“Socially liberal and fiscally conservative” has gone the way of the dodo as the Democratic Party has moved so far left under Obama. You don’t really hear people describing themselves like that anymore, with the term “conservative” falling out of favor. Also, there’s fewer people taking pride in trodding the middle ground nowadays, political polarization is increasing.
Fortunately, the annoying, once-common slogan “spiritual, but not religious” seems to be dying off also as social media now has people constantly updating and posting their thoughts, wants, needs, fears and location 24 hours a day, rather than slapping up static, trite descriptions of themselves in their bios or profiles.
Pingback: The Evolution Of Game | Reaction Times
I’m so stuck in 2015.
“You don’t really hear people describing themselves like that anymore, with the term “conservative” falling out of favor.”
Perhaps around your neck of the woods, but those terms are decidedly part of the mainstream.
The term is perfectly acceptable to the over 35 crowd, but the “conservative” self-moniker is increasingly unpopular with the younger generation, however you label them (millenials, gen x or gen y, etc.):
I blame the heavy damage to the conservative brand that occurred during the Bush years.
Pipe hitting your tonsils?
“I blame the heavy damage to the conservative brand that occurred during the Bush years.”
Ted “””Texan””” Cruz’s voice was the nail in the coffin.
“Conservative” means to CONSERVE. Something. Or other. So what would we be CONSERVING? Saul Ryan just slammed a bill through Cuckgress which forbids us from even flying the flag of the Freedom Fighters at U.S. cemeteries: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3433016/posts
So what should we be conserving about Amurikkka as it has now devolved? The right of Saul Ryan & Cuckrl Rove & Rahm Emmanuel & Li’l Barry Soebarkah & Ru Paul to admire one anothers’ schlongs in the Ladies Room?
Millennial Chicklettes will get wet between the legs for what chicklettes have always gotten wet between the legs for: The question of who is more masculine – Bernie/Joe-Biden/Rotten-Cl!tless/Pocahontas, or The Donald & his entourage?
On the evolution of Game 2017….I think it’s going to go in the direction of “She was bleeding out of her wherever…I love women…oops”.
I think the anger of 2015 is fading and a more positive transformation that takes the 2007 version of game and puts it into a more solidly masculine frame.
— puts it into a more solidly masculine frame.
Well put, whether one looks at the cartoon as a commentary on courtship/pickup or as political satire.
By the way, this is my cartooning debut. More may come, but since punchline comedy is not my strong suit, ideas are welcome. I like the way this cartoon turned out graphically. If I find a moment this weekend, I’ll re-do the 1950 character. I was going after a masculine-but-guileless look and the current version is not there yet.
Update — I made some minor tweaks to the cartoon and re-uploaded it. Key changes: made the ’68 and ’98 characters look younger, and made the ’50 character more attractive.
You making these drawings by hand with a stylus? Had to do with a mouse…
With a mouse. It kills the spontaneity and line-control I would otherwise have with pen-and-paper but it lets me fix mistakes and forgo having to scan and digitally process the image.
I had a Wacom tablet/stylus combo for a while that made drawing waaaay easier than with a mouse, I gave it to a friend in need. The price has come down on those a lot.
A pen-shaped mouse would be ideal — just checked to see if they exist, and it appears that they do.
Yeah, you can get just the pen/stylus for 30$ to 60$. Wacom is the flagship brand, I think abobe and microsoft make them, too. If you get the tablet along with it, the benefit is a much better drawing surface that is more “tactile” (I guess that’s the term for it) and adjusts to the pressure you put on the pen.
[thanks! that’s helpful to know. — PA]
UPDATE: Last week I commented on that filthy American mudshark, Aubrey Perry, who moved to Australia, married a negro, and then took to the interwebz to complain about her pro-Trump activist parents in California. Here she is again, bitching about the trolling she received as a result of her article:
May the trolling, harassment, and attacks intensify.
2016 mentality, 1985 surfer vibe.
[That photo from 1985 pretty much looks like me. Weird.]
MYGA — Making Yourself Great Again
Did you make that graphic commentary yourself, PA? If so, it was really really well done. I especially like the sly 2007 ref to Mystery. There’s something hypnotic about that particular image, although the Trump supporter in ’16 looks a bit like a thug.
Anyway, PA, I’m here again to help you with your emotions. I am going to introduce four music videos for you to study, PA — these are carefully selected, like the best potatoes from a crop. Out of many, many songs, these are the four that will demonstrate range. *yawns, stretches arms* I’m tired. You should thank me for putting this up. By the way, “*yawns, stretches arms*” in asterixes is a good type of way to show emotions. So is *enraged* or *laughing silently* or any of another million possibilities. Don’t force it. You should be FEELING it. Anyway here’s the videos.
The first video is the LAMENTING of Garth Brooks. (“The Dance”)
The second video is the GROWLY DOMINEERING of James Hetfield of Metallica. (“Master of Puppets”)
The third video is the ECSTATIC PASSION of Walk The Moon (“Shut Up and Dance”)
The fourth and last video to round it out is, yes, laugh if you will, but I like it, in lots of ways . . . THE DESPERATE HUNGER of crooner Michael Bolton. (“How Can We Be Lovers”)
Look them all up on YouTube.
PA Would be interesting to see the female archetypes for each of those time periods.
In each decade we see more weight, shorter hair, more tattoos and shit.
“…each decade we see more weight, shorter hair, more tattoos…”
Tech saturation = longing for more authentically organic expression/outlets (“My body is a canvas,” etc.). Gyms don’t fill this need, many like little shopping malls w/ dumbbells
More weight = Monsanto at large, and the like
Kudos to PA for writing “in OC” instead of the common, vulgar “in the OC.”
2007 is perfect, though i had to think on it for a second.
God, is that Garth Brooks vid insipid dreck. I wonder if that is a race thing; a genetic inability to enjoy something once it hits a certain level of dreck and artifice; there’s is NOTHING fortifying or passionate about the lyrics, arrangement and delivery; chain-restaurant country-fizz pop.
Or Nikcrit… You could say emblematic of anti-wS?
Another rapidly deteriorating cuck goes by the wayside – Glenn Beck suspended by Sirius XM for comments on Trump:
God, is that Garth Brooks vid insipid dreck. I wonder if that is a race thing; a genetic inability to enjoy something once it hits a certain level of dreck and artifice;
If someone were to post a shitty rap vid, might not then i wonder the same?
Or are even shitty rap vids not at that level of dreck and artifice?
I don’t follow Beck, but looking at his pictures, and reading those comments at the link, he manifests classic symptoms of delusion: unseen voices and Jesus in office, and simply the look on his face.
That sort of talk is allowable, for his cohort, of course. He is “channeling” and so not crazy.
Speaking of faces, Garth Brooks has enough make-up on his face to paint a garage.
Off topic but vaguely on the topic of game (because gorillas).
How about that story at the Cincinnati Zoo.
What an awful story. That gorilla is was an intelligent and sensitive animal, and it had to get shot dead because some kid got fallen into its enclosure. Just sad. Though i don’t necessarily disagree with the zookeepers decision-making for the situation, once it was transpiring. There was nothing else they could do. Apparently tranq’ing the thing would not be an option because they don’t go down right away.
