The Three Stages of the Red Pill

Fear — Blue Feet, Red Ears. “I’m not a racist, but…” he says. He stands planted in blue-pill zone but reaches over the boundary to hear out the red-pill points. Or to put it differently, he is emotionally and intellectually at home with the establishment-approved worldview but it no longer feels like a home. He is unsettled by what he’s seen his country become but he is not ready to challenge his beliefs.

The red pill is bitter, so limit its dosage when he seeks you out because as soon as you tell him that the World Trade Center towers were taken down with controlled demo or that women shouldn’t vote, he will think you’re crazy and run back to the safety of conventional platitudes. It’s best to let him do 90% of the talking. Actively listen, ask gently-leading questions, and fire off exactly one simple, memorable maxim. He will work his way toward the red pill because nobody stays long in a place that keeps him afraid.

Anger — One Foot On Blue, One On Red. Intellectually, he accepts the non-liberal truths but emotionally he is not ready to separate from the security of old thinking. When sufficiently fired up, he can be fully on board with the even most racist dialectic. But here is the dead-giveaway of a half-footer: he talks red pill not so much to find answers but to unburden himself. He will sincerely apologize, should SJWs attack him for something he had said.

He is in transition, seeking the emotional release of hard-hate ranting, only to settle back in blue-pill calm when spent. His ideological home is unwelcoming but as much as he wants to leave, he can’t quite yet. But he will; perpetual anger is exhausting, and eventually circumstances will force him to make the leap to the next stage.

Peace — Both Feet On Red. He has made a full separation from old blue-pill illusions, which is another way of saying that he has returned to Western tradition. That naïf who once “supported the troops” or exalted over the goodness of women — that was someone else entirely. He understands that while the here-and-now is a comedy, it is not a game. Reluctantly or otherwise, he has accepted responsibility for the people and things that he claims as his own and has cut his obligation to those that aren’t.

He does not live on a rarified summit. He simply understands that he’s on firm ground while blue-pillers either noisily thrash or quietly sink in the quicksand.

Advertisements

126 thoughts on “The Three Stages of the Red Pill

  1. Good post, PA. A couple of things, though, and not to start a flame war, but just some clarification:
    1 – What part of the WTC do you think was demo-ed? I consider myself as red pill as anyone else, but I’m not on that team. Am I DQ-ed from being a red piller because of that?
    2 – Our troops only do what the generals and C-in-C tell them to do. That’s where I draw the line – I support the troops, but the not the decisions that are made on what to do with the troops. Am I wrong?

    All in all, I can see myself in this post. I was always leaning Red, but when I found Z-man about 3 years ago, things changed. Your blog has been a part of my enlightenment – thanks for your words and insights.

  2. Thanks Mike. I’d put it this way: there is no orthodoxy at the red pill level; informed people sometimes reach separate conclusions and disagree on this or that point. But the question is, are their views as informed as they could be, or are they a product of habit or fear of what they may discover if they dig too deep? I believe that all three of the WTC towers were taken down by controlled demo. What convinced me is the Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth video — THIS ONE-HOUR version of their full two-hour film. It’s possible that someone else watches it and reaches a different conclusion than I did, but at least he will have weighed the evidence rather than blindly believed in the narrative. As to supporting the troops, I used that as metaphor for conservatives’ and liberals’ respective enthusiasm for neocon wars abroad while flooding the country with invaders at home.

  3. That’s a good progression of conversion right there.

    The one thing that got me down this path was finally reading up on the bailout and how all that went down and learning about the stock market and investing. I started to read different sites and then became aware of Breitbart. That was an eye opener. I would post stuff on FB, and one buddy said, “oh, that’s Breitbat, disregard it”–to paraphrase. And of course, told me to visit Media Matters….HA!

    One transition after another and then I find Heartiste, after doing a google search on birth control. I must admit that had I discovered that two years prior to when I did, I might have dismissed what he talking about. I got caught up in CH’s word mastery and kept on reading and it all came together.

    I wasn’t taken aback by any of it–it was a though I was primed or had been primed to accept the hard truths that I was somewhat aware about, but they were just circling around, not coming into a cohesive fashion.

    That led to other RP sites–some I still read, others I’ll just peruse now and then. As the good book says, “test all things, hold onto what is true.”

    When reminiscing about my blue pills days, I simply laugh and shake my head. There’s no going back now and I’m damn glad.

    Where once I was blind, now I can see!

  4. Pingback: The Three Stages of the Red Pill | Reaction Times

  5. I think very few WNs are capable of going all-in. Those that have are famous – Brevik, Roof, Pierce, Covington. They have severed all ties with the system.

    Most of us, myself included, are still one foot in WN, one foot in the system boat. I’m not proud of that, but it’s reality.

  6. I think this piece was interesting; it was the first ‘in-depth’ feature on the disaster with a engineering angle and analysis; and it was only two months or so after the tragedy.

    I think an important standard that conspiracy theories should meet is: how does this measure up to analyses that are counter to mine? Or to an indifferent, apolitical analysis.
    I’m not saying the following link does that, but there’s no starting premise that’s polemical.

    http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2001/11/19/the-tower-builder

  7. I don’t believe any conspiracy theories about the Towers.

    Either way, the reasons it happened are the same (too much immigration) and what the USA should have done about it (close our borders to foreigners from known terror-supporting regions) also remains the same.

    If anything, maybe 9/11 should’ve been considered divine punishment and a wake-up call for the USA being stupid enough to keep letting in so many foreigners that we knew to be antagonistic and sympathetic to attacks against soft targets. In 1998 there was that failed attempt to blow up the towers with car bombs, yet Bush was still out there railing against “Arab profiling” earlier in 2001.

  8. Thanks, PA, for the explanation. I think I’m with Camlost on this. Our nations ‘leaders’ (or should that be (((leaders))) ), have taken us in a direction that disgusts me. I pray for our nation’s future.

    At any rate, yes, looking at ALL the data and explanations are part of being an informed citizen. As a high school STEM teacher, I encourage my students to always look at ALL the data – don’t cherry pick. Funny how some of their other teachers don’t feel that way. Makes me sick.

    I read it once a while back that we don’t ever make up our own mind or develop our own beliefs – we hear others opinions, and compare them to our world view, then pick the opinion that most represents our own perspective (including religion -that’s a whole different ball of wax). But you can’t really see the truth until you allow your preconceived notions to fall – that was a big moment for me. The Z-man, Breitbart, Chateau, and you, PA (and others, too), have had a real strong influence on my enlightenment.

  9. “They have severed all ties with the system.”

    Or you might say they have ‘severed all ties with daylight and are now permanently locked WITHIN the system, no?

