody knows is so powerful, that no one would dare attempt to risk conflict with her, no matter how just, because (metaphorically, but real enough in psychological terms) Unstoppable Pimp Tyrone has her back and is going to come by and slap them even harder and then shackle them up.”

    That’s because Government mandate is all that we’ve got in terms of ultimate existential security; that’s true for any racial or ethnic group that isn’t on top in a anthropologically hierarchical sense….thus: irritating to whites and cold but necessary comfort for us ‘muds.’ lol.

    That is also why the two major clashing races maintain separate ‘ultimate dreads’: for the white man, the ultimate ontological bane is “The Government”; for the black man, it is, of course, “Raycism.”

  4. I knew the video that Handle was referring to even with the broken link.

    The Dominican guy with the orangutan arms, hereby nominated! for the Hood of Good.

    It is funny how in the real world exceptional people have tells. In his case the angular face and superior height and (of course) the 80s cartoon-style superhero jacket — but those stupid hoodrat girls ignored the warnings.

    How did that play out. Was she ever convicted and if so of what?

    In a functional society that would be a felony conviction — see the evidence — and she would be made an example of, with at least a year in the Big House. In my perfect world, she would be summarily executed, but we can dream.

  5. “In my perfect world, she would be summarily executed, but we can dream.”

    That is emotional tough talk, and it is my opinion that people under, say 25, should be executed EXCEPT for heinous crimes involving torture and such.

    But that such behavior as hers, is not considered a serious crime. Black females on the public transit are the worst instigators. It is such a well known fact and cliche. See for example youtube. I could recollect stories of my own.

    They are the worst of the worst. The dynamics are that they are not kept in check — by anyone — and also that they are resentful because they know (that they are at the bottom of the hierarchy).

    So the sex-race subset that is the lowest in their social hierarchy is given the most leeway in their behavior. And white males (men), are the most constrained.

  6. Pingback: TNB | Reaction Times

  7. “The dynamics are that they are not kept in check — by anyone — and also that they are resentful because they know (that they are at the bottom of the hierarchy)……So the sex-race subset that is the lowest in their social hierarchy is given the most leeway in their behavior. And white males (men), are the most constrained.”

    Yes, I think that’s a realpolitik-paradigm that explains a lot of our American social here-and-now.

    In one sense, that makes practical sense and prevents a sort-of natural tyranny from manifesting itself, which would be to the benefit of a few but a detriment to most. But in another sense, it’s a untenable reality that will and perhaps already has created a past-deadline tipping point , in terms of cultural tolerance.Let’s just say it’s a fluid situation tha could flood at any second.

  8. The nigger is the most radically autonomous player on the playing field (IN SPITE of the black Supremacist and to the absolute chagrin of the wS)… And quite predictably, his frequency of final self-annihilation is the highest…

    BUTTJEW just NOOO….

    ALL THE NUMBERS ARE SKEWED DUE the ubiquitous stench that is “affirmative action…” WHICH ULTIMATELY means the nigger’s rate of rapid degeneration is HEAVILY MITIGATED AND RETARDED by an even more FANATICAL, yet less DENSELY frequent, self-annihilation of the “white” mass.

  9. The blurry line between “white genocide” and “white self-annihilation” iIS STILL drawn by the most intelligent whites.

  10. I have been reading PA surreptitiously for quite some time now (since summer)
    and I have come away with a flat-out admiration. As a consequence of this, I
    thought I would compare PA, who says he is of Polish-American nationality, with
    two of my favorite Polish authors, Joseph Conrad and Stanislaw Lem.

    Stanislaw Herman Lem was one of the world’s great science fiction authors. Born
    in a free Poland (1926), he was forcibly “converted” into Communist-living by the
    time he was in his twenties. Like PA, Lem therefore was an “alien” resident in his
    own society, and It was this alienness which he exploited to write his masterworks,
    particularly my own personal favorite of his, Solaris.

    PA, I believe, is on the verge of producing a lengthy masterwork of his own.
    By dint of practice, diligence, and acute intelligence, I have seen PA grow in
    emotional resonance, particularly since late summer. I applaud PA for his
    hard-won, hard-fought improvements, which take PA to the first forefront of
    Internet-based writers.

    Solaris — to allude vaguely without spoilers — is a fictional masterwork on a par
    with Dostoevsky and Victor Hugo, which delves into man’s nature with technology
    and nonhuman intelligence. It soars into metaphorical heights and relies heavily
    on allegory.

    PA — although quite able to delve fancifully — tends to share Lem’s midlevel
    approach to writing (i.e. “reach the reader by the gut, and then don’t overwhelm
    him”) but PA is more ornate — at times — and more BAROQUE. This baroqueness
    of PA’s is a product, I believe, of a labyrinthine mind that delves more deeply
    than did Lem’s. Both writers — Lem and PA — however, share a basic distrust
    for society, and — I would further venture — a DISAPPOINTMENT with their
    respective positions. Lem never advanced high in the communist hierarchy, and
    by the time his talent was recognized, he was too old to benefit. PA, by the exact
    same token, is unrecognized by the Americans around him, seeking the Net as
    a creative outlet for his passions.

    The other writer I would like to compare PA to — favorably — is Joseph Conrad.

    Conrad was a Polish national who settled in England and wrote at the fin
    de siècle
    during the conclusion of the Gilded Age, when robber barons
    ruled the roost.

    PA has written a number of surprisingly Conrad-esque pieces. In particular, I
    would like to single out PA’s works (particularly in January 2015-June 2015)
    where PA elegantly delves into the world of minorities with little near-vignettes
    that echo Conrad’s tight, economical prose and his remarkable fluidity with
    idiom.

    In conclusion, I would like to applaud PA’s thematic powers and use of
    motif. As a writer, PA’s powerful thoughts provide an example of WHAT TO DO,
    and should be emulated by other Internet writers.

    Yours truly,

    Sorcerygod

  11. “How did that play out. Was she ever convicted and if so of what?”

    I did a quick Google inquiry fromt the posted link; two or three in the queue said she entrred a no-contest plea to a scaled down misdemeanor assault charge, but i didn’t delve beyond that. You can probably guess the rest: either that was it or the conviction, charge and record was/will-be tossed once she completes some over-crowded, lamely staffed state-required ‘anger-management’ seminar. lol…

  12. — I don’t now why you goys still live on the East Coast, the South, and Midwest with their huge populations of hostile Africans. (Laguna Beach Fogey)

    I live in a state that always comes at the top of those “Best States for African-Americans” lists. (And at the bottom of 2nd Am. rights lists) . Federal government jobs. A fat black 90-IQ single mother with one or two kids, a giant minivan, and near-six-digit salary is commonplace here. We are ahead of the rest of the country in realizing the full Diversity Utopia, comrades.

    — what explains the toddlerish abusive ‘High-T thuggette gurl gang’ behavior in the first place? (Handle)

    I’d wager on matriarchy. (along with the standard HBD explanations)

    — The dynamics are that they are not kept in check — by anyone — and also that they are resentful because they know (that they are at the bottom of the hierarchy). (Suburban_elk)

    I wonder how much they are aware of or care about that. From what both Sailer and Nikcrit write, their self-esteem is sky-high and the males in their milieu dig them. I wonder if it’s matriarchy, not low rank, that makes them feral. PS: I agree with your point that nobody keeps them in check (an element of matriarchy).

    — In one sense, [the constrained White men, liberated Blacks/females paradigm] makes practical sense and prevents a sort-of natural tyranny from manifesting itself, which would be to the benefit of a few but a detriment to most. (Nikcrit)

    You do concede a moment later that this has gone too far but you’re in a Marxist frame. The inverse of current anti-White tyranny is not oppression of darker races or women, it’s liberty for everyone, above all for those who can handle liberty.

    — The blurry line between “white genocide” and “white self-annihilation” iIS STILL drawn by the most intelligent whites. (Thordaddy)

    It’s a distinction without a difference. A girl who was abducted into prostitution and forcibly hooked on heroin, who ends up willingly shooting up until she OD’s — is a murder victim, not a suicide.

  13. It’s a distinction without a difference. A girl who was abducted into prostitution and forcibly hooked on heroin, who ends up willingly shooting up until she OD’s — is a murder victim, not a suicide — PA

    Perhaps… But it still leaves open the question of who her actual murderer is?

    The kidnapper?

    Or, the white father that allowed her kidnapping?

    In the latter case is the perpetuation of self-annihilation HIDDEN by the crime of a kidnapper.

  14. Interesting point TD. How would you apply that father/kidnapper/girl metaphor to the original matter of anti-White race politics?

  15. The highest virtue in the black community is “not giving a fuck”. This is the standard by which black fitness is communicated to other blacks. It can be observed at the street level and in national politics, and can be seen to a lesser degree in whiggers who ape (heh) their lesser’s behavior. At its core it’s a rejection of Europeanism.

  16. “The highest virtue in the black community is “not giving a fuck”.”

    That’s a subjective statement; which has validity to you. But i’ve seen that claim negated historically and on a day-to-day basis in my current job. And the conviction I say as much with is as strong and subjective as your statement and its seeming conviction.

    Which begs the question: how in the world can we quantify and qualify these kind of assertions? I mean, you say it to your ‘home team’ fans here and then bask in the reification. But what is that worth in the case that you might someday be up for a challenge?

  17. — she entrred a no-contest plea to a scaled down misdemeanor assault charge, but i didn’t delve beyond that. You can probably guess the rest: either that was it or the conviction, charge and record was/will-be tossed once she completes some over-crowded, lamely staffed state-required ‘anger-management’ seminar. lol…

    Who was it that just recently wrote “Non-enforcement of their misdemeanors as national policy” …

  18. “Who was it that just recently wrote “Non-enforcement of their misdemeanors as national policy” …”

    Yes, I see the ‘on the ground’ evidence of that at all times: I would say that it’s ‘the system’ itself that is reductive and over-stressed, not necessarily a willful act of progs protecting ‘minos’ or however you would put it.. But then one could reasonably argue that the disproportionate crimm-justice presence of certain groups has something to do with WHY said system is over-stressed.

  19. — what explains the toddlerish abusive ‘High-T thuggette gurl gang’ behavior in the first place? (Handle)

    I’d wager on matriarchy. (along with the standard HBD explanations)

    This is fairly standard behavior for young blacks, they are absolutely obsessed with name brands and flashy consumer consumption. Clothing is a major point of contention – it’s the reason why so many majority black schools have been going to school uniforms over the past 20 years in an attempt to keep focus on learning.

    Other brand names that young blacks talk about in Hip Hop ad nauseam – Air Jordans (“J’s”), Courvoisier, Cristal, Breitling watches. After a while it gets sickening if you truly listen, and it’s never ending with blacks.

    The major reason that blacks are present in the Western Hemisphere is that they were very eager to trade each other to coastal slavers in return for European Consumer goods like rum, clothing, pistols, shiny beads, steel blades, etc.

  20. Conspicuous consumption is by no means limited to ghetto blacks. Wealthy white and Asian women are some of the worst offenders. Apparently in the upper crust, you haven’t truly “arrived” unless you have a Hermes Birkin bag. The cheaper ones start at $50,000 and some are in the 6 figure range — for a goddamn purse!!!

  21. Conspicuous consumption is by no means limited to ghetto blacks. Wealthy white and Asian women are some of the worst offenders.

    The point is that they can afford it, though. And it’s a much smaller percentage of those people who would indulge in such consumption, as opposed to blacks who overwhelmingly qualify for free lunch at school but overwhlemingly fixate on name brands and “shine” they can’t afford. And those Asian and white ladies wouldn’t be on a subway train causing a ruckus and making fun of someone for being out of urban fashion.

    Any other people that found themselves in the terrible economic position of blacks would understand that the answer to improve is to spend your money on buying “Hooked on Phonics” for your children, rather than FUBU jackets, expensive hair weaves and Nike Air.

    Not that long ago LotB had a thread on the hilarious NYC case of the fast food working, single mother in NYC who used her $2500 EITC rebate on a single expensive handbag at Barney’s. She was accosted by security who “racially profiled” her and assumed her debit card was stolen or a fraud, they had to settle out of court with her an others:

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/aug/11/barneys-racial-profiling-settlement

    The combined spending power of the 30 million blacks in this country rivals the $$ GDP of many small first-world countries. They have a values problem, not a “poverty” problem.

  22. At some though one realizes that the entire “debate” over typical nigger behavior is ITSELF a critical aspect of the vortex of “radical autonomy.”

