A Few Words On Today’s Militant Blacks

The first word a Black baby learns is “mama.” The second word he learns is “racist.” That’s today. Before the Civil Rights coup d’état, Black men tipped their hats to White teenage boys. They helped White men track down and lay a beating on Emmitt Till, a visitor from Chicago who didn’t know that in the South of that day there were consequences to cornering and terrifying a married woman and then doubling-down on the churlishness when given an opportunity to apologize and go free. Since then, American Whites have been hog-tied by their federal government while Blacks have been liberated to follow their basest instincts and incited to violent anger by every one of their country’s institutions, now with the president of the United States telling them, in so many words, to go out and kill White policemen. They understand that the system stands behind them.

There are Black nationalists who want separation. But there are maybe four of them in the entire United States. Yet Black self-sufficiency was once a more serious movement, going back to the writings of Booker T. Washington. But today, what passes for nationalism among militant Blacks is nothing like what a White nationalist would recognize as a pursuit of sovereignty. Instead, militant Blacks see the country as a magic buffet that White folk are hogging for themselves. They see a nice park or a nice neighborhood, a nice school, a nice ratty flea market, or a nice restaurant without Blacks in it, and they feel robbed. So let’s say, Whites give it up to them via white flight; the place turns to shit instantly and the Blacks then look at the next nice White park, neighborhood, school, flea market, or restaurant and in a continuation of this cycle, they once again feel wrongly uninvited. They don’t want what nationalists have always fought for — land and its natural resources to hold as their own. They want the magic buffet that somehow always disappears the moment they touch it.

They want what commenter Thordaddy calls “liberation without separation.” And not even in the form of conquest or imperial dominion because they don’t want to rule over Whites, they want Whites to take care of them in perpetuity. It is a child’s worldview. Take a mentally retarded or a drunk White adult — but without the speech and motor impairment  — and you have the typical Black Lives Matter “nationalist.” There are, to be sure, militant Blacks among the talented-tenth but the animating spirit of their passion is the shame of being patronized by Whites, the shame of being in a superior station over their untalented 90% fellow-Blacks without much in the way of visible merit, the shame of having abdicated their responsibility for them, as well as the shameful and repressed thought that they are mascots, rather than players, in the shaping of their own people’s destiny. That compound shame, rather than being faced and reckoned with, is sublimated into one-part-toxic and three-parts-inane truculence like that which we see in the writings of Ta-Nehisi Coates.

Advertisements

107 thoughts on “A Few Words On Today’s Militant Blacks

  1. Speaking of Booker T. Washington, I can’t recommend his autobiography Up From Slavery (free on kindle) enough. Alas, I suspect not a percent of a percent of today's American blacks know that this inspiring work chronicling his heroic levels of determination, patience, and persistence and his commitment to the principles of independence, hard work, and self-reliance even exists. Definitely worth your time.

  2. If Hubert Harrison had grown up in this era, he’d have been a Thomas Sowell type. Try out for the ML Baseball, get cut, then spend his life enjoying the Stanford air-conditioning. As for Frederick Douglass, he’d be a comedian about on par with Richard Pryor. Mascots of the secular murk.

  3. It’s teenage rebellion – rebelling against daddy, but with the expectation of daddy’s financial and emotional support. Daddy needs to cut off his spoiled brats.

  4. They are a joke, not to be taken seriously.

    This essay is sure to rustle some jimmies.

  5. I’m surprised at you, PA. So you know that the American police state is only directed against whites. That is a great credit to you.

    Only whites feel the Spirit of 1776. That’s why libertarians and survivalists/patriots are nearly 100% white. Whites are the only race that value freedom.

    And knowing that the police of Norway or the police of America are only interested in policing whites, how do you now feel about Anders or Timothy?

  6. Pingback: A Few Words On Today’s Militant Blacks | Reaction Times

  7. “……… the president of the United States telling them, in so many words, to go out and kill White policemen.”

    Sad, paranoid, ridiculous and beyond the pale.

    Guess the heat this summer is getting to everyone.The brave new many-to-many media era: now every madmen can preach to his similar-minded choir.

  8. BLM are a terrorist organization.

    Those who support it–including elected officials–are guilty of supporting terrorism and inciting, directly or indirectly, violence against Americans.

    This isn’t rocket science, folks.

  9. Handle: for some reason your comment ended up eaten (in the Spam folder). I concur, I read it in college. It’s worth re-reading.

  10. It’s funny. I’ve spent almost 30 years thinking about, reading about, studying, and collecting info and artifacts on African COIN warfare in Rhodesia, South West Africa, and South Africa in the 1960s-1980s. I’ve lived and travelled there, and have been published on the topic. I’ve thought for a long time that the forces that conspired to end European rule in those countries would eventually converge on Europe and the U.S. Which I think they’re now doing.