    Ryu, if we were all figurative ‘Breviks,’ there’d be no foolish white people left to radicalize, no?

  10. “Either way, the reasons it happened are the same”

    Are they? I mean the guys in PA’s vid are contending that it was American govt. officials, not A-rabs, that A) created the clandestine immoliation within the three buildings; B) found, trained and then set-up and disposed of the seven or so hijackers; and then C) created all the govt. panels of political and military officers to proceed with the ‘foreign-terrorist’ decoy theory…. That is some sneaky-fucker shit right out of a Tom Clancy novel!

    [AE911Truth contends no such thing. Did you watch the video that you are completely misrepresenting? The only thing they contend is that NIST’s explanation for the collapse of the three towers is inconsistent with observed evidence, which points at controlled demo, therefore a new scientific investigation is necessary. Where did you get all that other stuff from? –PA]

  11. p.s.—- the counter-theories are not so much in PA’s vid, but within several from the vertical queue of similar vids that runs alongside the main screen.

  12. i wrote that p.s. before i saw your in-line boldface remark; the side queue vids r the ones i was referring to; one of ’em i’d seen before.

  13. As a high school STEM teacher, I encourage my students to always look at ALL the data – don’t cherry pick.

    Yes, but people will still believe what they are inclined to believe at the end of it all.

    Liberals also think they are “looking at the data” when they make crazy and comically exaggerated claims like the absurd idea that police are gunning down black men in the streets with “impunity.” (the 20,000+ blacks arrested daily puts the number of police shootings we see in perspective for those who understand numbers)

    Nor do liberals want to hear that the “data” shows that blacks are neither impoverished, starved or oppressed considering that they have higher average incomes than most of white Eastern Europe, along with combined $$ consumer spending power equal to all of France or the UK.

  14. All these particular profiles MUST BE GLEANED from the “words” of the profiled in the virtual realm.

    The desire of the “default elite” is a mass uncertainty that shall equal a mass insanity.

    So the task is not to find consensus, agreement or treatise…

    The task is to once again possess an individual sanity ACROSS THE BOARD.

    This requires a GENERAL CERTAINTY…

    And I am absolutely certain that the next radical step FOR ALL high IQ “white” male liberationists is either white Supremacy or self-annihilation.

  15. The measure of being “in” or “out” of the system can be dismissed with a wave of the hand because the nature of State subsidization is so uncertain.

    So a Ryu can point to a Breivik and a Roof who are TOTALLY STATE SUBSIDIZED and then to a Pierce and Covington who are with State-approval, socially castigated as “white supremacy” when, in fact, they are “national” STATIST, ie., national socialists, and SEE ALL AS “heroes” of “WN.”

    THIS ^^^ IS RADICAL AUTONOMY…

    AND REFUSAL to proceed to (w)hite (S)upremacy.

    Refusal to go beyond “red pill.”

  16. Alt-rite is so much like liberal “Christianity…”

    Forgot that HE was talking to his son.

    The idea of imparting one’s wisdom ON ALL OF HUMANITY is the radical liberationist’s grossest debauchery.

    Only white boys who swallow pills matter in this psychological battle.

  17. Camlost – you are right. They do. That was the point I was trying to make. I can talk to my STEM kids all i want, but at the end of the day, they’re going to ‘believe’ what they want. That’s sad, isn’t it? That a person, young or old, can’t just ‘open their mind’ and look at all the data, no matter the source, and make an educated ‘conclusion’ to what the data are saying.

  18. Camlost, I also think that people just need someone else to think for them. They have no confidence, or whatever, to be ‘sure’ of what they think, so they look to someone else. I’m sure there could other reasons, but some people just can’t think for themselves, and need someone else.

  19. One can’t, as a metaphysical abberation of a cabal of radicals set about to “kill” their peoples’ God, find himself in a dire diversification and then turnabout to articulate a conception of his peoples’ God along the lines of Perfection.

    OR HE CAN…

    But this thread is a singularity and it seems only the thread of wS has articulated his peoples’ God as Perfectiom without a suspicious past of voiced enmity.

  20. SoCalMike…

    But yours is an old and tired lamentation…

    I DID NOT ask for 9/11…

    So I sure in the fugg did not CONSENT TO ANSWER whether it was an “inside” or “outside” job.

    And if I say it was a little some of BOTH just to give courtesy to *your* psychological intrusion, DO NOT take this as invitation to further intrude.

    What to know and what not to care to know… This is the question.

  21. PA…

    The question that will arise eventually in those white boys with the most vigorous minds is HOW DID I ACTUALLY make these transitions?

    God-ordained free will?

    Or the universally-totalitarian. Stimulie that is (r)eality itself?

  22. Thordaddy, most of your comments are too abstract and self-referential for me to make any sense out of, much less apply. I still have no idea what your “wS” means except as some vague notion of belief in God and affirmation of patrilineality.

    You get your point across when you talk concretely and from experience like when you described your college football career. That was a memorable comment.

  23. PA…

    I am concretely saying to YOU that your ABILITY to “see” the above “pill” transitions ONLY FALTERS at the revelant nexus described as the “white boy.”

    IF…

    Your ABILITY TO SEE the “pill” transitioning WAS MORE PARTICULARLY articulated as from/to/from a “white boy” then you would be espousing something akin to (w)hite (S)upremacy.

    AS OF NOW…

    The post on “pill” transitioning MAY BE addressed to a little jihadi boy, a little Jew boy, a little negro boy, a little homodyke or a little illegal boy… Egalitarian.

    It’s a form of deracinated Christianity that you are mired in.

    And you still refuse to “see…”

    Anti-white Supremacy = anti-white Christianity…

    They are one in the same…

    Only, YOU THINK NOT.

    And will not articulate how or why OTHER THAN REFERRING to a liberated conception of “white supremacy” as your opt-out.

  24. If *you* RED PILL a nigger, HE MUST ASSENT to genuine (w)hite (S)upremacy OR he remains a nigger…

    Go down the liberationist line and the above truism REMAINS solid as a rock.

    YOU DON’T EVEN NEED TO KNOW what genuine white Supremacy IS…

    Rather, all you need to know is that the nigger is anti-white Supremacy… He and the ADL say it ALL THE TIME.

    AND IF YOU AGREE…

    With a niggerju’s anti-white Supremacy…

    Then you can not “red pill” anyone in your stunted state.

  25. First there was red pill and blue pill.

    And now there is black pill and white pill.

    I have heard of purple pill, now and again, which means somewhere between blue and red.

    Also there would be a grey pill, which is about data and events that can’t necessarily be seen as positive or negative.

    Realistically a green pill might be a selling point. A yellow pill is not. Nor would be an orange.