    THe Nigger is the ARCHETYPE racial self-annihilator and all those “things” that intelligent whites can conceptually consider as utterly degenerate are empirically validated by the nigger AS A MATTER OF COURSE… This is why “it” is typical nigger behavior.

    SO NEVER LOSE VISION of the goal of anti-white Supremacy… Which is to keep “us” immersed in nigger.

    That’s the Trump card.

  23. Edit…

    At some [POINT] though one realizes that the entire “debate” over typical nigger behavior is ITSELF a critical aspect of the vortex of “radical autonomy.

  24. “And those Asian and white ladies wouldn’t be on a subway train causing a ruckus and making fun of someone for being out of urban fashion……….Any other people that found themselves in the terrible economic position of blacks would understand that the answer to improve is to spend your money on buying “Hooked on Phonics” for your children, rather than FUBU jackets, expensive hair weaves and Nike Air.”

    I agree. but I believe the reason why things are that way is because of other thoughts that prevail here and at similar blogs; blacks, particularly females, are at the ‘lower end of the hierarchy’ of desirability, or whatever mix of quantitative and qualitative measure. And I think that the sobering tonic of that uneasy truth is what compels them to seek value in the adornment to their physical shells, rather than work on the transformational worth of those shells.

    So, you’re right: it’d be wiser to go the ‘Hooked-on-Phonics’ route and many other forms of painful self-transformation instead of falling for the folderol of personal accompaniment. But then if we were all that wise we wouldn’t be so pennywise and pound foolish when it comes to personal foppishness—- y’know what I’m saying, nigga? lolz..

  25. “At some [POINT] though one realizes that the entire “debate” over typical nigger behavior is ITSELF a critical aspect of the vortex of “radical autonomy.”

    So, you’re saying that the mere fact that there is such a ‘debate’ is proof that we’re being distracted from the prize of ‘objective supremacism,’ as we cannot even conceive of ‘separation,’ evidenced by our immersion in what is (or is not) ‘ni**er behavior,” no?

  26. particularly females, are at the ‘lower end of the hierarchy’ of desirability, or whatever mix of quantitative and qualitative measure. And I think that the sobering tonic of that uneasy truth is what compels them to seek value in the adornment to their physical shells,

    Ummmmm, that doesn’t really jive with the reality of black women, who have overly high self-image and boundless confidence. I’ve had at least 4-5 skinny white female friends mention to mention to me that they admire and wish they could emulate the self-esteem and IDGAF boldness of black women.

    A black female who is a 6 on the black female scale will have way more confidence than the majority of white women who are a 9/10. Black women who are 50-80 pounds overweight will still wear tube tops, leopard print stretch pants and strappy sandals without the least bit of hesitation or shame about what might be sticking or hanging out in rolls like a pack of cold hot dogs.

    They don’t consider themselves to be at the bottom of any scale, they don’t perceive it that way at all. They’re the very definition of radical autonomy, lol.

  27. PA…

    “We” know all liberationist movements EXIST within the same vicious paradigm…

    Scream “genocide” TO COVER UP a perpetuating self-annihilation…

    The wS IS THE LAST HOLDOUT in this “Matrixs..”

  28. Nikcrit….

    Totalitarian Diversity FORCES “us” to talk about these things AT THE VERY REAL EXPENSE of not talking about regenerate things. This is just the cold, hard logic of an indiffering radical autonomist.

  29. — Totalitarian Diversity FORCES “us” to talk about these things AT THE VERY REAL EXPENSE of not talking about regenerate things.

    This is why I limited Twk. to one comment per day prior to his ban.

  30. “Ummmmm, that doesn’t really jive with the reality of black women, who have overly high self-image and boundless confidence. I’ve had at least 4-5 skinny white female friends mention to mention to me that they admire and wish they could emulate the self-esteem and IDGAF boldness of black women.”

    Don’t you look at that bluster and over-the-top IDGAF attitude as a front and defense for low self-esteem? I know that’s sort-of traditional ‘amateur psychologist’ perspective —– but when you see that manifestation in its rawest form, as I do from being in a high-school environment —– it’s very, very obvious that that is the element in play. I mean, i’ve seen the delved-into and darker side of that bluster, hashed out with high-school psychologists and sociologists and counselors and spec-ed teachers, etc., ad infinitum, and therein often one witnesses the behind-the-scenes breakdowns from those oh-so bold girls.

    I’ll tell you something: that is a real bitch; the pain that unattractive adolescent girls experience, whether through asymmetric features or hierarchically deemed, via race (being ‘dark skinneded’) and so forth; that was something I’d heard about but hadn’t experienced firsthand too often and it was a wakeup. And some of those hair-flying fist-fights among black girls that you and I had discussed in the past? They too were often instigated by some ‘light-skinneded bitch’ talking to her black boyfriend.

    Whatever. But I wouldn’t interpret bold and loud black female adolescent behavior as a sign of “boundless self-confidence.”

    Far from it.

  31. Well, I don’t know anything about pyschology’s “official” line on this, but that field is absolutely infused with diversity and identity politics, anyway.

    My belief is that the average black female isn’t good enough as an actress to be able to fake the self-esteem thing that well. That’s just more thinking that blacks are inscrutable and mysterious to all others but in reality they’re quite talkative and opinionated, and hence aren’t that hard to decipher IMO.

    Some research suggests that “low self esteem” is vastly overplayed as the cause of a wide spectrum of social ills in the USA:

    http://thegrio.com/2012/02/29/african-american-women-heavier-but-have-higher-self-esteem-than-white-counterparts/

  32. “Some research suggests that “low self esteem” is vastly overplayed as the cause of a wide spectrum of social ills in the USA:”

    Well, I’ve seen that bf bravado after a few layers of it’s been peeled off; and then there are suicides and suicide attempts that pretty much settle the debate…. No, there’s a lot of bf bluster involved.

    It’s NOT some tactical theory to excuse black dysfunction, as you seem to be implying. If you really believe bf proles are truly confident and don’t engage in ego-boosting bluster, well, ain’t much point in debating it.

  33. “My belief is that the average black female isn’t good enough as an actress to be able to fake the self-esteem thing that well. “M

    That’s my point; they don’t fake it very well. And their desperation is achingly and painfully obvious.

    You might reconsider this issue for some other time.

  34. Did anyone here believe some “niggers” weren’t “black female,” secularly-speaking?

    More of that “cuck privilege” stinking up the place.

  35. It’s suicidal for whites to spend any time “peeling” back the layers of “black female.” And. absolutely self-annihilating to a sovereign white individual’s very being.

  36. It’s suicidal for whites to spend any time “peeling” back the layers of “black female.”

    Yeah, lol who knows. Maybe all of those 180-pound Nell Carter-sized tubbies wearing tight spandex so blatantly and so proudly are actually all in an existential state of internal self-doubt and panic worthy of a Munch painting… but either way they need to have their fat asses wearing other clothing.

  37. Being at the bottom of the race-and-sex hierarchy is not incompatible with having high self-esteem.

    And besides there is more than one race-and-sex social hierarchy. Whose perspective is being considered?

    Black hoodrat girls know that real white men despise and look down upon them; but in the ghetto those same girls have more status than white men.

  38. Whether or not obnoxious black girls have high self esteem or are fronting, they know that white people don’t like them and don’t want them around.

    That is a bitter pill for anyone, and (as long as we are talking pop psychology) that experience of being rejected will often serve to solicit more of the offensive behavior from the ‘marginalized’ group.

    So you don’t like us? well then have some of this! (twerks her ass in your face)

  39. Being at the bottom of the race-and-sex hierarchy is not incompatible with having high self-esteem.

    Thank you. The voice of reason.

    Occam’s reason also tells us that unsmart, loud and un-conscientous people are likely to tell us exactly what’s on their mind and we don’t have to second guess anything to reach what they’re “really feeling” inside.

    It’s suicidal for whites to spend any time “peeling” back the layers labia of “black female.”

    Considering their insanely high STD rates, yes.

  40. The state of the “black female” being is intimately intertwined with the tolerance for her “black man” to defile the white man’s woman in the name of “liberation” from “white supremacy.”

    It used to be excused BUT NO MORE because “black man” is POST-liberation and “black female” knows this better than anyone else.

  41. “Whether or not obnoxious black girls have high self esteem or are fronting, they know that white people don’t like them and don’t want them around……That is a bitter pill for anyone, and (as long as we are talking pop psychology) that experience of being rejected will often serve to solicit more of the offensive behavior from the ‘marginalized’ group.”

    Yes, and btw, that was the main point i was making in that particular comment and instance. And re. elk’s other comment, yes, perspectives on this issue vary, fer sure:

    To wit: Thor, invariably viewed my point as some sort of clandestine way to allot (even) more radically autonomy to some ever-slippery ‘black collective,’ while Cam was sure to make it ever-adamantly clear that black chicks will NEVER be the most choice and popular Adam&Eve catalog lingerie models, so why don’t they stop putting their ‘fat asses’ out there for negative perusal already, eh? I mean, they ain’t ever gonna be looking as fine as Giselle, right?

    And no doubt that is true, given the priority to those particular perspectives.

  42. “Occam’s reason also tells us that unsmart, loud and un-conscientous people are likely to tell us exactly what’s on their mind and we don’t have to second guess anything to reach what they’re “really feeling” inside.”

    That’s true —— until, in the realm of this particular example and overall topic, one is privvy to those after-the-fact sessions with the student and schoool shrinks and sociologists and other staff etc.

    The anguished cries and actings out by the students themselves are convincing too —- as are the disproportionate suicide rates of those with such troubled psychological records.

    But the point in our discussions is that your and other perspectives can be maintained too! Relax: no one’s saying that they’re deserving of sympathy or that one can objectively say that they’re deserving of the kid of pop-cult status that is sought by their bluster.

  43. “Being at the bottom of the race-and-sex hierarchy is not incompatible with having high self-esteem.”

    I would argue against this contention: I think it’s not incompatible with bluster in the guise of ‘high self-esteem.’

    But I;’m pretty sure that, given how racial and sexual hierarchies are meta in their effect, those at the bottom are aware of it and it DOES affect their self-esteem —— all of which may (and does, IMO) turn up the bluster level…..

    Maybe the point is: to the indifferent and unsympathetic bystander, it doesn’t matter if its ‘true self-esteem’ or hysterically tweaked bluster level, as the annoying effect to the bystander would be one and the same, no?

  44. — They too were often instigated by some ‘light-skinneded bitch’ talking to her black boyfriend // that experience of being rejected will often serve to solicit more of the offensive behavior from the ‘marginalized’ group.

    That’s one of the things I meant by: “But contact corrupts. Promises of equality even more so.” For all those charcoal-black, bubblefaced bright-smiled girls in Africa, none of those things are part of their consciousness. As Trainspotter used to say, “separation is the only solution.”

    For anyone who once had idealistic dreams of togetherness (all liberals fit that description), they learn, along with everyone else, that life teaches us that vague lofty dreams are insubstantial, and they were always fool’s gold.

  45. That example of mine didnt imply that the figurative “light skinneded bitch” approximated a white female. In fact, the spectrum trends duskier when assesding BM SMV. ….. To wit: Idris Elba & Madonna. Lol!!

  46. I know. I’ve heard of the “colorism” intra-Black thing. In a more neutral way, I heard Black guys in the Army call them “bright” rather than light-skinned.

  47. Thor,

    a bit more about that nytimes.com story i linked to the other day and asked you to comment on, (the one that noted an artist on the night of Obama’s being elected prez for the first time had the patrons of a Brooklyn bar strip and pose en masse, i checked out the other a bit. First: the name, Kaitlyn Greenidge, i took that as pun-like pseudonym. I also learned that she wrote a fairly lauded book…..sort-of interesting weird; she gives off a vibe that seems knowing of both sides of the polemics she teases with….etc.

    PA,

    I listened again and more closely to that Michael Moore link on Trump and Michigan voters that you posted and commented on. It is striking; i wonder if there really is going to be a huge, secretly moved rampage of disaffected voters; and you’re right, it’s hard to interpret Moore’s tone, though i haven’t checked deeply and i’m guessing his convictions for the election are on the record somewhere within the ‘net….

    that is a weird link; what is it though? a segment of some doc he did? An ad? a NPR teaser? It’s sort-of vague; that or i haven’t done cursory due-dill yet….