  11. I was too young to fight in Rhodesia, SWA, and SA, but I finally might have my chance in Europe and the U.S. now. Exciting!

  12. It is worth watching. Our MAGA hero pictured above tries to help one of the broken losers on the other side, calling him “my brother”, but to no avail. The guy he reached out to had thick enough wrists but his voice and face is whiny.

    It is pretty bizarre, to think how it is that people turn out like that (those limpwrist swapples).

    The explanation? is as simple as that white people have proliferated to the point that many many many of them don’t know and accept the fundamental realities of life, which is fight and struggle.

    Appeal to universalism all day long, but at the end of the day, the winners win and the losers get wiped off the stage.

    We forgot to teach the kids that lesson at school.

    It’s on now. There was a block party last night, downtown, “graced” by BLM and apparently they were throwing rebar at the cops. I got this info second hand but trust it; i bet it is not even in the paper.

  13. The Trump Man above is brilliant in that style of confrontation though. Respectful, assertive, on the ball, and most of all humorful.

    I can’t talk like that, with people in real life. Someone today was saying about how Dylann Roof was treated with kid gloves whereas BLM is not.

    My response is “Great, who fucking cares, white power now.”

    But upon thinking about it, the appropriate response, is that neither the cops nor BLM is on my side, the side of regular White people. It’s high / low against the middle.

    The cops are the strongarm of the “elite” and BLM are the Underclass, and it’s great to see them at each other’s throats. But the typical kool-aid drinker thinks that the cops are part of a “racist white power structure”.

  14. The reason that arguments against the other side, don’t work, is that argument ultimately comes down to Identity.

    They don’t want to be part of a winning white team — because of what that requires and entails.

    Which is blood and guts.

  15. There are questions about how we reconcile War, with our ethical instincts.

    I have thought that White Advocates would do well to include that predicament as part of their thing.

    There is no solution to those questions. I like Greer’s quote on War,

    Yes war is ghastly and no it will not go away.

  16. I didn’t get the quote right. Here it is in context,

    It’s become a running joke on the internet that the word “upgrade” inevitably means poorer service, fewer benefits, and more annoyances for those who have to deal with the new and allegedly improved product. The same logic can be applied equally well across the entire landscape of modern technology. What’s new, innovative, revolutionary, game-changing, and so on through the usual litany of overheated adjectives, isn’t necessarily an improvement. It can be, and very often is, a disaster. Examples could be drawn from an astonishingly broad range of contemporary sources, but I have a particular set of examples in mind.

    To make sense of those examples, it’s going to be necessary to talk about military affairs. As with most things in today’s America, the collective conversation of our time provides two and only two acceptable ways to discuss those, and neither of them have anything actually useful to say. The first of them, common among the current crop of American pseudoconservatives, consists of mindless cheerleading; the second, common among the current crop of pseudoliberals all over the industrial world, consists of moralizing platitudes. I don’t particularly want to address the moralizing platitudes just now, other than to say that yes, war is ghastly; no, it’s not going away; and it’s not particularly edifying to watch members of the privileged classes in the countries currently on top of the international order insist piously that war ought to be abandoned forever, just in time to keep their own nations from being displaced from positions they won and kept at gunpoint not that many decades ago.

  17. Elk’s video is excellent.

    In a shocker, heavy underdog Portugal beat the African mercenary French team in the Euro 2016 finals. As to my own personal note, we were so close. Poland, undefeated in the tournament (all wins, tied Germany in a game) was 1 – 1 with Portugal at the end of regulation time in the quarterfinals. Neither team scored in two overtimes. Then in the penalty kicks phase, the Portuguese goalie blocked one of the kicks, giving Portugal the win.

    Parabéns para a nação português!

  18. – I’ve thought for a long time that the forces that conspired to end European rule in those countries would eventually converge on Europe and the U.S. Which I think they’re now doing. (Laguna Beach Fogey)

    I’m less familiar with what happened in Rhodesia. In South Africa, social justice language allowed globalists to destroy White rule without a shot fired. They brought that model to the assault on Europe and the US but one hopes that this is where we push back because we oughtn’t fall for that dialectic any more — plus, we have nowhere else to go.

  19. In a way, whites (specifically white men) are in the same situation as the husband in the typical modern American marriage: all the responsibility with none of the authority.

  20. In a way, whites (specifically white men) are in the same situation as the husband in the typical modern American marriage: all the responsibility with none of the authority.

    And all of the Federal Tax Burden, too.