  26. t-daddy, your endless harping on radical autonomy suggests a radically autonomous personal regimen. You’re going off the deep end. This is life; not a dress rehearsal.

  27. “Simple continue”

    That’s trite
    But not
    Quite right
    Father
    A half-truth
    From man…
    Rather
    One hour
    See
    Be
    Zest
    Is the test
    Of a soul
    Not laid to rest
    Still wrestle yet
    Rustle
    Crow
    And beat his chest
    Run the blade
    Manifest
    The best
    Then ponder
    Weather
    Just?
    A vest
    A cloak
    To provoke
    A court jester jest
    I digress
    To be blessed
    With such
    Temporary quest…

  28. EPG…

    I’m the best at “radical autonomy” and white Supremacy…. The former BECAUSE I don’t lie to myself and the latter because there is literally no competition.

  29. p.s.—- the counter-theories are not so much in PA’s vid, but within several from the vertical queue of similar vids that runs alongside the main screen.

    That is a perfect example of how “conspiracy theory” is, for lack of a better word, marginalized.

    A lot of goofy ideas get thrown out, and they sound goofy and implausible, and that is what people think, when they hear about “conspiracy theory”.

    As PA corrected, the vid in question does not maintain that “the government” (whatever that means anyways) did it.

    I used to follow that topic closely, but now it seems to have receded in significance. It is my unwavering opinion that the three WTC were brought down in a controlled demolition, and that the Pentagon was hit by a missile.

    What evidence could come out now, this much later, that would be more convincing than what has already been out there.

    I remember arguing with an old lady at the office, and i told her my opinions on 9/11 and further that she was being lied to by the MSM trickledown media whores, and she responded that she would rather believe them than me.

    So i asked her if she thought that Oswald killed Kennedy, or whether instead there was a conspiracy. And it turned out she did not believe that Oswald had killed Kennedy per the official story. But that wasn’t going to shake her faith in the nightly news.

  30. Elk…

    What you and PA have just presented…

    Do you make things any more clear or less clear for “white boy?”

    I would say you both make things much less clear.

  31. Can’t wait until your venture into prose poems, TD. Or is that what you’ve been doing all along? Touche!

  32. Controlled demolition IS CONSPIRACY of which identifying the conspirators IS THE ONLY RATIONALE for “seeing” the conspiracy in the first place…

    Or…

    Just apathetic STOOGE posing as national gadfly?

    There HAS TO BE A NEXT STEP after “controlled demolition?”

    Anyone vouge for a possible demolition set-up throughout the buildings? Such a “controlled demolition” would be a massive conspiracy in and of itself spawning what has to be some convincing corroboration indicative of demolition installation? Is there anything out there, elk, in this regard?

  33. — I am concretely saying to YOU that your ABILITY to “see” the above “pill” transitions ONLY FALTERS at the revelant nexus described as the “white boy.”

    I have no idea what that means.

  34. PA…

    How did you successfully profile those you’ll find in the particular “pill” transitions above?

    HOW DID YOU DO IT?

    I’d say you had done it mainly in a state of racialization. But even more particularly, you are able to SEE the above “pill” transitions in the profiles of those you’ve profiled SO AS TO TRANSCEND the “pill” paradigm to BE WHERE EXACTLY…

    I’d say closer to Perfection…

    So what you have presented above is a racialized tendency towards objective Supremacy…

    Concretely, white Supremacy…

    Tomorrow’s white Supremacist is today’s white boy. This is the nexus.

  35. — you are able to SEE the above “pill” transitions in the profiles of those you’ve profiled SO AS TO TRANSCEND the “pill” paradigm to BE WHERE EXACTLY… // I’d say closer to Perfection…

    OK, I do understand what you are saying here. It is similar to with LBF said: what’s beyond the “red pill?” I can see the red pill transitions because I went through them myself. Not from a liberal starting point though. But mainly, I was thinking about people I know when outlining this post.

  36. PA…

    You are, in effect, reverse engineering white boys…

    You help impress a virtual “pill” transitional paradigm that then serves to MOVE young people “in” and “out” of the “pill” transitions. But the unintended consequences are YOU attempting to transcend the “pill” paradigm and those simply desirous to destroy the paradigm absolutely.

    You cannot destroy white man’s desire for Perfection…

    You only expose yourself as terminable when most advantageous.

  37. PA…

    Were you not a “white boy” once or is the phrase too American for your conceptual consumption?

  38. “That is a perfect example of how “conspiracy theory” is, for lack of a better word, marginalized.”

    Just to clarify and set the record straight, though no one seems much concerned about this tangent, but: I claimed the vid PA posted about the questionable explanation to the 911 tragedy contained ‘conspiracy theories.”

    It did not; they were ALL in the side-queue list of YT videos that ran alongside the screen of PA’s video. But they were unrelated to PA’s link.

    I neglected to make that clear, probably because it was a negligible point for me and my purposes, but not so much for his……. anyhow: my bad and i stand corrected.

  39. Thor: “Nikcrit….You need to “see” how sane I am…”

    T-Daddy, WTF are you talking about, buddy? I’m really starting to wonder…. There is something about your riffing that is alternately hysterical, yet, in turns, truly unnerving.

    You got this talent for going waaay out there, yet convincing common-sense folk that it is THEY who are askew in their thoughts and deeds.

    I think it’s your willingness to be unpopular and occupy the group outcaste status that oddly enough endears you to other commenters —– even while all-the-while driving them insane.

    I’m inclined, perhaps conceitedly, to believe I share a bit of that same quality; I’m somewhat of an ‘Afro-eccentric’ in certain quarters, usually white bohemia cliques, who don’t know quite what to make of me upon first encounters; they’re not used to the mixed bag of known and unknowing subjectry coming from my particular physical package

  40. Good analysis PA.

    For me it became much easier when I realised after a few personal encounters with sjw zealots on campus that they really sincerely hate us. When I hear negative talk now about white people it sounds sinister, like a tenderising of the body politic before the slaughter. They really believe in inherited guilt. I hope I am wrong but I can’t help thinking it will end in violence.

  41. Thordaddy. What is the objective of your writing? Do you wish to intelligibly communicate your thoughts, or is unintelligiblility the standard by which you measure communication?

  42. Philomathean…..

    My objective here is to convert PA to SELF-AVOWED white Supremacist (he is already a self-avowed white Catholic and so you glimpse the chaos) so that he can transcend his ethnic angst. He still thinks MRKA is the main distributor of “liberalism.”

  43. “The quickest way to be red pilled is to live in diversity.’