  48. Nikcrit…

    If you ever bothered to look into Mark Richardson’s “autonomy theory” of “Liberalism” then you would get a better grasp of my advances to his theory which placed “self-annihilation” primary to “self-creation” thus manifesting “radical autonomy” theory… That in the liberationist cycle of self-annihilation/self-creation, it is the destruction of the last static self-creation that PROVES one’s “radical autonomy.” Thus, the creation of a new Self IS MERELY THE PRETEXT to then destroy this new created Self as evidence of one’s radical autonomy and desire for Final Liberation.

  49. That video was strange in its disconnect between the straightforward impassioned monologue and the wierd slow-motion visuals.

  50. while Cam was sure to make it ever-adamantly clear that black chicks will NEVER be the most choice and popular Adam&Eve catalog lingerie models, so why don’t they stop putting their ‘fat asses’ out there for negative perusal already, eh? I mean, they ain’t ever gonna be looking as fine as Giselle, right?

    Right, but that’s just my personal opinion, and there’s no disputing taste. Now that we are rooting out “Eurocentric” expectations and standards all across the board in this country, maybe (formerly blackballed) African American women will rise up and carry Madison Avenue modeling to an all-time high in revenue and sublime achievement.

    And I know you brothers like ’em with a little more meat on the bones, and I’m okay with that. lol. Obsidian himself is an unabashedly proud Chubby Chaser, and that’s just fine with me.

  51. — Now that we are rooting out “Eurocentric” expectations and standards all across the board in this country

    Ties in with corruption of language. Words like “beautiful” are only used to describe Downs or biracial children, and after Michelle, the word has become ruined for a genuinely beautiful First Lady such as Melania.

  52. — [black girls] know that white people don’t like them and don’t want them around.

    This sounds cruel to even articulate, until one recalls that nobody wants the Other around. Even on my best behavior, I wouldn’t be wanted at a Black church or a Korean martial arts club, except as a virtue-signaling token for a few individuals there. In other words, my presence there would be a vanity-enabling function. Yet in other words, I would be an instrument of sin. Or to put it yet differently, contact corrupts.

    Of course, I don’t have any impulse to go where I’m not wanted, nor does my ego require validation by the Other.

    Halloween trick-or-treating is an ancient European pagan custom that others deign to appropriate. It’s a joy to give treats to the White kids who come up to your door, but unpleasant when non-White or brown/ foreign ones come up.

    Today is also All Saints Day, on which I had a short post last year.

  53. “So I approach the man and say: “Please turn that off.” He gives me that look and I hold the eye contact. He snarls something face-saving but reaches into the cab and turns the noise off.”

    I meant to note this for some time but keep forgetting to formally ask: RE. the passage above and several similar ones over the years, I would gather that you never had a ‘rap phase’ in terms of your pop-music history, did you? Even in your wide-eyed, pre-red-pill youth? (fyi: i’m just curious; promise this isn’t a set-up or some other kind of trap! 🙂 )

  54. No, I never had a rap phase. I would have been a bit too old for that cohort to have gone thru the phase, having turned 20 at the very very end of the 80s. I was indifferent to pop-rap of the 80s, like DJ Jazzy Jeff, Tone Loc, or Run DMC, or maybe liked it in small doses as a novelty. Had no interest at all in 1992’s gangsta rap.

  55. “Right, but that’s just my personal opinion, and there’s no disputing taste.”

    Agreed. But MY point was you raised that as an issue, as is your wont, when it had nothing to do with what we were discussing (whether black ghetto-girl insolence was bloated-self-esteemed arrogance or ego-compensatory bluster); you ignored that stated premise entirely and instead went into your usual set-piece describing how you and others find black female form and eroticism aesthetically distasteful…

    ” nobody wants the Other around. Even on my best behavior, I wouldn’t be wanted at a Black church or a Korean martial arts club, except as a virtue-signaling token for a few individuals there. In other words, my presence there would be a vanity-enabling function. “

    True….for you! Many-upon-many people are biologically of multiple races and ethnicities, yet feel comfortable at a ‘black church’ (I’m one of ’em, and, btw: ‘black people’ in America are almost code for a racially and ethnically amalgamated designation of people). I don’t mean to keep bringing this up, but I insist that you have to make a distinction between ‘mono-racial and mono-cultural people from day-one,” like yourself and “multi-racial and multi-ethnic with varied formative experiences” before you can bandy about terms like ‘would fit in’ or ‘wouldn’t fit in’ or ‘would be comfortable’ or ‘wouldn’t be comfortable.’

    I get the feeling you take that as browbeating, but it’s not; it’s an important distinction that you routinely ignore. And I’m guessing that even your co-proudly racist blog bud Camlost here makes the distinction I speak of while you don’t, merely because he’s seen said amalgamation from growing up in the “one-drop-rule” American south.

  56. — Many-upon-many people are biologically of multiple races and ethnicities

    Monoracial and monoethnic people outnumber them, and they are more cohesive by order of magnitude.

    — True….for you!

    For anyone who can tell the difference between a guest and a parasite, and between communal vs open public space.

  57. Ties in with corruption of language. Words like “beautiful” are only used to describe Downs or biracial children, and after Michelle, the word has become ruined for a genuinely beautiful First Lady such as Melania.

    Unnecessary plastic surgery to the face, as Melania looks to have had, is ALWAYS mistake, and frankly it is a mark against anyone, and those in her intimate circle who were unable to talk her out of it.

    It is sad. Why did a beautiful woman have her REAL and NATURAL face surgically altered.

  58. Chelsea Clinton has been suggested as having had work done on her nose and chin.

    Obamas’ daughter Malia is the textbook example of what would charitably be called handsome, if that usage is going to be extended across racial lines.

    She has a healthy look, but that jaw and the length of her face. Horse girl, they call her down in the pens.

    ************

    A recent commenter elsewhere suggested of Chelsea Clinton and her children that very few pics exist of them together with Hillary because Chelsea might have a soul and be worried about exposing them to Satan.

    Interesting; conjoined with Trump’s “respect” for Chelsea, maybe she will ‘get away.’

  59. a distinction between ‘mono-racial and mono-cultural people from day-one,” like yourself and “multi-racial and multi-ethnic with varied formative experiences” before you can bandy about terms like ‘would fit in’ or ‘wouldn’t fit in’ or ‘would be comfortable’ or ‘wouldn’t be comfortable.’

    Such a distinction is a given.

    As i said recently in another comment: To be Of Race, is to be opposed to those who are not (of race). That is axiomatic and tautological and definitional.

    To insist on that distinction is to make the essential point, that these groups are, when in the same time and place, opposed and in conflict.

  60. @et.al,

    I was going to say that I didn’t find Melania to be some obvious positive-in-contrast ‘beauty” to me, she looks frozen and unanimated. She looks cold and indifferent, which is probably an extant residual quality from her mercenary marriage…. I refrained because it would’ve been interpreted as mere retort to the commen and then-recent insults to Michelle Obama, and because I don’t like to offer subjective opinions of female beauty in most of these blog discussions.

    I understand that Scandinavian and certain Eastern European women are widely considered the ‘cream of European female aesthetic’ or whatever laudatory language you like, but here in the Upper Midwest, with the excess of Scandos, her distinctiveness is less spectacular; striking women are common ’round these here parts…

  61. Melania is 46 and I’ve never seen her morning face but she’s a sublime vision in ceremonial appearances. I freely call that beautiful.

  62. “…..that these groups are, when in the same time and place, opposed and in conflict……” —— from the perspective of a monoracial analysis of said multiracial variable.

    I don’t accept your premise of ‘of race’ or ‘not of race,’ just as I don’t except the false “racist or raceless” paradigm that what we call here “anti-racists’ demand-or-brand of the populace.

    The irony is your race-or-raceless insistence is similar to the bullying tactics of the contemporary anti-racist.

  63. Sorry in advance to repeat myself, but the effects of plastic surgery on a person’s face, are never good.

    The expressions on a face are very subtle, and a face’s expressions are limited once they are surgically altered. This seems to me somewhat common-sensical, and then so to see someone whom i would want to admire and respect — in this case Trump’s wife — having had that done to her, is disappointing. I am reluctant to use the word sad, because it would seem an ironic use of a pro-Trump meme (“Sad!”), but that is the word for it.

    It is sad that a beautiful woman had that done to her, and that she was dissuaded by those in a position to influence.

  64. I don’t accept your premise of ‘of race’ or ‘not of race,’ just as I don’t except the false “racist or raceless” paradigm that what we call here “anti-racists’ demand-or-brand of the populace.

    Of course you don’t.

    See, we are opposed.

    By not accepting the premise of what is Of Race and what is not, you demonstrate my point that we are opposed.

    This is not a logical trap, it is an explanation of our fundamental oppositional interests.

    nikcrit — Does the White Race exist or not?

  65. Trickin — it is not for you to accept or not, the premise of the existence of the White Race.

    All you can do is reveal your own preferences, which have no bearing on such a large question.

    *****************

    Of course the White Race exists, and as such is in conflict to those who would deny it, and its premise.

    Which premise contains the obvious point that it is conflict with those outside of it.

  66. the effects of plastic surgery on a person’s face, are never good.

    Same goes for tit implants ruining a perfectly fine pair of small perky breasts.

  67. Same goes for tit implants ruining a perfectly fine pair of small perky breasts.

    Bolt-on boobs rarely do that, they normally get installed on a skinny woman who is completely flat chested, or on a woman whose boobs are deflated after childbirth. Perky, small boobs are normally kept.

  68. And they have the texture of tempered (semi-frozen) Jello to boot!

    The way they push back on you does not feel particularly feminine or inviting.

  69. I would describe Michelle Obama as handsome. She’s too big boned to be pretty, but she is fit and healthy looking. I suppose the same term could apply to her daughter.

  70. Melania does not have the prettiest face, but she is tall, thin and graceful. She carries herself in a calm, feminine manner that is appealing.

  71. My one-word description for current & most recent First Ladies’ personae:

    Rosalind Carter – homey
    Nancy Reagan – adoring
    Barbara Bush – stately
    Hillary Clinton – cunty
    Laura Bush – prim
    Michelle Obama – angry
    Melania Trump – sublime

  72. I don’t think black women are particularly attracted to white men, so they should not get too offended when white men are not attracted to them. I think black women can be attractive.
    The reason people don’t like them is because a lot of them have an attitude problem. When they are nice, people like them just fine.

  73. I like Melania, too. She seems down to earth. She’s aloof, but that is typical for Eastern Europeans. She probably is a little on her guard, too, knowing how many people dislike her husband.

  74. “I think black women can be attractive….When they are nice, people like them just fine.”

    Lara,
    You’re not being an ideal Alt-right ‘chick’.

    In deference to the alabaster testosterone, you’re supposed to: aspire to the alpha-accoutrement disposition of Melania while referring to Michelle Obama and other black females as simian-like, i.e., “she-boons.”

    I noticed over the last few year, you consistently ‘flip the script” per-not being an ideal “HBD Chick.”

    [wings overdue a clipping? — PA]

  75. In deference to the alabaster testosterone, you’re supposed to: aspire to the alpha-accoutrement disposition of Melania while referring to Michelle Obama and other black females as simian-like, i.e., “she-boons.”

    Elk has some sort of choco fetish, too. The CDC’s annual statistics on STD’s in the black community should be enough to scare anyone away from this route, though. The BF’s have been hitting on me non-stop me entire adult life but it’s simply not my thing. And black co*och isn’t known for smelling the best either, on average.

  76. I think all men on the alt right should take a good, long look at themselves in the mirror and ask if they have the conviction and self-sacrifice of our primary adversary, Barack Obama.

    Can you imagine how much self-denial and willpower it took to give up women (i.e. Caucasians) and grudgingly start dating and mating with wookiees, for the benefit of your political career?

    Obama was smart enough to know that a black man married to a white woman could never be viewed as “authentic” black, and he had every intention of moving somewhat near black people (i.e the safety of heavily liberal but white Hyde Park) where he could use nearby heavy black Democratic districts as a power base to jumpstart his political career. Of course, the 100% privately-schooled Obama really doesn’t like being around blacks that aren’t Ivy Leaguers so he kept his distance from blacks himself but stayed just close enough to nominally claim residency in their political district.

    I commend him for his strong stomach and his single-minded dedication, he went from a millionaire blonde Australian heiress girlfriend to a sassy, neck-bobbing, bad thesis-writing monstrosity like Michelle. We alt righters should demand the same level of sacrifice from ourselves if we truly believe in our political ideals. 😉 🙂

  77. I read an interview once with Michelle Obama. She said people think she is a typical angry black woman, but she does not feel angry. I’m willing to give her the benefit of the doubt. I think she may have been angry when she was younger, but has mellowed out with age.
    As far as sexual attraction goes, if I only liked men who found me attractive, I’d like very few men. Even when I was younger, the men who liked me best were always older and usually had some personal problems such as alcoholism. I’ve never had much appeal to average white men. Getting upset because you aren’t someone’s type is just a waste of time.