  21. And as with the husband analogy, there are people in the “wife” role who are living in what they don’t realize is an unnatural paradise, and they love it. Blacks, obviously, but also pretty much the entire Democrat Party coalition. Many gloat about demographic shifts, taking it for granted that the husband will keep working, keep bringing in the money dutifully and taking even more abuse as the wife gets fatter and uglier each year.

    They can’t conceive of a scenario in which core Whites finally flip the board and quit playing. The era of nice White people will then end.

  22. Many gloat about demographic shifts, taking it for granted that the husband will keep working, keep bringing in the money dutifully and taking even more abuse as the wife gets fatter and uglier each year.

    A lot of Democrats think that the USA’s wealthy economic system fell intact from the sky and white males just happened to elbow others out of the way to inherit it all.

    [Exactly. The “magic buffet” metaphor in the original post. — PA]

    They don’t realize that the work ethic, law abidingness and high trust of white patriarchy is what allowed the country to be this economically successful. As the workforce shifts from highly productive, highly conscientious, highly educated whites to NAM’s with less ability our average income level will continue to drop, and there won’t be enough tax money to keep feeding the government.

  23. “A lot of Democrats think that the USA’s wealthy economic system fell intact from the sky and white males just happened to elbow others out of the way to inherit it all.”

    I have a friend who stopped by the other day. I see her only once or twice per year and we mainly just catch up and chat. She’s one of those Polish-Hispanic biracials we’ve talked about lately, though like Cam she’s visibly white to just about anyone. Anyhow, it was the night of the Dallas police shootings and she kept making occasional quips like, “Oh, I can’t stand white people anymore,’ etc., to which i’d laugh and reply, “But you’re white, goofy girl.”

    I mean, she grew up on the border of the black ghetto; married a white prole and has a horrible marriage (they stay together ‘for the kids’), moved to a white-prole-ish suburb the second she could afford to, and sends her daughters to white inner-ring suburban schools.

    Yet she says the kind of anti-white slogans without a drop of irony or contradiction and you get the feeling that she not only really believes what she’s saying, but she strongly identifies with that sentiment —– she wears it proudly on her sleeve.

    Anyhow, she’s really into desecrating ‘the white male.’ Her big rap is she thinks that not only blacks, but also women and other minorities should be accorded ‘reparations,’ which should be levied totally against white males.

    I openly ridicule her and say pointedly raycist and sexist bromides to raise her ire.

    Anyhow, she had an abusive dad, physically and not sexually, so maybe that counts for something.

    I think a lot of contradictive behavior like this is borne out of a fear of being anonymous; it’s an edge to not feel so cookie-cutter or whatever; i mean, the slightest bit of scrutiny of their behavior should inspire a reckoning, but it doesn’t and i think it doesn’t because genuine conviction really isn’t the goal.

  24. “the Magic Buffet”

    Love it. We have to serve it, clean up after it, and all for no compensation. Oh, and we can’t eat anything either. We truly are running on fumes.

  25. “Beyond the pale.” Have you not been paying attention? It all started with that Gates clown at Harvard and the Beer in the Backyard at the White House. The president absolutely has not done anything other than encourage the ferals among us to act out.

  26. It all started with that Gates clown at Harvard and the Beer in the Backyard at the White House.

    If I was that officer I would’ve refused to attend, even if it meant getting fired.

    Actually, I would’ve agreed to attend, so that the press announced it all, and then changed my mind and backed out of meeting the President.

  27. If I was that officer I would’ve refused to attend, even if it meant getting fired

    There was a post and a discussion at Lawrence Auster’s about that. The “beer summit” is as undignified as a “fried chicken” summit would have been in reverse. Consensus was that he was heavily pressured to attend. Probably pressured with stakes going beyond just being fired, would be my guess.

    Officer Crowley seemed to be a rare combination of race-idealist and a stand-up man. He was a chief diversity officer or something like that in one of his units. Can’t rule out him choosing to attend for reason of “racial healing.”

    One of Auster’s posts featured a photo of Crowley gently helping the elderly Gates down the White House stairs while obozo strode ahead imperiously. Auster, reflecting my own reaction, expressed a bit of annoyance with the Nice White Person effect on full display.

    On the other hand, Crowley chose the Blue Moon beer, which is a Belgian WHITE, heh.

  28. LBF, you must come and find me. We have much to discuss.

    I too know about Eugene de Koch and Barend Strydom. For a long time, I wondered if there were any Rhodie or Boer racists left. Then I found this guy; he must be one of the strongest nationalists alive, and he lives in SA.