Any fault lies in two directions. With the zoo in its design so that kids can fall in, and (of course) with the negligent parents. And but perhaps most of all! with the stupid fucking kid.
Of course there is that side story. The kid was a very light skinned black, and the twitter sphere was set astorm with calls of racism from concerned blacks, that the zoo would choose to kill a gorilla to spare a white child. They disagreed with the zookeepers’ actions, thinking that the kid shoulda been sacrificed as necessary for the health of the gorilla.
Knowing that it was a stupid black kid, with negligent black parents, does that change the equation, in anyone’s mind?
That is a damned good question, by the way. Ask it of yourself. And to go first, it makes me reevaluate things. How many more stupid black kids do we need in the world, versus adult gorillas, which are hard pressed to find a place to live.
There oughta be a law (or at least a flowchart),
Kid falls into gorilla cage —> is kid black or white?
I am not trying to piss off any black readers, but i have to say, that realistically it makes a difference, in people’s opinions, as evidenced by the reaction on twitter (the side story which is well documented), and i have to say, in my own thoughts.
I is a pretty excellent example of racism. I have been missing a lot lately, but let’s repeat this one here,
Kid falls into a gorilla enclosure; what’s the first question you ask?
Just repeating myself now, but seriously: unconscious reaction, what is the first question you ask?
Is that funny, or am i just a sick fuck? because both those things can’t be true at the same time.
What the gorilla story tells “us” is that “diversity” brings out the most morally repugnant extremism in people.
“If someone were to post a shitty rap vid, might not then i wonder the same?”
No, you couldn’t —— but I could, given that I’ve got the racial spread covered within my being; see, my ‘insipidity’ level is more racially vast and thus attuned than yours…..
Neither side truly believes in the right to existence from the beginning… Unless *you* are an animal, literally and figuratively.
And so here “we” have a 149 IQ “white” male address a four year old as “stupid fucking kid” WHO DOESN’T EVEN believe in his own right to existence from the beginning.
BUT A GORILLA?
It has such right with a grown toddler in its cage? Psshaw!
IF you understood RACISM proper THEN you would not lack the fatherly instinct for the right to existence from conception. This is the true father/child bond. A gorilla becomes a truly inanimate object NEVER HAVING claimed its right to exist AND ONLY asserted a right to exist over the child BY THOSE who would be self-annihilators themselves. It’s diabolically coherent. Very indicative of a high IQ bent on “infinite regress.”
Diversity is the place of conflicting “normals.” So if “we” could imagine racially-segregated zoos, “we” can conceive a place where conflicting “normals” do not manifest. What diversity does as witnessed in this case is give each side a chance to craft their respective racially-sensitive narratives to their own self-annihilation. In an all-white zoo, a past record of criminality and child neglect wouid steer this “accident” to an act of parental neglect where such record in an all-black zoo would have not nearly the effect. Likewise, a false initial perception that this society only takes decisive action to save its “own” is the birth of an equally insidious opposite reaction of misplaced hatred towards Man (realized through the child) himself.
The reality is that given the situation, the exact protocol was enacted with the primary aim achieved. It should be “seen” as a healthy survival instinct. One that can be contrasted to video of Asians LITERALLY running over a wandering, lost toddler in streets MULTIPLE TIMES with various VEHICLES.
What kind of country are we living in where authorities shoot a rare mountain gorilla, yet spare the life of a common niglet?
I had paid no attention to that gorilla story beyond the headline, and I was annoyed that they shot the gorilla because some stupid kid was stupid. Finding out the kid was black-ish makes me even more annoyed they shot the gorilla. But then, I’d feel that way if he was Chinese, Arab, whatever — anything but white. Because yes, I’m all about my race and the hell with the rest of you.
This confluence of zoos and race made me dream of a human zoo where people could go to see different races in their natural urban habitats. The upper class white people cage would have nice, well kept homes, mother and father in place, they’d sit around the dinner table talking and bemoaning the fate of poor immigrants. The black family would have a fat single mother slumped on the couch with a bucket of KFC while the children (of multiple fathers) ran rampant. Chinese family cage would have Tiger Moms screeching at children to study study study, cheat cheat cheat, so they can get into the fancy college and take over from white people. And so on.
Nikcrit is right, Garth Brooks is not highly regarded within the industry by fellow musicians or “real fans” (for lack of a better term). He’s the Nickelback of Country. “Low Places” is a classic, though – but he got very cheesy, predictable and formulaic along the way from his early years. And then he went off the rails with gushing support for Obama, losing him a lot of his former fan base.
This confluence of zoos and race made me dream of a human zoo where people could go to see different races in their natural urban habitats.
Yes, the we do have that – it’s called planet earth.
Liberalism and the twisted altruism embedded into media PC has now caused people to ignore what their eyes see and come up with crazy ideas and excuses as to why people aren’t responsible for their own condition, but it wasn’t always that way.
PA, I thought about you over the weekend [no homo]. As I mentioned earlier, I went to Palm Springs with my gf and some friends for tennis, hiking, partying. We saw dozens if not hundreds of young, good-looking White couples with little blonde children. The only interracial couple I saw was at a Starbucks in Indian Wells on Sunday morning, an old black guy and an older fiftysomething, plump white woman with short blonde hair. We sat near them and we could hear their conversation (the woman was loud). Turns out they were just friends who had just come back from a group hike. The woman was Polish and kept mentioning her Polish friends in Palm Springs and Los Angeles.
Cam: “Yes, the we do have that – it’s called planet earth.”
Cam, I wonder: in peterike’s zoo, would you be found in the ‘rich white people’s cage’ sitting at the dinner table talking and “bemoaning the fate of poor immigrants?”
Or would you be in the Chinese family cage, conversing with your “Tiger Mom” wife when she wasn’t “screeching at the children to study study study, cheat cheat cheat, so they can get into the fancy college and take over from white people?”
Just wondering, ‘cuz i could see you going either way, depending on the time of day!
Meow, Trickin’ getting a little catty today. I see the passing envy hasn’t quite passed yet.
The logical answer is that you and I will both be in the white peoples’ display. There your phenotypical soul will finally be (grudgingly) forced to acknowledge a sense of belonging and escape the obviously nagging, torturous guilt of wondering if you’re supposed to be somewhere keepin’ it real. :-):-)
Slightly O.T., but not really:
Given the forum being nytimes.com, I understand the neutrality and understatement, alongside the act of hiring a fairly centrist editorial guest-column writer. But I contend that, if nothing else, the Trump candidacy is healthy in that it is raising to the fore the REAL passions of the electorate, rather than the shadowplay neuroses punditry that’s existed for the last 20 years or so.
FWIW, i believe Edsall’s rough analyses: that p.c. is a sort-of cumulative groupthink of all the social and equalitarian-driven legislation from the ’60s, and that its fault lines are from that period’s ‘unfinished business;’ e.g., how the ’65 Immigration Act was never supposed to yield the lopsided ethnic proportions since then, in which Asian and African immigration have increased X10 while Euro entrees to the country have gone from 50% to !5% or so (precise figures are within the linked story).
I like the fact that Edsall, whose exact political allegiances I couldn’t decipher, is respectful of some Civil Rights basics; i.e., he doesn’t seek to return to the Antebellum South days —– yet he’s not critical or condescending of the blue-collar conservative concerns nor realpolitik. I believe that too is a result of the current politico campaign and its attendant controversies; finally, after a long, long interim, there are two candidates who represent two real, existing constituencies and who have acutely genuinely antipathies toward each other.