  78. “I think black women can be attractive….When they are nice, people like them just fine.”

    Lara,
    You’re not being an ideal Alt-right ‘chick’.

    Ummmm, Trickin those of us on the alt-right who’ve been around 3-dimensional (white) women are not the least bit surprised when they say nice nice things about black women or Wookieechelle Robinson Obama. So quit making stuff up like this.

    Women are programmed to be genial, supportive of other women, and complimentary, especially to other (undeserving) women. Even conservative women are fond of this sort of thing – if they didn’t constantly look for ways of giving a bolstering amount of emotional support to other females they’d be men, and less feminine.

    It’s no different than some chick trying to set you up with her “nice” friend who you soon learn to be chunky and unattractive.

  79. Women are programmed to be genial, supportive of other women

    As someone put it, men communicate by insulting each other but not mean it. Women communicate by complimenting each other but not mean it.

  80. Women are programmed to be genial, supportive of other women

    As someone put it, men communicate by insulting each other but not mean it. Women communicate by complimenting each other but not mean it.

    Exactly. Trickin’ tries to stir up sh*t sometimes, feigning cluelessness.

    Common sense would tell you that even conservative-leaning white women are still going to be uplifting and nice to females of other races, especially toward “downtrodden” black chicks who they don’t see as any legitimate threat to themselves. OTOH, you will frequently see black women crying bitterly about the alleged media bias towards “Eurocentric features” or the prevalence of blondes in entertainment and such.

    But with this subject it’s kinda like the phrase “black is beautiful” — if you have to keep saying it…

  81. “Women are programmed to be genial, supportive of other women, and complimentary, especially to other (undeserving) women. Even conservative women are fond of this sort of thing – if they didn’t constantly look for ways of giving a bolstering amount of emotional support to other females they’d be men, and less feminine.”

    The Alt-right’s way of calling a woman a liar.

  82. Archetypes change over time; there’s always an awkward phase…..IDK. I don’t care if someone prefers women be of a certain race, or their race, that’s ok with me. Unlike what Cam says, I never had a serious “serious” black g-friend, but i’ve had several close ones and I don’t think hierarchical when i categorize them under ‘white,’ ‘black’ and ‘mixed.’

    My biases though bother me: for instance, it’s difficult for me to say that, while i’ve had brief affairs with Asian women, i’m fairly confident I will never, ever have a sexual relationship with a woman of East Indian heritage; in part because i’m past my ‘numerical partner’ prime, and in part because, gulp, i just don’t find such woman that appealing (I also hate admitting this because, I can practically see them in retort saying: ‘no big loss for me,’ etc. hahaha).

    So it’s also a bit galling to admit as much out loud.

    But there you go: the halfrican has racist attitudes, too.

  83. Cam’s extreme prejudices towards black women does show there is unlikely to be a strong alliance between African Americans and Asian Americans. I wouldn’t say they hate each other, necessarily, but they are pretty different.

  84. West Africans are just physically masculine people. The traits that make their men handsome are not as appealing on their women.
    I don’t love Michelle Obama, but I think she isn’t as bad as some on the alt right make her out to be. She has a skill at being liked by other women. I know conservative white women who like her.

  85. “women are not the least bit surprised when they say nice nice things about black women or Wookieechelle Robinson Obama. “

    That’s not the consensus view; i recall even on harsh HBD sites, you’d get arguments over M.O.’s looks; for my part, I think she’s average looking… I’m also biased because I knew of her and her family and siblings prior to B.O. being in the picture; the family is solid and upstanding and sacrificial; her bro’ is very cool guy; i recall him playing pick-up hoops in the old UC fieldhouse before the Ratcenter…..

    You guys aren’t familiar with that part of the black world — the patrician, black-paleo-con extended family culture; they actually embody a lot of things the alt-right espouses — but your resentments are too keen to gather and give back respect: they believe in community commitment and local volunteering; but most important, when they create personal wealth and fortune, they STAY in the neighborhood they came up with and invest in their roots and SERVE AS EXEMPLARS for the aspiring and less-accomplished AMONG THOSE WITH THE SAME ROOTS, which, btw,is probably the most surefire way to ensure success for future generations.

  86. The Alt-right’s way of calling a woman a liar.

    Yeah, no sh*t, black Sherlock!! What an astounding revelation. Women lie like crazy, what was your first clue? And they often lie to help make other people feel good, especially other women. Or they just flat out lie to themselves on all kinds of small stuff usually revolving around interpersonal relations.

    My fiancee says typical dumb little lies all the time like this to try and save someone’s feelings, then you call her on it and she just laughs and moves along quickly.

    Why do you think every female writer in MSM outlets has gone out of her way to heap endless praise on Wookieechelle Robinson Obama for her alleged good looks, elegance, supreme taste in clothing, you name it? Literally, they can’t stop talking about it, ad nauseam.

    Michelle simply isn’t in the upper 1-2 tiers of black female attractiveness, and you damn well know it. They’re doing the typical female thing and giving emotional support through communication.

    ’m fairly confident I will never, ever have a sexual relationship with a woman of East Indian heritage; in part because i’m past my ‘numerical partner’ prime, and in part because, gulp, i just don’t find such woman that appealing (I also hate admitting this because, I can practically see them in retort saying: ‘no big loss for me,’ etc. hahaha).

    Yeah, I know what you mean and I have met a lot of East (dot) Indian women in IT business circles but the thing is that they’re much, much older than you’d guess when they get here to the USA and they’re the top 1-3% of upper caste Indians, and this means very nerdy and unconcerned with looks since that doesn’t get them anywhere back home on the subcontinent.

    If they “cleaned up” and acted more feminine they’d be much hotter. I’d liken it to comparing the surprisingly plain looks of Harvard women to the infinitely cuter girls you see at your typical sports-crazy big, flagship state school – no comparison in looks (obviously), but same gene pool.

    Check out virtually any Bollywood video and you see pretty much the same women, but much younger and wearing actual makeup. And the result is much better.

  87. There are many black Americans who fall somewhere in between the Obamas and ghetto blacks on the socio economic scale. I live near them. They are similar in a lot of ways to working class whites. They vote democrat, but aren’t nearly as liberal as white liberals.

  88. You guys aren’t familiar with that part of the black world — the patrician, black-paleo-con extended family culture; they actually embody a lot of things the alt-right espouses — but your resentments are too keen to gather and give back respect:

    LOL, you’re just proving me right in what I said above. He surely didn’t pick Michelle for looks, he coulda easily done better even if he insisted on a black wife. But he wanted a good, “authentic” black political family that he could attach to as he built up his power base in the heavily black South side of Chicago (from the safety of ritzyHyde Park, of course.)

  89. They are similar in a lot of ways to working class whites. They vote democrat, but aren’t nearly as liberal as white liberals.

    Exactly. For instance, Blacks and Hispanics have overwhelmingly opposed every gay marriage referendum that has been put on a state ballot as a stand-alone item, but they will still vote for the most leftist Democrat possible at every opportunity for economic and big government reasons.

  90. If it was not for the black underclass, black Americans would be good citizens. They do tend to identify strongly as American. The problem is their large, extremely dysfunctional underclass is a big drain on society.

  91. You guys aren’t familiar with that part of the black world — the patrician, black-paleo-con extended family culture; they actually embody a lot of things the alt-right espouses — but your resentments are too keen to gather and give back respect:

    This is the population I’m familiar with as they were my high school peers… about 50/50 white/black middle to upper middle class Catholics and some Protestants with a fair number of Arab Catholics mixed in. My current parish is similarly constituted (not many Chaldeans though).

  92. Exactly. For instance, Blacks and Hispanics have overwhelmingly opposed every gay marriage referendum that has been put on a state ballot as a stand-alone item, but they will still vote for the most leftist Democrat possible at every opportunity for economic and big government reasons.

    Not sure what the current polling is on that but my feeling is that blacks were maybe 1-2 years behind white progs on that issue. . . maybe for the reasons you mentioned. But on a personal level, I never encounter anti-homo antipathy from even more conservative church going blacks or whites. It just seems to be a non-issue.

  93. Nikcrit…

    That “black patrician” that you wrote about above…

    He IS SUPPOSED TO KILL THE NIGGER for the SAKE OF HIS PROGENY!

    Does he?

    DOES HE EVEN LAY CLAIM TO THE RESPONSIBILITY?

    {{{POOF}}}

    Nah…

    That’s for “white supremacy” to take care of.

  94. I bet Craig Robinson, given he understood the context and theoretical parameters of your question, would respond in the positive. He and his have advanced unflattering ‘black collective’ profiles and critiques for years, before and after the family’s association with POTUS.

  95. In a radically autonomous society, the “black patrician” is to annihilate the nigger, i.e., the anti-black patrician, who does not really exist as though he were already annihilated. Yet, “we” still have a nigger problem BECAUSE NO GENUINE black patricians EXIST.

    This entire reality ^^^ is “radical autonomy” for the “black” collective.

  96. Has Craig Robinson ever claimed MORAL responsibility for killing niggers?

    If not, it doesn’t me sheeeet UNLESS he is a principled black separatist?

  97. If the answer is no (i.e., he doesn’t claim that moral responsibility) I would venture that the association between classic historic ‘racism’ and the fog that posits that ‘the nigger’ is the result of said racism, still lingers….

    But that’s changing; don’t you think?

  98. but your resentments are too keen to gather and give back respect: they believe in community commitment and local volunteering; but most important, when they create personal wealth and fortune, they STAY in the neighborhood they came up with and invest in their roots and SERVE AS EXEMPLARS for the aspiring and less-accomplished AMONG THOSE WITH THE SAME ROOTS

    Sometimes I think you forget who we are and think that we’re going to break into adulatory clapping like many liberal whites when hearing “success stories” like this tale of the Robinsons staying in the ‘hood to lift up their fellow brethren. OMG, sooooo noble!!. LMAO

    But yes, my own personal experience tells me that high class blacks do exist in decent numbers, and “patrician” could be an accurate term for them.

    If anything, I’d say that upper class blacks like them would’ve been helped in some ways by continued segregation from whites as American society of the 50’s and before stressed personal behavior standards and would’ve allowed blacks to start self-assorting by education level and social graces. As it stands now blacks don’t really self-stratify into castes, and that’s damaging.

    But even to this day when a white friend tells me they just started dating someone new, what is the first question whites ask? (Yes, what does he do)

    Blacks don’t ask each other that question, they don’t self-stratify very much by behavior, education or income, partly because they now look to government to advance or solve any social ills. It’s a block to self-assortive mating.

  99. The more I think about it, the best thing about a Trump presidency might be having Melania as First Lady. I’m wondering if some of these fashion industry people, who tend to lean liberal, want that also.

  100. I’m guessing that the vast majority of men high SMV white women end up with are not particularly appealing to black women. What probably gets them most angry is all the SMV options their own high SMV black men enjoy, that they do not.

  101. I was once going through a building’s security check with a colleague, a young, short and very physically average White man who had a habit of no-filter flirting with every woman he came across. Not a hyperbole. So this very large surly Black woman checks our credentials and waves us through.

    He stops with this “I got gypped” look on his face and asked her “aren’t you gonna strip-search me?”

    She stands frozen and disbelieving for a moment, then senses his solid frame and erupts into an avalanche of giggles.

  102. IF….

    A healthy-minded white race existed…

    THEN they would recognize that “angry black female” IS THE PRODUCT of an individual conspiracy GONE COLLECTIVELY WILD!!!

    There was a time when “black” female allowed her “black me/n” to defile white female TO DEFILE white female in the name of “liberation” from “white supremacy.”

    NOW “black me/n” defile white female FOR SHITS AND GIGGLES without a stench of imperial imperative.

    The “black” bitches are MAD AS HELL and coming back with their own spice of radical sexual autonomy…

    And so there is no contradiction in the pride/fall scenario of many “angry black females.”

    THEY GOT DUPED BY THEIR BLACK MAN and all-out sexual degeneracy is the “winner.”

    “Cosmic Order” by an often repeated mantra of the “talented teeth.”

  103. Nik,

    It’s an objective reality that any non-black with actual experience with blacks can attest. A = A.

    Your defensive posture only confirms the fact.