    My Red Pill lense helps my enjoyment of black and white culture; I accept its humblings and it enhances my appreciation of the distinctions and relative strengths and weaknesses among the varoious races.

  44. Interesting to see CH mention the prospect of civil war in recent days at his site. Not once, not twice, but several times. The idea is getting out there, finally. It’s not as far-fetched as some on our side like to claim, but neither is it a given. There’s a lot of mischief to be made.

  45. I did some investigating, and, with the assistance of some comrades in TN, found Tim Wise’s new address in Nashville. Confirmed IRL. He now goes under a different name. When the civil war starts, it’s information like this that I’m hoping will come in useful for certain partisan black flag factions on our side. Until then…

  46. Since we’re on the topic of 9/11 conspiracies, my opinion is that it happened pretty much as we’re told; 19 arab muslim hijackers flew the planes into the WTC and the Pentagon. I believe this for two reasons:

    1) muslims have a tendency towards suicidal terrorism unlike other religions. If hindus or Taoists were suspects, then I would question the official narrative much more.
    2) In the age of the internet we know about Hillary’s speeches to goldman sachs, we know about what happened in Benghazi, we know about the NSA…its actually very hard for a relatively open society like the US to contain its secrets. We even know about the MK Ultra program and the black pilots deliberately inflicted with syphilis in Tennessee to study the effects of that disease. I have to think that we would know conclusive evidence from insiders about 9/11 being an inside job too, from leaks or defectors.

    Now, you can tell me all about this or that video, and I can produce a counter-video also full of technical details. I prefer to apply occams razor common sense arguments here instead of getting mired in endless technical details about the melting temperature of steel beams and terminal velocity of falling towers.

  47. — My Red Pill lense helps my enjoyment of black and white culture (Nikcrit)

    One can enjoy many different things but identity eventually runs up against the question of commitment. Like I wrote: “he has accepted responsibility for the people and things that he claims as his own and has cut his obligation to those that aren’t”

  48. “One can enjoy many different things but identity eventually runs up against the question of commitment.”

    And to some, cultural ‘committment’ invariably comes racial form; i.e., ‘black -vs.-white’ or whatever dichotomy one prefers. But it doesn’t have to be that way, yet more importantly, for many it DOESN’T appear that way, or feel that way —— and that probably because their particular formative experience didn’t render their perceptions that way.

    I don’t see why that is hard to accept or comprehend. Not only is that true, i have experienced set cultural dogma reinforcing as much; e.g., my citing of the past of a renovated warehouse in Hyde Park in which I came across a 12-step-like recovery group, but whose malady was not substance abuse but a communal lament about their MONO-racial-and-ethnic heritages; IOW: they were lamenting the fact that they WEREN’T biracial or mischlings or whatever, but rather boring old purebred Goys or Jews or blacks, etc.

    I, of course, see and acknowledge the absurdity in such a scenario and cultural clime —- but it’s real. And is it not surprising that, given our shared avatar bios here, the world of Nikcrit would encounter this moreso than would his respectful blog nemesis, PA? I mean, in my day-to-day millieu, white, black or hispanic boys, if given the absurd hypothetical choice, would overwhelmingly wish to be a black or hispanic male than a white Polish male. But perhaps more relevantly, they wouldn’t see the ethnic particular as a hard fact that eventually required some sort of ‘either-or’ fealty, what you describe as a ‘question of committment.’

    Whatever. I know this is familiar ground; i only paint out the particulars to exemplify just how common my contention is IRl —- for me and mine!

    I think we’re all sincere in our beliefs, but that cultural tunnelvision is a peril that all of us at times need to be mindful of. That is not p.c. sanctimony, but merely keeping the critical lenses clean and uncorrupted.

  49. It’s not a question of being respectful or otherwise, or appreciating this or that alien cultural group or quality. It’s about who you are. I will never be a Norwegian or US Southerner or a Thai, no matter how long I’ve been friends with one or lived among them. I’ve talked with individual Norwegians and one-on-one they are as ordinary and normal to me as I am to myself. But then when it’s one of me among seven Norwegians a weird thing happens where I appreciate how fundamentally different they are from me in their collective.

    I don’t think I am communicating the “responsibility” element of identity clearly enough for you. It’s a mutual unspoken bond that for better or worse, this is who you fall in with. Who you find yourself accountable to and who will take you in. It may well be the case though that you will never understand what I am saying here because your psychological frame of reference makes that impossible.

    — a communal lament about their MONO-racial-and-ethnic heritages; IOW: they were lamenting the fact that they WEREN’T biracial or mischlings or whatever, but rather boring old purebred Goys […].

    You keep company with some really pathetic Whites. Either because they mean what they say, or because they patronize you. Maybe it is the latter. As a biracial man you live in a Schroedinger’s world of inability to observe a White world without affecting how it behaves around you. Online it’s easier to witness authenticity, which is probably what pulls you here.

  50. — And to some, cultural ‘committment’ invariably comes racial form; i.e., ‘black -vs.-white’ or whatever dichotomy one prefers. But it doesn’t have to be that way

    Those “some” you refer to are the Supermen who are adrift between Africa and Europe, as my metaphor in that long-ago post went. To everyone else, it does have to be that way (ie, coming down to racial form).

    It may help to quantify things: since desegregation, White Americans have spend upwards of quadrillion dollars on seeking separation from Blacks in terms of housing cost, private schools, dindugeld taxes, commuting cost and distance, and other things.

  51. Nikcrit…

    I was hoping you would glimpse a little sanity in my new avatar… Besides, how many INSANE father of four who have bounced in SoCal for almost twenty years do you actually know? None or perhaps a one and only?

  52. “You keep company with some really pathetic Whites. Either because they mean what they say, or because they patronize you. Maybe it is the latter.”

    No, I had explained a few times in earlier exchanges, i believe at GL Piggy, so I cut to the chase. But this was the circumstance; i was in grad school, Hyde Park, circa late 80s/early 90s; i had volunteerd to do some tutoring at the university lab schools, and one of their properties was a former warehouse that had been converted into office and academic space, i.e., portable partition walls, etc. I was to volunteer with a h.s.-age study group, going over some basic college compositional skills and came upon a group on the ground floor of the building that i assumed was my assigned group. But it wasn’t; it was the aforementioned ‘recovery’ group….lolzz.

    Keep in mind, htis was the late 80s/early 90s, the period when political correct pieties and outrages were in full-tilt boogie; a time when every professional workplac environment featured mandatory ‘sensitivity training,’ in which groups had to role-play and assume humiliation-scenario as part of their ‘other-empathy training,’ etc.

