Free Speech

“You have to be very careful — SJWs can destroy you,” said a friend who learned that I write an Alt-Right blog.

I don’t take the risk, however small, lightly. I understand that if doxed, somebody who expresses the opinions we do would face what in effect would be a classic political persecution. This is why all of us who rely on a paycheck write anonymously. Here in the United States, as a remnant of our founding liberties, such a persecution would at least not entail the criminal dimension that it does in England. However, loss of one’s job is almost certain in such a case. There is also the trivial but serious possibility of physical threats.

Still, I told my friend, I refuse to be intimidated by… this:

SJW
Yeah, there are the common-sense precautions one should take, such as not providing any searchable facts about yourself. In the end though, there are two reasons for my lack of excessive concern:

1. SJWs Are Paper Tigers

They are sub-rational, damaged people who turn on one of their own before working up their mob-courage to attack somebody who doesn’t take their worldview seriously. Having read “SJWs Always Lie,” I am aware of the anatomy of their attack and the indicated countermeasures. Even if I forgot everything I had read in that book, I remember its cornerstone lesson: don’t apologize for something you wrote.

In fact, I’ve been saying “don’t apologize” way back on Chuck’s old GLP blog circa 2012 — my rationale on the practical level being that by doubling-down on their attack in response to an apology, SJWs (the so-called social justice warriors) give you no incentive to compromise. The mantra I suggested at the time was “I stand by my words.” If you refuse to back down, the enemy loses on the battlefield of his choosing and in the long run, you laugh.

2. You Can’t Be “Just A Little Politically Incorrect”…

… so you might as well say what you really think. Two major news events had a liberating effect on me: Edward Snowden’s revelations about the government spying on Americans’ phone and internet communication, and the persecution of George Zimmerman.

Snowden’s disclosures taught me that the government already knows everything about everybody in this country who has ever touched a computer or a smartphone, therefore we have, in a manner of speaking, nothing to hide.

Zimmerman’s ordeal taught me that there is no need to worry about the blow-back on our iconoclasm when there was this perfect New Diversity Man who likely never wrote a single racisss word in his life, and yet the entire U.S. establishment threw all it had at him in an effort to put him in prison for said racism.

The Pursuit Of The Truth

Blogger 28 Sherman recently tweeted:

1/2 of the @NRO vitriol at dumb Trump fans is pent up rage that they cannot express over the incredibly dumb minority vote bank on the Left.

We on the Alt-Right don’t have any suppressed rage — our rage is quite open — because we permit ourselves to think freely and seek the truth rather than fear it.

The purpose of exercising your right to free speech is, ultimately, to live in truth. The pursuit of the truth is a lifelong, subtractive process. You start with a clump of things you know and things you think you know, along with strips of your ego, little crystals of fear, chunks of ulterior motives and lies. And you cut into that lurid mass. You strip the thing down and as you get to the lean meat, the secret is — as the song goes — knowing what to throw away and knowing what to keep.

Along the lines of a similarly subtractive model, T.S. Eliot wrote the following in his 1921 essay Tradition and the Individual Talent:

Poetry is not a turning loose of emotion, but an escape from emotion; it is not the expression of personality, but an escape from personality. But, of course, only those who have personality and emotions know what it means to want to escape from these things.

Like Eliot’s poet, the Alt-Right already has the emotion, personality, reason, and clear-eyed possession of facts to pursue the truth. We are past the point of giving a fuck about political correctness as we shrug off the lies in our desire to think and speak freely.

If doxed and attacked, Alt-Right writers in any medium should not be ashamed of what they’ve written. Any “social justice” or cuckservative accuser who reads your words ought to be driven to pangs of envy rather than to his anticipated smug contempt. He might be envious of the talent he’d see behind the writing in many cases, and in every instance simply of the fact that you are asserting your freedom of speech while he’s a freakshow sell-out.

In spite of the trivial but potentially devastating risks, all of us here persist in defying the narrative and mocking its guardians. We are like something at night that’s irresistibly drawn toward light.

Happy Easter, folks.

Advertisements

263 thoughts on “Free Speech

  1. I’m also terrified of censoring power of SJW’s in the public sphere, but as alt-righters we sure need to make sure we make statements in the most elegant way possible, in certain situations. We don’t need to abandon the PR and diplomacy games completely, but instead master them.

    Last year a George DoE official was fired for saying the following on his personal Facebook page:

    “If I read one more thing about the Finland education system….not everybody in the US public schools are WHITE.”

    http://www.11alive.com/news/department-education-official-fired-after-facebook-posts/68769057

    And we know that he’s 100% right, but the statement itself is just a little rough around the edges. If he just read Sailer, he could’ve made the same assertion but at least used the term “student quality” instead.

  2. Happy Easter!

    I’m convinced that certain AltRight writers are intentionally left alone because doxing them would reveal how awesome they are in real life, thereby giving them even more fame and fortune..

  3. A lot of the problem is that status is conferred by the system rather than by a community.

    In a community everyone knows who is who, and the lost souls might be tolerated by they won’t be listened to.

    But because we live in a giant pozzed out system, where our status is conferred by how well we do within it, the dipshits are able to lap it up.

    In a world where people had to be somebody, only the good people would be listened to. But in this world everyone has an opinion. Except the people who know better.

    I checked out the 11alive link, and look at those newscasters. That is Atlanta and those two are celebrities for having that job. They have the necessary look, and the vanity to make something of themselves.

    It should be noted that the Georgia education official who was fired, for remarking the differences of US students from Finlanders, missed the grammar, in his statement. Which is odd, because it is a dumb mistake, and one that is a little bit pretentious because he was trying to refer to a collective noun (students) with the pronoun (everybody) and so thought he could use the pretentious plural (are) – but the pronoun (everybody) always wants the singular. So if they needed an BETTER reason to fire him, …

  4. Pingback: Free Speech | Reaction Times

  5. A high school teacher in Saint Paul was suspended just this month, for the following comments on his facebook,

    Anyone care to explain to me the school-to-prison pipeline my colleagues and I have somehow created, or perpetuated, or not done enough to interrupt? Because if you can’t prove it, the campaigns you’ve waged to deconstruct adult authority in my building by enabling student misconduct, you seriously owe us real teachers an apology. Actually, an apology won’t cut it.

    There have always been rules for ‘devices,’ and defined levels of misconduct. Since we now have no backup, no functional location to send kids who won’t quit gaming, setting up fights, selling drugs, whoring trains, or cyber bullying, we’re screwed, just designing our own classroom rules.

    These comments were used by the local BLM to get him suspended. These comments, not some others, these ones. The teacher is white, he teaches special ed, and his name is Olson.

    But now the community, such as it is, has rallied behind him, and is calling for the resignation of the superintendent Valerian Silva, for her ineffectiveness and counterproductivity. How is this for a bitch face?

    The other big trend in St Paul high schools is teachers getting beat up, by their black students.

    So at the same time that that is going on, BLM somehow has the sway to get special ed teachers suspended.

  6. “I understand that if doxed, somebody who expresses the opinions we do would face what in effect would be a classic political persecution.G”

    Given the fact that I do not like to converse in echo chambers, as would be the case if i went to certain center-or-center-left-to-center-right blogs, and given the natural enmity you’d guess someone with my social and ethnic bona-fides would have at alt-right/race-real/HBD-oriented web sites, I’m sometimes surprised I’ve garnered the respect and/or perhaps just ‘tolerance’ I have here in the alt-right sphere; I’ve only been banned from one blog and, really, only dissed and disavowed by two regular commenters prominent in alt-right circles; and even then, I drew more public sympathizers, standing up for me in said confrontations, than I did open hatas who reveled in my comeuppance and being banned.

    But I dont think I have any illusions as to why things seem to align on my side: there’s probably an element in play in which, if the shit really hit the fan and someone was diligently ‘voxed,’ I suppose I could provide a bit of explanatory cover in which someone could say —— “hey, it’s not what you think: one of the most prominent commenters at that blog was a black dude! We welcome open debate and opinion from the other side, etc….”

    I go back and forth on this. Do you think there’s some truth to that? Or am I making too much of my presence here and its general irony?

    as alt-righters we sure need to make sure we make statements in the most elegant way possible, in certain situations. We don’t need to abandon the PR and diplomacy games completely, but instead master them.

    Well, yeah—— that is precisely why, going back to Guy White right on up to here, I’ve always argued against those stupid-ass tendencies to slur and ‘essentialize’ the alt-right’s hypothetical ‘others.’ You recall me expressing my disbelief when commenters would go on about ‘niggers’ and ‘coon’ —– ‘coons!!!’—– in the comment string, and how i would say they were playing right into their enemies’ hands!

    Along those lines, that is why I always say the alt-right needs to separate its casual bonding-and-venting moments (in which putting aside contemporary social pieties and sanctimonies) from its more formal declarations and statement of positions (in which those same pieties and sanctimonies can sink them and their movement like a lead balloon).

  7. “So if they needed an BETTER reason to fire him, …”

    hahah; i noticed that too; but: it could be a southern regionalism, which affects a few common sub-verb phrases…..

    btw: how was this comment in terms of formal syntax and grammar? (it’s our idiosyncratic blog right to form our own syntactical code of arms!)

  8. Happy Easter from AIDS Skrillex ,Carl the Cuck, Safe Space Sally and the entire Church with No Salvation, you fucking white male!

  9. Camlost, you make an extremely important point in your first comment and I’m glad this came up early in the thread. Yes, style matters. I had a section on CH’s Jumbotron Test in an earlier draft but deleted it to keep the post focused. The idea is that if your post or comment were flashed up on a stadium jumbotron, would you feel proud or embarrassed of what you wrote. That, and political persecution, even if of the soft variety, is not something you take frivolously — if you condemn the present order, do it in a way that doesn’t gratuitously give ammo to your enemy.

    Back around 2004 I had an amicable email correspondence with Lawrence Auster. I’ve told this story before: being new to this whole scene, I asked him if he gets threats from liberals over his VFR blog’s content. He replied that he doesnt, and he credits his writing style. He told me (quoting from memory) “Someone like Oriana Fallacci is too emotional and personal with her statements such as ‘I hate Islam;’ my approach is more objectively framed and I’d express the same thought more impersonally, like ‘Islam is our mortal enemy.'”

    He did, actually, later get a threat-letter from SPLC, which he described in a VFR blog post. His response to them was to go fly a kite. He never heard from them again.

    Clarity and candor have their place though. I see your point about saying “quality of students.” But if you think that’s too mealy-mouthed or timid for your style or your audience, you can say “Finnish students,” with the plausible deniability that you’re contrasting them with non-Finns, as opposed to non-Whites, while everyone knows what you are saying.

    And there is also room for irreverent or even obscene language especially when done with wit or in the context of proper anger. There is also a time to skewer the carriers of poz with words that hit the id such as “mudshark”.

  10. Or: elegance and violence > artless candor > timid couching of words > lying.

    Per Camlost’s example, another set of rules applies in a professional context. You still never want to lie, which is why the fired school official is infinitely better than someone who would ignore race in the discussion of Finland-US student performance. But if he wanted to be more careful, then yeah, he could have used a euphemism.

  11. elegance and violence > artless candor > timid couching of words > lying

    1. We need to figure out why Finland is out-performing us.
    2. Finland is better situated to provide a stable and encouraging learning environment.
    3. “Not everybody in the US public schools are WHITE.”
    4. Let’s cut the crap: Whose children are we really concerned about educating?

  12. Speaking of the Jumbotron test, my version is the City Council test. What speech are you willing to make at the bi-weekly and televised city council meeting.

    An issue recently was a Muslim community center that was in violation of the parking codes, somehow. They were overflowing the lot and the locals brought it to the meeting. The larger issue is obvious. Why is there a Muslim community center here, and why is this place filling up with Muslims.

    Those questions would be beyond the scope of the city council. But perhaps the question might be asked,

    What can we as a community do, to discourage Muslims from setting up camp in our fair city?

    But wait! apparently it is in the city’s mission statement, that we are to encourage Muslims to set up camp here. So we are kinda fucked. It literally is in the city’s mission statement: above the portico entrance to the City Hall it reads “Welcome” … in Spanish.

    So that is what we are up against. The institution itself is ALIGNED against us.

    I use that phrase Unintentional Superstructure, to describe how the society is essentially formed to work against us. It is organized without our intent.

    The formation process itself, is opposed to us. I don’t know where to go from there. Except somewhere else. Which is what people have done, for a long time. That is what America was about, and we could always go off into the woods, or the frontier.

  13. A lot of the problem is that status is conferred by the system rather than by a community.

    In a community everyone knows who is who, and the lost souls might be tolerated by they won’t be listened to.

    Yes, very good point. And I think that this lines up with the larger fact that Westerners lose their way and start to embrace a toxic, birth-rate depressing form of altruism/liberalism in urban or big societies, which aren’t a natural fit for them.

  14. above the portico entrance to the City Hall it reads “Welcome” … in Spanish

    That is one of those statements that sounds like i might be taking poetic license or whatever, exaggerating. But no.

    And it doesn’t say Welcome, in English, alongside. Just in Spanish.

    This City Hall was built recently as an improvement and was a big deal. Its budget must have been in 9’s, maybe? though i could be overestimating. Architectually it is impressive, in some ways, actually.

    (I am basically doxxxing where i live, but who cares.)

    This city hall features a mural that is 25 feet high by maybe 40 feet across, and two panels of that dimension actually, on adjoining walls perpendicular so that it faces the onlooker twice as he passes by. And – again i kid you not – the theme of the mural is of a dusky foreigner with a blonde white woman on his arm, at a cafe. Total weirdness and not locally topical in the slightest degree at all possible even one iota. Basically Minnesotans are such idiots that they deserve everything they get.

    This mural was commissioned to a famous local artist, and they went with the degenerate pozz theme. As if there is a tradition of cafes and jazz and South Indians and husky dusky love.

    But this mural is 25 feet high, and facing in two directions. It TOWERS over the city, and it features a swarm of brown men, and a white woman in the arms of one of the luckies. And i kid you not those details are accurate and true. This is a prosperous suburb, and so had to let it be known that we are DOWN with the racemixing yeah!

  15. I wonder if the propensity for realtalk among AltRight adherents has some biological, ethnic, or cultural source? I wonder what the commonalities (if any) would be?

    Speaking for myself, my mouth has landed me into trouble with the authorities (parental and otherwise) since I was a little boy.

  16. But as far symbols go, there are a lot of contenders, for the most in-your-face preposterous, but this stuff here, as described above is pretty over the top.

    City Hall. The highest point in view, it has a painting of a white woman surrounded by brown men and in their hands.

    It is hard to believe that that summary of the details is not tendentious but rather, simply accurate. And i just have to wonder, how much the other residents, appreciate or care about or oppose or are upset by the “symbolism”.

    But when you talk about the “symbolism” that can be a sidetrack, because it is NOT simply symbolic. People will fall into the trap of “oh it’s just a picture” or “come on it’s just a movie don’t read so much into it!”

    It is not just a symbol, it IS our defeat and failure. Raising the flag. Their flag is raised over city hall. The artist who did that mural is white, the city council who approved it are (are: no sic!) white. They think it’s cool, to have this free-for-all where the white woman goes to the jazz cafe and is swept up in husky dusky romance? There is no jazz cafe tradition around here.

    The history of this “town” is the River, and that’s it. There is the River, and then the Indians, and then there was agriculture, and then there was suburban development. There was no jazz cafes, ever.

    But if this town doesn’t want a history, because it has none, well then it has to pretend to be part of something else?

  17. Actually, there’s a sorta irony in depicting the Twin Cities as some kind of symbolically ‘cucked’ apotheosis, because artistically speaking, it is source and home to one of the most transgressive and reversing of white-appropriates-black-artistry movement trends of the last 50 years: its fostering the innovating combos The Bad Plus and its antecedent late-’90s trio, Happy Apple.

    If you extend the music metaphor to politics and culture: you could say those groups broke free of the ‘either-racist-or-raceless’ dilemma that stymies both artistic and socio-political impulses relating Euro-white identity and culture.

  18. Well, the Twin Cities is waaaay too cold for me. But isn’t the talk about Somalis there vastly overblown? I mean, these guys look quite assimilated with their American nicknames and stuff:

  19. Freedom of speech = freedom of conscience = conscious of freedom = right to bare arms….

    This is the most basic psychologically of the true American man… Any force seeking to attack any aspect of this equation is some degree of existential threat the American white man.

    In the psyche war, words are the weapons of choice. “We” can “shoot” like we have machines guns or sawed-off shotguns or we can go precision like snipers. So there are those who will gratitously spray the crowd with “nigger, nigger, nigger” and those who will pinpoint that nigger as the existential threat which a “nigger” IS, by definition.