  104. Philo: don’t know what you mean. Fwiw, I don’t feel defensive. But who knows? Perhaps whites who posit thete larger collective ‘whiteness’ feel some impending End of the World.. But us mutable halfricans? It’s just another day of “As The World Turns.”
    Good night gentlemen.

  105. Nikcrit…

    What Philomathean is writing is that wherever and whenever a “black” is trying to play off anti-A as A then it should be known that all healthy-minded white men JUST KNOW that A=A and anti-A=black…

    Supremacy DOES NOT EQUAL degeneracy…

    And those who claim white Supremacy equal to white degeneracy are simply nigger-binded.

  106. Nik,

    I think you’re a good guy. I’d probably get along with you IRL. I’m not interested in getting in this type of tit-for-tat with you. Ultimately, it’s a fruitless endeavor because it’ll devolve into a low iq superior/inferior gymnastic routine.

    I don’t know where the halfrican fits in, but I can sympathize to a degree with the inward homelessness of the mixed races, and to that extent you have my pity, whether you’re looking for it or not.

    Ultimately, I’m in favor of a future for the sons and daughters of Europe, whether her children reside in the Mother Land or her diaspora.

    I think fundamentally this puts your interests in conflict with my own. Ethnic Nationalism is the solution. That probably means a section of land on this Earth needs to be allocated for the mixed races where they can govern themselves and live according to their tastes and sensibilities.

    This is hard to accept for most white people because it contradicts our altruistic impulse. I don’t even like writing it, and this comes from a hardened race realist with a Phd in diversity.

    Hard decisions need to be made if whites want to have a future. I think we’re seeing the beginning of that collective realization with DJT.

  107. It’s an objective reality that any non-black with actual experience with blacks can attest. A = A.

    The reflexive property does not apply to the BF, she is far more mysterious, complex and ultimately beyond the comprehension of the white folks – despite her often predictable behavior and tastes.

  108. Is there more to A=A than face-value reflexive property?

    — Ethnic Nationalism is the solution. (Philomathean)

    It’s also the human default, especially Ice Peoples’ organizing default. Even multi-ethnic empires and polities self-segregated by ethnicity. Being too immersed in the here-and-now of the late-stage American empire that bloomed (like a venereal flareup) after World War II makes one myopic to the above reality. It is also easy to forget that, literally, trillions of dollars and millions of lives had been sacrificed to making multikult and integration appear to work.

  109. Black women aren’t used to white men flirting with them so they are really taken aback by it. I think they like it. Black women might be more masculine physically than white women on average, but their brains are more feminine. They seem to spend an excessive amount of time and money on beautifying themselves. I think this is mostly because they enjoy it, rather than because of low self esteem. They are also emotional and not very rational.
    I am pretty strong, so I don’t feel physically intimidated by them. If I ever had to, I think I could hold my own against them.

  110. I usually treat them like I’m the boss and they should listen to me. They seem to like that.
    I am more deferential to other white people and NE Asians because in many cases they are probably smarter than me.

  111. “Being too immersed in the here-and-now of the late-stage American empire that bloomed (like a venereal flareup) after World War II makes one myopic to the above reality.”

    Much of the contemporary WN sense of bond, identity and inspired kinship, replete with kindred spirits and agendas, were forged from WWII.

    “I’m not interested in getting in this type of tit-for-tat with you. Ultimately, it’s a fruitless endeavor because it’ll devolve into a low iq superior/inferior gymnastic routine. “

    I’m not sure what you mean by this, but I don’t equate IQ with ‘superior’ or ‘inferior’ assessments of people and culture at large; I think those who do suffer from a crisis of spirit and imagination and even dare say priority; furthermore, I believe that, nonetheless, there are a lot of people who do make such an equation and that is the reason society endures the racial and ethnic frisson that it does.

    FWIW, are you even sure your assessments re. IQ and certain groups always correct? I recall shortly after you first posted on this blog, in the midst of a semi-serious volley were some regular commenters and I were estimating others IQ and you ‘corrected’ someone by saying they had estimated too high in my case, as my IQ was “in the range of “105-108” and then qualified your assessment by saying it was an expertise you acquired through your vocation.

    I don’t put too much stock in IQ tests, but I thought it amusing because, your expert assessment was 15 to 20 points lower than that of what I’ve scored, going by several metrics and proxies for those tests that weren’t literal “IQ” tests (i.e., the LSAT); I also know a tad more than the layman about intelligence testing as I have several psychologists, psychiatrists and social and academic counselors in my close family.

    No biggie, any of this, but IMO it’s always best to leave some room in your thoughts to be wrong and correctible. All of us are ignorant of something.

  112. — Much of the contemporary WN sense of bond, identity and inspired kinship, replete with kindred spirits and agendas, were forged from WWII.

    Romantic nationalism has existed since the mid-19th century and tribalism is as old as humanity. WN is Europeans’ emergent response to a racial war of unprecedented scope against us. Earlier, the same White racial identity was known as “Christendom.” On a more local level, WN is an evolving White American nationalism as distinct from other European nationalisms because “American” has lost all of its meaning.

    — I’m not sure what you mean by this, but I don’t equate IQ with ‘superior’ or ‘inferior’ assessments of people and culture at large

    I think what Philo is saying, with which I agree, is that these tit-for-tats devolve to the distracting HBD IQ-fetishism and this is not about IQ but race.

  113. “That probably means a section of land on this Earth needs to be allocated for the mixed races where they can govern themselves and live according to their tastes and sensibilities.”

    But wouldn’t it be rather inconclusive in terms of cultural ties an commitment to parcel land only for the ‘mixed race’ people in your future idealistic utopia? I mean, us mixed folk are comprise of ‘whole’ whites and ‘whole’ African Americans’….. So, I’ll welcome your pity for me if we come to a state where a separate state has been erected for, say, the likes of me, Lenny Kravitz, Colin Kaepernik, Lisa Bonet, etc., yet there’d be no sovereignty for Mom and Dad!! ):

    [micro-level concerns with individual cases are swept by history’s macro movements. More than one Jew claimed valor in WWI as he was led to the gas chamber, more than on Pole claimed a German grandmother as he was led blindfolded to the ditch, more than one German claimed Polish in-laws as he was cattle-carred out of East Prussia. The critical mass of people will have zero interest in the lot of Lenny, Colin, or Lisa and in 15 years your parents and mine will probably be dead. –PA]

  114. — Ethnic Nationalism is the solution. (Philomathean)
    It’s also the human default, especially Ice Peoples’ organizing default.

    No it isn’t. Ethnic, small-scale tribalism is the default for human experience.

    [I then clarified that assertion with: “Romantic nationalism has existed since the mid-19th century and tribalism is as old as humanity.” — PA]

    Nationalism is an extremely young idea and occurs when large confederations of tribes are able to cooperate and form something greater and larger, and it’s only N. Europeans (and the Japanese) that have ever even envisioned, let alone mastered, the concept. Europeans evolved from tribes just like anyone else.

    The Japanese have been smart enough to keep 3rd Worlders out.

    Much of the contemporary WN sense of bond, identity and inspired kinship, replete with kindred spirits and agendas, were forged from WWII.

    WW2 caused Europeans to see that the goals you’d normally accomplish through warfare could be achieved through advanced economic cooperation. 2 unstated reasons that Germany and Japan wanted to expand in the 1930’s-40’s – to get access to cheap raw materials and new markets for manufactured goods, they’re much more easily accomplished through trade agreement than through the bayonet.

  115. There are plenty of intelligent black people. They just tend to have it too good in white societies, and therefore aren’t interested in any type of self sufficiency for their own people.

    [you could even say, the Talented Tenth had signed a pact with the… devil. — PA]

  116. IQ was discussed a lot in the nascent years of the pre-alt right on HBD blogs, but I don’t see much IQ fetishism anymore. I think the reason it was so avidly discussed is because it explains so many social phenomenon.

    IQ is one human trait among many that can be quantified. Individually, a few points in either direction will may not make a huge impact on one’s life. However, it is the aggregate IQ of a group that is predictive of the type of society that group will form. The correlation is very strong.

  117. There are plenty of intelligent black people. They just tend to have it too good in white societies, and therefore aren’t interested in any type of self sufficiency for their own people.

    It’s because blacks don’t self-stratify by education, class, IQ.

    Blacks are essentially rural and tribal – they came from the tropics where you had low population density and few rules. The closer you put blacks together (such as high-density apartments, projects etc.) the less they are able to stay mindful of white people behavioral norms.

    And this is why blacks have so much trouble following rules of any type – they are not well selected for heads-down conformity and always want to stand out individually because the act of display was their main way to demonstrate reproductive fitness. In contrast, the ability to acquire goods and status over time is how Northern Europeans prove their reproductive fitness.

  118. If Nikcrit had to be a leader to his own people, we’d never hear from him again. The first thing to go would be all his free time.

  119. I’m not sure what you mean by this, but I don’t equate IQ with ‘superior’ or ‘inferior’ assessments of people and culture at large;

    I agree.

    The people who are seriously studying this do not make claims of superiority or inferiority based on IQ. They would likewise never claim that a horse is superior to a zebra. Evolution is not teleological.

    I think those who do suffer from a crisis of spirit and imagination and even dare say priority;

    No … the crisis of spirit came with the marxist attacks on our people. Understanding genetics enlightens the human spirit. All aspects of humanity must be considered.

  120. To add to the previous comment – much of the crisis of spirit comes from the heaps of blame white guilt that were laid at our feet for the conditions of much of the third world. HBD is a corrective to that. It helps us clarify who we are

    [I used to defend HBD by pointing out that it blows up the liberal blood libel of “racism” as explanation for disparate outcomes. — PA]

  121. ,“There are plenty of intelligent black people. They just tend to have it too good in white societies, and therefore aren’t interested in any type of self sufficiency for their own people.”

    I bite my tongue sometimes when i hear this, which isn’t to say that the contention is never true.

    But it is a bit more complicated: There are circumstances where, just l ike for white people, your race and ethnicity can work against you.

    For instance, take the classic AA situation: if there are NO blacks currently at a newspaper newsroom editorial writers section, AND a black candidate comes in with flawless clips, attitude and potential, he’s all but guaranteed the job.

    BUT: often you see a editor’s row of headshots atop a paper, one white male face after the other; sandwiched inbetween is the lone black male editorial writer.

    Well, guess what: when it’s time to hire another editorial writer, but not that one black face, who’s still working there, any and all ‘mino’ candidates are all but wasting their time by sending their resume and angling for an interview.

    General rule that has become oft-mentioned folklore phrase among black professionals: You applying there? They looking for niggahs? Oh, they already got one? Well, you can kiss that shit goodbye.”

    None of which is likely to generate sympathy here; moreso relevant to our conversations today: it’s fact that everyone has a particular trick situation and acccompanying gripe to go with it.

    Actually, since we got into a bit of symbolic logic earlier with Philo; there’s a logical economic principle to go with certain instances of AA hiring; finding the rarer black, say, writer-journalist, to work at an otherwise all-white-staffed newspaper and magazine, is akin to its/his value being correlated along the principles of the economic concept of ‘scarcity.’ why is a black with superior “white-level’ talent more valuable? For the same reason that the diamond in the rough amongst the other quartz-like rocks: it’s relative scarcity.

    My other gripe about comments and complaints like Lara’s is, they rest on a myth that flatters majority culture applicants: Many-upon-many jobs are filled by people in which 1,001 other people of equal aptitude applied for but didn’t get. So whites often say a job went ‘to a less-talented minority,’ which it did.

    But A) there’s an argument to be made ‘diversity’, in the rote sense of the word, is good for businesses that rep the community, a la a newspaper (i.e., i mean, is it outrageous that a paper tends to lean toward women when hiring a editor and columnist for the Food section, or to write the fashion columns?

    But even putting aside the worth of sometimes typecasting a position to race and gender, there’s the humbling fact i noted above in which many-upon-many people could do a professional job at the caliber of the one holding the job.

    Much of the labor market, at all levels, is hardly a case of professionals holding down because , when being hired, the won out in putting together the ‘just-right’ increments of academic and professional ‘merit.’

    I could look around this admin office righ this very second and find proof to attest that motherfucking fact.

  122. [I used to defend HBD by pointing out that it blows up the liberal blood libel of “racism” as explanation for disparate outcomes. — PA]

    I’m not sure what you mean by this, but I don’t equate IQ with ‘superior’ or ‘inferior’ assessments of people and culture at large;

    I agree.