    And those deprived full-blooded WASPs, Jews, Asian and other purebreds weren’t from society’s dregs; no, these were the vanguard of the emerging 21st-century corporate class….IMO and experience, it’s usually the prole sector of the majority population, in this countrey working-to-middle-class whites, that occupy the race-realist sector with its alt-right charter.

    You could be right to some extent, of course; i’m not a naive man, and i’m sure i’ve been spared certain racially confrontational realpolitik situations, because of my particular position within the b-vs-w day-to-day. But i’m also mindful of what EPG noted the other day: a lot of INTRA-racial distinction and finesse is totally overlooked in the service in tending to the everpresent B-W dichotomy that is pushed by that digruntled-within-the-majority sector.

    I just call it like i see it.

  53. Nikcrit…

    The dwindling of things “black” WILL NOT usher in things “white” socialist. And no true race-realist remains oblivious the “European” ethnic’s personal war on American white Supremacy.

  54. I’m a reluctant hater. I don’t want to hate other people, but hate other people because of multiracialism. I’d like to be able to admire blacks from afar (their speed, for example), or the talents and aspects of other peoples’ cultures, but I can’t do that because these peoples are being forced upon me and my country.

  55. Philomathean…

    This FORCED INTEGRATION that you “see” and viscerally resist NOW serves as the pretext to dispense with the LEARNED concessional front that is admiring “blacks” from ANY DISTANCE which will invariably lead back to the “give an inch and they’ll take a mile” recurrence of degenerate dysfunctionality.

  56. “but I can’t do that because these peoples are being forced upon me and my country.”

    I thought i recalled you in a earlier post and comment string noting that you grew up in a majority ghetto-black neighborhood in Florida somewhere; one that was highlighted in some mainstrema movie or something, no?

    If that’s so, how would that comprise you ‘being forced upon me (in) my country?” I mean, such blacks would likeliy have lineage that traces back to this country’s origins, no? And for the record, i really don’t get any satisfaction out of this racial tin-for-tats re. ‘who has residential provenance here,’ etc., as it really is all an accident of birth; fwiw, ithink guys like PA are as much residents of the u.s.a. as am I and other typical mid-american residents several generations deep. But it does humor me when these nationalists start to get all territorial about what they believe is their country because their particula personal politics and polemics stretch out some and just assume as much. I say such presumption is getting quite a bit ahead of oneself.

  57. Yes, that is true.

    It’s not only blacks, it’s every person from every wretched corner of the world pouring in here. Regarding blacks: I tend to get along fine with blacks, individually, it’s groups of them that are problematic and their peculiar group behavior causes my resentment toward them, resentment no doubt you’ve experienced toward blacks yourself. Absolute separation is nessasarily, for American Africans and Whites.

    I have no problem with European immigration into my country.

    Now, a Japanese man can no more come here, attain American citizenship, and claim to be American anymore than I can go to Japan, attain Japanese citizenship, and declare myself Japanese.

    And, yes, this is my land. My ancestors carved this country out of a vast wilderness. I take ownership of it because it’s mine. My blood. My soil.

  58. Thor,

    So let’s say we achieve separation. How do we interact with the non white world? They’re ~90 percent of the people on the planet. You’re viewing admiration through a contemporary lense.

    In an explicit White homeland children and adults will be educated through school, government and culture on the evils of multiracialism and diversity. That said, that doesn’t mean we can’t, for example, appreciate Thai culture, assuming the Thais allow us the opportunity.

  59. Philomathean…

    Implicit to multiculturalism, diversity, enforced integration and mob pressure for equality IS A MALICIOUS MANDATE TO ADMIRE the Other.

    So the learned behavior… That “liberal” behavior that must nearly kill “us” before we recognize “it” as a self-annihilating act… This learned behavior is,”You MUST ADMIRE the Other, white boy, or you shall be irredeemable.”

    So the most pertinent separation is psychological and it must precede any and all successful physical separation.

    Only here ^^^ can one begin to consider how to interact with the Other… Only when one has dispensed with the diabolical illusion of enforced admiration of the Other.

  60. Imagine one demanding admiration as a prerequisite to a “mutually beneficial” relationship?

    This is ^^^ THE IMPOSITION OF pathological altruism.

  61. “And, yes, this is my land. My ancestors carved this country out of a vast wilderness. I take ownership of it because it’s mine. My blood. My soil.”

    I could make the exact same claim on the exact same grounds. In terms of national sovereignty, WN makes for a much firmer argument in Europe than it does in North America, IMO.

    @PA, in terms of Euro immigration policies and the current debates and controversies; what is the specific standard, if there is one, that determines Whites from Arabs? Is it merely a matter of culture and Christianity vs. Islam?

    This may come off as naive, Williams Country style, but I sometimes have a hard time visually discerning certain, say, ‘Syrian’ immigrants from, say, certain southern and southeastern Europeans and other Mediterreanean-area populations….. I’m thinking of that guy, that comedian,….Latke?……. He was big about ten-to-fifteen years ago… he supposedliy came from Uzebikistan (sp?), territory east of E.Euorope and bit southeast of Soviet-controlled areas? He was, i believe, a Jewish comic and actor but he portrayed a sort-of cliumy muslim character…wtf was his name?

  62. In terms of national sovereignty, WN makes for a much firmer argument in Europe than it does in North America, IMO.

    No argument needed. It’s our land. Full stop.

  63. You could be right to some extent, of course; i’m not a naive man, and i’m sure i’ve been spared certain racially confrontational realpolitik situations, because of my particular position within the b-vs-w day-to-day.

    I think your epistemological blind spot as a biracial is that you can go around glibly proclaiming your appreciation and fealty to black and white culture, openly, and no one will bat an eye. In fact they would pat you on the back for it. Whereas us whites, merely openly expressing explicit appreciation, let alone preference for our own culture, heritage, genetics, is utterly taboo. It’s ironic, that by virtue of your dual heritage you are allowed to appreciate your whiteness unabashed. I think you get that intellectually but you don’t experience the demoralization.

  64. “No argument needed. It’s our land. Full stop.”

    Yeah, I guess if push comes to shove, the operating rule is: “whoever can take the land and adjoining seas and hold it.”

    Maybe the blue-pill-vs-red-pill divide amongst white westerners is God’s way of preventing world tyranny? Or at least I believe the white-west would be world rulers if political consensus amongst whites was unanimous.

    I think your epistemological blind spot as a biracial is that you can go around glibly proclaiming your appreciation and fealty to black and white culture, openly, and no one will bat an eye.

    Perhaps, though i’d characterize said ‘fealty’ and open appreciation manifesting as an open-mindedness; displaying a breadth of cultural knowledge and, most of all, bearing a noticeable lack of cultural resentments as the way to be accepted and have no one as much as ‘bat an eyelash.’