    As it stands, and the examples go beyond “nigger” and include faggot and Jew and migger and so on and so forth, the degenerates own the label (radical “blacks” “own” the word “nigger”), decide its public use AND ULTIMATLEY MAKE INVISIBLE a deadly threat to the “white race.”‘ In effect, because the mass of whites have been conditioned to take the word “nigger” off their mind, tongue and lips, the “nigger” does not exist. So where the diabolical protestations of “invisible racism” spring forth with undying fervor, the “invisible nigger” now rapes, maims and murders whites with public immunity. There is literally no nigger-on-white violence TO SPEAK OF…

    And Nikcrit, you’re still on the wrong side.

  20. @Cam,

    IDK. you have to ask elk re. somalis in twin cities. some of the vids he’s posted on the subject recently are very depressing to me, as i view the twin cities as a place that has avoided some of the refugee pitfalls of other u.s. places… haven’t been up there much in the last several years; my last trip up a short while back i never made it into town proper, but stayed in the hinterlands by st.olaf and carelton…… guess my ass is getting old; that’s my personal guard against p.c. talk!

  21. Nikcrit…

    What is your stance on the use of the word “nigger?” In general, in context… In whatever manner you wish to elucidate?

    My stance is simple. Where a nigger is is where a nigger can be called a nigger. And where a nigger sympathizer stands is where a “nigger sympathizer” shall be named.

    And this was ALL UNDERSTOOD by the until very recently dropped common sense notion that “niggers,” BY DEFINITION, are an existential threat to whites.

    Those who attempt to make niggers into invisible killers of whites (read: high IQ “blacks” and “jewhites”) ARE A MOST INSIDUOUS LOT.

  22. I had a section on CH’s Jumbotron Test in an earlier draft but deleted it to keep the post focused. The idea is that if your post or comment were flashed up on a stadium jumbotron, would you feel proud or embarrassed of what you wrote.

    I also feel this way about the content we put right in the very pages of the alt-right blogs that we add to daily – here, Sailer, CH, Sherman, Lion, wherever.

    I keep thinking about how I stumbled across the alt-right – by reading through AmRen and then seeing a commenter who linked to Lion’s old blog, then discovering Sailer, OneSTDV, Guy White, Chuck, etc. We’re always on stage to attract, find and keep that next alt-right convert, probably a conservative male of center-to-right politics who we don’t want to scare off by being too unpalatable, too obviously anger-driven, or too slur-heavy. And I’m always cognizant of giving of our blog commenting giving off too much of that vibe of being that pantsless, socially maladjusted nerdy white guy anger-keying at his computer somewhere.

    Others may disagree with how I feel about that, but I’m just not ready to give up the PR game, I’d rather play it and win it as best we can. It’s a lot like dealing with women – you humor them, laugh at all their anecdotes, play along and feign interest while not always saying the full scope of what’s on your mind. And I hate to use a stupid political slogan, but we should have our own “big tent” philosophy with an air of “inclusiveness” to it, otherwise we’ll drive away moderate, entry-level alt-righters and just devolve into Stormfront. (not that I don’t browse SF, because I do) We’ve got to keep asking ourselves if the things we say are still keeping an eye on moderation, level-headedness and the need to represent our movement well.

    PS – yes, it really, really pains me to use the term “inclusiveness” but it really was apropos there.

    PPS – I encountered a heavily tatted redhead bartender lately who had iron crosses and other curious artwork. When I noted the tats she started to declaim into a whole canned, rehearsed spiel about how she used to be a skinhead, but not the “racist” type and how she’d never get the 88 or 14 tattoos etc. etc.. I made a quick joke that I’d gladly pay for either those tats if she’d get them and the look I got back from her was absolutely priceless – it was a crazy mix of wonder, respect, bewilderment and disgust.

    I swear I’m going to get one of those little google glass cameras to record this type of stuff one day.

  23. “What is your stance on the use of the word “nigger?” In general, in context… In whatever manner you wish to elucidate?”

    I’m mainly familiar with the black-use context of the word; that makes up for 99%+ of the instances i encounter it.
    For purposes here? I think it should be put aside, or cited via quote or qualified in context, for the sake i spoke of earlier: it could otherwise be used to p.c. tar-and-feather you…
    Perhaps you think that’s cowardly but the negative results from not doing as much are out there for your perusal? And who says that clever diplomacy and stealth avoidance of certain pitfalls are acts of cowardice.
    I look at it more as a more clever means of symbolically icon-izing yourself, your comrades and your mission. A ideological parsing process.
    As for your question specifically, once again i don’t know because I don’t feel you indulged my initial request of being clear.

  24. — We’re always on stage to attract, find and keep that next alt-right convert, probably a conservative male of center-to-right politics who we don’t want to scare off by being too unpalatable, too obviously anger-driven, or too slur-heavy. And I’m always cognizant of giving of our blog commenting giving off too much of that vibe of being that pantsless, socially maladjusted nerdy white guy anger-keying at his computer somewhere.

    I agree with that, and it really describes life in general. You comport yourself with basic dignity, class and confidence. Speech that is all-anger-driven all the time won’t just drive out the curious, it will also drive out or exhaust the in-group.

    Life is a bitch, no-self-control losers don’t get the girl, war is a historic constant. We are in the middle of a different sort of war now, though one with grave existential implications. People were blown up in Brussels, nationalists came out to peacefully protest, and Belgian police surrounded them animal-control-style while Islamic flags waved over the makeshift shrine to the dead. Then, you get the things that Elk described upstream. Anger is a natural response to those things. But anger has to be controlled. That’s the direction I come from in agreeing with you.

    — we should have our own “big tent” philosophy with an air of “inclusiveness” to it, otherwise we’ll drive away moderate, entry-level alt-righters and just devolve into Stormfront.

    I know what you are saying, and I am moving away from that position. Yes to big-tent philosophy if it means pro-Whites from all walks of life. No, if that means compromise on principle, GOP/cuck-style. I understand that it not what you are advocating (the compromise on principle thing) but the impulse to inclusiveness is often taken in that direction by wobbly moderates.

    To in fact disagree with you, effective recruitment has an element of exclusiveness to it. Psychology 101. Frat hazing, asshole USMC drill sergeant — those are the things that attract people and if they pass the initiation, ensure loyalty. It’s even the case with immigration — immigrants who encounter obsequious PC in their favor feel contempt for the host nation; ones who have to jump through difficult hoops feel more respect and loyalty. That was even the case with me: when I came to the US I was bullied with Polack jokes. Eventually I got into two fights (won both) and then bullying ended and I was well-liked. For all I know, that may be the root reason for me being pro-redneck American today.

    That sidetrack aside, the point is that Alt-Right came into public awareness this year and it is the only place, only mindframe where you have sincerity, energy, passion, creativity, momentum. This is not the time to be “inclusive” in a “please like us, we’re not scary” way. Now, I am not implying that you are saying all this. I am in part going with various possible extrapolations of your basic point.

    In final analysis, style matters; we want to attract moderates, but only in the sense that they come to want to radicalize themselves to our level, rather than we accommodate ourselves to their moderate level.

  25. Nikcrit…

    Perhaps you did not pick up the salient point?

    By not calling a nigger a nigger, otherwise understood as not calling “a spade a spade” and thus rendering null and void one’s whole entire claim to an alt-rite “zeitgeist,” ONE DOES A DEADLY DISSERVICE to the white race.

    You would be more true to claim familiarity with the machine gun-type usage of the ghetto black and the shot gun blast-type usage of the media-created “red neck.”

    BUT CERTAINLY, you have an IQ for its PRECISE USAGE. Dare I say, use “nigger” when it is perfectly acceptable to use “nigger.” When one finds a “black” with an inherent hatred for white, one has a nigger in sight.

  26. “When one finds a “black” with an inherent hatred for white, one has a nigger in sight.”

    I don’t see that live; I see it in mediation, as i take that kind to be one of those Tipton story cases —- which, i swear, i do not see in my personal encounters. Rather, live, i encounter the black-to-black version of said term, which could indicate everything from fraternity to intra-black transgressor and/or saboteur.

    I think that is a neverland topic in the abyss between the mono-black and mono-white world: whites think prole blacks sit around and want their women while indulging schadenfreunde upon their overall state and future. they seem to have no idea how effectively p.c. has been in that blacks no longer preoccupy their muse with relative white prosperity or regret; they don’t wish to emulate white iconry or aesthetic; nor desire their women, either. and it’s not a rejection thereof but rather a happy oblivion.

    IDK, that’s my halfrican perception—— but then perhaps my bio-meta preconditions impose their own perceptual limitations, no?

    @PA: Does biological NAM-dom or Jewishness ALONE exclude one from being a potential recruit to the Alt-right? It’s not clear to me from your above comments.

  27. Does biological NAM-dom or Jewishness ALONE exclude one from being a potential recruit to the Alt-right?

    Note my word choice pro-Whites. In theory anyone can be pro-White. In practice, in identitarian movements friendly outsiders (and in-group moderates) should not be in leadership positions or presume to be leaders/critics of the movement.

  28. “In effect, because the mass of whites have been conditioned to take the word “nigger” off their mind, tongue and lips, the “nigger” does not exist. So where the diabolical protestations of “invisible racism” spring forth with undying fervor, the “invisible nigger” now rapes, maims and murders whites with public immunity. There is literally no nigger-on-white violence TO SPEAK OF…:

    Oh, ok, this is what you speak of, in terms of black malice toward whites: yes, i agree that this exists, whether explicitly or by presumed default —– whch is nowadays the more common manifestation.

    Sort-of a slur that SIDESTEPS the issue here of ‘FREE SPEECH,’ no?

  29. No, if that means compromise on principle, GOP/cuck-style. I understand that it not what you are advocating (the compromise on principle thing) but the impulse to inclusiveness is often taken in that direction by wobbly moderates.

    Yes, I agree…. there’s a fine line between being too inviting and being too wishy-washy on principles. It’s kinda like forming a religion with overly easy strictures – if it’s too easy to follow and doesn’t force you to change and act in line then what’s the point?

    I’m mainly familiar with the black-use context of the word; that makes up for 99%+ of the instances i encounter it.

    You’re not going to lecture us about the difference between the N-word ending in -A versus ending in -ER?

    I guess when your homeboy Toure finally arrives here he will explain the difference, before he goes on to explain the parameters and nature of the type of sanitized “white pride” that the government should allow us to express legally.

    That was even the case with me: when I came to the US I was bullied with Polack jokes.

    You shoulda moved down South when freshly arrived. Native Southerners don’t know terms like Dagoe, Mick or Pollack. They’re meaningless here.

    When one finds a “black” with an inherent hatred for white, one has a nigger in sight.

    Yeah, a lot of alt-righters talk endless about how blacks “hate” white people, but I don’t think that’s often true. Blacks look at whites with a mixture of respect, love, admiration, fear and pity, but don’t often hate – that’s generally the province of much brighter peoples. Blacks would rather have at least whites as neighbors, schoolmates and family, though – and being family means loaning money and sharing your resources today because that’s what blacks do with each other. Giving constant monetary support (i.e. Democratic party) to sorry relatives is one of the worst traits of black money management, and keeps them from building household wealth over time.

    And when blacks specifically target whites for crimes it’s not because they hate them – it’s because they know that whites are a soft target and will just call the police when crimes are committed. Committing crimes against other blacks down the street won’t lead to police involvement – those other blacks will instead collect family members from around town and retaliate in overwhelming force immediately – and instant punishment is the only deterrent that those with short time horizons can often understand.

  30. “You’re not going to lecture us about the difference between the N-word ending in -A versus ending in -ER?”

    No, I wasn’t going to. But I see now that you did. Always on the lookout for that LCD factor in ‘the community,’ I see.

  31. they don’t wish to emulate white iconry or aesthetic; nor desire their women, either. and it’s not a rejection thereof but rather a happy oblivion.

    Well, the average black male gets a hold of a lot less white females than what alt-righters generally think. In general, blacks males can occupy themselves with the vast supply of much more easily beddable black women instead of doing all of the patient waiting, working, more waiting and courtship that it takes to sleep with the vast majority of white females, and they’re perfectly content sharing those few negrophile white women out there — black celebrities have been happily and shamelessly passing Amber Rose, Coco Austin and the Kardashians around like a platter of hors d’oeuvres for more than a decade. Cam Newton just got engaged to a former stripper who already had a kid.

    When I was in college I knew and partied with quite a few athletes (we were top 25 in football and basketball) and there would always be that one negrophile white girl who would (literally) bang the entire football team. The players loved in and embraced it, contrary to what alt-righters think even the NFL-bound players weren’t banging the hottest white girls on campus or the cheerleaders, they usually dated the star golfers, baseball players or BMOC fraternity guys who were the son of a Senator or bigtime business man. I’m pretty sure that the chick who got Jameis Winston into trouble at Florida State was that of white chick who always went black.

    And if you’ve ever been to the projects or to an HBCU one thing should stick out immediately – it’s all females. I think in the case of the projects it’s because so many of the males are incarcerated, but it gives easy sexual odds to those not in jail.

    But in high school it became quite obvious to me that brothers will shag just about any willing female that isn’t dark black, and who can blame them? It’s all upside for them, they can only mate upwards. They will gladly “hit” anything from 100lbs to 300lbs, but won’t spend money on them, open doors or pay child support on time, though.

  32. “In general, blacks males can occupy themselves with the vast supply of much more easily beddable black women instead of doing all of the patient waiting, working, more waiting and courtship that it takes to sleep with the vast majority of white females, and they’re perfectly content sharing those few negrophile white women out there —”

    OK. Everyone has their own tales to tell.
    I vowed to stop discussing this issue on Alt-right blogs; it’s too sensitive a topic for reasonable debate and there’s nothing so important about it anyhow, IMO. I just say be careful about getting all your facts on the matter from CH and comparable sites; for some thus spake more of what they wish than of what before their own lying eyes.

    Perhaps my experience is skewed from the particulars of my vantage point over the years. Still, what i see now in my lower-middle-class prole perspective of eros across color lines doesn’t greatly depart from earlier, more affluent views and perspectives.

  33. I don’t read CH, never have.

    STD and marriage rates don’t tell us anything? Getting a black chick in bed is about the easiest thing you can accomplish. You think black females are choosy about sexual partners, or making men date them? Down South they’ve got dozens of public high schools that need to have nurseries to keep the black females in school, with a significant percentage pregnant at some point by end of Senior Year. You doubt that?

  34. And legitimacy rates are not anecdotal, either.

    Lol!! I’m not arguing for virtue here? I’m just conveying who’s with what and how hard it is to, umm, initiate, those configurations.

  35. Nikcrit…

    Again, you are missing the tree from the forest…

    There is the ghetto use of the word in question, the media-created “redneck” usage of the word in question AND THEN there is the precise usage. The former two are used in such a gratuitously liberal manner SO AS TO OBSCURE AND ELIMINATE its precise usage.

  36. “SO AS TO OBSCURE AND ELIMINATE its precise usage.”

    Right. You’re speaking of the Ronald Exantus and Phillip Chism types? The senseless, animalistic murderers who are beyond reproach and then some, right? If so, what did I say that was unmindful of that category?

    I don’t want to get TOO off-topic here; i sort-of have that tendency; so as for my and your and my and Camlost’s tangents here, i figure we’ve been down this road before. We both see real examples; it’s just that we pick ones that flatter our particular cynicisms or wishes, case may be.

    I mean, none of us are truly in denial of ALL of what’s out there.

  37. MegaNigga explains to his audience of young Korean women that he stays Niggerific and theyt don’t need to ask why. (1:50)

    will.i.am is MegaNigga, Ultra Nigmatic. (3:05)

  38. Camlost
    “Getting a black chick in bed is about the easiest thing you can accomplish.”

    Now I don’t know this is really true.

    When I was being exposed to MGTOW material, I was already WN and at first I assumed that the notion that feminism is “opressive to black men” was ludicrous. I immediately thought of what a NOW rally looked like, with a bunch of Djooish hags goading a bunch of young White women into a “protest” alongside a few token negro bucks who looked like they were hired as they were so out of place.

    Strange how I can’t find any of those pictures on Spoogle now.

    One of the foremost MGTOW philosophers is a Dominican who goes by Barbarossa, and he made a sufficiently convincing argument for this notion.

    Basically, Black women have far less shame about raising fatherless children on Welfare, so they fornicate in a huge harem with the biggest, meanest thug on the block, and breed his spawn courtesy of the White man. Resonated with something I heard in High School about Tupac having kids by like 17 women. Enter welfare, black men who work and get a job as a janitor can’t get any pussy. So they choose the thug lifestyle to try to get to be the baddest nigger. Playing by the rules doesn’t get them anything.