  29. “The “beer summit” is as undignified as a “fried chicken” summit would have been in reverse. Consensus was that he was heavily pressured to attend. Probably pressured with stakes going beyond just being fired, would be my guess.”

    That Gates brouhaha marked the first time i ever commented on a HBD blog; i was curious, and dug it up —– here’s what ‘nikcrit’ said, circa summer of 2009, before he had yet to drink one ounce of alt-right Kool-Aid, lol!!

    nikcrit: “Good article. But it really doesn’t reflect anything on the Gates case. Gates would probably agree that he isn’t representative of the typical black American who encouters police on the streets. Furthermore, he didn’t call for undue level of press and hysteria surrounding the arrest; the financial interests of the media did.

    What this officer wrote here makes sense and is a chronicle of what seems to be a noble mission and career.

    Yet, while it may not be as important, and it certainly isn’t worthy of the attention it’s been getting, what Gates endured was unfair and discriminatory. In a nutshell: once Gates identified himself as the owner of the house, the officer should’ve left — even if Gates was less than dignified in how he verbally conducted himself over the course of the incident.

    What many covering this story have neglected to point out is this: a law officer acting professional would’ve been able to put aside his indignation at Gates’ alleged sass and left the scene once he learned that no crime was being committed. Granted, it may have been the officer’s discretion to make an arrest for disorderly conduct, based on Gates verbal indignation, but what it really shows is a thin skin — and a lack of foresight on how the incident would be viewed after the fact. He chose to feel threatened and menaced by a cranky, 59-year-old man who uses a cane, who was justified — if a bit ill-mannered — at the hassle of being treated like a criminal in his own home.

    Had the officer taken the noble route and simply left after realizing Gates was the owner, it would be Gates who looked petty and driven by racial antipathy rather the police officer who acted out that antipathy further and made it into a national story.”

  30. I don’t recall the details of the Gates Incident, beyond what is repeated on this thread. But i am inclined to agree with Trickin’s comment from 2009.

    It probably was YET ANOTHER case where the cop couldn’t stand having his authority questioned.

    The flip side, is that Gates was acting like a teenager, like a dick, like an adolescent, … like a black man whose accomplishments in life are not merited. / ouch

    Two self-important people who can’t bow down gracefully, to each other, to custom, to well tempered manners and to the goal of a civil society.

    Black Americans and cops, two segments of society that oh-so-deserve each other. Might it be said that they are engaged in a recursive dance of annihilating esteem?

  31. Yet, while it may not be as important, and it certainly isn’t worthy of the attention it’s been getting, what Gates endured was unfair and discriminatory. In a nutshell: once Gates identified himself as the owner of the house, the officer should’ve left

    HUH? Gates was RENTING the house, first of all.

    And anybody can claim to be the owner of anything, without proof. Gates went crazy at being asked for his ID, then freaked out even further demanding the officer’s ID. You can hear Gates screaming in the background of his call to the dispatcher.

    Gates deserved to be arrested. You can’t just abuse private citizens, right? So why should anyone be allowed to heap loud verbal abuse on public servants.

    It’s just another example of black folks not being able to shut up or follow rules, plain and simple. The Africanization of America continues.

  32. The “beer summit” is as undignified as a “fried chicken” summit would have been in reverse.

    Oh but black people ‘get’ white culture because they have to live in the “dominant paradigm” but white people can NEVER get black culture!

    That line of reasoning is a staple of so-called critical race theory.

  33. I remember the Gates incident as if it were yesterday. Years later, his cranky, unstable behavior, and his pinched little pug-monkey face, is what people remember.

    Cop 1, Gates 0

  34. Years later, his cranky, unstable behavior, and his pinched little pug-monkey face, is what people remember.

    LOL. And the officer tried to walk away himself and told Gates that he was leaving and that Gates would have to come outside if he wanted to discuss with him further. (at which point the dignified educator kept screaming and said “I’ll come outside and speak wit’ YO MOMMA.”

  35. Being a cop is a political appointment, despite police claims to the contrary.

    No one forgives the Nazi police for enforcing law and order in their time. Somehow though, the Americans think they are exempt from this rule.

    Wrong – American police have to enforce the laws and orders of an antiwhite government. It is the same as Soviet police enforcing Soviet law and order, or North Korean police enforcing their culture’s laws.

    Cops and soldiers are pawns who take their orders from the king. Sure, they may curse under their breath now and then, but they’ll jump for that paycheck.

    The only way white cops will serve white nationalism is the day we have enough $$$ to pay them. That’s what and who they serve – the dollar. And if a jew or a black man has the money, the white cop serves him.

  36. When I was living in South Africa, I was always surprised to meet cops and security force personnel who were happily serving the ANC regime–when only a few years earlier they were fighting it!

