The Treachery and Self-Deception Behind the Rhetoric of Compassion

From the Daily Caller:

Leftist Norway politican Karsten Nordal Hauken was brutally sodomized by a Somali and felt so incredibly guilty in the aftermath he subsequently begged authorities not to deport the man.

The Treachery 

Anonymous Conservative offers his r/K selection-based interpretation of Hauken’s behavior:

Notice how this character is more fit, in a Darwinian sense, than you are, when it comes to surviving a brutal occupation. Notice how his type seeks to engender a brutal occupation, that they will survive better than you would because of the subconscious instincts they have to bow down before evil.

Nature programmed the r-strategist this way. He could never out-compete you, one on one, in a free society. In such an environment, his type is destroyed. But that isn’t his game. Unable to compete directly, he has evolved into a machine, designed to import a brutal occupation, and then survive it, as you are killed trying to fight it because of your K-strategist urges.

[…] They are trying to get outsiders to genocide our K-strategist model of human for them.

A reverse scenario would involve K-selected people welcoming a harsh winter, a condition under which they thrive but the r-selected interlopers are culled. Reader Camlost adds:

Also, collaborators are often motivated by the same sorts of weakness – the inability to compete in the current hierarchy and the holding of petty grudges are often cited as motivating factors for collaborators who are later caught and questioned. Their twisted reasoning is they they’re willing to bring in an outsider to smash the current order if it somehow improves their standing or gives them revenge/power over others that they couldn’t normally achieve on their own.

The Self-Deception 

Anonymous Conservative also writes that those treacherous motivations are subconscious and someone like Hauken would vehemently deny that this is what he’s doing, instead ascribing his motives either to compassion on account of the immigrant’s plight or to justice as necessitated by the K-selected Norwegian’s alleged perfidy such as racism.

The self-deception with which a person rationalizes away his low impulses reminds me of a point that was made in Vaclav Havel’s 1979 essay “The Power of the Powerless.” The anti-Communist classic features Havel’s parable of the greengrocer’s sign. The parable shows how a merchant’s act of displaying a sign bearing a propaganda slogan is his gesture of submission to the regime, yet one that veils the underlying real message of his abasement behind the slogan’s pretty lie:

if the greengrocer had been instructed to display the slogan “I am afraid and therefore unquestioningly obedient;’ he would not be nearly as indifferent to its semantics, even though the statement would reflect the truth. The greengrocer would be embarrassed and ashamed to put such an unequivocal statement of his own degradation in the shop window, and quite naturally so, for he is a human being and thus has a sense of his own dignity. To overcome this complication, his expression of loyalty must take the form of a sign which, at least on its textual surface, indicates a level of disinterested conviction. It must allow the greengrocer to say, “What’s wrong with the workers of the world uniting?” Thus the sign helps the greengrocer to conceal from himself the low foundations of his obedience…

Similarly, r-selected appeasers don’t say “I want Somalian rapists to eradicate masculine Norwegians and their children yet spare me on account of my willingness to tolerate forced sodomy.” Instead, the rabbit displays his own greengrocer’s sign. At least the proverbial woman who gives herself to the conqueror collaborates after the conquest, not before or during the siege.

***

Here is Havel’s original 1979 essay. Here is my 2016 version, in which I replaced a total of about 20 words: the proletariat-related keywords with diversity-related ones, and greengrocer-related words with office manager-related ones. To uncanny effect, I replaced no words in the final paragraph.

Advertisements

23 thoughts on “The Treachery and Self-Deception Behind the Rhetoric of Compassion

  1. When I read a piece like this NOW, the default assumption is false flag. Every media story that plays to this Narrative of pathetic, self-annihilating “white” male publicly self-flagellating OUGHT TO BE considered diabolically manufactured propaganda and forever proving otherwise. In other words, “we” should deny, deny, deny the veracity of stories like this to the point of pushing these either defectives or paid stooges to the front and center of the mainstream media. “We” should push for this “white” male to articulate the tolerance for rape due a war-like upbringing. “We” should push for that Somali faggot to explain how hate-raping a “white” male isn’t really a sign of faggotry, but “power” instead? And “we” should really look into how “white” FAGGOTS INVITE THE BARBARIANS within to be both sodomized and to have sodomized those whom they hate. Specifically, those that detest sodomy altogether.

  2. Butt what he’s really doing is ensuring that both his enemies and those who share his degenerate desire are all equally sodomized.

  3. And of course, if the default assumption is ubiquitous zeitgeist agitprop then “we” need to pull on the memetic tenacles, metaphorically wrapping said tenacles around the necks of the self-annihilators. And one such tenacles implicit to this “story” is alien-homo-hate-rapers… Ahhr!!!! Nonwhite faggots possessing a racial-rape fantasy for “white” liberals… Which just goes back to the pervasive homo-sexuality, ie., desire for radical sexual autonomy, within Islam/Arab world and its symbiotically-regressive relationship with “western secularism.”

  4. There is also the matter of turning the above into a “survival strategy” with an incredible amount of follow up detail… So being racial-hate raped = survival strategy… Sometimes and in some places? But this reeks of “universal equality.” It practically grants ANYTHING as “survival strategy” if one survives… Another day? Week? Year? What? Survives? In what way?