    Before welfare, blacks had better family values then whites do now. The illegitimacy rate was higher of course, but not batshit retarded. In the ’60’s, The incentive for blacks to behave was real; they could marry a reasonably attractive black woman and reproduce like a civilized human if he was able to distinguish himself by holding down a job that could pay the rent. When Whitey started paying the rent, all that ended. You had to go gangsta if you wanted the pussy.

    No wonder they hate us so much. I now subscribe to the idea that while Black male propensity for crime is greater, the main cause difference in crime rates between blacks and Whites is Black Female reproductive choices.

  39. Wow, that Will.I.Am video brings to mind Spike Lee’s Bamboozled, one of the his few movies that I’ve been able to tolerate long enough to finish.

  40. Spike Lee’s Bamboozled, one of the his few movies that I’ve been able to tolerate long enough to finish.

    Yeah, that was among his better efforts; I’d put “Bamboozled” up alongside “Clockers” as his best movies, with ‘Summer of Sam’ a respectable second.

    Some other director needs to do a good Son of Sam movie; with the story playing off all the stuff going on in NY at the time; so much has been written about that time—– the heatwave, the blackouts, the riots that followed the blackouts, the skyrocketing crime rate, the bankrupt city hall budget, crazy ed Koch—– someone needs to put it all together and render the period via the Sam saga. Who’s hte current director of today assuming ‘Young Scorsese’ mantle?

  41. “Still, I told my friend, I refuse to be intimidated by… this:”

    OK. Understood. But at the same time, make sure you allow yourself enough enough psychic space to still be AMUSED by such antics; otherwise, your victory is at best a Pyrrhic one….(that video is soo fukin’ ridiculous.)

  42. Nikcrit…

    You ARE IN DENIAL when it comes to identifying the rabid push by radical “blacks” and “jewhites” to take the word “nigger” OFF THE MIND, tongue and lips of the white race…

    You are in denial about a diabolical cabal’s intention to create an invisible, in-your-face killer of whites.

    You are in denial that a critical mass of “whites” do not and cannot SEE any nigger-on-white violence BECAUSE “niggers” don’t really exist.

    Can you dig this? Can you get hip with these kind of “genocidal” machinations which come off as looking like a self-annihilation?

  43. In the ghetto, where “nigger” can be your bestest homey or worstest enemy, “we” say the word “nigger” has been liberated.

    Same scenario in the media-created “white supremacist” use of the word “nigger” which goes to equate to ALL blacks. This ode to egalitarian precept is evidence that this usage of the word “nigger” has been liberated.

    All this LIBERATION OF THE LANGUAGE works to give the masses the perception that “nigger” used in the most precise manner is not legitimate… Is not allowable… IS NOT EVEN CONCEIVABLE… There are no “niggers” to speak of… There are no “blacks” with an inherently murderous hatred for mankind and ESPECIALLY the white race.

    And you Nikcrit… You either deny the above as being operative at a large scale or you swallow the insidiousness, recognize your daily dealings with a real nigger subset and then go about constructing ways in which YOU eradicate these public vermin. That’s revolutionary and something indicative of a “halfrican” Supremacist. In fact, it’s like your solemn duty. It is the solemn duty of ALL decent black men to turn back and annihilate the niggers amongst them. And all decent black men should hold their heads in shame knowing that they leave this pressing task up to decent white men who they understand will be given no public immunity.

    If “we” can’t call “a spade a spade” then it’s game over.

  44. Did anyone else notice that Trump’s main effect has been to take all the media attention away from “black”-on-white savagery and put the media focus back on “white supremacy,” ie., hitlernazifascistauthoritariannationalsocialism which “hates” all things liberated.

  45. “And all decent black men should hold their heads in shame knowing that they leave this pressing task up to decent white men who they understand will be given no public immunity.”

    No, it’s because I don’t see anyone who is nowhere near the level of irredeemability that you describe and lament. Nowhere near that level.

    And you don’t either; it’s a hypothetical lament.

  46. Nikcrit…

    I am defining an archetype that exists in our daily milieu which “operates” in the most radically autonomous manner such that its toleration in the concrete, no matter how little, works TO MAXIMIZE THE AUTONOMY of all “others.”

    You ARE DENYING that the nigger exists, period! And this is why you sympathize with those who attempt to take this inherently dangerous archetype off our minds.

    It’s your hidden anti-wS.

  47. And furthermore… There is no illusion on my part that a Redemption or a redemption of niggers is a genuine concern of yours or mine. In fact, no one who believes in Redemption can bring themselves to acknowledge the nigger and those who can acknowledge the nigger ONLY in its most liberated iteration do not really believe in Redemption.

  48. thor:“You ARE DENYING that the nigger exists, period! And this is why you sympathize with those who attempt to take this inherently dangerous archetype off our minds.”

    nikcrit earier in this very comment string:
    “You’re speaking of the Ronald Exantus and Phillip Chism types? The senseless, animalistic murderers who are beyond reproach and then some, right? If so, what did I say that was unmindful of that category?

    I am denying nothing of categorical detail or distinction; i just think it’s tactically very unwise to use derogatory description when other forces can be punitive towards as much. Yet none of which reduces either my candor nor conviction in conceding such negative forces and individuals. Besides true Christianity holds the possibility for redemption for said forces, though i certainly see how one may not have the stomach to mouth as much as the instances of said ‘forces’ continue to pile up.

    Your ambivalence and doubts are duly registered but please don’t challenge my stated and adamant convictions. You may be the do-all-to-end-all ‘ruminating bottom’ as far as blog commenters go in this neck of the blogosphere; but you’re no determiner of moral absolution.

    I concede that duty to solely the lone and top presider over western scripture.

  49. Y’know, perhaps you even address some of my retorts in earlier comments; e.g., the first graph of your 6:14 remark.

    If so, the oversight is probably a result of your unrepentant, umm, “cryptic-ness” —— of which I and many-upon-many others have already addressed.

    I try to follow you, but that always seems to end up the equivalent of treading water.

  50. No one likes niggers.

    If we didn’t have to hear about niggers, from niggers, we wouldn’t have to talk about niggers.

    I don’t even like talking about niggers. I don’t even like saying “niggers”.

    However, being held HOSTAGE by a word, is unacceptable.

    The initial post is on free speech.

    **********************

    Is using the enword good public relations, is it Big Tent, is it inclusive?

    I don’t know. My personal opinion is that enword talk is crass – but blacks themselves insist on it and that is the point.

    Those people call themselves niggers. That is all there is to say about it. This point has been made a million times. It is a power play, and they would seem to have won it. They say that we call ourselves niggers, but you cannot (call us that). They decide who gets called what. So it is yet another clear SYMBOL who is winning.

    Another symbol that is not a symbol. It is not a symbol, it’s the fucking thing. Just like whosever flag is raised on the hill, is the WINNER – them is the rules of the game. They raised the flag (by tricking us into doing it! but hey that counts) and so they won. The niggers decide who gets called what, and so THEY won.

    It IS a symbol; so it is more accurate to say that the symbol is the thing.

  51. If we didn’t have to worry about niggers, our problems would be solved.

    ********************

    Will you (will i) be talking Somali niggers down at the city council meeting? of course not.

    So it fails the jumbotron test.

    But that they call themselves niggers is the essence of the matter. It is the elephant in the room. It is the symbol of all our problems. It is ITSELF our problems transcendent of its symbol (the symbol is the thing).

    They did not stop calling themselves niggers, once we did. We stopped calling them niggers … and gave them more confidence and more power. They have won that power play with a magic word called the nigger.

    So i hate THEM for sinking me to their level. Truly that is where it is at. Fuck them and their debased low-ass level. Their heads will be better as fly strips.

  52. What is it that Trump says about the terrorists, that we have to play at their level, in order to win?

    Is he right about that?

    Is there another way to win, against the niggers, than to play at their level?

  53. The larger idea, once again. Is that these race problems, and in particular between white and black in America, will proceed in spite of our best efforts.

    There is nothing we or anyone can do to prevent the struggle for dominance between the races.

    That struggle for dominance between the races, goes on to the extent that the races in question exist.

    (Now these big axiomatic-style are used against me personally but hey! someone has to sum it up, and thank you very much.)

    But fuck the vanity and is it not true?

    And the corollary to that statement is that said struggle for dominance and results, effects (no sic) the life courses of both (or all) races’ representative individuals.

  54. Now i think that those statements above, the axiom and its corollary, are obvious enough, but somehow they are sensitive and a little bit taboo, even (or especially) in the race realist corner.

    Because no one wants to acknowledge to himself, or hear about from others, how he has suffered FAILURE and DEFEAT in this our multirace living arrangement wherein plays out a struggle for dominance between black and white, and which struggle the blacks have as of late been winning.

    And yet the examples are undeniable and in your face. See the video upthread of the Somalis beating on and intimidating their vanquished foes: the beaten and intimidated whites.

    Yeah it is a war. One side is winning and it aint us.

    Those Somalis that i have to ride the bus with (yeah i ride bus fuck off) – are en-confidenced by the simple existence of that video. They know that they can beat on us, and get rewarded for it! They get rewarded for it with status in their community, and pussy. And they don’t get punished, at all, hardly ever.

    But to repeat, this struggle for dominance will not cease, until the winner is satisfied. When will the Somalis be satisfied. When will La Raza be satisfied.

    Heads on poles. Would that be good public relations? I think it would be. It is not smart to talk like that though.

  55. We can’t win the fight until we acknowledge that we are in it.

    Does that pass the jumbotron test?

    We have a long ways to go. Whites don’t want to acknowledge that we cannot live together as equals in some raceless society.

    ***************

    My problem with blacks is not that they are scheming on teenaged white girls. My problem is that they are black.

    Our conflict is not assuaged at all, if they are not specifically out to get the white girls. The conflicts and the problems are much larger than that, … though the white girls are the perfect “symbol”.

  56. My cute little corollary, that these race conflicts play out in your very own little life! – is of course a staple of critical race theory, or whatever it is called at school these days.

    But white people don’t get to use that corollary because they cannot come to terms with how they have suffered and been beat. Maybe Toure will give us permission to cry?

    Have i told you lately about my mutilated penis that i love you?
    have i told you just how much i care
    have i told you LATELY, that i love you!
    and i mean it from the bottom of my heart

  57. Elk…

    “We” can most certainly fight the psychological war in a manner far beyond the grasp of the ground orcs and aimed directly at the high IQ cabal of anti-white Supremacists who COMMAND these grounds orcs with mediated memes.

    The first order of business is getting Nikcrit TO CONFESS that the “nigger” of OUR CONCEPTION EXISTS and largely operates invisibly DUE the media machinations of a cabal of high IQ anti-white Supremacists. And as a savagely unpredictable, parasitic predator, this is a revelation of INSANITY at the “highest” levels of the government/media/academia/entertainment complex.

  58. The second order of business is to use these common sense labels to AGGRESSIVELY IDENTIFY specific individuals who personify the label. In other words, use these fighting “slurs” with the utmost precision, sniper-like. Any gratuitously liberated use of these words should be treated as crypto-subversion… A manner in which to spray the crowd and to render the term dead to the entire room.

  59. With my limited experience of Somalis, what an alien entity that thing just is… Nigger-like in his unashamed penchant for social retardation, he is, nonetheless, brazenly conniving. Almost like a kid in a pornoshop with a paste-on mustache touting a half-pitched tent. “Other” Trust Factor on a scale of 1-10: one.

  60. “We” just now know that “forced integration” is the COST of the “crime” of segregation. “We” just now know that a separation of whites from blacks and blacks from whites WILL INCREASE the rate of “black” self-annihilation and increase the rate of white regeneration.

    THIS IS NOW A “CRIME” THAT NECESSITATES “forced integration” of the “other” with “whites.”

  61. “We” have an open-source Narrative now…. But its authorship in regard to those memes that move the masses is still very limited mainly to a set of high IQ “jewhites.” And here “we” are trying to answer the most basic of questions and inject our answers into the Narrative.

    IF we cannot rid society of niggers (or miggers, or Jewish anti-Supremacists, or jihadists, or homodykes or any anti-wS) then we shall be annihilated sooner or later. And when one realizes that this is exactly the fundamental pathology suffered by the “white” liberal many realities come to make sense. “We” cannot rid society of our most vicious predators and so “we” will be annihilated. This is the liberated logic… The rationale to total nihilism… All the rest is the prophetable Cover Narrative.

  62. And I reiterate… The real Trumpening was a complete media turn from “black”-on-white savagery and a refocus on nazihitlerfascisttheocracy and then the obligatory “best friend to Israel” speech.

  63. If there was a violently zealous movement to remove the phrase “innocent baby” from the Logos, would anyone believe the intention of the violent zealots was anything other than the “good-riddance” of the existence of any “innocent baby” in the minds of that masses?

    So when a “black” owns the word “nigger,” he owns nothing… Worse than nothing. He “owns” pathology… Willingly and without shame. He “owns” an archetype that distant and recent history has proven extant time and again featuring more lucid white men penning testament to that which won’t be morally annihilated. The job is still at hand. The Nikcrits SHOULD BE the morally neutral referees in such life and death questions, no?

  64. The correct answer to the use of the word “nigger” is relatively straight forward. I like to think I have already figured this out.

    First of all, let me reject thordaddy’s notion that a “nigger” is now be officially redefined as a Black who can be identified as hating Whites. That’s a redefinition of a very old word to suit your own way of thinking. thordaddy, you reinvent a great deal of language to coincide with your particular set of ideas, but trying to redefine old terms is a bigger project than inventing your own. I think you overstepped yourself on this one. A nigger is what it always was, just a vulgar slur for Negro.

    Contrary to Politically Correct belief, there is of course no legitimate moral objection to saying “nigger” that doesn’t exist for calling someone a “shithead” or a “retard” or a “cumstain” (I use that one a lot while driving). The question is what kind of person needs to fall back on name-calling.

    Relevant is what it says about you if you need to put someone else down in order to feel better about yourself. Rarely is that in any way useful at this stage for the likes of us. Besides, when we need to indulge in this vice as we all do occasionally, the shiv is much stronger if we use more sophisticated covert insults anyhow. We are smarter and classier than our enemies.

    Now for a devout Christian, saying “Oh my God” is worse saying “motherfucker” because it’s a commandment not to use the Lord’s name in vain. Similarly saying “nigger” while White is much worse than saying “motherfucker” to a fashionable Political Correctard for the same reason – religious blasphemy. As such, the Justice Legal System will not persecute you for calling someone a “goddamn motherfucker” but will persecute you for calling someone a “nigger,” because Political Correctness, not Christianity, is currently our State religion in the West.

    Now where Blacks are permitted to, and do, use the word “nigger” and Whites cannot, what we have is a form of Compliance programming. This is a scenario OVERTLY meant to emasculate and humiliate us, and it WILL backfire eventually. It’s actually a very stupid idea for our enemies in the long run because it’s totally in-your-face. But that’s a separate post.

  65. Heretic Phi…

    I applaud your effort, but it just doesn’t make the cut… A slur is that sort of thing that creates a subset of the whole… So within the Negro collective, wiser men spotted the “nigger.” Hundreds of years later, OUR “best and brightest” ALMOST SWEAR that “niggers” don’t exist?

    Are you listening? “Retards” and “cumstains” ARE NOT parasitic predators READILY ACKNOWLEDGED, but nonetheless wholly protected, by the “black” collective.

    THE INTENT of striking the word “nigger” from YOUR mind, tongue and lips HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH etiquette or class or whatever stupid notion of racial “chilvary” you bring to the table.

    There IS A NIGGER ARCHETYPE…

    He is the worst of the “black” collective. The MAIN MECHANISM of “black” self-annihilation, ie., the reason to excise the whole “black” collective)… Radically autonomous and self-evident enemy of wS.

    He HAS BEEN CONDITIONED to hold a “special” animus for whites.

    His violent anti-social nature amongst a majority white collective is “liberation theology.”

    If *you* see “him,” you should not fear to call him by that name which all can understand.

    He isn’t everywhere. But he is invisible. Yet, he’s on WorldStar Hip Hop, Drudge and the Daily Ken everyday. Yet, he doesn’t even exist. Damn, that nigger is radically autonomous.

  66. Heretic Phi…

    You cannot argue against the PRECISE USE of the word “nigger.” Or rather, you can try to argue against its precise use like you did above, but such argument will just fail because there is not argument against the precise use of the word “nigger.”

    SO THE REAL DEBATE is whether “niggers” really exist in the PERSON.

    The side of anti-wS SEEMS TO SAY, “no, niggers don’t really exist… They are the product of a white racist mind.”