    The South Africa right-wing scene is rife with gossip and conspiracy theories, and there were plenty of rumors going round that well-known former Rhodesian and South African special forces soldiers were in the pay of the ANC government.

  37. Many mistake the motives of police and soldiers.

    They need money just like everyone else. Just make their living serving a regime. That regime may be pro white, or anti white. As long as the checks clear, they will do their job.

    The only time cops become revolutionary is when they aren’t getting paid. Herr Hitler was able to buy an army, the SA, when the German gov of the time stopped paying.

    Honor? Duty? Justice? Nonsense. Money! There we go.

    In truth, I regard cops and soldiers as morally neutral. Like robots maybe. While on the clock, they have no minds of their own. WN will find no traction among white cops, as long as the USG continues to pay them.

    There are no legal revolutions. It is the first thing outlawed when a new group takes power. WN will be won by “criminals” and “turrists”. All the “good guys” work for the system.

  38. Everyone has their self serving rendition of the details.

    Riiiiight. And since we all have different perceptions, wouldn’t it be a good idea for our Chief Law Enforcement Officer to STFU and let local authorities handle such issues?

  39. “In truth, I regard cops and soldiers as morally neutral. Like robots maybe. While on the clock, they have no minds of their own. WN will find no traction among white cops, as long as the USG continues to pay them.”

    In that quote you more or less define ‘petit bourgeoise’ consciousness and purpose; what really more is possible for a decisive class of a given society? it’s the lumpenproletariat and the elite that usually make up the organized dissident class.

    At the same time, the elites also disproportionately comprise the parlor pink AND parlor fascist contingent as well.

  40. “The death of God does not terminate in an atheism: it is the remains of Golgotha: it is definitive, it continues.” -Pierre Klossowski

  41. I feel zero sympathy for liberals who meet such an end because there is no excuse of “I didn’t know,” especially for an intelligent nearly 30-year-old man. I’ll even admit to feeling a bit of Schadefreude. It’s hard not to feel it when the victim was either a dedicated possibly Jewish self-aware anti-White or a modern-day member of the Jim Jones cult. Probably — given his professional status and evident ambition — one who fancied himself becoming a ranking cadre member of the cult who forces others to drink the Kool-Aid rather than a hapless true-believer.

    No excuse, because there is a counter-narrative freely available on the alt-Right one would pick up to offset what’s been imbibed in college and in the media and in his social milieu. His mother is quoted saying:

    “They took his life for literally no reason. They didn’t finish robbing him, they just took his life. They hurt the community, and they hurt the long-term possibility of what he could have done.”

    The quote may have been outright fabricated, or if not, she could have been in a numbed state of such shock that she wasn’t even aware of her own words and just spoke on dazed autopilot. So I don’t want to criticize her personally. But to remove those words from the context of grief, you expect hate to come next. When it doesn’t, when a gut-driven appeal to retributive justice does not come next, it’s hard to not feel contempt for someone like that, and categorize them as a person who actively seeks his own annihilation.

  42. “They took his life for literally no reason. They didn’t finish robbing him, they just took his life. They hurt the community, and they hurt the long-term possibility of what he could have done.”

    She’s proud to announce her son as July’s nominee for the 2016 Amanda Kijera award.

  43. Did anyone else notice anything odd about the Seth Rich murder?

    The Washington Post article about him include the fact that ‘”he wore a panda suit whenever he could — his mother said he simply found them “cute and adorable”’.

    A panda suit? WTF?!

  44. How about the bozo reporter, presenting the story ‘on the scene’. Only in DC could such a pompous weirdo get away with that over inflected style of speech. Nice hat! — you really are walking the beat and feeling the pulse of the neighborhood!

    The vic’s name was Seth Rich; but on the other hand he didn’t look like Abe Foxman. He was from Omaha but what does that even mean anymore.

    He went to Big City and had his capital adventure.

  45. Just last year another SJW activist was stabbed to death by an Obama supporter on a metro train full of people who just stood there watching, even though the perp was like 5-7 and 130 pounds.

  46. Well of course the U.S. media says nothing, but over in the UK Daily Mail we find out this about Seth Rich.

    “He grew up in Omaha, where his family played a strong role in the Beth El Synagogue. His grandfather was a founding member of the synagogue and his father was head of the congregation until recently.”

    Friggin Jews in OMAHA! And growing up in Nebraska sure didn’t turn him into a Republican!

  47. Good catch. Why am I not surprised? TBH, the names “Seth” and “Rich,” plus his bizarre behavior, pretty much guaranteed he would be a Jew. Also, look at that face!