    The fight over IQ hasn’t even started yet, and it’s going to be very emotional and explosive. Just imagine the wrangling we’re going to see in public schools over the next 50 years concerning the gap in differing outcomes between blacks and whites in discipline and achievement. (Asians don’t exist)

    The fact of the matter is that average student quality is the biggest determinant in the output you get from schools. But we all known that hearkens to the question of intelligence and any mere suggestion of the possibility of considering that such a thing as IQ may potentially exist is rayyycist, rayyycist, rayyycist.

  123. General rule that has become oft-mentioned folklore phrase among black professionals: You applying there? They looking for niggahs? Oh, they already got one? Well, you can kiss that shit goodbye.”

    LOL, please.

    If you’re qualified and the white man is excluding you then don’t continue sitting on your black asse*s hoping that the white man lets you snatch a few more crumbs that fall from his table, start your own publications. If they are economically viable, they will survive. If not, they die. The white man didn’t inherit newspapers that fell from heaven intact and then “box out” blacks to prevent access to them – he invented the industry, and the paper, and the ink and the market it takes to sell them.

    There’s nearly 1 billion black people on the planet. Blacks run more than 60 countries of their own.

    The 30 million blacks in the USA have an annual spending power of over $$ 1 trillion but you’re still sitting there crying about “inclusion.”

    http://www.blackenterprise.com/small-business/african-american-buying-power-projected-trillions/

  124. “[you could even say, the Talented Tenth had signed a pact with the… devil. — PA]”

    Some might say eastern-bloc immigrants capitalizing on the end of the Cold War signed a pact with the devil by leaving their comrades back home alone and coming to settle down in the Big Satan.

  125. LOL, please.

    If you’re qualified and the white man is excluding you then don’t continue sitting on your black asse*s hoping that the white man lets you snatch a few more crumbs that fall from his table, start your own publications.

    (Sigh) The perils, pitfalls and politics of being hired by a existing company, large or small, is a template scenario in America for those of every race —- but leave it to Cam to reduce it to a situation of ‘begging the white man for crumbs” when black people take part in this universal hiring process.

    Dude, you are a very unscrupulous debater. Cherry picking even when there’s no cherry tree in sight!

  126. But A) there’s an argument to be made ‘diversity’, in the rote sense of the word, is good for businesses that rep the community, a la a newspaper (i.e., i mean, is it outrageous that a paper tends to lean toward women when hiring a editor and columnist for the Food section, or to write the fashion columns?

    It is not as if we have never heard that argument.

    And it is telling that nikcrit’s examples, of the public school administration and of the newspaper, are both those work environments strong vectors of poz.

    It is not a “coincidence” * that both those work environments are beneficiaries of diversity in the sense that it was sold to us, as having to reflect the make-up of the community at large, AND that they are pozzed out petri dishes of dysfunction.

    * The word “coincidence” is one of those concepts that the post-modern world has backwards, and its backwards usage is in fact indicative of many of the problems we are trying to get at. In the above relationship, it actually IS a coincidence that those two things go together — they are co-incidental of the same problem, which same problem is the nebulous thing that we can’t quite define.

    But we say that such effects are NOT coincidental to indicate there is something tying them together! but the thing is exactly that they ARE coincidental.

  127. — Some might say eastern-bloc immigrants capitalizing on the end of the Cold War signed a pact with the devil by leaving their comrades back home alone and coming to settle down in the Big Satan.

    Indeed. Or as the classic song goes, “You’ve got your demons, you’ve got desires, but I’ve got a few of my own.”

  128. but leave it to Cam to reduce it to a situation of ‘begging the white man for crumbs” when black people take part in this universal hiring process.

    Universal? There’s like 3% of worldwide blacks that live in close enough proximity to whites to take part in the same “hiring process” and Western hiring practices are already more than fair to blacks considering true ability.

    There’s not enough white people around to take the blame for the incompetence of all others across the globe anymore. And whites are starting to realize that.

  129. @ Trickin – so, a news room that looks like this MUST be discriminating against that 2nd black hire, right?

  130. Nikcrit has a valid point about Eastern Europe. If I were to live in Ukraine, my life would be much tougher. At least I’m not wealthy. That would feel very unearned for me.

  131. Those are our opinion leaders.

    And they are sitting on the floor and dressed like college kids.

    The chick in the lower left is a solid 7, but has the worst posture of them all.

  132. If I were to live in Ukraine, my life would be much tougher.

    I disagree with that entirely. The way that core Americans have treated their children is unforgivable.

    They left their children, particularly their boys, in the hands of the medical and educational institutions.

    I would rather have been born anywhere else in the world.

  133. Those are our opinion leaders.

    And they are sitting on the floor and dressed like college kids.”

    That was probably a student newspaper or some other intensely youth-driven publication; y’know, my daily and i’m pretty sure most, barring maybe the national or near-national dailies, such as nytimes and washpost, have average readership ages betwween 63 and 68.

  134. This Wikileaks/email issue with Hillary may be a harbinger of future conflict within high-level government apparatus between the old guard of white workers versus more recently appointed SJW’s, NAM’s and other assorted fruits and nuts who have moved into government work.

    It’s destined to happen sooner or later.

    James Comey may have gone public with this last round of info to better control the narrative against increasingly disgruntled FBI workers who are staging a coup to protest what they feel was light treatment that Hilary got earlier this summer. Many of them are said to be angry at Hilary getting a slap on the wrist for behaviors that would’ve meant loss of job, seniority/pension and (possibly) freedom for them.

  135. “Many of them are said to be angry at Hilary getting a slap on the wrist for behaviors that would’ve meant loss of job, seniority/pension and (possibly) freedom for them.”

    There’s just as much dem gossip that has it that Hillary’s the victim of a smear job; the telltale sign in Cam’s quote that let’s you know it’s just contrary rhetoric? “Many of them are said to be angry…”

    Shame on you, Cam; you’re being a real schlocky propagandaist and a unscrupulous debater today. You need some vocational sensitivity training and fast!

  136. the telltale sign in Cam’s quote that let’s you know it’s just contrary rhetoric? “Many of them are said to be angry…”

    Well there’s gotta be some reason that Comey pushed this news release only 10 days prior to the election, after having given Hillary a complete pass earlier this summer. If you have a better reason let me know. Maybe he remembered that he’s a lifelong Republican or maybe he decided he wants to has some impact on the election himself. Either way, something big happened behind the scenes.

    And your messiah himself said he doesn’t think that Comey did this to try to influence the election.

  137. It is the desire for “eternal” orgasm that manifested the Islamic paradigm and not the other way around. In this manner, Islam originates wholly deracinated and inherently pathological.

  138. Shame on you, Cam; you’re being a real schlocky propagandaist and a unscrupulous debater today. You need some vocational sensitivity training and fast!

    What, you don’t think there are some deep state machinations at play here? The turmoil within the bowels of Mordor over the unexpected rise of Trump is palpable. I think it’s a very real possibility that Comey was facing mutiny within the FBI ranks over his soft-pedaling of Hilary this summer.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3886942/Resignation-letters-piling-disaffected-FBI-agents-wife-urging-admit-wrong-Director-Comey-jumped-chance-reopen-Hillary-investigation.html

  139. Comey was facing mutiny within the FBI ranks over his soft-pedaling of Hilary this summer

    That is the emerging consensus among the know-nothing dirt-people, and it would seem to fit the facts.

    Hillary sprogs are forever unconvinced that it is anything but evil white men and their vast conspiracy.

    My sense in “talking” to those (unbelievably) remaining Hillary supporters, is that they think politics is inevitably so corrupt that Hillary’s actions are not unusual, and that whoever is going to be at that level, has to act in that way.

    I don’t talk politics with those people much anymore, because it becomes contentious … but that is a whole other topic.

  140. There’s just as much dem gossip that has it that Hillary’s the victim of a smear job; the telltale sign in Cam’s quote that let’s you know it’s just contrary rhetoric? “Many of them are said to be angry…”

    Liberals call it a smear job … but come on! the facts on the ground regarding Hillary’s criminal negligence, which criminal negligence is UNDENIABLE at this time — and what’s more, which criminal negligence is the VERY LEAST of what her crimes may include.

    A smear job?! Those emails are not made-up. Hillary doesn’t even deny that they are real, she simply pivots it onto the Russians. Which tactic is a joke in itself.

    To whom does the big bad bogeyman Russian menace seem a plausible explanation? Everyone Gen-X and younger is nonplussed with “the Russians”, and those older demographics cannot but see it as lame.

    “The Russians” is such trademark Hillary tone-deafness, and it is frankly surreal.

  141. “Russians” are not white Supremacists… Even Russian Orthodox would deny fealty to genuine white SupreMacy.

    And Hillary is a bona fide anti-white Supremacist…

    She saber rattles… Intimates WWIII under the pretext of cyberwar on American democracy AND then “wins” for the global “matrixs” in a last ditch concession to Putin averting war. Win-win for all commies involved and “wn” gets trolled by their hero and psychologically vanquished by his enemy within.

  142. What will they call the Millennials? “The Destroyed Generation” fits the bill. But the generation that follows them is promising. I read somewhere that Trump would win if only high schoolers voted.

    This (76% White, 13% hisanic, 8% Asian/other, 3% black) elementary school cancelled its mock elections after the assembled student body erupted in pro-Trump chants. Other students said that muslims should not be here:

    http://freebeacon.com/culture/elementary-school-cancels-mock-election/

  143. To resurrect the “living-dead,” you must relentlessly inject “it” with God-ordained free will OR you will operate next to the “living-dead” on a day to day basis, diversity or not.

  144. It is also easy to forget that, literally, trillions of dollars and millions of lives had been sacrificed to making multikult and integration appear to work.

    Shit like this makes my stomach churn:
    https://www.michigancapitolconfidential.com/22910

    “The University of Michigan’s new chief diversity officer will collect $385,000 a year under his various job titles, including a new one created by a recently revealed $85 million, five-year U-M diversity plan. . .

    President (((Mark Schlissel))) nominated Sellers for the job several weeks ago. The new full-time administrative position “will serve as a leadership voice on diversity, equity and inclusion for the entire university.”

    The diversity plan Sellers will oversee will spend $17 million a year over the next five years. It seeks to “recruit, retain and develop a diverse university community” and “support innovation and inclusive scholarship and teaching” through a number of new and expanded programs.

    The $85 million plan is in addition to the $40 million a year the university already spends promoting diversity.”

    That is $125,000,000 per year that could be allocated to roads, bridges, tunnels… fuck.. just about anything useful besides promoting black people’s already inflated self-esteems through “inclusive scholarship and teaching.”

    The average student is now graduating college with $37,000 in loans, starting out their lives chained to student debt. Many come out with frankly shitty educations and shittier job prospects. Where is all this money going to? Oh yeah, “dem programs.” And who is all this money going to?

    Trigger Warning!

    Meanwhile, tuition has been raised 3.9%

  145. And of course your comment (which unfortunately sat in mod because it had more than one link) supports an overarching assertion of mine: contrary to liberals’ claims that the evils of our time — mass immigration and race mixing — are natural and irresistible phenomena, they are in fact products of discretionary policy. They depend on colossal state and institutional efforts to advance them and even more so, to suppress our natural opposition to those policies.

  146. $385,000 per year to do what exactly? That that is allowed to fly in Michigan, where if it were put to a referendum it would be shot down, is a disgrace. Someone needs to take his money and put him to work cleaning up trash on the side of the road for the next 20 years. Maybe he can develop a conscience, but judging by his face and the look in his eyes, that will not happen. What an ugly person.

    Everytime i see well-to-do black people, i assume that they do nothing worthwhile or productive. Almost all of them are like the diversity coordinator above. Blacks themselves consider that success. Scamming the system is their version of being smart. Other non-whites feel the same way.

  147. The $85 million plan is in addition to the $40 million a year the university already spends promoting diversity.”

    Well, this is a merely an effort by good schools like the U of Michigan to placate those forces that go crazy when noticing that the UM-Ann Arbor is 5% black (and half of those probably athletes). It’s just a way of trying to forestall the next thing that’s coming for public universities – massive relaxation of entrance standards based on racial griping.

    The South doesn’t have to worry about these things, our flagship state schools don’t have this huge diversity apparatus but that’s mainly because of the number of HBCU’s here. This U of Michigan “diversity officer” route may actually be cheaper than funding 8 HBCU’s across your state, however.