    I don’t read a “survival strategy.” I read DESIRE for a degrading annihilation.

  5. His actions are deplorable to many—- and each component of that ‘many’ have their own diabolical interpretation of what that deplorable action ‘means.’

    Are they ALL possibly correct? And if not, says who?

  6. Also, maybe there’s something to be said about those low on the dominance hierarchy totem pole being eager to invite any help (even an outsider) that they think will smash the system and give them hope, since they can’t fall too much further anyway. And they think that letting others expend energy in fighting the battles will help them stay safe and unscathed (survival strategy). Established dominance hierarchies are actually supposed to be more peaceful and are a feature of more stable, long-term mammal societies. (like Tigers or Lions, who establish a dominant member through competition and then the losers bow out and accept it)

    and each component of that ‘many’ have their own diabolical interpretation of what that deplorable action ‘means.’

    C’mon now, lol. Your last experience should teach you that T-Diddy doesn’t deal in the realm of multiple possible definitions. He’s like the old Vatican Council – firing off absolutes coming in the form of one official dogmatic line only… and you must comply.

  7. Cam: hahaha.. Yeh, but there’s value in his assessments. Ruminating bottoms slowly but surely suss out the ideological ‘catchalls’ that wind up usurping conventional logic consensus. I’m as pessimistic as the next guy; but I’m willing to wait out for the final denouement. ….. I’m willing to say it: I respect the boy’s rueful deliberations; he’s surprised us in the past! Lol!!

  8. Pingback: The Treachery and Self-Deception Behind the Rhetoric of Compassion | Reaction Times

  9. I respect the boy’s rueful deliberations; he’s surprised us in the past! Lol!!

    Not in less than 5,000 words and 3,000 quotes he hasn’t.

  10. Come on Camlost…

    There are two components to the “white” male’s high IQ mind… A will to perfection (will towards objective Supremacy) versus a will to do anything (will towards radical autonomy)… Truly a head divided.

    As it stands, high IQ “white” male NOT ONLY DENIES his will to Perfection, ie., objective Supremacy, but in his desire for radical autonomy is the catastrophe that is a self-enforced finite playing field… A strictly physical realm where one meets “absolute freedom” at the very edge and either concedes to a limitation on his freedom or he takes a leap of faith? But one has already rejected any leaps of faith beforehand when rejecting objective Supremacy. And so concealing any and all concessions to a limitation on one’s freedom becomes one’s primary protocol.

  11. Camlost…

    You still cannot understand the liberated use of quotes TO IDENTITY one’s liberationist interlocutors?

    For instance, it’s clear that in this instance, because “we” are dealing with a very disturbed “white” male liberal then perhaps “we” shall use “rape” instead of rape? The former signifies an understood dispute amongst rival liberationists over real rape while the latter lends credibility to a certain definitiveness that really no longer exists ESPECIALLY in this “story.”

  12. You still cannot understand the liberated use of quotes

    Pope T-Diddy I understand and I accede fully to the will of the Holy See. (you) JK – yes, I do see the political distinction you made between the liberal attitude on “rape” versus “real rape” and yes, it is very key to our topic here now that you mention it.

    @Trickin – you’re an effing jerk, lol.

  13. it’s been well-documented that SOME men who’ve been raped feel guilty because they enjoyed it, and develop a strong sense of attachment to their “deliverer”.. I don’t want to imagine what transpired during the “intimate” moments between these two…erm…people, but Nordal sounds to me like a young bride who just lost his virginity, and now feels a lifelong attachment to the man who took it from him.

    IOW, betas are often just one body orifice violation away from being the weaker sex themselves

  14. It’s not that I don’t agree with r/K selection theory, but I think this is reading too much into it. Cowardice is not a survival strategy that leads well to reproduction as it turns women the fuck off, but playing it safe does ensure survival for the most part. You have to be able to live, breathe, and eat before you can fuck.

    This shit, uh, does not make any evolutionary sense though. Guys it just doesn’t.

    I vote for Occam’s razor. High flying Shitlibs like this are Hoe Mo’ sekshuelz ga-ga for Negro penis.

  15. Elk suggested this as well when the subject first came up, that Hauken might just be a fruit-garden variety homo. Whether he is or not, a point is missed: people or animals dont think about Darwinian fitness logicaly — they just follow their impulses, which are adaptive in a natural setting but on occasion not so much in an artificial social structure. A mudshark who puts her White child in harm’s way by dating a criminal nigger and ends up with both her and her daughter dead (cf. four-year-old Savanah Walker and her mother Heidi) was following her subconscious Darwinian impulses, just like a low-status male who welcomes a hostile occupant in order to elimitate his rivals.

    Hauken’s pre-conscious Darwinian reasoning didn’t think three chess moves ahead; just one step ahead. A bull doesn’t want to have lots of offspring that live to reproductive age to perpetuate his genes; he just wants to fuck a cow and gore whoever comes near his calves. With similar linear simplicity, Hauken’s instinct says “scary darkie kill big man on campus no kill me I win.”