    Is that where you are at?

  67. ” Damn, that nigger is radically autonomous.”

    LMAO! A rare brandishment of Thordaddy wit.

    PA, you must have the most unique blog in the alt-right.

  68. I think you overstepped yourself on this one. A nigger is what it always was, just a vulgar slur for Negro.

    The question is what kind of person needs to fall back on name-calling.

    Seriously, I’m with Heretic on this. There’s no real practical use for this for the alt-right, white America isn’t going to name-call it’s way out of the predicament it’s in right now. Why in the world should anyone on the alt-right give a rip about the type of n-word semantics that Thordaddy has been arguing here, it’s about as useful as sending more funding to inner city schools. And the tolerant, open-minded Nikcrit is hardly the Grio-reading type that would be more appropriate to take to task over topics like this, he’s about as black as Obama’s microbrew-drinking, arugula-eating ass.

    Blacks call each other “nigga” because they lead a derivative existence. Allowing themselves to be named by others is just their tacit and somewhat bizarre acknowledgement of their lack of relevance anywhere on the planet except when in proximity to whites. So, us obsessing over the word seems even more pathetic and strange.

    ” Damn, that nigger is radically autonomous.”

    At my high school they woulda said “y’all niggas autonomous as hell.”

  69. Nikcrit, Camlost, – Thordaddy operates on a highly theoretical plane. He falls flat in his effort to communicate when getting overly formulaic but he’s been transcendent in a few of his inspired comments.

  70. — Blacks call each other “nigga” because they lead a derivative existence. Allowing themselves to be named by others is just their tacit and somewhat bizarre acknowledgement of their lack of relevance anywhere on the planet except when in proximity to whites.

    Good point.

  71. It’s despairing to read what passes for a high IQ “white” male “race-realist” these days…

    WILL NOT identify as white Supremacist…

    WILL NOT identify his archenemy as “nigger…”

    And LITERALLY authors tales of Jewish, female and Islamic “supremacy…”

    EVEN AS HE REJECTS objective Supremacy, personally.

    The sum total of this profile is RADICAL AUTONOMIST…

    His “race-realism” IS an ENTRYIST MECHANISM…

    His “race-realism” is HOW HE HIDES behind the white brute WITHOUT letting everyone know he hides behind the white brute.

    To deconstruct the issue of identifying the nigger as that which instatiably ravages all regenerate entities within its proximity, thereby, creating a state of infectious mob mentality, TO A SIMPLE “name-calling” is to signal to the anti-wS that *you* are not “race-real” in the least bit. You are LIBERATED SUBVERSION.

  72. thordaddy
    “If *you* see “him,” you should not fear to call him by that name which all can understand.”
    The “nigger” is everywhere, even in White cities where there are almost none. For when you go to a bar to socialize and sexualize, it is on the loudspeakers calling itself “nigger” which we cannot so as to emasculate us in front of our young women. I don’t know about where you work…

    It also speaks explicitly of sex, workin ‘dat pussy, in ways that White men cannot without vicious social retaliation from feminists, for the same reason. Where a White (male) singer in popular music is overtly sexual, there must be a negro in the song to legitimize his masculinity so as to protect him from feminist attacks. I call this “negrogitification”, it’s a word I made up to describe this phenomenon though there is probably a better one. This crap is decades old now.

    Or at the very least he must SOUND black like Pitbull. Wiggers were originally a pushback by teenage White boys in the ’90’s who were tired of being emasculated by feminist indoctrination in high school. They figured out they could borrow a permission slip to be sexual from the “nigga” by pedestalizing it’s culture.

    Like an NFL game, which can be thought of as a type of softcore cuckold porn, White men must express our masculinity through the “nigger” as a proxy, which is a dirty word for only us us to say, as masculinity is a dirty thing for only us to have. But vicariously, through the “nigger” which we cannot speak. That is why SJW’s speak of “white males” but will get all squirmy if the conversation includes “White men”. As you can see with AIDS Skrillex, “man” changes to “male” to pull him back into his comfort zone. He dare not imply in himself the manhood by his own race that he sees in his opponent.

    No, thordaddy, the “nigger” is most certainly not “invisible”. It’s the emperor’s (or President Butt-Naked’s) pee-pee when hes running around without his gonch on. Everyone can see it, and Political Correctard attempts to make it go away through silence are going to backfire spectacularly.

    Our team is sweet at dank memes. Everything will be just niggeriffic, soon enough.

    The issue is how you use it. It must not come from a place of butthurt. That is the key.

  73. Once again, “we” battle with those who use a liberated language. When one sets this frame beforehand, a lot more can be accomplished in the aftermath.

    So a radical autonomist sees this:

    Abortion = reproductive right…

    And a wS sees this:

    Abortion = self-annihilation…

    So the sum total of these equations in the current milieu is:

    Self-annihilation = reproductive right…

    So what this tells “us” is that the high IQ “white” male, with his egalitarian tendency and “faith” in total entropy, has come to “see” his “reproductive right” to self-annihilate AS HIS HIGHEST REALITY. The very state of affairs LOGICALLY NECESSITATES a self-annihilation. This is the “smartest” move.

    In reality, it’s ALL PATHOLOGICAL…

    A simple denial of the right to exist from conception.

    A simple acceptance of one’s mother’s “right” to have killed him in utero

    A total rejection of objective Supremacy, ie., empirical Perfection…

    A bona fide self-annihilator SUCH THAT:

    High IQ “white” male = self-annihilator…

    And it’s over unless these ^^^ pathological malcontents are not converted to wS.

  74. Heretic Phi…

    You are rather liberated with your use of the word “nigger” to the point of describing a more collective phenomena, whereas, my nigger is a truly personified target of annihilation BY THOSE WITH A STILL INTACT SENSE of civility. I am speaking to the equivalent of a murderous jihadist when I speak of the “nigger.” It’s a simple leap in logic to understand that if this “thing” isn’t put down with extreme prejudice THEN “it” will ANNIHILATE YOU in due course.

    And again, I describe the “nigger” as an “invisible, in-your-face” entity that covers the bases already. “Invisible” IN THE SENSE that the masses CANNOT SEE ANY nigger-on-white violence… The “white” masses cannot think, speak or yell “nigger” TO SAVE HIS DAMNED LIFE…

    And “in-your-face” BECAUSE that violence is all up in our greeelz through BOTH msm and alt-rite media.

  75. “….just their tacit and somewhat bizarre acknowledgement of their lack of relevance anywhere on the planet except when in proximity to whites.”

    Comically conceited self-reification: you could easily turn around what you said and say ‘blacks are irrelevant to my decidedly limited and contained POV.”

    In any case, I bet you’re right and that those blacks themselves don’t care, as you’re not relevant to them. Then the blog host chimes in, in agreement.

    I surmise that all involved are equally uninterested in each other; how is that not easy to see?

  76. Nikcrit…

    You STILL HAVE NOT… Testified to the REAL EXISTENCE of the true nigger… To that which “we,” healthy-minded white men, CAN TRUTHFULLY NAME with precise articulation thus rendering all objections to those lamentations held by the destroyers of our civilization.

    Ghetto use + media created “redneck” use = NO PRECISE USAGE…

    Why do *you* follow these memetic instructions even after the formula is laid bare for you in a simple summation?

  77. Actually, that KPOP vid earlier in this threadthat Phi provided serves as a pitch-perfect renouncement of the claim Camlost made in his last comment and which PA seconded. There’s this whole phenomenon of a Asian pop music, much of it based in black American stars, iconry, production and other socio-racial-cultural hybrids, with nary a un-hybridized Euro-Caucasan ingredient —— but it’s just not ‘relevant’ because two 40-something white guys ain’t feeling it. (this is the point in which someone points out that they were singing in English, thus there was white-Euro influence; cue: fall-in to a debate about the roots of American rock music:”Is it seminally white or black?”)

    The halfrican is naturally the quickest to see the “Six Degrees of Separation” rule, no? lol!

  78. btw, that vid with Nikki Minaj and will.i.am was very interesting and pretty creative, IMO; as for the socio-cultural-racial-semantics? You could create a college course based in that vid, with all its signifying toward multi-cult-meets-21st-century technology. I mean, that song proves in three minutes some of the future dreads of the alt-right; we lament it by holding up its omens to an idealized past; but today’s youth just take the new and future social and racial technocracy as an already established given, as destiny.

    It also serves to put a mark of aging on this former pop writer, who used to trade in guitars, bass, drums and keyboards, and other nostalgic relics

    Might as well be touting the virtues of lyres and flutes, eh?

  79. Nikcrit…

    No one doubts the parasite’s ability to perpetuate… “It” is not extinct, after all. What is so perplexing is that the parasite perpetuates a self-annihilating parasitism…. A perpetuating self-annihilator JUST IS the parasite. And just like some race of men are tended towards objective Supremacy, other races of “men” are tended towards ravenous insatiability. Eyeballed from these distinct and dichotomous race of men simultaneously, one can hypothesize a MANDATE of mutual annihilation… “Our” desire to escape their insatiability and their desire to devour EVERYTHING IN SIGHT leads to an inevitable existential showdown. “We” seem to be on the brink.

  80. “Our” desire to escape their insatiability and their desire to devour EVERYTHING IN SIGHT leads to an inevitable existential showdown.”

    How convenient! (why is it that those who feel they have divine insight to philosophical order of things always posit that THEIR RACE or whatever fated biological determinant is cosmically just, noble and prescient while all others are some form of existential peril?

    You’re just knocking down one for the sake of exalting thyself. It’s not so theoretically crisp, cut and dried.

  81. “We” seem to be on the brink.

    Yeah, but ‘of what” exactly?

    I mean, you’re always proposing in apocalyptic language, some kind of divine reckoning in the works —— so, maybe that’s fated, too, and whatever results will be the new order that’s needed.

    I mean, maybe white objective supremacism needs some sort-of evil antithetical force, which, added all together by some sort of objectively divine force, constitutes the future reality you’re always hinting at?

    So maybe all the folly of our current arrangement is just requisite stagecraft for the convergence of objective supremacism and radical autonomy —- and said convergence is our collective ‘just dessert,’ no?

    I don’t know, but that seems to be about as good a speculation as any; I sorta like Phi’s earlier stab at things. At least i could follow it and ascribe some recent history to go in accord with his particular view and logic, which is often not the case for me here.

  82. Nikcrit…

    What’s convenient about recognizIng the claim of all the opposing factions and coming to the conclusion that ALL ARE AGAINST “white supremacy…” Er… Against white degeneracy… But not really against whites degenerating… And REALLY AGAINST white Supremacy… Against the greatest of spirited white men leading our civilization?

    This is axiomatic to the anti-white Supremacist, who, by definition, denies being a white Supremacist.

  83. Nikcrit…

    “White genocide” or “white self-annihilation?”

    OR…

    Make your case for a third meta-racial reality?

    Genocide/self-annihilation?

    If the white masses ARE ALREADY self-annihilating, and quite prophetably so, what would a true enemy of the white race do? Would you not “genocide” its best and save massive resource by not “genociding” is ALREADY dispirited, deracinated, homosexualized and bureaucratized masses?

    That best = white Supremacist…

    Just because “we” understand BOTH a common language AND the liberationist’s relentless attempted perversion of our language.

    “We” JUST NOW KNOW that as white males “we” were MANDATED TO BE “white” anti-white Supremacists… White boys who were to be conditioned to grow up and be against the greatest of spirited white men…

    And THIS IS, IN FACT, the meta-racial reality.

  84. but it’s just not ‘relevant’ because two 40-something white guys ain’t feeling it.

    First of all, Will.i.am sucks. That song sucks. If you’re gonna talk about hiphoppers at least pick one with some real artistry and without the shiny suits and autotune. I can name some if you need me to do so.

    Second of all, nothing you said contradicts my point at all – he’s a black American which means he’s been in proximity to whites. My point is that no one cares to know anything concerning the 900 million nameless, horribly uninteresting, underachieving, overbreeding, modern output-deficient blacks in Africa – especially other blacks. Why? Because they’re not relevant and have very little agency or identity on their own.

    And I’m sure that they’re all nice, lovely, caring and warm people, down to the last and least. Is that what you want me to say? But in the course of modern socio-geo-politics they are are complete and utter non-entities.

  85. Actually, that KPOP vid earlier in this threadthat Phi provided serves as a pitch-perfect renouncement of the claim Camlost made in his last comment and which PA seconded.

    The hell it does. Today’s rap is now the definition of throwaway entertainment, forgotten and tossed onto the scrap heap quickly.

    That dumb song is just empty entertainment from afar, Koreans have the luxury of admiring the outlaw hip hop image for a little escapist fun, while not having to actually be around black people. You think western/Asian fascination with rap videos equals acceptance of blacks? Do you think Koreans would be ready to import a few hundred thousand Africans to the neighborhoods of Seoul and tolerate a new generation of “aspiring rappers” limping and sagging their way down the hallways? You are out of your mind. Are they laughing with you or at you?

    A comically small number of blacks in rap have signed a deal with the devil and commoditized their minstrel image and gotten rich off of it, while making an enormous number of whites and jews wealthy. Where’s the market for hip hop in Africa itself if it’s such a great, sustainable and valid art form?

    I suggest you watch Bamboozled again, my man.

  86. That song sucks. If you’re gonna talk about hiphoppers at least pick one with some real artistry and without the shiny suits and autotune. I can name some if you need me to do so.

    Yes, however quaint, i know you always cite your street cred and know it’s much, much more did did TCQ over some corny global record company collaboration project like the Black Eyed Peas and Will.I.AM. I’ll grant you all of that, if you insist.
    But what I’m speaking of is the sociology of his collab with Minaj and the K-pop thematics, (e.g.., Nikki’s aegyo primping to the camera, etc., sort-of spoofing k-pop girl groups); the mashup of relatively recent mega-pop genres in that vid and how, with the emerging Asian pop markets and cultures, how it sort-of mocks your casual bad-faith putdowns of blacks; (and if you do here opt for the defense i earlier predictied and go on about ‘how american blacks are nothing without the white-led American record companies or whatever, i could go and cite some African-pop movements that influence French chanteuse pop, etc,, ad infinitum, though i ‘d really prefer not to, as i get your point, however non-mutually exclusive it is).

    Imagine this: your seeing that vid and listening to that will.i.am/minaj song and your 15 and have no predispostion whatsoever about blacks-vs-whites, Asians-vs-Americans, or whatevewr social dichotomy you wish to proffer? what then would you make of it? I mean, a 15-year-old is in no position to loftily turn his nose up on the song and mumble something about how Public Enemy was much more politically relevant, etc. No, I”m speaking how radical the pop product is as a result of 21st-century technology and markets and other mega-and-meta forces that go into pop muse and production and therefore product.

  87. edit: “Yes, however quaint, i know you always cite your street cred and know it’s much, much more HIP AND AWARE TO CITE, SAY, TCQ, over some corny global record company collaboration project like the Black Eyed Peas and Will.I.AM,” that first sentence of mine in the last comment should have read.

  88. Today’s rap is now the definition of throwaway entertainment, forgotten and tossed onto the scrap heap quickly.

    LMAO! So was the rap of our era! The only difference of course is we were young, dumb, naive and full-of-cum then, and thus inspired to read into it whatever cheery incentive we cared to.

    I mean, is this gem from our era really a more sophisticated bit of art product and agit prop than what the youngsters of today are popping to? lol!!

    (lol! I admit it; after posting that P.E. vid, I watched it all the way through; sweet memories!…..”never the less they cannot understand —- that I’m a BLACK MAN—- and I can never be a veteran!….. Oh, how I loved Chuck D back in the day)

  89. Chuck D on American penal institutions: “This is what I mean, an ‘anti-nigger machine,’ cuz if I out alive, then they won’t come clean!” lol!!

  90. I’ll grant you all of that, if you insist.

    I do insist. And since PA already told me that I was right about my quite incisive and obviously correct other point about the n-word I think that makes the score 2-0 today. Just more ACC domination 🙂

    And you are really playing dumb a lot lately, first with PA’s obviously allegorical reflections last week and now with this music thing. You’re with your white friends now, switch back to standard English mode – you don’t have to dumb it down and be afraid to look to intelligent or bookish since we won’t scold you for ackin’ white. LMAO

    Seriously, you know damn well that within hip hop there’s an enormous artistry gap between the organic creativity of early rappers as compared to this producer-driven, obviously manufactured bullshit. You don’t even have to be a rap fan to understand that.

    Imagine this: your seeing that vid and listening to that will.i.am/minaj song and your 15 and have no predispostion whatsoever about blacks-vs-whites, Asians-vs-Americans, or whatevewr social dichotomy you wish to proffer? what then would you make of it?