  48. The funniest thing is that’s Seth mother mentioned “community” as if SWPLs like him every have anything in common with the low-income blacks they’re displacing in this transitional areas. They have no social or professional traffic with each other, despite both sides playing nominal lip service to the same political party as their great “uniter.”

  49. The most important thing about the Seth Rich murder isn’t the victim.

    ….the killer….got away with it.

    Almost no one alive today can do that. The Dallas Shooter couldn’t do it. Tim and Anders couldn’t do it. Ordinary cops and soldiers can’t do it.

    Black criminality is a great virtue. They’ve scared the invincible Murkan police and the entire system now. It’s magnificent. I feel proud of them.

    Whites could learn alot from them. I like how they are out on the streets, shaking things up, offing pigs, robbing, looting….while whites whine online about it. You do not obtain power in this world by having complaints. You gain power by acting on them.

  50. The French rebelling, huh? I’ll believe it when I see it. But then, deep within the true French runs the blood of those who slaughtered the Huguenots in the streets during the St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre. To say nothing of the murderous mobs of the French Revolution.

    But was all the manhood of France lost in the warfare from Napoleon to WWII? Very possibly. I don’t think Western Europe has the nerve to truly rebel and do what needs to be done. For a minute the other day I got excited when I saw a headline about a big street protest in Berlin. Nah, turns out it was the Soros crowd busy attacking cops!

    We’ll know the Revolution is upon us when the white European cops (the ones that remain after decades of affirmative action) turn their guns on the invaders and the political traitors.

    The advantage of Europe with it’s geographically much smaller nations is that a military/police coup is far more likely to succeed. Think about that in the U.S. Where the hell would you stage the coup? There’s just too much ground to cover. Europe can do it.

  51. “I’ll even admit to feeling a bit of Schadefreude.”

    Well, that’s a start……. Something to remember, partisans: nobody gets out of this shit alive….. No one!

  52. ***But was all the manhood of France lost in the warfare from Napoleon to WWII?***

    France lost its balls two centuries ago when Napoleon had The Marquis De Sade thrown into the madhouse.

    Germany is still cogent though. I’ve sometimes wondered if the most German Germans are now almost universally American citizens.

  53. France is a very interesting case because when Algeria revolted from French Colonialism in the 1960’s somewhere above 800,000 French returned to France within 15 years. Some of them are still alive, so (in theory) they should not having any qualms about sending any other non-French refugees or settlers back to their ancestral lands.

  54. “Algeria revolted from French Colonialism in the 1960’s somewhere above 800,000 French returned to France within 15 years.”

    Well you know, it was perfectly fine for colonial nations to throw out the white invaders. It was good! Noble! Strong! But whites aren’t supposed to throw out the invaders to our nations, amirite? We ought to take a lesson from the former colonies and learn that the way to rid yourself of an external invader is to slaughter them in the streets.

  55. Interesting and entertaining post-Brexit analysis. Subtitled in English where necessary. Kolonko is a news personality in Poland who makes alt-Right and EU-sceptic points. He predicts a number of economic and political fallouts from Brexit, including the collapse of Merkel’s regime:

  56. I’ve been advocating that for years. Just as Africans and Asians resorted to violent struggle to eject European colonialists, Europeans must also use force and violence to liberate our countries. Whites need to take our own side and admit that we occupy the moral high ground here.

  57. In the case of Algeria there was actually a right-wing French terrorist group (the OAS) that violently advocated holding on to Algeria as a colony. They hit targets in both France and Algeria, striking against the native rebels there and against leftist targets in France (attempted assassinations on De Gaulle and the liberal write Jean-Paul Sartre).

    There’s no highly organized right-wing equivalent in France today, just a few collections of pitiful skinheads who usually get put down violently by the government or liberal Antifa groups.

  58. EPG: “France lost its balls two centuries ago when Napoleon had The Marquis De Sade thrown into the madhouse.”

    Well, ok, if you want to say Picpus was a ‘madhouse.’ Compared to most penal and other involuntary occupant institutions, it was a relative resort.

  59. ***(attempted assassinations on De Gaulle and the liberal write Jean-Paul Sartre)***

    It may actually be to Sartre’s credit. He was a coward in the worst sense. At the end of the day, most ‘existentialists’ were fleeing from themselves as a sort of self-congratulatory fashion statement — a mutual masturbation, like covering your face with piercings.

  60. ***Black criminality is a great virtue. They’ve scared the invincible Murkan police and the entire system now. It’s magnificent. I feel proud of them.***

    Ryu, these comms of yours have a late-Brahms quality to them. The stark linen tradition is present, yet there’s a certain sympathy with ‘dat ragtime overly corrupting it.