That’s healthy and overdue.
“I see the passing envy hasn’t quite passed yet.”
Yeah, right: i’ll never know what it’s like to have a crew cut and four-wheeler, armaments stashed in every nook and cranny of my truck and in my home, while on my way to the Garth Brooks concert.
Damn! (though I do believe my fine state has a ‘carry and conceal’ law; ’round these here parts, guns are associated more with hunting raccoons and other live game like deer rather than figurative ‘coons’ like you find in Georgia and Alabama.) (lol!)
I’d be curious in particular to get Thordaddy’s read on that Edsall guest-column on Trump; the part in the last quarter of the piece in which he goes on about Trump reigniting the collective white male’s sense of autonomy and cultural and political identity.
Edsall is just regurgitating a little center-leftist fantasy added to some alt-rite prophesyzing.
The Trumpening HAS HAD THE EFFECT of refocusing the mind of mass “white” male off his resentment for an incredibly radically autonomous “black” male and onto illegal immigrants and nasty “women.”
It is the unprecedented and destructively-guaranteed “freedom” of the nigger that ultimately falsifies wS in the mind of the masses with the most resolute conviction.
The reality is that the Edsall’s of the media are stunted… Behind the curve… A day late and a dollar short. Dusty old “men” without a fighting bone left in their bodies.
Nearing Final Liberation, the pull of genuine wS on the self-annihilating “white” masses can only intensify. In the American context, the radical autonomy of the “black” male is the gateway to the bum rush of the hordes.
To mend fences between a dispossessed “white” mass and a radically autonomous “black” collective, even by economic means, is the antithesis to the solution of separation FROM ALL THE DEGENERACY.
“We” aren’t to separate from our women… Only temper their desire for radical autonomy.
“We” aren’t to separate from immigrants… Only rationally control their entry into our homes.
“We” MUST separate from the “black” collective DUE an irreparably dysfunctional “relationship.”
The Trumpening COOLED THE MOMENTUM THAT WAS RAPIDLY INCREASING in regard to that last recognition.
If Trump isn’t wS… Then he is anti-wS.
“We” must first dispense with the low-T air quotes. This shit is rampant.
——The trend became very popular in the 1990s, attributed by many to comedian Steve Martin, who often used them with exaggerated emphasis in his stand-up shows.——
Each Pond Gone,
You’re not the first to take note of that rather compulsive tendency of Thordaddy’s…. Speaking of, you seem to be a literary-deconstructionary capable fella; could you translate Thordaddy’s above screed?
If you had to, how would you tidily sum it up?
I’d put something forth, but it might just be too sharp of a dagger. Heard somewhere today, “we never stop becoming what we think the WORLD is.” This would apply to every individual on this particular planet. I’ll leave it at that.
I wonder if Harambe, the gorilla who was murdered for apprehending the African kid who broke iinto his enclosure, was simply reacting in a rational way towards a member of a human subspecies who in his ancestral memory are known to hunt and kill gorillas?
The zoo is already de facto suicide for a gorilla.
Gorilla populations were reduced quite a bit during that last Ebola outbreak, they are highly susceptible.
I’ve already explained the quotes which are instigated to signify the dominance of the radically autonomous frame. If said high IQ “white” male dared speak the language of genuine wS then he would instantly recognize the indispensability of the “quotes.” He dare not, though.
If I use “we” without quotes at this latest stage of Final Liberation then I give passive assistance to radical liberation and self-annihilation. There is no “we” without quotes UNLESS you claim the lie of “universal equality?”
This same scenario plays out with a myriad of liberated words used in a liberating language.
Under what alt-rite principle do gorillas have a right to existence, period?
“Murdered?” That’s stupid, LBF.
“air quote” : Parodying parodies of parodies of…
—What? A great man? I always see merely the play-actor of his own ideal.—
And yet, Camlost, you post that quote with no sense of irony. That quote is a CONFESSION of a “man” whose stunted conception of a “great man” could not rise above mere “play-actor” of “his own ideal.” It is, with 20/20 hindsight, AN INDICTMENT of Nietzsche and his own conceptually stunted Self BY Nietzsche himself. In his most passively deceitful manner, he is claiming that great men do not really exist because he simply has no certain vision of a great man not even in himself. So why quote him other than to signify his radically autonomous legacy?
That wasn’t me, Bouncerdaddy.
t-daddy, some friendly advice: learn the constellations before CRITIQUING the stars.
If you say, “The gay man just wants to visit his partner like any other couple,” THEN you SPEAK THE LANGUAGE of radical liberation and signal submission to the zeitgeist.
To solve this problem in the realm of Internet blogging and commenting, I would retort, “There is no such thing as a ‘gay man.'” I would write “gay man”
In quotes to signify that I object to your attempt at impressing a radically liberal social construction as a factual reality. When I address your ASSERTION of a “gay man” IT MUST possess the quotes so that an audience automatically understands that a fundamental dispute is at hand. A dispute over REALITY itself.
A reality that includes “gay man” is a reality that asserts that man be sexually averse to the female and/or sexually attracted to the male. Ergo, man = gay male and “universal equality” is validated. So YOU validate “universal equality” when you speak of “gay man” WITHOUT the appropriate quotes.
This scenario plays out everywhere.
Sorry Camlost… But it really wasn’t a critique of you or EPG… It was a critique of Nietzsche obvious anti-wS and a blatantly confessed stunted conceptual ability.
At the individual level, “we” understand that the high IQ “white” male suffers an existential crisis equivalent to a failure to conceptualize his greatest, spirited Self. And if he suffers this pathological deficiency then so do, in general, all “white” males with inferior IQs.
Just here, “we” have at least 3-4 “white” males with >135 IQs unable to assimilate the assertion above. I call this advantageous lack of conceptualizing one’s greatest, spirited Self, DESIRE for radical autonomy.
Thordaddy, could you someday provide us with a definition of radical autonomy that is not laced with more jargon or quotes?
In the metaphysical sense, radical autonomy is Hell… A conscious oblivion lasting for all time. You can see with nothing to gaze. You can smell with nothing of scent. You can hear with a total absence of noise. You can feel and having nothing to touch. You can taste it all and only have nothing to eat. Genuine radical autonomy desire upon total annihilation.
In the academic/logical context, radical autonomy is desire for absolute freedom on a finite playing field. A synthesis of Auster’s and Richardson’s work culminating in the phenomenon of indiscriminate self-annihilation (nondiscrimination + self-creation = indiscriminate self-annihilation).
And as a continuation of the “nature” of Liberalism, radical autonomy is self-annihilation as Final Liberation.
Ok thanks, I see the utility of the concept in our forum.
But when you say “the fathers” does this mean the same thing as (western) patriarchy?
When I say the “fathers,” I mean YOUR RACE is your father all the through to the God-father. So “racism” is the immersion of the individual into his father(s) and/or “the fathers” as succession… Race in particular and in general in relation to the white male.
AS it stands now, a critical mass only know “racism” as the stunted concept of the radical liberationists. They only know “racism” in an interminable dysfunctional relationship with the “black” collective.