  148. Good election within a week of the election. Includes footage of Trump doing away with his teleprompter and hilarious film of Tim Caine losing his notes. Most of the audio is original footage in English. The host’s commentary is subtitled. Frank talk about Huma’s muzz background and of various black women in Hillary’s corrupt circle.

  149. The latest Big News on the criminal syndicate running for president, is that the email links contain coded references to child sex slavery, in the form of “pizza parties” and such.

    The allegation is that Hillary is involved to the point of participating in child sex slave rings.

    From Trump’s speech at the Al Smith Dinner post-debate, that seemingly out-of-place remark,

    “Hillary’s belief that it takes a village…in places like Haiti she’s taken a number of them”

  150. A commenter elsewhere speculates:

    — “I think The Golden Don found out about those poor kids years ago and he’s been plotting all this time to avenge their suffering, even if it cost him his last nickle. There is a flinty grimness in his pursuit of the White House that I noticed, even when he’s smiling, but I couldn’t understand it until now. He literally loathes all of those evil fuckers; which also explains his refusal to go along with the yukks at that roast thingy.”

    The “roast thingy” being the Al Smith dinner where Trump stomps all over the customary bonhommie of the event.

  151. Fox News just said that analysis of the emails shows that Bill Clinton traveled on Epstein’s “pleasureliner” flights far more than previously known. But I don’t expect the MSM to pick up that story any time soon.

  152. If the larger conspiracy behind the allegations is true, MSM’s willingness or not will be irrelevant. FBI can make arrests at highest levels without media’s permission.

    BTW, my “Creepy Gottard Tunnel” post is getting steady hits via web searches today, probably tied to public’s attention to the developing story of Podesta’s weird emails.

  153. =PA: “The “roast thingy” being the Al Smith dinner where Trump stomps all over the customary bonhommie of the event.”

    I initially felt it was bad form to not get into the self-deprecating spirit; that even if you hold genuine convictions of animus toward your political rivals, such dinners and ‘roasts’ were healthy to keep some semblance of ‘greater good’ intact, etc.

    But then I thought: well, if you really, honestly and truly feel your rival is evil and on a course of destruction, then….. .”
    I also reconsidered Trump’s performance at the Smith dinner/roast in light of that vid PA posted the other day of Trump featuring the Michael Moore narration (still can’t pick up the partisan bent intended of that, if there indeed is one, etc.)

    Anyhow, check out this review of Trump’s performance at the roast; I often find myself drawn to and/or in accord with mid-brow ecumenical critical frames toward popular culture and political events; I generate from similar base creeds and impulses, so find myself structurally in tune with such mags critical perspective…but this one I felt might’ve missed discerning Trump’s intentions and political calculus for the Smith event.

    Check it out if you care to:

    https://www.ncronline.org/blogs/distinctly-catholic/trump-boor-ruins-al-smith-dinner

  154. I also reconsidered Trump’s performance at the Smith dinner/roast

    Now, if (and that’s an “if” with compelling and accumulating circumstantial evidence) Trump has known all along that he’s sitting at a table with leaders of a pedo trafficking ring, then his speech and obvious contempt make even more sense.

  155. The greatest flaw of the alt-rite is the inability to “see” their fundamental desire for radical sexual autonomy and so now that it appears that those at the “top” are some of most sexually degenerate kinds of demons THEN the ROOT PATHOLOGY is no sexual morality.

    And so even if alt-riters came into power due the mass self-annihilation of the sexual degenerates gone wild, it would only be a reset and rerun to the same end where a new access and power will only drive the desire for radical sexual autonomy right back to where “we” are right now.

  156. Damn, that kid looks like he’s ten-years-old.

    He may be just that mentally; I mean, it says in the story that he placed the order on his cell phone….. another brilliant criminal who expertly covers his tracks.

  157. Nikcrit…

    Even baby pitbulls have sharp teeth… And baby niggers lack heart beat. Sharp teeth without heart beat equals vampire sheeeeet.

  158. “Now, if (and that’s an “if” with compelling and accumulating circumstantial evidence) Trump has known all along that he’s sitting at a table with leaders of a pedo trafficking ring, then his speech and obvious contempt make even more sense.”

    well, that’s a rather romanticized image for your candidate but i’m sure it’s a bit more complicated than that. To wit: most of those he might be holding contempt toward are also east-coast politicos he gland-handed and contributed to and, umm, TCB’ed in ways a man of Trump’s ways, means and profile has to.

    So while I won’t play moral scold and hold he and his to a standard that no one maintains, period, I will note that he best not play the ‘I-won’t-sully-myself-with-these cynical-Democrats,’ card, ‘cuz the veneer is thin and transparent.

    Something to keep in mind: if things get real hairy for HRC in terms of timetables and other hardcore specifics, it’ll be mentioned in detail just how much Trump donated to the Clintons and other unsavory Dems AND just what specific accusations Trump signed-onto that were critical of those Dems and PRECISELY when he jumped on the accusatory bandwagon.

    Bottom line: i’m sure there are instances where he leveled accusations but later still contributed to those politico’s campaigns anyhow. Again, that’s par for the course —– but that will nonetheless somewhat neutralize the vitriol.

  159. It is worth noting that nikcrit has declared that he does not support nor vote for Trump.

    In real life, people who are unwilling to vote for Trump — EVERYTHING they say about politics and society, culture and history? — reflects a perspective that is either limited and warped, or consciously and explicitly hostile to core and White Americans.

    The Trump coalition is a Funnel to the Future. Everyone outside of it is no more than an anecdote or curio, and worthless beyond the bonds of circumstantial relations.

    *****************

    The most prolific commenter at this blog will not vote for Trump.

    And his case, as illustrated in the comment at 11:01, is that we live in an imperfect world.

    That we live in an imperfect world is a cliche of a criticism, and can only be a cover for a more personal resentment.

    ****************

    Of course it is an imperfect world, and everyone except George Washington and King Jesus is compromised. This is not junior high school and we all know this.

    Not voting for Trump is allowing the established power structure to continue its ways which include the awful things that they do.

    Anyone not seeing that Trump is oppositional to that power structure, which power structure is demeaning to the spirit, lacks discernment and common sense in their appraisal of current events and politics.

  160. “Anyone not seeing that Trump is oppositional to that power structure, which power structure is demeaning to the spirit, lacks discernment and common sense in their appraisal of current events and politics.”

    I did not see that in him until that vid PA recently posted (not the one with michael Moore) in which he laid out his specific ‘ism’ criticisms).

    otherwise, elk

  161. I’m not sure a vote for Trump is necessarily a blow to the power structure (whatever that is). I’m not even sure I want things shaken up much. I have a good life. I still think I’m voting for Trump. The fact that I am reading that I should hate Trump, and yet I don’t, is why I still support him. I don’t like being told what to do. Things seemed to have calmed down in the last few weeks. Personally, I am looking forward to Nov. 9, no matter who wins.

  162. “And his case, as illustrated in the comment at 11:01, is that we live in an imperfect world..That we live in an imperfect world is a cliche of a criticism, and can only be a cover for a more personal resentment.”

    Elk is swinging for the fences early this morning: in the above quote, he starts out with an irrelevant premise, from which he then makes some wildly speculative conjecture.

    Otherwise, elk.

  163. People in real life whom i know, some of them are not voting for Trump. In their case, they are trapped in the mindset that they came-of-age in, which was the 60s and the liberal social justice causes of those times. Somehow for them, the Democrats and even Hillary the Monster is part of that.

    But those people are old or close to it, and out of touch.

    In the case of younger people, either they are SJW’s and all that entails, or they are racial partisans on the side of non-whites, or they are nervous that Trump will disrupt things to their disadvantage.

    And that last explanation is not condemning, i guess. People are convinced that Trump is going to mess up the way things are, which they see as not too bad.

    I don’t see that things can continue the way they are without getting worse to the point of really bad. So the status quo, even though it is comfortable enough, is not an option.

    Now whether Trump is truly an alternative, and nikcrit and others have expressed doubts on that — that question is evaluated with one’s intuition, and the common-sense factor that he is self-funded.

    And considering his speeches and the momentum behind them — they cannot be characterized as a con job on the common man, the core American. How could they be (a con job)?

    Trump is no psychopath. His feelings are real. In other words, he means what he says.

  164. “In the case of younger people, either they are SJW’s and all that entails, or they are racial partisans on the side of non-whites, or they are nervous that Trump will disrupt things to their disadvantage.

    And that last explanation is not condemning, i guess.”

    Kunstler has a recent podcast with Orlov, both of whom are big voices on the topic of the Long Emergency and the inevitable de-escalation of economic and political, and social and cultural, power structures. (Which inevitable de-escalation is not taken as a given within the AR, but which in my opinion ought to be, though how it plays out and the timeline is utterly unpredictable.)

    But within that podcast, Kunstler reveals his laughably predictable jewish neurosis about the Trumpenkreig, when he suggests that a Trump presidency might likely inspire a military coup against him because the military could not handle the military chaos that Trump would (according to Kunstler) cause; to which hypothetical Orlov responds in his flat foreign flat inflection, why would he do that?

    I bring this up as an example of the established classes’ un-reasoned idea that Trump wants to destabilize things up to and including the armed forces on the world’s stage, simply because of what they perceive as Trump’s raison d’être.

    But that is not Trump’s raison d’être — that is how he is being perceived and portrayed by the established classes and their fearful nancy-boy dickheads.

  165. “I bring this up as an example of the established classes’ un-reasoned idea that Trump wants to destabilize things up to and including the armed forces on the world’s stage, simply because of what they perceive as Trump’s raison d’être.”

    I in fact like Trump the Trope; Trump as advertised is actually appealing at times to me.

    It’s just that I don’t believe he can live up to his self-billing; his egomania of the celebrity sort won’t allow it.

    Perhaps my ‘celebrity bias’ is too comprehensive?

  166. It’s just that I don’t believe he can live up to his self-billing; his egomania of the celebrity sort won’t allow it.

    Perhaps my ‘celebrity bias’ is too comprehensive?

    Trump is clearly someone who hasn’t heard “no” too much in his life, and that’s why he’s petulant, petty and (possibly) not great at the compromises you have to make as a politician.

    But all of the talk of all the crazy stuff he’s allegedly going to do is hilarious, the Presidency doesn’t have any of the power they claim for mounting invasions of Canada and such. Nor would he want to do any of what they’re claiming. It’s just shriekery, plain and simple.

  167. I don’t believe Trump will do even 10% of what he is promising. At least he will stop Hillary from doing what she wants to do.

  168. In real life, people who are unwilling to vote for Trump — EVERYTHING they say about politics and society, culture and history? — reflects a perspective that is either limited and warped, or consciously and explicitly hostile to core and White Americans.

    I think that’s excessive. There’s a lot of moderate Republicans and middling independents who really are turned off by Trump’s demeanor and vocal excess and won’t vote for him for that reason. The fact that they’re turned off is Trump’s own fault, ascribing bad motives to them takes the responsibility off Trump for not playing the image game better.

    But that’s politics today – it’s all sound bites, pleasantries and social media. And the liberal MSM controls most of the narrative, but you can neutralize their advantage by being sanitized and safe yourself in your comments.

    Trump still has yet to become a politician, which is fine by me and he still has my vote. But you have to take the bad with the good – only someone like Trump from completely outside the political arena could’ve been bold enough to stick with the ideas of curtailing immigration and changing our trade agreements.

    Hillary and the Kenyan were lifelong politicians who had been preparing for their time on the big stage for 30 years, making sure to always be palatable for the cameras, and always be masking their true politics for as long as possible. For instance, neither supported gay marriage openly until 2009 and Obama opposes reparations publicly, but only because he knows that they’re an instant death sentence to a politician – but you know he wants reparations $$ for blacks in his heart of hearts.

  169. I don’t believe Trump will do even 10% of what he is promising.

    Even if the GOP keeps both House and Senate that is not possible, the Presidency is not a dictatorship. But the President does have great power in determining the makeup of the Supreme Court, and in enforcing border security-related Executive Orders.

    Even Trump’s very election will greatly slow the flow of border jumpers into the USA, before he even passes one single law or issues a single order. The simple announcement that we now have the will power to enforce laws on the books will be huuuuuge.

  170. @PA,

    Your in-line remarks in regard to my November 2,6 at 2019:26 am comment stung hard. That kind of reckoning comes hard for me. Very hard.