    Yes, I see your point. It’s totally unrelated to mine, though. And if culturally clueless aliens came from space and saw that video they probably wouldn’t perceive even a smidgeon of the cultural clash or ethnic swirl issues you’ve mentioned. They’d have no way of understanding that Blacks, Whites and Koreans have social differences – they’d just assume the truth – that humans as a species are just like any other animal and have sometimes wide differences in phenotype and temperament partly based on their area of evolutionary origin.

  91. Cam,
    Nothing I said hints or as much as slightly implies that Asians, rural or urban, are interested in or in any way open to a mass immigrant invasion of American or African blacks; it’s my understanding that they’re somewhat intrigued-by-afar but ultimately pretty disdainful of both African and African-American blacks, though moreso the former.

    You always do that: take what someone said, then find it’s LCD corrollary, however vague and irrelevant, then hold it back up as some sort of proof of contradiction. I’m not naive about this shit; just trying to find a new angle to amuse my bored and jaded ass.

    Re. Autotune: it’s really not that relevant in rap, though i don’t consider KPOP rap, nor the will/nikki ditty; you know, Autotune is just the branded product that became associated with pitch modulation, whether it be vocal or instrumental. But modulation technique existed long before Autotune—– compression, reverb, in all sorts of effects; the more modern form you’re describing is almost a r&B genre of its own and marks and distinguishes the vocal styles of vocal r-n-b artists like T-Payne and Trey Songz…,, Freddie Mercury was a example of a classic-rock-n-era artist who often played with the pitch and modulation of his voice before the technology was branded to do as much.

  92. Rap is relevant to the Underclass, which is more and more people of all races.

    It is not however relevant to aspiring White people.

    There is no way around that: White people aspire to their OWN traditions. Kids and young people may not know that yet, and a lot of them get lost in the shuffle and don’t make it out.

    **************

    Rap and the central place that blacks have in it, is another symbol of the state of the world.

    I don’t think anyone denies that rap is THE form of culture, in this day and age. I am not clear what you all are arguing.

    White people have created the technostructure that rap culture is promulgated with. So in that sense the rappers would not have the same stature without being part of the global system of commerce and technology.

    The themes that rap “treats” are very real, and highminded whites oftentimes mistakenly disregard them it all as stupid. But the life experience that rap relates is that of the Underclass: “the Life” as they call it.

    But White people need another model to sell to their kids.

    *******************

    A lot of the confusion about it all, on this thread, is that middle class white people do not partake in the culture, “the Life”, that breeds the rap, and at the same time their alternative culture pales in comparison, in its significance and influence. So these white kids, Swapples – they fuck around ironically with rap too, but everyone knows that it is two different groups of people and two different things, and never the twain shall meet.

    The white people’s swapple culture pales in comparison to the influence of the Underclass culture of rap. Those are primarily trends in demographics, and their cultures are reflections of that.

    That may not address whatever is your disagreement, which again i am not clear on.

    As music rap sucks, but lyrically some of it can be good.

  93. Basically every single black kid in America and around the world, tries to rap. So some of them will be good at it.

    But then it gets back to, what are its themes?

    Its themes have to be on “the Life” because that is the audience. At the same time, there are themes that can fairly be called metaphysical.

    I shot his ass
    we was rollin and smokin
    them niggas didn’t know who was jokin
    Come at me?
    them faggots be broken

    So that is one verse and pretty good but it needs four more.

  94. It is the subtle premise of this post that “our” — meaning “us” white males — are under assault for our “freedom to speak.” The meme “freedom of speech” is better translated as a freedom of conscience. And “we” are here because of an already agreed upon GIVEN that our freedom of conscience is under existential threat. But this understanding does not mean the mass of “whites” are then conscious of their freedom. And because the mental JUST MUST BE protected by the physical, there stands an axiomatic pre-emptive “right to bear arms” where one’s freedom of conscience is at stake. And it is in the totality and totalitarianism of the zeitgeist that the white man’s freedom of conscience and his commensurate consciousness of freedom IS ALWAYS AT STAKE AND UNDER THREAT.

    This ^^^ is race-realism.

  95. What evidence could be more indicative of our state of radical autonomy than a gaggle of sloppy nigels hard-hustlin’ Justin Beiber t-shirts in the streets of SD?

  96. “…..a gaggle of sloppy nigels hard-hustlin’ Justin Beiber t-shirts in the streets of SD?”

    What? Some black kids are out selling his t-shirt? where? Outside the venue where he’s scheduled to perform? what’s your point?

    btw, Thor, why don’t you take a stab at completing a verse or two more of sub_elk’s start at a rap song? You proved earlier that you can drop some flow!

  97. “And the tolerant, open-minded Nikcrit is hardly the Grio-reading type that would be more appropriate to take to task over topics like this, he’s about as black as Obama’s microbrew-drinking, arugula-eating ass.”

    I’m sorry, but I must point out that this is another self-serving tendency that you often indulge for yourself: anything someone black does that’s not a tradtionally long-running stereotype and that may or may not be personally demeaning is nothing but attempts to “act white” and “not really be black.”

    I mean, I work day-to-day in what we conversationally call ‘ghettos’ and not everyone there is eating jalapeno-flavored Cheetos and drinking tall cans of Arizona watermelon-flavored tea. Basically, any act that isn’t consensually established to be a crude black stereotype is by default ‘acting white.’

    How very convenient is that?

  98. One cannot be “black” and especially not a nigger and known nothing of “liberating” from “white supremacy.” It’s inconceivable to conceptualize an American “black” who knows nothing of the “struggle” as an American black. So thoroughly have the generations of whites from Gen X forward been SIMULTANEOUSLY IMMERSED in the ubiquity of “white supremacy” and the chaos of “black liberation” THAT THEY CANNOT “see” the nigger as “apex black…” So desensitized to the sheer radicalness of the irredeemable nigger that they literally “see” JUST skin deep NOW… They just “see” blacks or Africans American or just individuals. Blinded fools.

  99. Nikcrit…

    Not kids, man… Adult “black” males… He’s at Sports Arena tonight, apparently. Mondern “black” male kneels to the dolla’ bill… It’s a mindboggling spectacle EXACTLY BECAUSE none of the participants can “see” it as a mindboggling spectacle…

    The “black” man raised to defy the Man is a slave to the Almighty Dollar TO THE POINT of slangin’ Beiber-prop to equally degenerate “whites” who just bought a $1.50 t-shirt for 20 bucks.

  100. White people have created the technostructure that rap culture is promulgated with. So in that sense the rappers would not have the same stature without being part of the global system of commerce and technology.

    Thank you. I wish I could’ve said this as elegantly 4 posts ago.

    Basically, any act that isn’t consensually established to be a crude black stereotype is by default ‘acting white.’

    And now obvious hyperbole is lost on you, too? Nevertheless, I hate to break this to you but some (nameless) folks actually enjoy being a stereotype, and happily embrace the role without the least bit of shame or moderation – but will still cry foul and complain endlessly when they reap the rewards of such behavior. By now you’ve surely noted this yourself. But anyway, don’t blame me if you’re a 40 year-old black man who thought that Nicki Minaj was good hip hop. Let me help you:






  101. Camlost:

    1) I wish I was only 40!

    2) RE. “Let me help you “ Dude, I am familiar with and personally spent f2f time with each and every one of the rappers whose vids you just posted. That probably sounds some mixture between nauseous and arrogant and pathetic but it happens to be true. Yes, I once cared about those and other raps by those artists but my jaded ass doesn’t anymore.

    And here’s a newsflash that you may or may not be surprised to hear: many of those rappers you just cited are arguably more indifferent or disenchanted to their work than I am.

    That said, thanks for the ‘MC’s Act Like They Don’t Know’; t’was a nice, refreshing blast from de past. (if you’re interested, sometime remind me and i’ll tell you a quick, amusing tale that involves De La Soul, the Chicago Sun Times building and an impromptu swim off Wacker Dr.)

  102. The purpose of exercising your right to free speech is, ultimately, to live in truth. The pursuit of the truth is a lifelong, subtractive process. You start with a clump of things you know and things you think you know, along with strips of your ego, little crystals of fear, chunks of ulterior motives and lies. And you cut into that lurid mass. You strip the thing down and as you get to the lean meat, the secret is — as the song goes — knowing what to throw away and knowing what to keep.

    Great passage. I remember my first foray with the alt-right blogosphere was a serendipitous encounter while digging into some undergrad research on a specific muscle protein complex, which lead me to a few HBD blogs that happened to be discussing this very same topic, and down the rabbit hole I went. I never bought into the PC bullshit from the beginning and it was liberating to discover a community of people who aren’t so hidebound to these supposed enduring taboos. IDK if we stopped pretending that we are all exactly the same skin deep, if we came to some kind of frank and humble acknowledgement of our preordained aggregate genetic and cultural endowments, we might just be able to break some kind of deadlock and move forward.

    Your above passage reminds me of yet another quote from the Judge in Blood Meridian:

    “The man who believes that the secrets of the world are forever hidden lives in mystery and fear. Superstition will drag him down. The rain will erode the deeds of his life. But that man who sets himself the task of singling out the thread of order from the tapestry will by the decision alone have taken charge of the world and it is only by such taking charge that he will effect a way to dictate the terms of his own fate.”

  103. Ok speaking of pop music on this thread, here is my contribution. I’ve been jamming out to Raury lately … from your perspective, nik, you may find him interesting for his fusion of acoustic guitar with electronic beats, all mashed up with the afrobeat, hip hop and synth pop…(Raury taught himself guitar by watching Youtube!). Then on top of that you have the 60’s hippie aesthetic you were referring to in an eariler thread.. Of course as a jaded pop music scribe I’m sure you will dissect all the focus groups that were pandered to in the production of this video, but what the hell, I like it!

  104. Slightly O.T.

    Y’know, I’m working at home writing assessments this week, as this is Easter break snd there is no student attendance. So I’m tuned into a lot of breaking news either by the big-3 cable-news stations or on newsflash alerts while on my laptop —— and i’m really sort-of charged up by how Trump is handling this supposed controversey involving his chief of staff or chief aide or whatever his title.

    It’s interesting in that he’s not necessarily denying any behavior by his aide; but he’s specifically saying he doesn’t think he deserves to be fired AND HE’S CITING LOYALTY ALONE AS VINDICATION FOR HIS ACTIONS.yue
    I
    I think this incident could serve as a milestone in how the major press and the pack-rat wave of it that follows handles future p.c. indiscretions; transgressions from here on in may be duly noted but no longer able to totally ruin a person’s career —- or there at least is some kind of leveling of the playing field taking place.

    Just a year ago, many here felt p.c. orthodoxy had become such a stranglehold that there was no reason for hope; i recall peterike sounding a fatalistic alarm several times. But this whole Trump thing, if not too much else so far, seems to have sounded a rallying call or even ‘dog whistle,’ to those who want to see a defier of the p.c. orthodoxy not only just survive but actually even thrive to some degree, even if he doesn’t fully realize his stated ambitions this year.

    This story will be interesting to follow; i think it’ll determine the sort-of unofficial policy/consensus for how the rest of the national media cover Trump for the remainder of the campaign.

  105. “I’m sure you will dissect all the focus groups that were pandered to in the production of this video, but what the hell, I like it!”

    Ha! In fact, i’d never heard of him until less than a week ago, and that was just a mention of his name but with no vid link.

    I liked the video; interesting music style but would ilke to hear more of his playing, even if solo….. Also, I think that there is my future halfrican trophy wife who first appears at the 0:11 second point in the video..,, Damn! if y’all could’ve found her for me in my younger years, then there’d be many-a-more pure white girls here in the upper-midwest! lol..

  106. I think this incident could serve as a milestone in how the major press and the pack-rat wave of it that follows handles future p.c. indiscretions; transgressions from here on in may be duly noted but no longer able to totally ruin a person’s career —- or there at least is some kind of leveling of the playing field taking place.

    I could go on and on about the refreshing candor of the Trump campaign. I like the guy, I think he’s hilarious, he’s a ballsy iconoclast, and all the things discussed ad infinitum on this blog and throughout the alt right.

    Yet I keep coming down to the same basic fears– this is a guy who rather casually promotes nuclear proliferation and seems to have a very tenuous and almost juvenile grasp of foreign affairs… of course I will be painted as a panty twisting cuck for saying this ,… but he is amateur hour material and unsuited for the highest office in the world, he can not be responsible for the largest arsenal of nuclear weapons in the world, capable of destroying our entire earth many times over. When he has inferred several times that he would use “worse than waterboarding” (i.e. other forms of torture) and nukes are not off the table with ISIS, then I get pretty fucking worried.

  107. “When he has inferred several times that he would use “worse than waterboarding” (i.e. other forms of torture) and nukes are not off the table with ISIS, then I get pretty fucking worried.”

    I think that’s the point from a negotiating point of view.
    Murica’s enemies are liable to be to take his threats a lot more seriously for the same reason you are. I don’t think he’s that much of a moron, but I think people are a lot less likely to piss him off. He’s a genuine Alpha. You don’t know, but he’s not an idiot.

    Besides, our current tyrants use torture anyway, they just ship you off Murican soil to do so. Ever heard of Guantanamo Bay? How about Abu Ghraib? At least with Trump’s methods it’s done openly so we know what inhumane cruelty to protest.

    Honestly, you think the last 4 Tyrants were better equipped for a nuclear arsenal? Why?

    Would you rather have the worlds largest nuclear arsenal in the hands of your enemies than your ally?

    If you haven’t figured it out, bro, if you’re a White man whose not Jewish or gay, Murica is your enemy.

    All that matters is, whose side is Trump really on? I don’t actually like him, I think he’s an asshole. Much more importantly, I don’t trust him either; but the fact that he’s given air to our people means he’s probably not explicitly our enemy, and he is the ONLY one who can rise to power in the current system that isn’t.

  108. @ Heretic – did you see this article about “black privelige” on CNN’s main page today?:

    http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/30/us/black-privilege/index.html

    (if you’re interested, sometime remind me and i’ll tell you a quick, amusing tale that involves De La Soul, the Chicago Sun Times building and an impromptu swim off Wacker Dr.)

    You mean the underground road where they filmed Batman? IIRC the part where it curves around above ground is like 50 feet above the river, which I doubt gets above 40 degrees even in the height of summer. Someone fell all that way into that cold ass water? And also, as a gesture of good will, I’m going to hold off on another one of my typical low class, racist “LCD” jokes about black people not being able to swim. jk, don’t get uptight.

    When he has inferred several times that he would use “worse than waterboarding” (i.e. other forms of torture) and nukes are not off the table with ISIS, then I get pretty fucking worried.

    You’re starting to sound like Nik. Trump wouldn’t do anything so crazy, if elected he will surround himself with political lifers who would reign him in quite quickly.

    But he really shouldn’t talk about ISIS except to point out the failure of Hillary and Obama in the Middle East. Everything he says in relation to foreign policy should end with a shot taken at Hillary, that’s the right way to sling political mud.

  109. And here’s a newsflash that you may or may not be surprised to hear: many of those rappers you just cited are arguably more indifferent or disenchanted to their work than I am.

    Wait, I meant to ask you this previously but exactly what do you mean by this? I’m not doubting you at all, it seems plausible and likely. There’s a crap load of talented artists out there (Prince, Cobain, Dylan at times) who seem to be always ready to give a big FU middle finger to the whole world. You’ve said this about a whole range of artists across different genres.

    Are you saying that they’re disenchanted with the business side of music and the fickleness of fandom? Or are you saying that they don’t take their work as seriously as we think they do? Or are you saying that these artists don’t like what the industry has forced them to become?

    Yes, however quaint, i know you always cite your street cred and know it’s much,

    LOL, I have never claimed to have any such thing, I just went through a rap phase just like lots of American youth. The difference is that I’m 42 and I did so at a time when rap was just better, and before wiggerdom was as common. That came right after my glam rock and 80’s top 40 phases.

    I actually still like these tracks by KRS-one, also. Notice the booming voice, ability to change verbal tempo and crystal clear delivery.

  110. You mean the underground road where they filmed Batman?

    No, a few blocks west of there….. near the original Billy Goat Tavern (“Cheezeborger, Cheezeborger —- Pepsi, no Coke!); actually, about a mile away by car but closer by footpaths.