In reality, this ideological imposition is truly rooted in anti-racism… Anti-father… Hatred for the father. A
logical nihilism due belief in “infinite regress.”
“We” are to hate our fathers for KNOWINGLY planting us in a world of self-annihilating degeneracy.
“Murdered?” That’s stupid, LBF.”
He dindu nuffin, muffaga. Justice for Harambe!
One of the ironies for me of you starting this blog is thatwhile I enjoy it and the familiar commenters, now that you’re a blog host you understandably don’t comment as much as when you were just another avatar throwing in your five-cents worth.
[The comments section is half of a blog’s appeal, and as long as basic rules are respected I like readers/commenters having their free say there. I get mine in the O.P. I do read every comment that is posted here. — PA]
“When I say the “fathers,” I mean YOUR RACE is your father all the through to the God-father. So “racism” is the immersion of the individual into his father(s) and/or “the fathers” as succession… Race in particular and in general in relation to the white male……AS it stands now, a critical mass only know “racism” as the stunted concept of the radical liberationists. They only know “racism” in an interminable dysfunctional relationship with the “black” collective…..In reality, this ideological imposition is truly rooted in anti-racism… Anti-father… Hatred for the father. A logical nihilism due belief in “infinite regress.”
A request: read the above quote of yours, line-by-line, or sentence-by-sentence, and imagine you are DEFINING and RATIONALIZING each of those verbal components in a logic-driven philosophy class or seminar; I understand why PA asked you what your theoretical or academic mechanism or framework is; the core assumptions or ‘premises,’ i.e., philosophically speaking are untraditional yet uncited and left unqualified; e.g., wtf do you mean by saying “I mean YOUR RACE is your father through all the through to the God Father…” Why do you presume a statement like that doesn’t need support or explanation? Is that a tactical bit of rhetoric? Is provoking your reader or commenting engagee a limited part of your debate sophistry? I’m sincerely asking because I can’t believe that anyone as educated, realistically aware of contemporary academic and spiritual mores would presume the rhetorical conceits that you do —– so I can only conclude that those presumptions are calculated conceits.
And if you decide to address my questions here, please don’t feign bewilderment or claim you couldn’t be more clear; what IS clear is that my accusations of incomprehensibility in your writing is shared by just about everyone else on this blog.
Philosophy is supposed to be somewhat inaccessible, right? I remember having to get those yellow cliff notes on Heidegger and Wittgenstein and others just to know what they were talking about…
What is YOUR race? Answer that first so I at least know what you are working with?
And “racism,” what is RACISM to you GIVEN what you have asserted in the first question?
I think it is SELF-EVIDENT that one’s race is one’s father… His race is his seed. Anti-racism is to be against your seeding and its seedler.
If “race” is a real phenomenon then “it” envelops both the individual and the collective in radically different manners so much so that a radical liberationist must collapse this distinctive enveloping through the imposition of (universal) “equality.”
Nikcrit, again, YOU ARE TELLING the world that you CANNOT CONCEIVE of your RACE as YOUR father… And father’s father… And your father’s father’s father… All the way through to THE God-father.
Ergo, you are conceptually stunted and factually ignorant.. In a state of radical autonomy… Thoroughly liberalized.
Your only move is to deny the phenomenon of race altogether and yet stand certain about the phenomenon of racism bein nearly all-pervasive. To have your cake and eat it too.
When a radical liberationist accuses one of being a “racist,” he is merely accusing one being a “white supremacist,” ie., a white man who does not believe in “universal equality” (if I wrote without quotes is would be a passive agreement to the idea of a real phenomenon).
Either indifference to the charge or a denial of its premise.
There should be vigorous affirmation.
The mechanism of Collapse is mass belief in “universal equality.” And with the dominating selective pressure to find mere equality in an innumerable amount of relations, “we” seem to swim in a sea of total liberal validation. The only course of action at the individual level is to delegitimate every false imposition of mere “equality” while adhering to a metaphysics that is the antithesis to “universal equality.” That being, belief in objective Supremacy, i.e., Perfection.
This ^^^ is if you wish to fight against Collapse. Most do not. Self-annihilators by choice.
Your only move is to deny the phenomenon of race altogether”
And your move is to avoid my latest question to you of how you establish race to be the equivalence of paternal familiarity?
Thor dodges us again; refuses to answer my/our question.
Race as lineage is a very common understanding… But then lineage is seed and egg. Yet, the zeitgeist is anti-wS. Put it together Nikcrit?
What is YOUR race?
Your race as your father is your lineage through the seed. Can you not conceive this reality, Nikcrit?
I swear, you’re like some of the city h.s. kids I deal with; you take a question about re. interpretation of a rhetorical detail of yours and you turn it into a accusation. ‘
Adolescent temper… Is that self-annihilating too?
You still will not answer the question?
And how have you inexplicably tied “it” to your concept of “racism?”
“Your race as your father is your lineage through the seed. Can you not conceive this reality, Nikcrit?”
No. Not strictly and for infinite posterity; race/phenotype is a relevant physical attribute; it’s qualities are still being discovered —— but historically speaking, it’s a fluid term that constantly changes in meaning in accord with scientific discoveries and social developements, which tweak the term in accord with popular interpretation.
It’s also a physical continuum; ironically, the way most alt-righters use the term, whether they know it or not, they’re usually conveying a sense of both phenotype and particular verbal-dialect and corresponding socio-economic status (among blacks, the latter is their primary means of delineating ‘race.’)
I asked no “strictly” interpretation…
“We” are trying to make sense out of your concept of “racism” AS SUBSTANTIATED by your concept of race. Right now, it’s inexplicable outside of a LEARNED BEHAVIOR.
Hey, intellectually innovating discovery isn’t always a riveting endeavor. But the awards, such as the kind of divine wisdom bestowed by Thor and I is clearly worth the wait, no?
I mean, not all of us are pacified by crude ethnic slurs, strip clubs and sleazy Vegas junkets? We need some abstract mental gymnastics leading to something organically edifying.
“Race as lineage is a very common understanding… But then lineage is seed and egg. Yet, the zeitgeist is anti-wS. Put it together Nikcrit?”
Via casual usage of the term, you’re implying a definition of ‘race’ that is no more than, say, 60 years old. It’s funny how you deconstruct every aspect of current zeitgeist orthodoxy on racism. But in the service of your anti-anti-racism sermons in submission to incomprehensible ‘racist’ aka ‘objective supremacism’ rectitude, you rely on the most flimy and vintage folkloric definitions of ‘race,’ which in the light of modern genomic research is almost little more than outright superstitition. (None of which to say that genetic-race innovations are anything that inspiring and edifying—- but they do lay to rest many of the race-presumptions of old and that which Thor relies on to cast stones.)
You’re a father of teenage females and you’re mortified of potential miscegenation amongst your kin. FWIW, I’ve experienced racial pathos and enmity and fully understand your dread; I don’t think that should be the case but I understand that the world is the way it is and I and my needs are not the only things that have to live in said world. IOW: I say it’s fine to own your dread and be driven by it in your actions; but why spin some quasi-rational theory or philosophical pantheism that isn’t warranted beyond alleviating a fear. Your intellectual inquiry into ‘race’ is justified and, IMO, useful beyond and outside the meta sub issue of miscegenation.