    That more than any claim of fealty one would explicitly make —– but i think i catch your drift and agree, pretty much totally.

  65. “IS A MALICIOUS MANDATE TO ADMIRE the Other.”

    Question: is it pathological or self-annihilating if one ‘admires the other’ free of the pressure of any mandate?

  66. Nikcrit…

    Wouldn’t that depend on the essence of the admiration?

    And certainly no admiration free of outside pressure NEED BE PUBLIC, no?

    Right now, the zeitgeist DEMANDS admiration for the Other BECAUSE “it” is the Other and therefore the measure of control is more aptly defined.

  67. Was 9/11 an inside or outside job?

    Do you admire the Other

    I NEED NOT ANSWER EITHER ONE OF THESE PSYCHOLOGICAL INTRUSION whose only purpose is to pull one into the chaos of the Narrative and place one within the relentless riptide of the zeitgeist.

  68. Thor,
    Admiration of someone or something free of all or any ‘mandate,’ is to me on its way to being an act of genuine ‘free will.’

    ——————————————————————————————————————–

    RE: “Maybe the blue-pill-vs-red-pill divide amongst white westerners is God’s way of preventing world tyranny? “

    PA, you can thank me after the the Packer-vs-Cowboys coming up now for providing you with a superb sub-topic for this thread! 🙂

  69. Nikcrit…

    You are missing the
    point…

    Philomathean wills to live in The Land of white Supremacy…

    So that…

    THERE IS NO “so that.”

    It SHOULD BE full stop at desire to live in The Land of white Supremacy.

    THE ADMIRATION of “blacks” is TOTALLY irrelevant to the desire.

    I desire a land of white Supremacy SO THAT I may admire “blacks” from afar IS A TOTALLY UNNECESSARY frame indicative of submission to the zeitgeist…

    The “black” collective REJECTS objective Supremacy, ie., Perfection…

    SO THAT the debate over admiring “blacks” IS A REAL MIND FUGG as the above general knowledge MAKES said “black” collective ABSOLUTELY UNADMIRABLE TO ANY DEGREE.

    This is not the Matrix… It’s tic-tac-toe… One step at a time.

  70. [eric holder]: “We need to have a discussion about race.”

    [eric bolder]: “No, we need to have a conversation about white Supremacy.”

    [eric shoulder]: “That means thordaddy will give ‘us’ something to cry on.”

    [eric folder]: “Well, let’s just talk about rape.”

  71. displaying a breadth of cultural knowledge and, most of all, bearing a noticeable lack of cultural resentments as the way to be accepted and have no one as much as ‘bat an eyelash.’

    It would be entirely possible for whites to partake in the equanimity you enjoy, if they were only allowed a modicum of explicit pride that is granted to everyone else. Because such pride is stigmatized so thoroughly, it falls into extremism.

    Also, beyond the black-white dichotomy in the US, there are people out there you hate, you just don’t know it yet. To borrow an analogy from middle-brow escapist lit, whites are like the Night’s Watch, protecting you and yours from the marauders beyond the wall.

  72. No… “Explicit pride” IS DEFINITELY NOT NEEDED for individual white men to strive towards Supremacy.

    UTTER NONSENSE…

    And BOUND to take “us” to the same place of relative degeneracy that “we” are trying to escape in the first place.

    High IQ “white” male EITHER CONCEIVES a “god” more perfectly revealed than the God of the Bible OR HE STFU…

    His atheism doesn’t mean shit in the existential formula OTHER THAN total annihilation AT HIS END.

  73. “Implicit to multiculturalism, diversity, enforced integration and mob pressure for equality IS A MALICIOUS MANDATE TO ADMIRE the Other”

    I agree, however, the future scenario I envision is one where Whites are free of that mandate. This is why I wrote about population wide education on the evil of multiracialism, which can be transmitted in both secular and religious terms. This process will re-otherize the other in one generation, probably less considering the manifold events that could possibly lead to separation event.

    Once the dust has settled and our people are healthy in mind and body once again, admiration, or, if you like, appreciation, from afar can be a good provided White interests are sacrosanct and we approach the other from a position of love, appreciation and admiration of our own people first.

    How does the cliché go? You can’t love someone else before you love yourself.

  74. “you are allowed to appreciate your whiteness unabashed”

    No, he’s not. I’ve never met tricken and I can say with 100 percent accuracy he’s be badgered by blacker blacks.

  75. ” I can say with 100 percent accuracy he’s be badgered by blacker blacks. “

    Lol!!. Well, I’m around these figurative ‘blacker blacks’ every day of my work week and have substantial give-n-take with this group. I think i know what you’re saying but i’m wondering if perhaps you’re projecting a bit of your strong childhood experiences onto what you’d think i might endure; I mean, i hear you, but in my case there’s also a strong adult-vs-child and authority figure-vs-student element in play, which heavily neutralizes the social dynamic i think you’re getting at and that i appreciate you noting even if i don’t think you quite got it nailed here.

    See, the world’s different today for a lot of reasons; via technology and other mundane forms of ‘progress’ and interaction, no one is that alien anymore; prole blacks see bourgeois blacks every day and every hour of the week; along those lines, prole blacks are repped in the pop culture, as are bougie-blacks in this day and age, and that alleviates a lof this hypothetical class tension with the races that you are sort-of symbolically citing but not really gleaning from actual current experience. I would add that I, too, would feel similarly and possibly posit as much if it weren’t for the surprising first-hand experience i’ve gathered from my current gig, in which the intra-racial class clashes, IN ALL THEIR NUANCED DETAIL, are a day-to-day occurrence.

    But I appreciate the good-faith assumption; I’m just duly noting that it’s not that cut-n-dried anymore.

  76. The civil war, I see, is getting off to a propitious start.

    Everything is pretty much falling into place just as we predicted it would.

  77. It’s two worlds. In one, Whites go about their lives relating to one another, with non-Whites figuring into things about as much as wombats do — in other words, none at all. There is something degrading about spending too much time around people of other races or even thinking too much about them or discussing them. It’s diminishing to our spirit and I am not using the word in some heroic connotation but simply in its commonplace relationship with basic human dignity. This occurred to me as the weekend wound down. I went to an all-day party that went late into the evening yesterday, in which there was no non-White. Today, I spent the day with a cool group of people on the Chesapeake, again, the normalcy of being with all-White families was blazing like the sun under a blue sky.