  61. There’s nothing political, commendable or competent about black criminality. It’s simply a case of JNBN. Core America has nothing to learn or benefit from it.

    [JNBN is like that drunk guy at the club “opening sets” and getting in the big bouncers’ grill because he’s operating without higher mental functions; he is nobody’s model of pickup skill technique with the girls or toughness with the big dudes. He is a joke. — PA]

  62. ***Compared to most penal and other involuntary occupant institutions, it was a relative resort.***

    Of Sade’s death, I’ve encountered at least 10 different accounts. They range from pathetic and painful/roadside in the mud, to an enigmatically public Socratic spectacle in a pampering hospital. This fate is reserved only for those accustomed to ‘extremely severe unpleasantries,’ to put it very lightly

  63. Whites have lost something vital. Think of the Boston Tea Party. This was a great example of white revolutionary activity.

    How many whites today could do that?

    I have learned many things as a nationalist. I was surprised to learn the difference permission makes. A cop or soldier breaking the law takes no risk. To replicate what they do, without the uniform, is almost impossible. Not because the activity is difficult, but because few can take the risk.

  64. EPG,
    Well I enjoy many of our discussions, I regretfully find my self saying that with each new post, I’m finding your comments more and more cryptic and confusing. If I may: drop.the crypticness and go for directness and clarity and then, as we become more familiar with each other’s prose, then some of the more elliptical formations can more easily take root, no?

  65. I once drowned in warm desert parables, and reincarnated as German-American Scheisse-Lord. Will try to be less elliptical in my formations; have never ‘voice-texted’ in my still rather young life

  66. Radical autonomy says to beat a parasite, you eat a parasite.

    But nobody believes the nigger tastes delicious.

  67. What is ,”voice texting“?

    Is this like dictation ,with one’s ,secretary?

    Please advise.

  68. It is nothing new. I just use it on this new phone of mine. This LG keyboard is something else then. Very counterintuitive and it’s autocorrect offers terrible choices, and for some reason I always miss on the keyboard especially the letter U versus the letter i. That really sucks. I was much happier with Milo V Moto G phone, but the fucking saleswoman talked me into upgrading when I lost my phone and I have this supposedly nice LG and for my purposes it’s good for shit

  69. And no, please don’t persuade me to get an iPhone. I sort of make a personal refusal versus apple and Mac stuff. I don’t see why I should pay 4 times more for Stuff and possibly much more expensive service calls while Android technology usually works just fine

  70. Apple makes the SWPLs feel unique and creative… despite their mass manufacturing in China just like everyone else. I use the Samsung Note for the huge screen.

  71. The Obama government, lower and lower T/solar minivans;
    miscegenation as stipulated playbook
    –pseudo, corporate decorum

    The Alt-Right correction, Ford Model T re-released/T soars above skyrockets;
    “…nobody believes the nigger tastes delicious.”
    –Real Life, ‘invigorating technique’

  72. OT: (PA, please run this comment and discard my last one, as I neglected to write the featured article’s intro to the quotation and link that follows. my bad; thanks.)

    Today’s nytimes.com ran a long, rambling Trump related piece that tries, in feature-story mode, to track down and label what one might roughly term the ‘Trump Constituencey,’ and the piece becomes more or less a profile of the budding ‘alt-right.’

    It outright uses the term —— and not in a solely derogatory way; it also cites commong alt-right sphere figures, tropes and contentions, without blanketly condemning such complaints or denying their existence.

    Here’s an excerpt indicative of the overall thrust of the article:

    “Some are elated by the turn. In making the explicit assertion of white identity and grievance more widespread, Mr. Trump has galvanized the otherwise marginal world of avowed white nationalists and self-described “race realists.” They hail him as a fellow traveler who has driven millions of white Americans toward an intuitive embrace of their ideals: that race should matter as much to white people as it does to everyone else. He has freed Americans, those activists say, to say what they really believe.

    “The discussion that white Americans never want to have is this question of identity — who are we?” said Richard Spencer, 38, a writer and an activist whose Montana-based nonprofit is dedicated to “the heritage, identity and future of people of European descent” in the United States. “He is bringing identity politics for white people into the public sphere in a way no one has.”

    The article also goes on to discuss the ‘alt-right,’ first with its inline-textual explanation set aside by commas, then with a hypertext link that goes to a Breitbart column that offers a glossary of alt-right terms and contentions.

    It’s interesting IMO in that the piece, though ultimately critical and indictful from a center-left perspective, nonetheless refrains from being an outright polemic and diatribe; it allows the alt-right concerns validity on their own merits but implies the reaction —– the formation of the ‘alt-right’ and other synonymous results —– are indeed a forming menace that will need to be dealt with.