Your race as your father can simply get no more concrete and less flimsy as a definition.
The point Nikcrit is that your definition of “race” CANNOT SUSTAIN your definition of “racism.” So something has to give?
Thordaddy – some people are just dense and cannot comprehend no matter how many times you explain things to them in simple, plain English.
It’s trickin’s world, boys; we’re just livin in it.
Cam, whose team do you pick to prevail in the finals? Lebron’s or the halfrican’s?
Barry’s true colors are shining through
I would say that Obama is an idiot, but those lines get a laugh from the crowd, so who are the real idiots?
Another clip of Obama making the rounds lately is of him stuttering and reeling from frog memes that are kicking his ass,
“If we turn on each other based on differences of race or religion,
If we fall for a you know a bunch of okey doke, just because it sounds funny, or the tweets are provocative
Then we are not going to build on the progress we started.”
“[A] bunch of okey doke” is a phrase Obama comes up with on his feet without a teleprompt – and this phrase too gets laughter from the crowd.
But this phrase is not a colloquial Americanism (h/t MPC). That is not how the phrase is used, and that is not what it means, in colloquial American usage.
Obama uses the phrase to mean common-people stuff; but amongst real people it is not used ironically.
What a pompous pretender. But again – the phrase gets a positive response from the audience, so who is the real idiot?
The clip though shows Obama looking tired worn out frayed old and weak, so it goes in the archives. He is a lily livered and unimpressive man. Even to his egomaniac self, his act his worn out.
whose team do you pick to prevail in the finals? Lebron’s or the halfrican’s?
You mean Klay Thompson? He’s a halfrican, but Steph Curry isn’t.
I root for the Hawks but they got eliminated in the 2nd round, as they’ve done for the last 12 years in a row…
He’s clearly starting to worry about his legacy. Chicago just had its deadliest month in 21 years:
Yeah, in my experience that term typically refers to a scam or cheating maneuver of some type like a bait-and-switch – as in “don’t fall for the okey doke.”
“You mean Klay Thompson? He’s a halfrican, but Steph Curry isn’t.”
Hmmm. You told me something I didn’t know; I just knew of Dell and assumed he married a white woman…. Stephen seems lighter than both his mom and dad though; she’s pretty mixed herself…. i see that fairly often; kids who’re siblings with one markedly darker or lighter than the other.
Apparently the San Jose attacks on White Trump voters were a pretty big deal and all captured on film. Saw a snippet of some nasty brawling in my office lobby TV, including a blond teenage boy getting dragged across the grass. I’ll look at YouTube later this evening.
Multiculturalism’s Altamonte? Or as a commenter elsewhere put it, the end of America’s Weimar era?
OT link of intrigue: BBC openly bans whites from applying via its job postings…
“BBC openly bans whites from applying via its job postings”
If anti-Whites are openly gleeful or otherwise quietly feeling shadefreude over this, they’re dancing on their own graves. There is no BBC without Whites. There is nothing without Whites. If Whites go elsewhere, BBC becomes as irrelevant as Salon dot com.
Video of one kid being chased in San Jose here:
Rather than our usual riposte’s in which I make a joke of your claim and you in return accuse me of anxiety-revealing bluster, let me just honestly ask:
If gathering info for some sort-of pundit-like overview commentary, do you see a national mood drifting toward white nationalism and white consciousness? And if so, is it confrontational, an attempt to reclaim lost ground? Or do you see a secessionary impulse taking root? A territory to reform into white ethnostate?
I wonder because I don’t; i see more fragmentation, atomization and insidious media influence via meme-like infiltration; a corruption from sources both conscientious and blind. A cultural and geographical reoroganization wrought by the rush of IT technology of the last 25 years that was so subversive and ground-shaking there’s yet to be a sound and thorough assessment of just what precisely it has socially and economically wrought.
I wonder because I don’t; i see more fragmentation, atomization and insidious media influence via meme-like infiltration
I think you see things in a very stasis-like way, history’s dynamic nature is your blind spot. I’d liken your perspective to a wealthy Baby Boomer: things have always been great from your perspective, and getting better by the day especially during your youth. Sure, the Baby Boomer might objectively think there is too much immigration, but subjectively he’s not losing any sleep over it.
You’re not a Baby Boomer but you are analogously a Talented Tenth mulatto who has had a charmed life and who lives in a very friendly Williams Syndrome region. I just thought of another analogy: Your perspective is similar to a hot chick who is too young and too sheltered to see anything nasty, so she believes that everybody is so nice (except those few creeps who stare at her but they don’t count).
White people have never spoken candidly to you in person. You have no idea how they really feel about “sensitive subjects” because they are always so nice.
PS: don’t take it as gratuitous jabs, Nikcrit. Not intended as such. I’m serious in that I believe that (like many people) you don’t appreciate the fact that things change, especially under the forces that Whites had been feeling for decades and which are now sharply intensifying.
As to where I think things are moving, I tend to agree with Vox Popoli, today’s post “Trump as Tribal Leader.”
I think you see things in a very stasis-like way, history’s dynamic nature is your blind spot.
A lot of modern liberalism’s craziness is rooted in lack of historical perspective. Much of what we consider “reality” in contemporary America can only exist because of the political stability and material wealth we have that was centuries in the making, and built on stern values and hard work and tough decisions that are now unseen and forgotten.
“`PS: don’t take it as gratuitous jabs, Nikcrit.”
I don’t really take it as such, or worry even if it was rendered in that tone.
But I do find it a bit insulting; that, or even somewhat oblivious, because I’m nowhere close to being that naive and cloistered a man. Think of all the back-n-forth we’ve had over several years: do i really deserve to be wrapped up that neatly and reductively? Or just recall the recent link I posted a few weeks ago featuring a Tucker Carlson; his socio-political-partisan POV was almost exactly that of what you just presumed for yourslf and that was the antithesis politically and theoretically of what you just projected on me —- yet I’m the one who came upon, read, and passed-along that link to this blog. Hell, the mere fact that I comment on this blog is enough for you to give that strawman treatment of me reconsideration.
Also, re. the ‘talented tenth’—– that alone is a rather aging and at this point ‘blank’ categorical. But just to be clear: a biracial family even today, let alone in 70s and 80s when the term applied to me and my family, wouldn’t really be included in the soul and bosom of the ‘Talented Tenth’—- as such a family’s base components are a challenge and complication to the “up from slavery” ascent, pride and symbolism that “Talented Tenth” symbolizes. There’s a long-standing tension there between those two aspects of modern NAMs. But then it’s typical that you wouldn’t consider that, as you tend to grossly underestimate those from races and classes that you are tactically and viscerally uninterested in and alien to.
That’s fine. But it can appear very foolish when offered under the pretense of rueful or academic consideration.
The casual assessment of ‘Nikcrit,” in terms of intellect and basic modern relational skills, IS NOT THAT UNIQUE IN THE WORLD OF NAMs. It is a mistake to confuse verbal dialect and class caste and consciousness with intellectual rank; for instance, my dad is from the poorest part of the Chicago ghetto and still has black-agrarian dialect in his voice, yet he is the one with a UC med degree while I’m the lowly lit-and-journalism major.
You can paint your nemesis as a silly caricature. But if you truly believe as much you do so at your own peril.