  171. re. immigration; i think both parties need to develop more wedges on that issue. it’ll be interesting to see how that issue alone affected Trump’s election result. I think there’s more intra-Hispanic ambivalence on that issue than is repped in the media. I realize that that may come off as overly appeasing —— but i don’t know how else to reckon with that 18% figure; there’s got to be some sort-of bipartisan concurrence on stopping the current rates, otherwise Trump can say all he wants but it’ll still be for naught……

    Three main things and they are manageable: stop illegal growth; reduce or at least maintain current underclass levels and amend current trade policies.

  172. “And this is why blacks have so much trouble following rules of any type – they are not well selected for heads-down conformity and always want to stand out individually because the act of display was their main way to demonstrate reproductive fitness. In contrast, the ability to acquire goods and status over time is how Northern Europeans prove their reproductive fitness.”

    Yes, and i believe there is competition in this country over what kind of ‘mating prowess’-style or, as you put it, ‘reproductive fitness’-model will prevail overall.
    It’s sort-of presumed to be a given that the Northern European way is the more noble method, and I’d agree: there is very little cultural and nationalistic cohesion if the other way, the ‘strutting peacock’ approach, you might say, is allowed to reign free.

    I’m developing a theory of how a new multiethnic class may develop and gain influence in america if we enter a paleo-con-era of governance, i.e., a Trump administration, or (more likely) a strong paleocon counter-movement in protest to a (likely) traditional-90s-style globalist democrat administration, which is status-quo but now tired and ripe for overthrow.

    In a nutshell: we’re ready for paleocon roots revival and solidity —— but the country is too deep in multiracial essentialism, as it’s been going on for over 30 years AT A POP CULTURAL INCULCATING LEVEL.

    That’s essentially the rub of my prediction; i will reveal more details later —– and i promise PAWORLDANDTIMES.WORDPRESS.COM will get the exclusive scoop! lolzz.

  173. In a nutshell: we’re ready for paleocon roots revival and solidity —— but the country is too deep in multiracial essentialism, as it’s been going on for over 30 years AT A POP CULTURAL INCULCATING LEVEL.

    More than anyone here I do agree with the overall wisdom in some of the observations you share about how technology and pop culture/media are changing mating patterns… but sometimes I think you undervalue the fact that if economics change and the USA is less affluent it makes entertainment/media less of a factor because these things are the luxury of a very wealthy nation with lots of idle time and extended childhoods that last into the late 20’s and 30’s.

    OTOH, you look at how the Islamic World is actually growing more conservative there are some that speculate that the male patriarchy in the Muslim World is seeing the effect that technology and media have on women (gives them too much free reign sexually) and the pullback to stringent Islam is a direct reaction to that.

    To us in the West we think something as innocuous as the cell phone does not come with cultural values attached, but nothing could be further from the truth. In Islamic countries there is no mixing of men/women after age 10 and women are not allowed to spend time alone or communicate in private with males who aren’t related to them – but the cell phone breaks this taboo forcibly and gives women sexual power to operate in a clandestine way.

  174. The sheer psychoticness of debating the general state of “black” female KNOWING everything “we” know as supposed race-realist is ONLY EXPLAINED by “radical autonomy” which is equal to being nearly inexplicable.

    The bulk of the white race simply cannot psychologically conceive of a separation from the other although the other taunts and darws the white race to make separation concrete.

    It is truly as reverse psychology goes.

  175. Thor, I asked you a question re. my interpretation of a comment of yours the other day, two or three posts back; you ignored my question or didn’t see it, so i’m going to try one more time.

    From a few days ago:

    ““Three Nation Solution.

    A Land of white Supremacy…

    Liberated Cucklands…

    The Southern Monopoly…”

    My attempt to deconstruct the Thordaddy Paradigm:

    “A Land of White Supremacy”= White pro-whiters all living under an ethos of aspiring ‘Objective White Supremacism”?

    “Liberated Cucklands”= “The rest of those whites who did NOT ascribe to ‘aspirational objective supremsacism”?

    “The Southern Monopoly”= “Non-whites and other ‘minos’ who don’t fit the physical mold requested AND, whether through conscious resistance or inability to grasp it conceptually, are NOT adherents to that aforementioned “aspirational objective supremacism.”

    Am I on the right track here?”

  176. — a new multiethnic class may develop and gain influence in america if we enter a paleo-con-era of governance, i.e., a Trump administration (Nikcrit)

    A new multi-ethnic class has already developed and gained influence in America. A “paleocon” revolution is more likely to eradicate them, rather than increase their influence. Multiethnic ruling classes are innately unstable and indicative of late-stage decadence. It’s like a bunch of infections in a late-stage AIDs patient.

    — In a nutshell: we’re ready for paleocon roots revival and solidity —— but the country is too deep in multiracial essentialism, as it’s been going on for over 30 years AT A POP CULTURAL INCULCATING LEVEL.

    I don’t follow the reasoning here. Are we ready for something that ain’t gonna happen?

    A less charitable take on your assertion is that you’re basically saying “yes! it’s too late for them now! the past 30 years had sealed the deal!” And if that’s what you’re saying, its coming from a place of profound ignorance about human nature and history.

  177. “I don’t follow the reasoning here. Are we ready for something that ain’t gonna happen?

    A less charitable take on your assertion is that you’re basically saying “yes! it’s too late for them now! the past 30 years had sealed the deal!” And if that’s what you’re saying, its coming from a place of profound ignorance about human nature and history.”

    No, it isn’t. And i would say your insult is not only wrong but also ironic… For now, let’s just say I don’t sign-on to your theory, acknowledged or not, of infinite racial dichotomy (mainly because such thought negates and/or contradicts the evolutionary development of racial variance, period, but more on that later). Similarly, that figurative “late-stage AIDS patient” you conjure is, anthropologically speaking, the coming-into-being of the white race historically speaking —– so I wouldn’t speak so lowly of you and yours because you deserve so much better! 🙂 .

    More later; this is too blessed an Indian Summer day for me to sit here and argue with racial self-haters! 🙂 ………60+ degrees, brialliant late-autumn color, porcelain-clear-blue skies and tan terrier pit that i love walking: what more does one really need in this life, eh?

  178. For now, let’s just say I don’t sign-on to your theory, acknowledged or not, of infinite racial dichotomy (mainly because such thought negates and/or contradicts the evolutionary development of racial variance, period, but more on that later)

    White women are the most sought after.

    Black genes are not desirable, and they are not sought after.

    That is my theory on “infinite racial dichotomy”.

    ***********************

    White people don’t want black people in their communities and they don’t want them in their gene pools.

    Blacks want to be around White people for the benefits that they (blacks) derive.

    Whites suffer for it.

    It aint rocket science.

  179. Similarly, that figurative “late-stage AIDS patient” you conjure is, anthropologically speaking, the coming-into-being of the white race historically speaking

    This ought to be good.

    Trickin knows next to nothing, as evidenced heretofore in his posting career, about natural science or physical anthropology.

    So let us hear what he has to say about this most complex and contentious topic.

  180. Sub_elk: Bluster and light-hearted sarcasm are two very different things..

    I’ll go into detail later, but I’m saying an amalgamation of paleocon and multi cult culture is coming—–soon to a town near you..

  181. Trickin knows next to nothing, as evidenced heretofore in his posting career, about natural science or physical anthropology.

    Trickin thinks that multicultural solutions are viable, hence any lack of knowledge in these two areas pales in comparison to his lack of understanding of history, which brutally demonstrates that multiethnic solutions are never sustainable. But, he’s an artist, not a warrior, so I don’t fault him for that – it makes him a good, albeit disillusioned guy underneath.

  182. “It aint rocket science.”

    Every alt right blog ought to make that its tagline.

    Yeah,this is exactly what I want to say every time some alt-righter starts with the 9/11 truther Alex Jones conspiracy bullsh*t.

    We don’t need to ascribe secret motives or objectives to the globalists who want to end western civilization, the SJW’s and multiculturalists are doing all of their work right out in the open in blatant fashion.

  183. “Trickin knows next to nothing, as evidenced heretofore in his posting career, about natural science or physical anthropology.”

    Well, I am someone who holds a BA in journalism and a MA in literature but I have some grasp of the basics in those areas you say i’m deficient; I have some personal interest in anthro to go with any rote undergrad studying.

    I think you’re less than generous even if not totally wrong.

    I disagree with your above racial summation though; in a nutshell, I think the very terms change generation-to-generation, so transforming is the change and resulting norms; look at the cultural and ethnic composition and interaction of this country today compared to 100 years ago; some things that would be considered radical are now not even really noticed. The terms change though; ethnic composition in the aggregate is hardly a homeostatic thing over time.

    Or is that just more TNB on my part? I mean, you, PA and Cam will beg to differ —— but you three are regular commenters on a proudly raycist alt-right blog? Yet there’s often racial dissent of a blue-vs-red essence among this blog’s very commenters.

    The kids I work beside and many of my fellow staffers aren’t particularly keen to ‘get into the white gene pool.’ lolz.

  184. Or is that just more TNB on my part?

    Outside of the shag bragging, I suspect that you’ve never been guilty of TNB for even one moment in your half century on the planet.

  185. “I suspect that you’ve never been guilty of TNB for even one moment in your half century on the planet.”

    Well, I was one of those types who loved to ‘talk shit’ on the basketball court: on my high-school team and, especially, during shirt-vs-skin games at the local YMCA. I would get sort of parodic with it though if I got too overboard.

    But still, that is rather negro-ish behavior, don’tcha think?

  186. Well, I was one of those types who loved to ‘talk shit’ on the basketball court: on my high-school team and, especially, during shirt-vs-skin games at the local YMCA. I would get sort of parodic with it though if I got too overboard.

    Pretty standard now, especially if it’s of the good natured variety. I’ve seen brutal fights on basketball courts, though. My junior year we won a close game over our biggest rival on the road and a few of our own players were mouthing off and we nearly got mobbed by the other team’s entire student section.

  187. Nikcrit…

    In the liberated Cucklands, miscegenation will be the norm and exiles from both The Land of white Supremacy and The Southern Monopoly will be welcomed as “refugees” and dutifully assimilated in cuck ethos.

    “Blacks” in The Southern Monoply will be there on purely economic terms as tentative shareholders of a revitalized plantation producing and distributing with monopoly-type status the King of PEDs… The world’s finest sugar.

  188. ““In the liberated Cucklands, miscegenation will be the norm and exiles from both The Land of white Supremacy and The Southern Monopoly will be welcomed as “refugees” and dutifully assimilated in cuck ethos……Blacks” in The Southern Monoply will be there on purely economic terms as tentative shareholders of a revitalized plantation producing and distributing with monopoly-type status the King of PEDs… The world’s finest sugar.”

    Well, there you have it PA, elk, et.al: Thordaddy just tidily exemplified my theoretical offering of an impending “Paleocon-multiculti Amalgamation in ‘Merica.”

    So, what’s not to love in that? lolzz.

    (I’m telling you, man: Thordaddy is a one-in-a-million find; if only I could figure out how to monetize that kind of talent, if that’s indeed the word for it).

  189. $385,000 per year to do what exactly? (elk)

    Propaganda Minister.
    As Robert Putnam demonstrated in Bowling Alone, people don’t actually like diversity, therefore it has to be forced upon them.

    I grew up in the thick of diversity and subjected to massive pro-diversity indoctrination, but I always felt that there was something off about it and that I was being lied to. But I am also someone who takes great offense to being pissed on and told it’s raining.

  190. It’s just a way of trying to forestall the next thing that’s coming for public universities – massive relaxation of entrance standards based on racial griping. (Cam)

    Back when I was applying to colleges, U of M employed a point system to it’s applicants. On a 150-point scale, a score of 100 was needed to guarantee admission.

    If you were black, you got an automatic 20 points. That was not a small boost, it was a huge boost… to put in context, a perfect SAT score was worth 12 points!

    That ranking system has since been deemed illegal by the Supreme Court.

  191. Nikcrit…

    Paleo-cons are not genuine white Supremacists YET and the “multicult” are, in fact, radical autonomists desirous of total annihilation.

    So whatever “amalgamation” that one can conceive of will, under a mutually beneficial military federation between The Land of white Supremacy and The Southern Monopoly, STAY STRICTLY CONFINED to the liberated Cucklands by all means necessary.

  192. The liberated Cucklands will be “vallied” by the Rockies to “its” West and the Appalachians on “its” East. Furthermore, although the liberated Cucklands will have the Mississippi River, it will not control its Gulf port nor its northern anchor. Those will be under the control of The Southern Monopoly and The Land of white Supremacy.

    Three Nation Solution > Two State Resolution > One World Ordered Institution…

  193. Pingback: How America Can Be Made Great Again – PA

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s