    The other world is a place where non-Whites, in contact with us, are consumed with a mix of wonder and an inferiority complex that compels them to latch on to us with fury. There really is something crippling to us about having too much of racial-awareness, its entanglement of one’s own and the Other, on one’s mind for more than a passing moment. I’m not saying that race et al shouldn’t be commented on here, even to the extent that it does. I’m just noting the fact too much exposure to other races (in person or even in concept) and the resulting racial self-awareness it imposes on us wherein we see ourselves through the filter of race rather than taking this basic matter of our humanity as given as the fact that the sun travels across the sky, is a feature of an era we’ve been born into. As with all eras, this one too will have seen its rise and fall.

  78. In simple summary PA…

    It is absolutely crippling to only view white Supremacy RELATIVE to the “black” collective as though the latter was the originator of the former AND ULTIMATELY in control of the “white supremacist” paradigm that so cripples the white race.

  79. Sime live in the world of racial absolutes; some don’t.

    I’m guessing their mutual worlds are largely unknown to each other.

    I may never know what I’m missing or lacking, if anything.

  80. Most white people are not race obsessed or even preoccupied. It is hard to get the average white person to talk about race much at all.

  81. ^^ That’s because most whites would prefer not to be. That of course was the noble goal of the Civil Rights Movement. Judge not by the color of one’s skin but by the content your one’s character, right? That ideal, however, requires all parties to uphold their end of the bargain, which of course has not happened. Blacks and other assorted fruits and nuts have taken that olive branch and thrown it in our face. It has only happened because we have allowed it to and the only way out is for us to start thinking racially as well, as unpalatable as that may be for most white people. If we do not, then we will be seeing more of href=”http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2016/09/30/white-house-wants-add-new-racial-category-middle-eastern-people/91322064/”>THIS

  82. yeah, it was a sad week for ‘Wisprosports’; i expected much worse from the Badgers, so that was not even bittersweet…. But yesterday afternoon’s debacle? Scary thoughts ensue…

  83. Thor:

    Maybe that Gazelle-like sense of personal sacrifice is requisite for the ‘high-Nordic’ transference of its superior material standard and industrialized mentality to the lower Euro tribes, and from there down unto NAMdom?

    Does that make theoretical sense to you?

    I mean, to heck with my white-elite ‘ennui’ theory; still, maybe a given people reach a point of cultural apex in which the only ‘next step’ that maintains destiny and grace is to pass along/bestow its essence onto others, in this case human lessers, no?

    I don’t know.

  84. The reason I don’t subscribe much in the White elite ennui theory, at least in its straightforward sense, is because of the evidence against it. Namely, all of the putatively suicidal elites fight viciously against their real enemies — populist challengers from the Right. Hillary pulling all stops against Trump; EU leaders’ vigilance against nationalists; McCain yukking it up with Sharpton one moment and attacking Tom Tancredo the next.

    Is there something to the Nordic I dunno, docility? There is one scene I witnessed recently at Oslo airport that kinda sits with me. There was a minor kerfuffle involving an American arguing with someone in customs line. Nothing anyone would bat an eye at here, but over there, a big teddybearish, burly uniformed Norwegian security agent appeared from nowhere and gave the loud man a stern talking-to. The Norwegian giant had that broad very Nordic face of a lumberjack. Very childlike in its gentleness and honesty as I judged it. But I could easily see him snapping someone’s neck without so much as a shrug if it’s what he had to do.

    PS: one of my first posts here was about “White Guilt.” It was before most of y’all found this site. There I argue that it never was “guilt,” it was always pity.

  85. Really interesting discussion between Stephan Molyneux and Jared Taylor, in which they posit various theories for white pathological altruism. The good stuff starts at 45:00, which I’ve linked to. I listened to it on my commute today. Jared Taylor says something reminiscent of what nikcrit has been saying – Taylor says he has been getting letters from non-whites saying essentially “stop this self-flaggelating insanity! We need white people to lead us into the future.” Thought you guys would appreciate it.

  86. “Docile” is not my word. The gazelle/big cat analogy spoke more to the point of those at the 9-10 Nordic rank WITH A VISCERAL FEEL for their existential end OVER and above those Nordic of 8 and lover rank. In other words, IF the white race is facing extinction THEN its whitest aspect IS CLOSEST TO THAT ABYSS.

    What shall “we” see from those 9-10 Nordics?

    Earnest self-annihilation is a real phenomenon in the 9-10 Nordic sphere. It’s not docile… And it’s only “graceful” in the sense that barely any make an absolute disgrace of the situation.

  87. “IF the white race is facing extinction THEN its whitest aspect IS CLOSEST TO THAT ABYSS.”

    Do you agree with me that THAT specific subset of whites has some particularly special aspect that would be lost if they were to self-annihilate? I’m thinking you agree as you once mentioned that it was the 9-to-10-level Nordics that specifically created the highest material standards of already overall higher white standards of living. do you recall saying that?

    IDK, maybe a misunderstanding there accounts for other disconnects; fwiw, i’ve always acknowledged the particular talents and rewards of white culture, including its INTRA-hierarchical distinctions.it’s just that I don’t equate that with a larger or aesthetical sense of ‘superiority.’ Humans need everything from rarified intellection to primal and viscereal-refreshing physical vitality —— and we certainly see lopsided evidence of both those aspects in our ever-present rainbow-coalition of mediated deeds, day after day after day after day.

  88. Taylor says he has been getting letters from non-whites saying essentially “stop this self-flaggelating insanity! We need white people to lead us into the future.” Thought you guys would appreciate it.

    If you remember that nutcase Th*wack in the midst of his insane guttural ramblings he did say one memorable thing about whites along the lines of “no one should really want to see whites decline, they’re too valuable to the planet.”

  89. Do you agree with me that THAT specific subset of whites has some particularly special aspect that would be lost if they were to self-annihilate?

    Maybe some technology will be found that can re-extract and re-claim those necessary genes from the places to which they have scattered, I’m thinking some can be found in the Midwest…

  90. PS: one of my first posts here was about “White Guilt.” It was before most of y’all found this site. There I argue that it never was “guilt,” it was always pity.

    Exactly.

    But a lot of the craziness that goes on in the world is just people wanting the world/government to behave in the same way that they treat their own people.

    Why do blacks always despise law enforcement, rules and order? Because soft matriarchal laxness, easygoing rules and cutting corners is how they treat each other. It suits the tendencies that biology has awarded to them.

    Why do an alarmingly large chunk of Nordics always show a quixotic, almost childlike belief in making life easier and helping others? Because that’s how they treat their own people.

    Why do low-end Middle Easterners always seem to embrace violence and lack the ability to get along with others (economically, politically or socially) beyond the tribal level? Because constant warfare, strife and rivalry with the next village is dictated by their genes.

  91. In my experience with Scandanavian Americans I would say they have a problem with direct confrontation, but still want their way. They can be very stubborn. They are physically tough people. They will work outside in very cold weather.