All duly noted Nikcrit. Keep in mind though that even if you objectively understand things in a “non-sheltered” way, subjectively there are things that keep people awake at night, and my sense is that your subjective reality is different than ours.
To be postmodern is fundamentally to reject a sense of Origins/histor. persp. What’s now touted as liberalism is steeply rooted in a nihilistic abandonment of any philosophy of history, where more crucial insights tend to reside.
Example of subjective reality: there is a photo on CH’s twitter feed (retweet of Ricky Vaughn) showing a White teenager chased by a pack of Mexicans and one Black. If you attached a mind-reading device to my hindbrain as I looked at the photo, it’d read off “incinerate the toxic biomass” re. the pursuers and all of their kind. That reptile-brain brain amygdala reaction then gets processed in the forebrain and translated into lawful behavior that nonetheless seeks liberation from a political system in which White teenagers are attacked by foreigners.
How does your hindbrain respond to that photo?
“How does your hindbrain respond to that photo?”
Such a circumstance to me gives me an adrenalized dread: I see discord as the ‘primitive and primal’ axis of my “Supreme Middle-Most Theory” feels the testosterone end is being too predatory, and from there comes all sorts of trouble and regret…..
I imagine that you, being more biologically involved along purely tribal lines, in such a predicament as the one you fleshed out, would just understandably succumb to an ‘Us-vs-Them” mode that could only feel fulfilling and fortifying in that instant.
But that doesn’t mean that it is a mode that would eventually yield long-term solution and balance.
I’m aware of the ethnic disproportions that come with human conflict and their predations; i’m not verbally filibustering (i.e., ‘equivocating’) on the issue; it’s just that I really, truly, honestly, absolutely, from the genetic-ground-up, have simultaneously base loyalties in play, and my primal bodily reactions are in accord with those more elaborate loyalties——- as they are for ANY rueful and contemplative bit of…mystery meat!
Check out the contrast in quality, in the physical forms, of the specimens in that picture.
Nothing more needs be said, it is so obvious.
I don’t underestimate the black man, and i agree that there is a large segment of the alt-right that is lost in cartoon-land, in their caricaturizations of blacks.
I am not a wannabe racist. Everything on the topics here, essentially boils downs to giving your children the advantage on the Playground.
And as i put it before, the punchline is that, in the final analysis it’s not a playground. Due to the Measured Effect (on their lives) of the social hierarchies that children are subject to growing up, and something analogous for adults and people of all ages, throughout life.
As it turns out, it is a SIGN of RESPECT, that the Negro requires a racist response.
Nikcrit sees that photo and conceives neither a “race” nor “racism.” Fascinating evidence of a purposely stunted intellect.
The question is what UncleBeast shall do the white boy who stops, stands his ground, and with self-identifying intent, guts the first few of these tarted turds to the ghastly reversal of the mob mentality?
“Nikcrit sees that photo and conceives neither a “race” nor “racism.” Fascinating evidence of a purposely stunted intellect.”
I disagree. I stated what I think of the photo in reply to PA and my reply could be inferred to be a position on ‘racism.’
“As it turns out, it is a SIGN of RESPECT, that the Negro requires a racist response.” — Suburban Elk
No reason to stop there when you can impress the insight on a more savage “player,” muh nigga.
It is a SIGN OF RESPECT (for one’s self and one’s loved ones) to put down the rabid dog fixing to maul everything in sight.
To annihilate the nigger IS EXACTLY what a nigger desires!!!
It is a sign of MUTUAL RESPECT for the healthy-minded white man to eradicate HE WHO HAS MADE HIMSELF a NAME amongst the legions of anti-white Supremacists.
If you live by “any means necessary…”
THEN *YOU* DEMAND annihilation.
This is operative at the individual and collective level.
I don’t “see” any “racism” in that photo. What I “see” is a total confabulation of ANTI-RACISM. It’s no longer just parasite/host… It’s aggressive, metastasizing parasite and a dwindling, nearly morbid host.
How is this RACISM in any sense given the liberationist viewpoint?
What you should “see” is a mob fleeing their “fatherland” to pirate another, subsequently, leading to the individual white flight from their Fatherland.
What you should “see” is “bad black side” and “weakly white side” with perhaps a dash of instinctual intelligence.
What *you* should “see” is the violent pathology of anti-racism.
But then one just assumes the violent savage is of right mind when he is equally vicious to all. So even though Trump is no wS, no true Christian, not conservative, not traditional, etc. this does not stop the deluded hordes from PRETENDING it so… And the purpose of this collective play-acting is no more sophisticated than maximizing one’s autonomy to a radical extent. Ultimately, this requires no resistance from whites at all. It’s all very coherent. Yet, coherently diabolical.
Once you are certain that race is real… You have REACHED the pinnacle of race-realist belief…
You immerse yourself in “racism.”
But this has no meaning in a language liberated.
So you immerse yourself in white Supremacy.
You delve into the greatness of your fathers.
The radical “black” collective then becomes a pesky, petulant obstacle.
“What *you* should “see” is the violent pathology of anti-racism”
In fact, I think that would be a fair and tidy summation of what I see in that picture; an animus unleashed from the most flimsily rationalized of mass-induced cues and memes; anti-racism as an inevitable volley of reciprocal resentment
In that photo is all the extremes of “radical autonomy” from a foamed-mouthed pack of Pavlonian prepubescent pit bulls to the self-annihilating “radical autonomy” of a “white” boy possessed of the indignity to fearfully flee from that which ultimately operates below what just is an impenetrable language barrier and any notion of spirited free will.
So if one or two can outrun *you* then what? You’ve spent all your potential fight on flee…
The reality is you must sometime stop, turn around and crush the head of that snake…
The reality is few will “close the gap” and when the first one does and is put down with extreme prejudice then it is a deterrent effect on any followers…
The reality is that warding off 3, 4-5 untrained anti-racist punks MUST BECOME a distinct focus in the white boy’s mind and life.
The reality is if you put one and then two down… Three, four, five and so on are psychologically demoralized as the front of this mob… That part so willing to “close the gap” got crushed…
And so “closing the gap” is fight/flee training when engagement is unavoidable.
Smash whoever closes the gap first… Retreat, recover, repeat.
That’s what happens when you cannot out-flee ALL the horde.
In that photo is the conceptualized reality of a white boy at the bad end of many violent strikes if/when he can no longer outrun ALL the mad mob???
And even if he manages to outrun them all in the battle of exhausted will… There is nothing to celebrate.
The matter then becomes one of reconceptuaization… A matter of not assuming all the final effects through the liberated paradigm.
I think perhaps this white boy turns around to commence the game of violent strikes which for the trained young white boy becomes like baseball and the VAST difference between whiffing, hitting a single, a double, a triple, a homerun or a grand slam WHEN STRIKING THAT SWEET SPOT…
In conjunction, “we” lionize a Mayweather for the very fact that one can rarely if ever strike him “in the sweet spot” where violent strikes are like grand slams,
Stick and move. For a young, white boy of 10-12… Start here.
Stick and move… Strike and retreat… You are “playing” with snakes. Each looking to strike in the sweetest spots.