    The piece also quotes alt-right figures that are usually considered to controversial to even be mentioned, such as Taylor and Spencer.

    Check it out:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/14/us/politics/donald-trump-white-identity.html?action=click&contentCollection=Book%20Review&module=Trending&version=Full&regi

  73. In the same way that liberalism nominally gains, liberalism nominally concedes. But because “we” can envision Final Liberation as total Self annihilation then “we” can envision a total liberal oncession. Merely speaking about “white identity” is a nominal liberal concession. To totally concede, liberalism must speak of genuine white Supremacy… Must write of that particular white identity which stands above all other white identities. “We” are almost there BECAUSE “we” are so close to Final Liberation.

  74. At Final Liberation… The conceptual maximization of one’s autonomy and that “wall” of a finite material reality… The NEXT RADICAL step is…

    Total annihilation or wS…

    Or concession to an infinite playing field and admission to a incredibly STUNTED notion of autonomy, radical or otherwise.

  75. Today’s nytimes.com ran a long, rambling Trump related piece that tries, in feature-story mode, to track down and label what one might roughly term the ‘Trump Constituencey,’ and the piece becomes more or less a profile of the budding ‘alt-right.’

    And what percentage of those who have casted a vote for Trump have actually heard of Auster, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Richard Spencer or terms like “race realist” or “alt-right” ?

    I’m guessing less than 1%.

  76. That NYT article was better than I expected in several ways. It took White discontent somewhat seriously. It didn’t have a blatant schadenfreude tone. It didn’t frame White identity in the usual “that’s just old white men” since it ended on a fair-sounding account of big pro-Trump ralies at colleges. It also factually profiled Spencer and others.

    My overarching objection to the entire frame of that narrative is NYT’s apparent failure to recognize a sentiment of “we want out.” We don’t want a ‘seat at the table’ as European-Americans or Legacy Whites or whatever. We want a divorce. We don’t care. Game over, absent supremacy, we want separation. America is dead to us, let others handwring over managing the wonderful multicultural tapestry. We just want to have our own country, and we will.

    That’s the emergent spirit that any articles, even ones that are sympathetic to White grievances, are failing to account for.

  77. “That NYT article was better than I expected in several ways. It took White discontent somewhat seriously. It didn’t have a blatant schadenfreude tone. It didn’t frame White identity in the usual “that’s just old white men” since it ended on a fair-sounding account of big pro-Trump ralies at colleges.”

    Yes, that is what jumped out at me and compelled me to make the O.T. comment/post/link to the piece; I felt that was very noteworthy, considering the fact that nytimes.com is the heart and soul of Cathedral ethos; it marked a true improvement in terms of candor and acknowledgement in its reporting of a phenomena that is its advesarial to its cultural and political temperament. Improvement indeed.

    “My overarching objection to the entire frame of that narrative is NYT’s apparent failure to recognize a sentiment of “we want out.” We don’t want a ‘seat at the table’ as European-Americans…… We want a divorce….. Game over, absent supremacy, we want separation. America is dead to us……”.

    Well, back to the polemics it is, I guess.

    PA, is there really that much consensus on ‘your side?’ I sense that many alt-right figures, commenters and likewise are, while open to gaining great influence, would be happy to see their view and constituencey more widely recognized —– unencumbered by caricature and other forms of misrepresentation. I know alt-right machismo must not in any whatsoever posture in a form that could be mistaken for being ‘womanly.’ But is this piece at least a serviceable start in the spirit of ‘realpolitik candor’ across confrontational political lines?

    i could be letting my own politics muddle my view. But I get the feeling that many sympathetic to the alt-right would like to see their positions respected and well-reprsented and from there are open to seeing how things develop.

    I say there’s still not alt-right consensus on need for a clear sovereign ethnostate.

  78. — I say there’s still not alt-right consensus on need for a clear sovereign ethnostate

    Some things are not yet articulated but what I did is to point to a direction in which our underlying instincts will go. An important part of what I wrote is “absent supremacy, we want separation.” That’s the very essence of White people in a multicultural state. It also scales down to myriad examples of independence wars within other such empires.

    “Supremacy” suggests an America that is indisputibly White in demographics, culture, jurisprudence, temperament, and so on, and which also acommodates, is responsible for, and also rules pre-65 non-Whites. That’s uniquely an American situation, and one that worked. Post-65 immigration, accelerated since Clinton’s term and now blown up to transparently malevolent intensity under Obama, nullifies America in the White psyche, though most aren’t saying it yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s