  92. lara, et.al,

    For the record, i didn’t put anything too specific into my choice of ‘docile’; I was mainly speaking of the tone of certain Northern European political gestures —— specifically, that ‘passionate release’ of the Arab convicted of planting the Lockerbie bomb.

    That’s pretty docile to me —- and that would be just a start to long list of critical descriptives.

    I mean, i see the ‘sturdy Scandinavian’ thing too; actually, the moment i used the word ‘docile’ i was thinking of that Scottish political act —– the forgiving, and later revealed scheming involved. So the docility charge gets put on the WASPs, not the Scandos!

  93. Blacks are not soft on crime when they are the victims. I just watched a Forensics Files where the black stepfather, of a murder victim, wanted to personally administer the lethal injection to his step daughter’s killer.

  94. Blacks are not soft on crime when they are the victims

    If left to their own devices blacks are both subjective and soft on law/discipline 100% of the time. A huge portion of crimes in the black community can’t be solved because the victims refuse to tell police what they know and testify or cooperate with law enforcement, then later blacks bitterly complain that law enforcement can’t solve crimes despite the lack of information. The squalor and poverty of the civilizations blacks lead then become the major deterrent against crime – no one bothers to leave their mud huts to go through the trouble of stealing when there’s no goods worthwhile enough to merit the effort.

  95. Nikcrit…

    The 9-10 Nordic is speculated to be the descendant of the speculated ruling class of all the major ancient empires. These blonde/red hair, blue-eyed ancient elite where that class of “Aryans” that the Nazis venerated and basically birthed our modern understanding of HBD.

    But the annihilation of the 9-10 Nordic as an aspect of that Nazi veneration is more “self” induced than genocidal EQUAL to your modern “white Christian.” His annihilation is largely a chosen deracination.

    On the other hand, a white Supremacist BEING anti/self-annihilation MUST BE genocided.

  96. “His annihilation is largely a chosen deracination.”

    If so, that is a cosmic blunder that will consume us all. That/they are the standard-bearer for human civilization, period.

    but if that is so, one better hope that the concept of Nordic ‘trickle-down cultural bestowment to the point of genetic ‘take’ best be true. If not, then planet earth and ALL earthlings truly are screwed.”

    That or some thoroughly unanticipated script and agenda better produce itself.

    And in a jiffy!

  97. trickle-down cultural bestowment

    Only the English have talent for cultural bestowment, which is another way of saying imperialism.

    Germans try to hammer the round pegs through square holes because they fail to understand that nobody else is as Ordnung-driven as they are. Scandinavians are somewhat similar except that they expect others to be as kind as they are. The Romance nations are inept at best in their imperial ambitions, butchers at worst. Slavs and Celts couldn’t care less about molding others in their image.

  98. RETAKE: blog host, please delete the last comment:

    @PA, Thor, etc.

    Where else, I ask with true objectivity, are you going to find discourse like this amongst a rainbow coalition of commentariat?

    Maybe I’m caught up in a moment of impassioned bluster here, but I say this type discussion is very rare in terms of candor, breadth and content, especially when taking in the ethnic bona-fides of its participants.

    That, or we need heed the warning I’ve characterized in exchanges with EPG is manifesting itself: that said glut is preventing me from seeing the zeitgeist-ful forest for the trees!

    Hey, what can I say? Happy hours can unleash all sorts of rhetorical mischief!

  99. — Where else, I ask with true objectivity, are you going to find discourse like this amongst a rainbow coalition of commentariat?

    You don’t know the half of it. The comment you asked me to delete is now rubbing elbows with Sorcerygod’s zapped comment in the Trash folder. Yes, he still tries to comment here.

  100. O.T.: On my way to work this morning, the regional UW-based NPR station female announcer informed me that Wisconsites are pulling out their pom-poms tonight for their beloved Green Bay Packers, who tonight revive their heated rivalry with the dreaded Chicago Cubs.

    Ouch and ouch again—– for all the overheated rhetoric AND a closing line that merely confirms its obvious lack of sincerity.

    i mean, why even bother with all that consider the particular demo here?

  101. Only the English have talent for cultural bestowment, which is another way of saying imperialism.

    The English also have capacity for a level of objectivity that is light years ahead of any other culture. This is evidenced by how many peoples of the world can adopt their cultural features/artifacts (language, dress, business practices, social customs) without even realizing that they’re “culturally appropriating” these items.

    A lot of the anti-Western craziness we see in the Middle East comes when their insanely jealous and anti-feminist men realize that even the most mundane Western technologies or practices (such as cell phones, TV programming or co-ed schooling) actually come with some underlying values attached and this makes their formerly docile women less docile and controllable.

    For instance, women can’t even drive in Saudi Arabia. It allows too much freedom that could lead to women choosing their own sexual partners.

  102. It is exactly the lack of IMPERIAL INTENT that so retards the white man’s regenerate sexuality. And it is the INHERENT anti-imperialism of radical sexual autonomy that shall lead to a proverbial mass “jerking off” and the EARNED SPOT at the bottom of the dust bin…

    And the NERD shall be MOST ACCOUNTABLE.

  103. 1) Why does this post deal with “he” instead of “he/she”?

    This note comes from a stern anti female supremacy advocate, make no mistake.

    2) The red pill is bitter, so limit its dosage when he seeks you out because as soon as you tell him that the World Trade Center towers were taken down with controlled demo

    We can be sure the WTC wasn’t taken down the way it was recounted, but we can’t be sure how.

    3) Or that women shouldn’t vote, he will think you’re crazy and run back to the safety of conventional platitudes.

    If today we all agree women “shouldn’t” vote, tomorrow a part of us will agree that the other part of us “shouldn’t” vote.
    Plus: when you use “shouldn’t” that way, you sound like the converse of a NYT’s Roger Cohen like another.

    All vote, or no-one votes, there are the two real allowed options.
    While very aware how women vote is driving the West towards the direction opposite that of my liking, you won’t get to make me subscribe to dictatorship this way.

  104. All in all, I wonder how aware you are that if you got it entirely the way you like it, free-thinking individuals who don’t feel the need for comfortable platitudes would be at least as much in trouble as they are with the corporate supremacist media and SWJ remote-controlled crowd now.

    Why would a free-thinking person support you, when it’s all too evident there would be no room for free thought and free thinkers in a setting where your movement be the majority and held the power?

    A race-affectionate, country-loving one would. A consistent free thinker, who’s repealed by the idea of forcing anything onto anyone, does not.

  105. Pingback: The Three Stages of the Red Pill — PA | Red Pill Nation

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s