Obviously, under a self-annihilating ethos that ABSOLUTELY pungently possesses nearly all the truly non-Christian authoring of the Narrative… A phenomenon of the highest IQ “white” males being self-annihilators MAKES FOR a white boy who must learn early on to FIGHT FOR HIS LIFE.
Some other thoughts… Going to the ground in a mob situation is very, very risky… Unadvisable. Ground game is best for one on one situation playing to a weight/strength disadvantage. In a potential mob scene, you are one kick away from an amateur thug ending it quickly. Then there will be the sheer psychological “weight” of the mob that has you “stay down” because you are down. So unless your ground game is strong in the sense that having engaged he who will first “close the gap” and this engagement goes the ground where a swift and unrelentlng submission via bone break, joint break, eye gouge, etc. with ALL INTENT of getting to your feet IS ALL THAT IS ON YOUR MIND… THEN NEVER go to the ground in a mob scene. Always stay on your feet.
Some of you must be out of your minds; if you speak of Trump in the sense that PA does—– as one who by default has become an abstract ‘tribe leader’ —– than i can hear that and even note such thought as nimble and precise.
But to put your soul and body on the line for a mono-maniacal egocentric like that is as mentally suicidal as is Thor’s advice against how to avoid mob-ready physical annihilation. Play up the Trump follies for all they are worth; appreciate that the alt-right-minded has found a defacto source or groundswell to rally around. But don’t make the crucial blunder of putting blinders on when it comes to appraising his limits.
IMO, i’ve come to agree with much of what Cam says in that he’s not a singular splendid force but a serendipitious rallying force for an white-western political urgency that’s been long in need and has been long overdue.
But that source/symbol’s personal flaws and weaknesses are a source of real danger, considering the might and magnitude they now carry because of what he has managed to achieve.
There is a lot in that little… Get specific…
One knows how to avoid the mad mob… It’s called flee…
The question is what arises when you’ve exhausted yourself BEFORE the most maddest of the mob has???
Do you get devoured like in those animal shows because you literally have no energy to fight?
Trump SHOULD BE VERY CLEAR… Come to my rallies prepared to physically defend yourself from crazy anti-white (Supremacists) and do not expect preferential editing from the dying, old media.
The relevant phenomenon IS NOT Trump as tribal rallying cry for “angry white male,” but Trump as THE FALSE RALLYING CRY of those justifying “any means necessary” to all it deems “white supremacy.” Trump’s true value is as MEDIA-generated false representation of “white supremacy” and the coalescing force this brings to bear on a mass of anti-white Supremacists. That you cannot and will not recognize this suggests a state of radical autonomy.
Yes, Trump’s abrasive personality is an issue, especially with female voters that may have leaned GOP against Hillary.
However, you do realize that Trump knows exactly what he’s doing? Here in Wisconsin he tells a crowd that if he acted “more Presidential” he’d be “boring”:
The implication is that “boring” wouldn’t be bringing out a lot of those working class American voters who stayed home and didn’t vote for Romney. In Indiana he told a group of voters the same thing – that if he acted “more Presidential” he might not have been able to win the nomination.
I don’t know if he’s going to win, but he is lucky that he’s running against a quite flawed candidate hermself. Pretty soon he’s going to attack Hillary viciously on Whitewater, her husband, Benghazi, the email scandal, her association with Wall Street, etc. etc. and that’s probably the better strategy. And Hillary can’t escape her husband because she attacked and discredited some of his rape accusers, and also recently made comments that she’d add Bill as an economic advisor and put him “in charge” of the economy, since he’s “the only one who can fix it.”
and also recently made comments that she’d add Bill as an economic advisor and put him “in charge” of the economy, since he’s “the only one who can fix it.”
On this (and this alone) I’ll heartily agree with you. However, ‘Whitewater’ is ancient history and will only make him sound a bit desperate.
As for Trump knowing what he’s doing? To some extent, yeah; but don’t tell me that he isn’t impulsive to the point of regretting it sometimes. He’s a loose canon and very often creates unwanted and regrettable results in an instant.
Trump SHOULD BE VERY CLEAR… Come to my rallies prepared to physically defend yourself from crazy anti-white (Supremacists) and do not expect preferential editing from the dying, old media.
As Sailer pointed out last week, Trump is making it a point to NOT say much about the violence against supporters at his rallies, most of it when they attempt to leave and go back to their vehicles.
He’s got little to win by doing so – he will just appear as an “oppressor” advocating violence against the NAM’s if he says too much publicly.
Oh, no doubt. Being rich your whole life has that effect on some people’s degree of impulsivity – they’re very insulated from consequences because they always have ability to get out of trouble, and money means you can indulge every whim. Also, as Sailer says, Trump tends to “think out loud.” Another possible characteristic of those who’ve had money their whole life and don’t have to worry about how they’re perceived by others around them when it comes to the PC or “interpersonal diplomacy” games.
Also, he’s a lifelong New Yorker and they tend to just blab off whatevers on the tip of their tongue endlessly, too. Down South we always talk about how the relocated New Yorkers come down here and talk incessantly – usually whining, moaning, complaining about something.
btw, what is the context of that pic of the blacks and browns pursuing the white kid?
I saw cam’s pic but no explaining text. i apologize if someone earlier in the thread provided a link that i’m overlooking.
That was during the Trump rally in San Jose recently – the kid was wearing a Trump t-shirt.
And his tackler appears to be a Somali who flew in from Williams country, and bragged about it on Twitter:
do u think this is true?
I added some ‘category’ pages at the top of the blog (under the Menu link in mobile view). WordPress is great on the front end but its back end is cumbersome for working on blog settings. I’m still working on getting an extremely overdue Blogroll on the sidebar; web-searching for solutions turned up claims that WP discontinued that feature (?!) at least in the graphic theme I’m using.
UPDATE: a “Top 5” blogroll is added.
That guy is apparently a high schooler from near here.
A high-schooler going out to Cali to politically agitate (to mob, as they say), and making what can easily and legitimately be interpreted as terroristic threats on social media.
Will there be any consequence for him, at all?
It is a mistake to talk tough; and also i don’t have the background for appropriate measures; but there’s gotta be a lot of people who do. But what about his fellow high-schoolers, can’t they just kick his ass? I would like to get along better with the local kids to hear about their experience at school, particularly with the Somalis.
The Somalis a class apart, as far as immigrant threats. They are shit, and at the same time, impressive. They are selected for criminality and mobbing and all that, to the same extent that the jews are selected for transacting.
A lot of Somalis are very low-T in their looks, and sensitive. On the individual level. But they are more inclined (selected for) toward criminality than any other group.
The Mayor of San Jose was too busy criticizing Trump on political grounds, thus we see the lack of police protection. I’m guessing that the San Jose police won’t care too much about interviewing this kid and opening a criminal warrant, of their own accord.
And if he goes to San Jose police himself and files a criminal complaint I’m doubting that they would either issue a warrant or seek extradition from equally uncooperative law enforcement authorities in Minnesota. Or they might issue a warrant for whatever charge rates just below their threshold for requesting extradition from Minnesota.
I think it’s pretty clear that Trump was saying “there’s my African American (supporter)” and not saying “there’s my personal black slave right there” like the resulting explosion on Black Twitter is trying to make it out to appear.
Hillary won’t touch this comment directly, I predict. It would be toxic for her, as well.