  111. Are you saying that they’re disenchanted with the business side of music and the fickleness of fandom?

    In terms of the rappers, many-upon-many of the old-school elite are just hanging on by the skin of their teeth; I recall even more than ten years ago a certain rapper —— God, i can’t recall who right now, but one of the original late 70s heavyweights, blowing off a local, little-ass record store signing and meet-n-greet because he was busy several blocks away enjoying the lunchtime buffet at a Ponderosa restaurant chain. Yeah, the phrase ‘My how the mighty have fallen,” applies to plenty of creme-de-la-creme rappers.,

    Also, not to go into minutiae, but there are some on-going music -biz litigative cases that have to do with copyright, sampling and a few other music-technology matters that will have bigtime impact on marginal past players in terms of compensatory dues owed, with massive retroactive scales in play —– so that, quite understandably, is on many an old-school rappers’ mind.

    Geez, here we go; we’re going to piss-off our blog host if we keep going off-topic so routinely like this. Sorry, bracie!

  112. p.s.—– the old-school dude grazing at Ponderosa was DJ Kevin Donovan, the titular force aka “Afrika Bambaataa.” i’m in the wiser half of my 40s and he’s got to have a dime or so on me.

  113. I’ve been a bit inconsistent in communicating my preference on o.t. comments and thanks for dealing with that as I’m still seeing what works best.

    For now I ask that comments under a new post (especially on its first day) be on-topic. On older posts, go wild.

  114. @ Heretic – did you see this article about “black privelige” on CNN’s main page today?:

    http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/30/us/black-privilege/index.html

    (if you’re interested, sometime remind me and i’ll tell you a quick, amusing tale that involves De La Soul, the Chicago Sun Times building and an impromptu swim off Wacker Dr.)”

    That article isn’t about “Black Privilege”. The subject matter is barely discussed. It’s merely clickbait to suck the audience into being lectured on white privilege, and it pisses me off.

    Talking about “privilege” in the Black/White conflict is a loss of frame. “Black Privilege” is a losing argument. (Djooish and Female privilege are valid, so CNN isn’t going to post those.)

    Talking about “Black privilege” succumbs to the frame that it is comfort that matters, not freedom.

    I don’t want to talk about Black Privilege. I want to talk about White Destiny.

    All I have to say to those who whine about White Privilege is, “where can we go to celebrate our Whiteness where it won’t oppress brown people?” There is nowhere we are allowed to go to be White. They don’t want “equality”, they want genocide. It will never be enough until we are extinct. If we are so horrible then get away from us and let us have our own nation. Not likely, we will have to build that out of blood and fire.

  115. “All I have to say to those who whine about White Privilege is, “where can we go to celebrate our Whiteness where it won’t oppress brown people?” There is nowhere we are allowed to go to be White. They don’t want “equality”, they want genocide. It will never be enough until we are extinct. If we are so horrible then get away from us and let us have our own nation. Not likely, we will have to build that out of blood and fire.”

    I’ve got a rather confrontational opinion on this subject that i’ve stated earlier: I contend that, in terms of there existing a universal humanity inter-dependence, pro-or-con on an individual level, that caucasians are sort-of an idealized ‘super-middlemost’ hybrid of humanity writ large and, to cut to the chase, are ultimately driven by a compulsion but ultimately by a ‘fate’ to create idealized norm; e.g., in other words, I’m afraid that the 20th-century proverbial ‘white Man’s Burden” is sublime and is a existential duty that is inescapable; there would be insufferable penalties if you neglected it—– yet certain and inevitable frustrations when you do take on such a task, with history attesting to that fact as well. Highest-end Ashkenazim and NE Asian I.Q. is valuable but to ethereal and ether-based, while African and Hispanic-core primitivism is unorganized but teeming with desirable human vitality and passion; the gamut of such homo-sapien ingredients are all needed but only the caucasian maintains the aggregate ideal amount;

    summation: we drive each other crazy but ultimately ‘need’ each other; any other interpretation is sloppily presumptive on how much our self-definitions are reliant upon ‘the other.’

  116. That article isn’t about “Black Privilege”. The subject matter is barely discussed. It’s merely clickbait to suck the audience into being lectured on white privilege, and it pisses me off.

    Yes, I know and I agree. That’s why I used the quotes. The article didn’t even attempt to cite any of the myriad of real examples of black privilege, they could just called you or me to be provided with a long list.

    yet certain and inevitable frustrations when you do take on such a task, with history attesting to that fact as well. Highest-end Ashkenazim and NE Asian I.Q. is valuable but to ethereal and ether-based, while African and Hispanic-core primitivism is unorganized but teeming with desirable human vitality and passion;

    White people have plenty of passion, just not in the post-modern world where they have nothing left to conquer or fight against. Modernity and success have caused Europeans to let their altruism run amuck and support globalism and liberalism. The Japanese have also lost their conquest impulse (as evidenced by low birth rates) but fortunately for them they somehow retain the good sense to keep their own country occupied by themselves.

    summation: we drive each other crazy but ultimately ‘need’ each other; any other interpretation is sloppily presumptive on how much our self-definitions are reliant upon ‘the other.’

    ** wretching** …. JFC, how trite.

  117. Yeah, the phrase ‘My how the mighty have fallen,” applies to plenty of creme-de-la-creme rappers.,

    Yeah, but in the music business isn’t true that financial success is almost a completely separate skillset that you have to master? I’ve always been under the impression that few artists make money off their actual album sales, it’s the tours, appearances and other stuff. And it’s certainly better to be popular in music today as compared to 30 years ago, there’s just more media outlets, a larger population with more disposable income, and more opportunities to make a $ buck outside of just selling a record.

    And those that have bad money management skills (or huge entourages or bad drug/spending habits) are destined to finish their musical life broke because few artists have long careers now, regardless of genre.

  118. summation: we drive each other crazy but ultimately ‘need’ each other; any other interpretation is sloppily presumptive on how much our self-definitions are reliant upon ‘the other.’

    That comment gives yooooge credence to Camlost’s assertion that Black psychological existence is derivative of White attention.

  119. @PA,

    But you’re only giving the thought consideration from the ‘middlemost’-white perspective looking ‘down’ toward the ‘afro-hispanic’ vitality placement.
    But what of the look toward Asian and Ashkenazim abstract intellect? More feasible then?

    Inter-connected is not one and the same with one’s personal identification.

    “That comment gives yooooge credence to Camlost’s assertion that Black psychological existence is derivative of White attention.”

    Probably true to the extent that one culture/race/group is more prominent of categorical language abilities, which in and of itself concedes particular and certain ‘superiority.’
    But the acknowledgement of the difference still manifests in the more primitive group in some form, which may or may not be valued by the superior language group; i think we see evidence of that today, much to a lot of cog-dis found here and at similar-minded blogs.

  120. ** wretching** …. JFC, how trite.

    I’d wretch too —— if i was inclined to interpret the remark in such a bad-faith way.

    You’re doing what Thordaddy sometimes does to me —– trying to reduce me to some silly-ass SJW platitude, when you know damn well that I’m beyond such sophomoric folly. So let me ask you what I just asked our blog host: what of my hypothetical if you look from the ‘white-middlemost’ to the higher Asian/Ashkenazim more ethereal and abstract? Is that more safe an idea to allow to resonate?

    And then consider that idea coupled with the fact of Asian hyper-assimilation of white cultural form and aesthetic? is that the Asian version of cultural slumming?

  121. “White people have plenty of passion, just not in the post-modern world where they have nothing left to conquer or fight against. Modernity and success have caused Europeans to let their altruism run amuck and support globalism and liberalism. “

    That more or less is what I’m contending in this debate1 (So, “JFC” backatcha!)

  122. Nikcrit, I realize your proposition was made partly in jest though with just enough conviction to make it seem like you’re floating a trial balloon to see “how will those guys react to what I sorta really think?” Maybe it’s also one or two Brewer’s Reserve barleywines? A short but serius answer is that I sincerely believe that races are meant to be separate. Contact corrupts us. Interdependence corrupts us as it’s never stable, and instead tips over to exploitation — dole and destruction whey they’re parasiting on us, slavery and abuse when we exploit them.

    White man’s burden today, it’s to survive as White, to make it to the other side of this shit-period in history.

    Nature had made each race sustainable on its own terms in its own habitat. Meddling in Africa proved that partial welfare makes their reproductive incontinence an asteroid-sized thereat to all of the rest of humanity. Whites and Japanese/Koreans can adopt to material comfort and not explode past their country’s carrying capacity. Not so with others. So at bare minimum (and I say no to the entire notion of WMB to begin with) if “we” have to take care of them, then “we” must have the liberty to cull their excesses or else we are destroyed. And so thus the business of responsibility over other races becomes inhumane.

    And in all this, I like Heretic’s comment: “I don’t want to talk about Black Privilege [or Black anything else -PA]. I want to talk about White Destiny”

  123. And in all this, I like Heretic’s comment: “I don’t want to talk about Black Privilege [or Black anything else -PA]. I want to talk about White Destiny”

    Yes, I agree. That’s why I called out Thordaddy for his strange obsession with browbeating our resident superman with this whole nonsensical and pointless “acknowledge that the nigger is a nigger!!” stuff – it’s dumb. If you’re claiming that the white man is worthy he doesn’t need to worry about any identify but his own. And anything that is good about the European or his societies surely developed way before the white slavers start pulling up to the African coast trading rum and pistols for slaves, anyway.

    A short but serius answer is that I sincerely believe that races are meant to be separate.

    Yes, the fact that they evolved separately suggests this. If you look at the temperament that evolution conferred on blacks they sure weren’t meant to live in high population density or in nuclear families. And whites surely weren’t meant to live in post-modern, nonreligious societies because it makes their birth rates fall precipitously.

    if “we” have to take care of them, then “we” must have the liberty to cull their excesses or else we are destroyed.

    And whenever American blacks use the term “we” (Obama does this all the time) it means brace yourself for an upcoming suggestion that will culminate in the white man reaching for his wallet or doing some work for the lazy or the incompetent.

    Probably true to the extent that one culture/race/group is more prominent of categorical language abilities, which in and of itself concedes particular and certain ‘superiority.’
    But the acknowledgement of the difference still manifests in the more primitive group in some form, which may or may not be valued by the superior language group; i think we see evidence of that today, much to a lot of cog-dis found here and at similar-minded blogs.

    When I say that blacks outside America are “irrelevant” that’s not a dis to them, it’s a criticism of American blacks for not having the guts to take an interest in them, learn an African language, or take their own black asses back to the motherland and do the work it takes to make something decent of your own. And I never said that Africans are inferior, but Superman decided to take it that way – I just said that Africans are utterly ignored by American blacks, despite being 30 times more numerous and in charge of a lot of territory devoid of white “racism.” (not to mention them also being a whole lot better behaved when they’re lucky enough to get to a nice country)

    And why are you expecting others to see you as important, anyway?

    It just reminds me of an old quote from Chris Rock:

    Chinese people got dissed, they formed their own shit. Chinese people get dissed, it’s like ‘fuck you… Chinatown!’ Okay?
    Italian people got dissed, they formed their own shit. Italian people get dissed, it’s like fuck you… Little Italy!’ A’ight?
    I don’t care what country you go into: you will not find Little Africa anywhere. What, the ghetto? Little burnt-up Africa?

  124. It’s a remarkable realization that no “race-realist” has ever accused the radical “black” liberationist of his “obsession” over expunging the word “nigger” from the minds, tongues and lips OF ALL WHITE PEOPLE…

    I mean, are “we” to believe that this drive that dare not be called an “obsession” is really nothing more than for our own good courtesy of an inexplicable “black” chilvary?

    What part of using “nigger” PRECISELY, as opposed to liberally and gratuitously, EQUALS “obsession” to YOU?

    “Obsession” IS MORE EQUAL TO a drive to expunge a certain word from a peoples’ vocabulary for the purpose of making invisible an existential threat to those very people.

    And make no mistake, the nigger qua nigger is an existential threat to the white race.

    Now, if you HAD THE SENSE to conceptualize objective Supremacy in its absolute (read: as Perfection) THEN it would become clear to you that a white man striving towards objective Supremacy… A white man converting to white Supremacist NEED NO BLACK MAN TO EXIST ON THE ENTIRE PLANET.

    So the TRUTH is that a white man can convert to white Supremacy sans negro AND the white man can also identify a certain existential threat known as the “nigger,” ie., the worst of the “blacks.” And NEITHER OF THESE actions are the least bit obsessive.

  125. I remember earlier in my time, I was accused of obsessing over “homosexuality.” My take was, and still is, Liberalism equals the homosexual “nature,” ie., the self-annihilating “nature.” Even Lawrence Auster himself accused me of being obsessed with this “reductionist” argument. But, per the “rules” of the enemy, ALL THINGS, including their very “liberal ideology,” reduces to the “purely” physical. Ergo, Liberalism, at its origin, is a physical act… Er, a physically annihilating act… The homo-sexual act… The anti-creative act. Embrace Liberalism and *you* due deracination and desire for radical sexual autonomy.

    But whatever… Obsession. Can you smell it?

  126. There are a few fine features of Liberalism as homosexual “nature” starting with completely and thoroughly pulverizing the idea that American is the originator and main exporter of “Liberalism” on the planet. Secondly, “we” can now work to alter the narrative of the “INTELLECTUAL RIGHT” famous for authoring its many intriguing and fascinating Liberal creation myths. For a thing BOUND BY STRICT PHYSICAL LAW CANNOT BE IN POSSESSION OF a spiritual or intellectual origin. There is no gnostic origin to Liberalism. No Enlightenment as the origin of Liberalism. No Protestant heresy as Liberalism’s origin.

    It is Liberalism as the self-annihilating act. Its true origin is a singularity belonging to the mind of one man who first thought that I can defy Creation and “rightly” choose self-annihilation.

    This is the DOMINATE PSYCHOLOGICAL state of the high IQ “white” male…

    A fervent belief in the “right” to self-annihilate AS HIS MOST cherished freedom. In his mind, it is “smart” to think this way.

  127. Freedom of speech = freedom of conscience = conscious of freedom = right to bear arms…

    This ^^^ is axiomatic to the free white man…

    But this has only been formally articulated by the white men of America.

    The liberationist assault is coming from both sides in effect pulverizing our freedom of conscience and rendering us unconscious of our freedom…

    When one thinks about the radical (black) liberationists’ attempt to expunge “nigger” from the white race’s vernacular, one CAN VISUALIZE AN ALL-OUT ASSAULT on the American white man’s axiomatic creed starting with an obvious curtailment of his speech following all the way through to a real desire to dis-arm him thoroughly and completely.

    So then to reduce this to mere “name-calling” means you are “race-realist…” Not.

  128. “And why are you expecting others to see you as important, anyway?”

    I’m not, if you’re directing that at me; I do think there’s reciprocal ‘intrigue’ or ‘bewilderment,’ a sorta anthropological fascination back-n-forth between blacks and whites.

  129. “Nikcrit, I realize your proposition was made partly in jest though with just enough conviction to make it seem like you’re floating a trial balloon to see “how will those guys react to what I sorta really think?”

    No, I wasn’t really jesting; perhaps I was a bit verbally tentative because I was a bit tongue-tied articulating the thought…..I think there’s s mutual-intrigue dynamic going on; maybe it’s just not universal. I guess it would make sense that i encounter it more than ‘you and yours’ would, no?

  130. “It’s a remarkable realization that no “race-realist” has ever accused the radical “black” liberationist of his “obsession” over expunging the word “nigger” from the minds, tongues and lips OF ALL WHITE PEOPLE…”

    It’s an argumentative presumption and conceit for you to say that moves to eradicate the N-word from public discourse is a black-based urge, (e.g., your sarcastic reference to ‘black chivalry’); it’s a intra-white game, the turning the slur into a taboo, done strictly for purposes of intra-white status games and mongering —— hence, the reason why even ‘cutting-edge’ race-realists stay away from the word in open parlance situations.

    You must know that; it’s often discussed here and at similar blogs.

  131. Yes, the fact that they evolved separately suggests this. If you look at the temperament that evolution conferred on blacks they sure weren’t meant to live in high population density or in nuclear families. And whites surely weren’t meant to live in post-modern, nonreligious societies because it makes their birth rates fall precipitously.

    @Cam,
    I’m curious, do you ever feel any personal identity cog-dis from being half-Asian; something along the lines to what i’ve described over the years on these blogs in depicting occasional halfrican angst?

    I’m curious if that’s something inherent to our mixed beings? Or something that can literally be internally transcended merely (or sheerly?) because you convincingly ‘look white?’ I wonder about that because I clearly can’t ‘pass,’ but the mild irony i’ve encountered when dealing with other b-w biracials is that the ones who’ve expressed the most personal angst and conflict relating to their heritage have been ones who could pass, or who were, if not presumed white, could easily appear to be something other than black.