    There are tons of examples that validate Anonymous Conservative’s interpretation of submission-gone-wrong as rabbit strategy. Example 1: cuckservatives. Example 2: Peter Biehl.

  16. Elk suggested this as well when the subject first came up, that Hauken might just be a fruit-garden variety homo.

    I think it’s a given that Hauken is gay and spent willing time with the Somali perp, the non-existent details given on the case suggest that. One of the articles mentioned that the defendant argued in court that he had been in a consensual relationship with Hauken but that the jury “didn’t buy” that explanation. After those trumped-up rape accusations against Julian Assange I don’t know what to think about rape prosecution in these flaky, fruity Scandinavian countries.

  17. “One of the articles mentioned that the defendant argued in court that he had been in a consensual relationship with Hauken but that the jury “didn’t buy” that explanation. “\

    Of course they didn’t ‘buy it,’ being the RACIST JURY upholding the stifling WESTERN EUROPEAN RACIAL AND CULTURAL HEGEMONY like they do!!!

  18. Of course they didn’t ‘buy it,’ being the RACIST JURY upholding the stifling WESTERN EUROPEAN RACIAL AND CULTURAL HEGEMONY like they do!!!

    Ok… you’re passionate enough about mansex imperialism to yell about it.

  19. PA
    With similar linear simplicity, Hauken’s instinct says “scary darkie kill big man on campus no kill me I win.”

    But the “scary darkie” already is the “big man on campus” now.
    And he doesn’t go after the big dogs, he goes after the women and little shits. In a situation like this, you don’t win unless you’re a woman. Or, a powerful tyrant using an alien enemy as a weapon against your own people. There is no time in our evolutionary history where this would have made sense for some weak little shit that isn’t female.

    Three cheers for sociobiology but it has to make sense to be feasible. Sorry but I just don’t buy this one.

    On the other hand, you know, we contrast the aggressive conquering tendencies of the Vikings against their current herd-like behavior acting as lambs for the slaughter.

    One thing we overlook is that these aggressive men went out and carried women from other nations off back to their homelands for breeding. And so the behavioral traits associated to submission to a conqueror would have been selected for through the women, but some of those traits may actualize in the men.

    All this stuff is interesting theory but at this level of complexity we’re just guessing.

    Hopefully when we win we can take genetic samples from pathetic shitlibs like this and figure out exactly what is wrong with them.

  20. It’s not that “white” liberals don’t fear the radical “black” collective or even the individual nigger… They very much fear these “things” and should fear these “things” WHEN in their right mind. Where they go off the rails is when in a degenerate state of mind they not only ascribe to the notion of having nothing to fear from the radical “black” collective, but they cannot even see a single nigger amongst them licking his chops in savage anticipation of an easy meal.

  21. One thing we overlook is that these aggressive men went out and carried women from other nations off back to their homelands for breeding. And so the behavioral traits associated to submission to a conqueror would have been selected for through the women, but some of those traits may actualize in the men.

    I’ve at times come up with the same observation—— and it’s more-or-less based on dogma, opinion and scientific-article citings that i’ve gathered from this blog. But i’ve been hesitant to say as much because 1) i’m not very confident at citing hard quantitative sources for opinion; and 2) I don’t want to seem like i’m picking fights.

    Overall, I think these evolutionary ‘choosing for’ arguments and theories sort-of combine and operate simulataneous and on many levels, even within one given race, ethnicity or culture.

  22. One thing we overlook is that these aggressive men went out and carried women from other nations off back to their homelands for breeding. And so the behavioral traits associated to submission to a conqueror would have been selected for through the women, but some of those traits may actualize in the men.

    It’s possible that the amount of actual raiding and wife-stealing that the Vikings did is not as extensive as the image that people have in their mind.

    And a lot of political/military violence of ages past was carried out by “extraneous” males who had no wife or ability to anchor a household financially. But when wives, homesteads and economic resources things are easier to find through other means you don’t have so many of these extraneous males around. There’s some research that suggests that even the crusades happened at times when there was a huge “bubble” of shiftless, rootless males of military age in Western Europe.

    A lot of ISIS recruits are like this – losers in a loser country, with bad economic prospects and very little chance to get themselves laid due to stifling sexual mores, and also very little chance to land a wife due to the punishing cost of dowries. (this is why 1st- and 2nd-cousin marriage is still so widely practiced in the Middle East, it’s keeping the dowry money in the family instead of giving it away to others).

    And most of those Muslim immigrants grabbing the asses of German girls in Cologne or Berlin on New Year’s are pretty sad 28 year-old virgins who are too weird, harsh and violent to get a Western girl to pay attention to them. They’re not wired properly to be able play the patient, calm social game that it takes to meet a mate within Western society. Anwar Al-Awlaki was known to have patronized dozens of prostitutes in the USA before he was killed in that drone strike, he was married with a kid by I can’t imagine that his ugly, hirsute, birqa-wearing wife gave him much relief after having to look at Western girls his whole life. Also, those bombers in Brussels made pathetic videos of themselves in nightclubs getting drunk and comically rebuffed by the Western women they were clumsily approaching on the dance floor.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s