Her advisors are surely already telling her to be careful not to pander too much to various, silly, alleged racial hysterias like this, with the Democratic Party already at risk of being perceived as the “black party” and falling over themselves to placate the #BLM crowd.
— like the resulting explosion on Black Twitter is trying to make it out to appear
Echoes of Ross Perot’s “you people” manufactured scandal. Key differences — Then: the media controlled all narrative and people ‘cared.’ Now: the country is priming for war.
I believe that Trump is everyone’s last chance to resolve our differences peacefully.
The other key difference is that during Perot’s time core America hadn’t endured virtually 24-hour coverage of similar “racial” topics on 24+ different media outlets for the previous 7 years.
I don’t think that WordPress will post a PNG file to view inline here? (.JPGs and .JPEGS do work). Here’s Sailers link to a graph showing how many times the terms “sexism” and “racism” were mentioned in its content over the past 150+ years:
So as could be predicted beforehand, white boy could not outrun ALL the mob. Now, nearly exhausted, taken to the ground and providing time for the rest of the mob catch up, one is in a much worse position than if he had never fled in the first place.
What’s your next move Nikcrit… If you are that white boy on the ground, exhausted from running and surrounded by the mad colored mob?
When I conceived of a “radical autonomy” that was a purposeful self-annihilation versus the nondiscriminating self-creation it is sold as, I was cognizant of unwittingly providing this abstract phenomenon with particularly concrete conceptions.
In this case, the horse is out of the barn, and importing Somalis into your environment is purposeful self-annihilation, period. And the series of tweets from this Somali jihadist scum VERIFIES the unpredecented “radical autonomy” of the very individuals who blood libel white man with the calls of “genocide.”
This a toxic stew destined for sudden incineration.
“Trump’s true value is as MEDIA-generated false representation of “white supremacy” and the coalescing force this brings to bear on a mass of anti-white Supremacists. That you cannot and will not recognize this suggests a state of radical autonomy.”
I recognize that value. I think he and his candidacy exposes a rote and robotic state of his political opposition; in fact, i think i’ve noted before that that is Trump’s particular genius. It’s almost savant-like, his ability to quickly raise ire while simultaneously getting his believers to see qualities and allegiances in him that simply do not exist.
And I don’t extend as much in a critical vein; rather, i marvel and am truly curious how he does both those things.
“What’s your next move Nikcrit… If you are that white boy on the ground, exhausted from running and surrounded by the mad colored mob?”
I don’t know. And I’m saddened by that fact.
Perhaps I have to reconcile myself to the fact that the tensions (p.c. -driven radical autonomy leading to self-annihilation?) but which i call lingering ‘overcorrections’ from the civil rights era have to simply run their course, which unfortunately means some sort-of confrontationally violent catharsis that flexes the racial dichotomy.
I literally, of course, don’t want to sacrifice the white kid to test my political read, but part of me is curious to see what would’ve happened had things resolved themselves differently, i.e, if the rainbow-of-color mob had cornered the white kid uncontested and could’ve acted out any urge or wish generated: would they have literally stampeded him to death? Or would that overwhelming advantage have summoned a collective act of mercy and would have spontaneously settled for a physically sparing humiliation and verbal bluster, perhaps? (don’t laugh; i’ve seen the latter in situations involving mobs of uneducated and surly in-the-heat-of-the-moment NAMs).
In any case, I honestly don’t know or have a confident guess. But I am glad that it didn’t come down to that.
How exactly did things resolve in that vid IRL? Was the white kid’s mixing back in to the general crowd more or less the end of the incident?
This new video hits hard:
“This new video hits hard:”
Yeah it does!
Actually, Trump makes statement on the “thugs and illegals” in San Jose today:
Whoredaddy what’s with your obsession with “white supremacy?” What’s wrong with whites just being whites, having pride in their heritage and culture? Why can’t we just live unmolested in our own land? Is it too much to ask to have our own ethnic interests and to be able to advocate for ourselves without being accused of racism? I ask this because the whites I deal with on the day to day are far from supreme by any measure. They are very low IQ dysfunctional people. What about them? They are just as white as you and me, but they could certainly benefit from a collective pride and largesse that comes from an ethnic identity, moreso than any of us. Furthermore I have yet to see you coherently defend your concept “objective supremacy.” It’s an inherently subjective valuation. No way around that.
I tend to agree… decentralized social media is leading to all kinds of interesting political realignments as younger generations have no interest or awareness in the detentes that have entrenched the Boomers. For instance there is a black college age commenter on youtube that I follow at times who is vehemently anti-SJW. In the video below, he rails against the Black Lives Matter protestors who harassed Milo during his Dangerous Faggot Tour. Milo, who has become a kind of court jester of the alt-right movement, as the gays tend to do, is a pretty unexpected figure to rally around.
From Amren – Obama makes comments about “right wing radio” stoking racial fears – remember that old aphorism that the higher the monkey climbs, the more he will expose (sorry Nik):
I don’t necessarily disagree with much of what he said. But I don’t even feel the rationalization was necessary; I think America has the right to close its borders for reasons entirely unrelated to economics. What I disagree with is his not mentioning the ethnic strictures on immigration; how since in the last 50 years they’ve consciously lowered the level of European immigration to the U.S.
And the center-right media does ‘stoke racial fears’ just as the center-left tripe like MSNBC stokes racial fantasies through its memes. Either way, I say there’s too much attention paid to mainstream cable news of either bent; I agree with peterike along those lines that it’s all just one big tactical distraction.
Deja vu of Bill Clinton attacking talk radio in 1995. I’m surprised that Obama is in that trope, rather than correctly pointing to the Alt-Right internet as multikult’s enemy.
I get a note of truculence from professional leftists as well as from amateur libs/SJWs about the breaking down of liberalism, which is really their anger with White men who are becoming cynical if not overtly hostile to liberal America. The liberal project was always carried on the backs of high-trust producer citizens, Whites. It was always a no-upside proposition for middle class Whites, into which they were bribed and goaded and which they complacently went along with.
But the system is breaking down because Whites (middle class men in particular) are slowly checking out — and the Leftist ruling class is getting angry, like an ageing woman haranguing her ever-scarce suitors over the diminishing dinner dates and gifts.
Oh. I see cam lost answered my question about how that San Jose protest intended for that white kid. Yeah, it doesn’t surprise me that no charges will be issued
Attention: the kind of ‘Mud’ interests MSNBC does NOT promote and pedestalize; i.e., you alt-righters aren’t alone in being politically ostracized:
I think Swain is important because her and her background recognize and is familiar with traditional agrarian southern-black tradition and folklore and she can connect with the kind of blacks that make up a great amount of black American population, etc.
But another part of me wishes there was a more ‘black-outlier’ verision of Swain and her politics; someone who could speak for me AND better represent my personal interests and style; as ‘we’ aren’t a prominent political bloc or constituencey yet we ARE very underrepresented.
I wonder if it’s folly to imagine a black-white alliance within the alt-right; it would be mutually beneficial politically for sure —— but I am cognizant of the fact that the mere cultural disaffections between the two groups is enough to ensure such a coalition never takes off.
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account.
( Log Out /
You are commenting using your Google+ account.
( Log Out /
You are commenting using your Twitter account.
( Log Out /
You are commenting using your Facebook account.
( Log Out /
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.