    I once did a ten-questions-format interview with this author, who was pushing her first book. She was very politicized and at one time conflicted about her mixed heritage, but to me she could easily pass as a sort-of southern-European white woman, though i guess her sister was ‘more black’ looking… Pretty good book; sorta upper-caste east-coast angsty in its approach, but a real writer with a fairly mature voice for someone then in their early 20s.

    http://danzysenna.com/Biography.html

  132. Nikcrit…

    Where you witness intra-racial squabble over that most taboo of words, you merely observe the squabble of various degree of “white” male liberationist. Were you to level up to the perspective of the white Supremacist versus the “black” anti-(white) Supremacist, you would recognize that the “black” anti-(white) Supremacist DESIRES TO MAXIMIZE the autonomy of the nigger. Conceptually, you just cannot get there because you just cannot conceive of objective Supremacy and thus give life to and possess the perspective of a genuine black Supremacist. As such, you cannot reason your way to MINIMIZING the autonomy of the nigger with extreme prejudice.

    In short, this is ALL OUT OF THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REALM of a bona fide “halfrican” self-annihilator. *You* are “them.”

  133. But even take “our” little “squabble” of that most taboo of words… It wasn’t really an intra-racial status game…

    IT WASN’T EVEN A DEBATE…

    Use “nigger” PRECISELY…

    It doesn’t get anymore correct than this and only a madman argues against using words precisely.

    Most “white” male liberationists with high IQs don’t want solutions that they hadn’t discovered themselves… How else could they maintain the pretense of a high IQ?

  134. @thor,
    nope. I don’t agree that i facilitate black radical autonomy; what makes you think you see, crystal clear, everyone else’s folly?

    But then I guess a ‘halfrican self-annihilator’ would say that, now wouldn’t he?

  135. Nikcrit…

    You facilitate in maximizing the autonomy of the nigger by PRACTICALLY making “it” invisible in the minds of the white race. You are still hesitant to give credence to the lowliest type of “black” with an inherent hatred for whites that “WE” CALL “nigger.” But where there was a conceptual failure in regard to objective Supremacy, no such conceptual failure exists here. You can conceive the nigger exactly how I have conceived him. You just cannot give him any existence in the concrete? Why oh why? The high IQ answer is that by doing so — able to conceptualize nigger even as you deny his existence — IS TO CREATE stealth nigger… Maximize the nigger’s autonomy to a radical extent. This is the aim of the expunge the most worstest word game.

  136. thordaddy
    “It doesn’t get anymore correct than this and only a madman argues against using words precisely.”
    Can you show me some etymological evidence that the word “nigger” originally meant what you say it does?

    Language evolves. Neither you, nor I currently own the word “nigger”, nor do we control it. Niggers do. It’s “precise meaning” is the definition by which Niggers name themselves.


    “Most “white” male liberationists with high IQs don’t want solutions that they hadn’t discovered themselves… How else could they maintain the pretense of a high IQ?”

    That’s a strong statement. I like it.

  137. Six months ago before the Trump train came along, ALL THE MEDIA focus was on either “blacks” being violated by “racist white” cops or “white” liberals getting polar-bared naked and sniffy not a scent of racial animus in their semi-vegetative aftermath.

    And what is the nexus… But the Big Nigger, himself…

  138. Heretic Phi…

    I can show you that our language has been liberated and I can play too…

    You are getting awfully close to suggesting that niggers either don’t actually exist or exist only when they want to and never when a white man sees “it.”

    But if you are merely implying that “nigger” is evolved from “niger” which just translates to “black” then okay…

    But what does this have to do with everyone understanding “nigger” not as a “black” person, but as the worst and lowliest type of “black” person with an inherited distaste for whites?

    Am I really making up a novel definition of “nigger?”

  139. Heretic Phi…

    This isn’t about breaking liberal taboo… Liberal taboo means nothing at the end of the day. This is about giving concrete existence to a known existential threat to the white race.

  140. thordaddy
    “But what does this have to do with everyone understanding “nigger” not as a “black” person, but as the worst and lowliest type of “black” person with an inherited distaste for whites?”

    I don’t think everyone understands it the way you do. I’m pretty sure most people just understand it as a vulgar term for “negro”. “My Nigger” means “my (black) friend”.

    Don’t tell but I sort of like this one. I’m a “white” self-self-annihilator I guess.

    Chris Rock tried to alter the term in popular usage to make “niggers” a lower subclass of blacks. This was 1996. That was a novel idea and people got it but it didn’t really catch.

  141. You are still hesitant to give credence to the lowliest type of “black” with an inherent hatred for whites

    Yes, I am hesitant to do as much because, in my mind, I see that person also having a equally deep hatred for fellow blacks and that he would equally prey upon whites as well as blacks.

    But if that animus toward fellow-blacks is not relevant to you in your definition, I would disagree.

    You keep intimating that i’m trying to conceal some kind of consciousness of a certain kind of black, but i’m not.

  142. If the Earth lost its magnetic field and radiation increase so much that only people who looked like Wesley Snipes and Lupita Nyongo could live; would niggers still exist?

  143. “we’re done talking about Black people until I make a new post in which they are the central subject.”

    Really! I thought this post had been kidnapped by The Root or something; Thordaddy got all Nigmatic and on a roll.

    Thwack: Exactly! The disenchanted white advocates don’t see how they use blacks as a relative abstraction in their pro-white consciousness; no group or person exist on a perceptual island.

  144. I think the above illustrates why wn fails collectively, leaving wS as the only viable option at the individual level. It is clear that most high IQ “white” males and even high IQ mulattoes CANNOT DETERMINE whether the nigger actually exists or not. And the fact that something so basic cannot be resolved in their minds does not then create a cognitive dissonance in regard to their wn REVEALS THEM TO BE EVEN MORE suspect.

  145. PA
    And Thordaddy has the last word on this fascinating subject.
    ————————————————————————————

    Too bad no one seems to understand what he’s talking about?

  146. What are the odds that Bonita will be charged with assault?

    Also, check out the dolt in the background. Could someone look like more ridiculous. That’s college material these days.

    In the screenshot above, it is clear who is being aggressive. The white guy is scared. He is being bullied.

    With bullying such a sensitive topic, SFSU might want to make an example that they won’t tolerate it on their campus, that their students will not be made victims of it.

    A guy gets pushed around for his hairstyle, but Bonita won’t face any consequences.

  147. It is a fascinating video, and the internet agrees!

    The guy’s name is Goldstein but he don’t look jewish to me. He says that he doesn’t want charges pressed (what a nice guy!) and is willing to dialogue with anyone interested in discussing the issues.

    This article is recent and is about the guy named King who took the video and DOES want charges pressed on the bitch, for her assault on HIM.

    According to King “It’s just not right. It felt wrong.”

  148. Thwack: Thordaddy is a valued commenter. I know your disruptive m.o. from Heartiste’s. Don’t make me mod you.

    Camlost: if she has a problem with appropriation then she needs to turn in all her clothes and put on a grass skirt.

  149. He says that he doesn’t want charges pressed (what a nice guy!)

    Elk, that whole “forgiveness” thing flared up several years ago in a more serious case of Carter Strange’s attack. Matt Lauer (?) tricked his parents into saying that they forgive the attakers, though as I recall they angrily retracted that shortly after.

  150. On CNN they’re saying that douchebag from Counting Crows wears extensions for his locks. How pathetic.

    if she has a problem with appropriation then she needs to turn in all her clothes and put on a grass skirt.

    Exactly. And also stop speaking English and discontinue using cell phones, televisions, toilets, email, electricity, indoor plumbing and automobiles.

    He says that he doesn’t want charges pressed (what a nice guy!) and is willing to dialogue with anyone interested in discussing the issues.

    What are the odds that Bonita will be charged with assault?

    What a pansy. Somehow I don’t think that the MSM will spend much time discussing this or having this kid on feel-good talk show panels, they’re too much in fear of BLM and the far left. But I would love, love, love it if we could somehow get a public comment from Hillary or Bernie on this one, we need items like this in the news as much as possible.

    And I’m agreeing – there’s no way law enforcement would do anything even if he was adamant on pressing charges. But if the races were reversed Obama would’ve already sent Loretta Lynch and the entire DoJ down there to pursue the guy, throw him in leg irons and prosecute him for hate crimes.

  151. It is frustrating to see things like that, those kinds of videos. That bitch needs to be smacked in the face. Everyone has to get “checked” or their behavior continues to expand.

    That woman Bonita is not a student she is late 30s and nether is she an employee but with an associated nonprofit. Both the University and the nonprofit have issued weak statements. No one has any balls. Except the videographer King, who wants charges pressed.

    It is funny how people are often true to their names. Goldstein is a wimp but King a good man, Bonita is black her name in reverse. [perceptive. –PA]

  152. “On CNN they’re saying that douchebag from Counting Crows wears extensions for his locks. How pathetic.”

    That guy is one of the most insufferable jackasses in the biz; he’s notorious. Pompous, arrogant, pretentious. You name it. Upper-middle-class Jewish dilettante from Pittsburgh-turned-New-Age-prophet. Yikes!

    Anyhow, just look at this picture; what more really needs to be said? (though I guess I respect his ability to hustle together and make money off such a myth)

    https://www.google.com/search?q=adam+duritz&espv=2&biw=1366&bih=661&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj46aKe4O3LAhWB4yYKHU6ZDkEQ_AUIBigB&dpr=1#imgrc=x7zQCmT_hxr1UM%3A

    Camlost: I asked you to respond to a question I put in a comment in the Free Speech post; it’s in the second half of the comment string but not near the very bottom; do a ‘find’ search for the word ‘senna’ and get reply to my question if you feel inclined to.

  153. That guy is one of the most insufferable jackasses in the biz; he’s notorious. Pompous, arrogant, pretentious.

    I’m glad you confirmed my hunch about that dude. I’ve never paid much attention to him on purpose, even when their music was on MTV non-stop (literally) – he just reeked of d-baggery in my eyes. And their music just seems predictable and inauthentic to me. Just looking at him I could’ve almost guessed most of what you described about him and his background. And I’m not sure how he was able to obtain both Jennifer Anniston and Courtney Cox for a time, but as annoying as he must be I’d guess that he’s less idiotic than Courtney’s other famous mate David Arquette.

  154. And can you believe that the Bonita chick actually puts her hands on the guy? But I guess she knew that she wouldn’t face any immediate physical consequences from that slight little California twerp.

  155. I was raised in a fairly high-percentage neighborhood and attended a public suburban high-school that was over 50% Jewish and FWIW that guy with the dreds in the video could fairly well be Jewish even though he doesn’t appear to conform to more familiar Ashkenazim or Sephardic physical archetypes (think of Beck, who i believe you once cited in an earlier comment string; this guy in the vid seems to be along ‘that type’ in terms of discussion in coming up with Jewish types of physicality.).

    As one of the vids posted of the confrontation points out via voice-over narration, the most outrageous aspect of the college employees accusation is that chides the white student for ‘appropriating’ dreds, apparently the sole province of ‘people of color,’ which would the leave open culpability for the legions of black American women who ‘appropriate’ European female hair styles via their bottles of lye and hair color. In this college employee’s idea of a just world, black females must ‘go natural’ henceforth (even though one could imagine the legions of Korean owners of black beauty shops nationwide shuddering at the mere thought).

    However, the alt-right commentary and criticfism of this vid and the issues it raises is flawed and even ironic in one aspect: the critical claims that, in fact, the employee insulted the college kid. While she was wrong and galling in her actions and in her presumptively ideological conceits, she nonetheless really didn’t ‘assault’ the student; she had a sort-of wily, shit-eating grin on her face the whole time; and before the force of her grip got excessive, she relinquished her hold.

    She was in the wrong but it would be ironic and ill-advised to indulge the same sort of vague, finger-to-the-wind accusations and cultural blame-game tactics that she clearly used in assessing one’s own damages incurred, no?

    I say a lot of this b.s. is just a sort-of cultural hangover or cultural over-reaction and reset to Civil Rights movement of the ’60s. Epic changes will be followed by near-epic overreactions —- and i actually believe that we, right now in the last few years, have commenced the first seismic ‘re-corrections’ over those aforementioned ‘over-corrections,’ e.g., the first fight-back against 21st-century politically correct orthodoxy.

  156. Actually, Nikcrit, she could face battery charges, undoubtedly, if that poor specimen of a “white” male decided to press charges. Assault, no. Battery, yes.

  157. Then again, “we” all understand that pressing battery charges would engender more mockery than this “white” male has already received. .

  158. he nonetheless really didn’t ‘assault’ the student

    It was assault, as defined by the law, and the video is clear evidence of it.

    No one on this board wants a nanny state, but examples such as the above are indisputable in revealing the different standards – the different standards IN THE LAW – that apply to black and white.

    And THAT issue is NOT minor. THAT issue is worth the anger and the rage.

    For nikcrit to miss this obvious point is just huh?

  159. In Minnesota i think it would be fifth degree misdemeanor assault. When someone is physically restrained from leaving, that qualifies as assault. And as well it should, by the way.

    The kid felt threatened, and was not allowed to leave. That he was eventually allowed to leave does not mitigate the crime. Which point is important, nikcrit. If i restrain somebody for 10 minutes and make them afraid and then let them leave – they were still restrained for a time and that is the crime.

    But the details in this case are secondary. The larger point, as i stated above, is the different standards (for different races) IN THE LAW,and by no reckoning is that anything other than a big deal.

  160. For nikcrit to miss this obvious point is just huh?

    I’m NOT missing the point; I’m reiterating that point via the rhetorical tactic of warning against ‘stooping down to their level.’

    I agree there’s an outrageous double standard; I think that’s the ‘cultural correction’ that’s coming and that I cited in the comment of mine you reference. Incidentally, I too think the anger and rage is justified; I think ‘one’ or ‘we’ or ‘whomover’ is justified in their taking umbrage with such incidents but that still doesn’t mean that they need to compromise their standards of confrontation if it doesn’t threaten the larger parameters of their defense.

    to wit: I think the video critiques here and on youtube of the incident would still be just and effective rhetoric even if it had dropped the few phrases claiming ‘SHE assaulted ME,” etc.

    We’re better than that, darn it!

  161. She was in the wrong but it would be ironic and ill-advised to indulge the same sort of vague, finger-to-the-wind accusations and cultural blame-game tactics that she clearly used in assessing one’s own damages incurred, no?

    It is not vague or ill-advised to point out that there are different standards in the law, applied to different races. And such different standards effectively make the law against the constitution and invalid.

    That is not ironic – it is the whole point. That the legal system FAVORS blacks over whites.

    For someone to miss this point, is unforgivable, and the example above is perfect. And there are literally 50 thousand other examples that can be cited, of hate crimes that blacks are not charged for, and which would be less likely to occur if they were charged, and which result in real victims and real problems.

    For the third time, the larger issue is the point. And anyone not getting the larger issue, needing it spelled out? – get a clue.

    Someone who doesn’t get the larger issue, which is the double standard, is obviously coming from a very different place.

    But go ahead nikcrit and make your case.

    How is it that White Advocates ought not be concerned about how the law is applied differently to them than it is to black advocates such as Bonita who will not be charged.

  162. Thor, elk, it’s all that ‘technically speaking’-talk and literal citing of local ordinances and so forth that creates that very ‘nanny state’ that elk warns about.

    Still, what you say is indisputable. But what’s also indisputable is that such confrontation and physical interaction occurs, say, dozens of times at public events ranging from pro sports games to pop-music concert gatherings; and that cops and security and other event authorities routinely overlook such incidents if they quickly naturally resolve and move along by their own natural developments.

    And regarding this particular incident AND THE OVERVIEW OF IT IN THE SERVICE OF ANALYSIS OF IT AS A CONFRONTATION OF IDEOLOGY AND IDENTITY POLITICS it would have been ‘better’ to have not deployed some of the same overreaction and victimization that these p.c. criers so often do.

    I’m saying it was a bit ironic. Cite what you wish is the evident legal reality; that’s wise —– but be careful about using that same information as a moral or theoretical rationalization.

  163. My previous comment was crossposted to nikcrit’s at 7:34 pm.
    ______________________

    I see that we agree that the double standard exists and is a big deal.

    It is just one in a million examples. But what is the reason that THIS video goes viral, and not some of the others which are much more damaging and graphic?

    That is a good question, by the way. It is not just the far right such as here, nikcrit, who find this particular incident WORSE, in some ways.

    We can all sort of get thuggin – that happens because youngbucks and bigdicks. But when it carries over and crosses into this? it is WORSE somehow. Truly, it is. The bullying gets down to the level of this awfulness where a obviously weak and confused white kid gets picked on by a woman who is older and bigger than he, and supposedly there to help him.

    So that the “bullying” gets down to this level, makes it all the more clear and unpleasant.

  164. Someone who doesn’t get the larger issue, which is the double standard, is obviously coming from a very different place.

    No one is doing that; I pointed that and even other double-standards out in my initial comment. I just suggested that the student wasn’t really ‘assaulted,’ though that is a subjective assessment and therefore has no empirical affirmation or rejection forthcoming,

    AT NO POINT DID I SAY OR IMPLY THAT THERE ISN’T A DOUBLE STANDARD IN PLAY; IN FACT, I REITERATED THAT FACT.

    What’s up, elk? Are you still pissed at me over our tiff the other day? You’re clearly doing backward somersaults to be contrary with me today. Just wait until we naturally disagree on something. I mean, that’ll come quick enough.

  165. When I re-watch the video, I wonder if Goldstein is more ‘just’ mentally annoyed, and not feeling physically threatened by her arm tug and thus not accusing her of ‘assault?’ Or, is he scared, and therefore shielding his intimidation due to feelings of vulnerability?

    I can’t tell, nor can I read minds. But I guess it’s up in the air, to some degree. So, whne i say ‘was he assaulted?’ I’m wondering what his SUBJECTIVE answer to that is, while I concede that the incident may have conformed to the stipulations of some legal code, statute or ordinance.

  166. And regarding this particular incident AND THE OVERVIEW OF IT IN THE SERVICE OF ANALYSIS OF IT AS A CONFRONTATION OF IDEOLOGY AND IDENTITY POLITICS it would have been ‘better’ to have not deployed some of the same overreaction and victimization that these p.c. criers so often do.

    I’m saying it was a bit ironic.

    I would like to hear someone else’s opinion on that.

    I get that it seems like “bitching” to go all maniacal about some mishap involving lowly universtiy students. But something about that particular incident is upsetting. I think it is as i described above. It is all so 1984.

  167. @elk, ok, got you, buddy.

    O.T.@et.al,

    I’m off this week and rarely watch tv beyond sports and news.But with more downtime, and TBS running NCAA tourney games, and leaving said station on after the games i’ve caught some modern sitcoms, Big-Bang Theory one of ’em, now on in the other room.

    And while i once thought the alt-right was a bit paranoid in their assessment of the pop zeitgeist, I humbly admit i am blown away by the absolutely complete pussification of white males rendered on these shows; either outright flamers or over-the-top aspie nerds and dorks.

    It’s all self-deprecating ‘who-can-outdork-the-other’ humor; that’s the presumed aspiration, with nothing thematically or even in the rote storyline explaining WHY that is an existential ‘given.’

    Very weird; week writing too.

  168. Nikcrit, the recent “We Don’t Have to Live Like This” post covers your epiphany. We haven’t owned a TV in several years now. The final straw for me was the commercials.

    Adults can handle the poz. But the programming damages children, who don’t have critical filters and trust adults, including adult programming on teevee.

  169. Other developments on this case:

    1. Her name is Bonita Tindle, she’s a SFSU student and not an employee – you can see her on linkedin and other social media, but if a firestorm continues she will surely delete all profiles

    2. Her roommate says that she is absolutely obsessed with ideas of racial oppression/grievance

    3. Apparently Goldstein has done some interviews and agreed that “cultural appropriation” from blacks is indeed a “thing” but that it doesn’t apply to his dreadlocks

    4. Most of the liberal media whites discussing this are obsessed with deciding whether or not dreadlocks should be genuinely considered the “cultural property” of blacks – it’s bizarre – they have the inner trigger reaction that Bonita is in the right 100% and that the white guy “had it coming” (like Omar Thornton’s victims) and deserved to be assaulted if it’s true that “cultural appropriation” actually occurred here. And the funny part is that Goldstein’s stupid “Egypt” comment shows that he actually agrees with her on that – if that would’ve been me I woulda said that I don’t give a damn what she thinks and that I’ll wear my hair however I see fit without consulting her ugly ass.

    Here’s an examples of some white liberals debating whether or not Goldstein is the “guilty” one:

    5. Apparently, she had also been making some comments about “let’s get scissors” to her fruity little high yellow friend standing there, and had also told Goldstein “we don’t allow your hairstyle here” when he was simply walking through the cultural center minding his own business – I think we know what would happen if similar comments were made with races reversed

  170. Most of the liberal media whites discussing this are obsessed with deciding whether or not dreadlocks should be genuinely considered the “cultural property” of blacks

    Funny dat, all those Back women with White (Asian?) woman wig-weaves.

    Completely o.t., hilarity might ensue, at least based on web-search keywords traffic I see arriving here. There is a steady stream of people who appear to be looking for office manager-sort of web sites who come to my recent “Office Manager’s Sign, 2016” post. Any Red Pill converts among them, or is everybody a click/close visitor?

  171. Funny dat, all those Back women with White (Asian?) woman wig-weaves.

    That hair comes from India or Korea. Down here in Atlanta it’s a thing for a group of 5 or 6 “youths” to steal a car and run it through the front window of (Korean-owned) black beauty supply stores in the middle of the night, and then rush in to grab the very expensive packs of extension hairs off the shelf. They then sell it out of the backs of cars, at the flea market, or give it to their female friends that “do hair” for a living – about 1/3 of blacks must be involved in the barber or weave industry and blacks spend an insanely large portion of their incomes on hair care. (they’re not all blessed with the 50% Euro genes that confer flowing, straight locks like our resident Rick Fox lookalike)

  172. And while i once thought the alt-right was a bit paranoid in their assessment of the pop zeitgeist, I humbly admit i am blown away by the absolutely complete pussification of white males rendered on these shows; either outright flamers or over-the-top aspie nerds and dorks.

    …. and you’re basing this on what? A single weird, outlier TV sitcom you had on for one episode in the background?

    Dude you are so wrong. And the alt-right is paranoid about this.

    Virtually every other TV show, movie, or pop music album, prominently features white men in normal, non-pussified roles. watch shows like Game of Thrones, The Americans, Homeland, Archer, Brooklyn 99, Vikings, Breaking Bad, I could go on…. I mean I just today watched a matinee of Deadpool… I normally i hate superhero movies but this movie really turns the genre on it’s head. It’s friggen hilarious. And these shows and movies are syndicated and watched all over the world.

    Nikcrit, why oh why did you give up your pop culture bona fides?? It’s not too late to catch up. I can help.

  173. That hair comes from India or Korea. Down here in Atlanta it’s a thing for a group of 5 or 6 “youths” to steal a car and run it through the front window of (Korean-owned) black beauty supply stores in the middle of the night, and then rush in to grab the very expensive packs of extension hairs off the shelf.

    Camlost, it’s is so funny you posted this because I have personal experience, indirectly, of this exactly!
    One of my best friends from kindergarten to the present is a Korean guy, whose family owned not one but TWO wig stores in the ghetto… and by ghetto I mean GHETTO…. I would often hang out with him at one of the stores where he would work after school. Anyway the store would get robbed frequently of course, and his dad very quickly learned the benefits of conceal carry. His store never was robbed in the manner you described above, but at one point some thugs … or in the current parlance “teens” … came in and beat the SHIT out of his frail grandma… she suffered an intracranial hemorrhage from this but went on to outlive her son who died from pancreatic cancer. Yeah I’d say this was one of the defining moments that made me a “raaaycisss”… that said I’ve found that Koreans are some of the most solid, reliable cool people you could possibly know.

  174. “Dude you are so wrong. And the alt-right is paranoid about this.”

    I admit my view is very anecdotal. Now that I think about it, I recall seeing as much and noting a few years back the same thing going on a sitcom that starred Maya Rudolph (or is it Randolph), the former SNL cast member, and i felt that too was over-the-top.

    Or maybe I’m taking admittedly anecdotal views from the last time I was even semi-mindful of the 7-10 p.m. primetime zeitgeist in the ’90s and was just struck by the change.

    In any case, I’d freely defer to someone objective and much more familiar with what’s out there in our here-and-now.

    And i’m maybe not as uninitiated to the television zeitgeist; I watched some of the better cable-television series in relatively recent years: Breaking Bad, The Wire and so forth.

    I’ll also confess: I’ve seen every episode of Entourage as well, my guilty pleasure. It actually does a fairly good job of accurately depicting the behind-the-scenes grunts of the star machines: publicists, flaks, A&R people, personal assistants and lower-level agents (can’t speak for the upper-echelon Ari Gold types, but I believed his character while enjoying his excesses).

    In terms of stomach-able television, who else reps and speaks for the middle-class junket-and-expense-account class? hahha

  175. Speaking of bad tv, Kiss of Death (1995) is on netflix.

    How is this for a tough guy cast. David ghostman Caruso, Ving thickskull Rhames, Nick someone’s nephew Cage, Samuel L (don’t call him sammyboy) Jackson, Michael the jew Rappaport; and the ever unappealing Helen Hunt. And Stanley this can always use another jewTucci.

    LA, crime, tough guys. Caruso goes to meetings and is trying to get out of the life but his compromised cousin Rappaport needs a driver or he’s gonna popped. Caruso agrees to one last job … and it all goes bad.

    I may be trying too hard to make a joke out of this, but the movie speaks for itself.

    David Caruso is the Boston Irish tough who doesn’t look like much but he has grit in his soul and he comes from the mean streets and punches way above his weight. And what was the deal with Helen Hunt, who did she ever appeal to, can someone explain that?

  176. The movie is worth wasting two hours of your life, for this one exchange between Rhames and Caruso,

    Rhames – I smell fear in this one

    Caruso – You wanna dance with me?

    They were destined for those lines. In my previous post i wanted to nickname Rhames realnigger but chickened out so went with thickskull but realnigger works better. That was his whole schtick.

  177. PA
    Thwack: Thordaddy is a valued commenter. I know your disruptive m.o. from Heartiste’s. Don’t make me mod you.
    ———————————————————————–

    How is it disruptive to highlight the fact Thordaddy’s concept is so philosophical that it flew over everyones head; so much so no one could understand it enough to clarify or cosign on it?

    Im actually giving him the credit he deserves?

    Free speech for thee but not for me?

    Be careful bro; you are dangerously close to giving aid and comfort to the enemy; are you sure you want to do that?

    (PS– Im following YOUR rule that black people are only allowed one post per day on your blog)

  178. At a Wisconsin Trump rally a 15 year old girl and a silverback Trump man have an altercation and it is caught on video and written up by Bitchingtonpost.

    The video is pretty good and the story is that the 15 girl who is already a massive BMW (and to think, she is only gonna get bigger) claimed to have been groped and then pepper sprayed, but the video reveals that she threw the first punch and was then sprayed.

    The comments at Huffpo reveal the insanity of the leftist crowd. Everytime i read that stuff i can’t believe that people are so inclined to the leftist perspective. For instance taking seriously the girl’s claim that she was groped,

    – This person obviously brought pepper spray to the protest and decided to engage with them. I see a premeditation on his part and he should be charged with sexual assault on a minor.

    – Trump supporters are excusing a little roughing up and bruising of a female reporter on video and are now saying there’s no evidence of the groping of a 15 year old, so it didn’t happen. It’s like these people don’t have mothers, sisters, daughters, or wives.

    Since when do we not take seriously the claim of a 15 year old girl that she was groped?!?!?

    – The brave Trump supporter feared for his life against a 15 year old girl.

    Thats why he pepper sprayed a child…………

    They accuse us of seeing what we want to see, but yet the video is right at the top of the page. In the comments they say that the girl is 19, which looks closer to reality.

  179. This person obviously brought pepper spray to the protest and decided to engage with them. I see a premeditation on his part and he should be charged with sexual assault on a minor.

    That quote is from the comments at the Huffpo link about the altercation between a Trump supporter and a protestor.

    The leftists are irrational. They project insane.

    The event was not a “protest” it was a rally for Trump, and that fact is right in the article’s headline. And per appearacnes it was the BMW actively seeking confrontation, not the Trump man.

    And then to suggest that he be charged with “sexual assualt on a minor” – oh hey, just ruin his life, why not, she said so and he deserves it because he is a hater because he supports Trump so even if he did not do it he deserves it anyways.

    It is similar to the SFSU incident in that the woman is antagonistic and physically threatening and in this example violent, and were it not for the video, their account of things would have to be taken seriously.

  180. “Dude you are so wrong. And the alt-right is paranoid about this.”

    The Americans, Homeland, Archer, Brooklyn 99, Vikings, Breaking Bad,

    I’m no TV expert, but there’s also a difference between cable programming and mainstream TV. And there’s quite a dearth of white action stars in Hollywood now – it’s better to be black or British. And this is despite the fact that black American action stars don’t do very well when American movies are released to Europe, their movies lag quite a bit.

    The video is pretty good and the story is that the 15 girl who is already a massive BMW

    Well, yeah… chances are. But, what is a BMW?

    How is it disruptive to highlight the fact Thordaddy’s concept is so philosophical that it flew over everyones head; so much so no one could understand it enough to clarify or cosign on it?

    I’ll take the liberty of speaking for everyone here and tell you to please back up off Thordaddy, stop beating it to death.

  181. I’m curious, do you ever feel any personal identity cog-dis from being half-Asian; something along the lines to what i’ve described over the years on these blogs in depicting occasional halfrican angst?

    Nah, not really. The only point of significant impact on me is that you have half as much family in the USA. Most of the time my white friends just want to come over and eat my mom’s cooking.

    Not only do I pass, but I really, really, really pass. Freckles and hair that gets red highlights in the summer with a lot of sun. I just have that slightly squinty-eyed look like that Harry Solomon guy from 3rd rock from the Sun. And think about it – if someone like me tried to follow Danna and write a memoir about being mixed nobody (me included) would think it interesting or edgy in the least (and who could blame them).

    but the mild irony i’ve encountered when dealing with other b-w biracials is that the ones who’ve expressed the most personal angst and conflict relating to their heritage have been ones who could pass, or who were, if not presumed white, could easily appear to be something other than black.

    I’ve seen that, too. I know it’s a crazy, crude and possibly offensive theory, but maybe there’s a correlation between white/black mixes being more introspective and self-aware the lighter (and therefore more white) they are. I’d think that darker blacks who are supremely introspective generally end up like Ta-Heezy Coates or James Baldwin.

  182. The BMW is the highly coveted automobile from Germany, the Ultimate Driving Machine as it is sometimes called.

    Also it refers to Big Maine Women, as referenced in a Weimerica podcast.

    I had not heard the term and appropriated it to Midwest and Minnesota ‘girls’ who are themselves full sized four seaters and with Germanic and hidebound tanning.

    Obviously the Big Frames are well fitted to childbirthing and axewielding, but when padded up with 100 pounds of lard it is to behold. The ‘girl’ in the Huffpo video is of their line.

    People who are not “from around here” cannot believe how big these women get, and how common their Volkswagon buttocks and 6-foot frames.

  183. Also in reference to that Huffpo. Not that it matters but the details are up in the air. How old is the girl. Who was it who sprayed her (it seems not to have been someone silverhair).

    I thought the incident a good example of what nikcrit was talking about how in any crowded situation, a thousand minor incidents will go down many of which might technically be assault, but it is up to the wisdom of society which actually are transgressions.

    The girl says she was groped, that silverhair touched her breasts. Just a stupid accusation. As if some respectable old guy is going around groping teenage girls. Yeah he’s a pervert, of course he is, he is a Trump supporter he obviously hates and therefore.

    One of the first jobs i had i was 14 or 15 working as a busboy and dishwasher and turned around quickly in crowded quarters and my hand went squarely into or rather onto some older girl’s crotchzone. She seemed like an old lady, she was probably 26. She was very upset.

  184. That job sucked. It paid 5 bucks an hour and they took taxes out. What the fuck, taxes on five bux an hour. And there would be piles of dishes caked with grease and grime stacked six feet high. The dirtiest job in the place for the least money. The waitresses, those dear damsels with their endangered crotchzones, were supposed to share out their tips but of course they were miserly.

    The restaurant is still there under a different sign. I bet it pays 6 dollars an hour now.

  185. Thwack…

    Naming a “terrorist” an Islamic jihadist is not philosophical any more than naming the radically violent “black” a nigger is philosophical.

    The “philosophical” dispute THAT RESIDES IN YOUR MIND ONLY is rooted in your denial of an extant nigger.

    LITERALLY, in your mind, niggers do not exist!!!

    And it does not even matter that the “black” collective gives existence to the nigger on a minute by minute, hour by hour, day by day basis…

    So this then makes one wonder?

    What is your real purpose in denying the existence of the worst and lowliest type of “black” individual?

    I say it is to make the nigger EVEN MORE radically autonomous… To enable “it” to violate the white race invisibly… This is the true motive behind taking this particular word off “our” minds, tongues and lips.

    So there is no philosophy here.

  186. People who are not “from around here” cannot believe how big these women get, and how common their Volkswagon buttocks and 6-foot frames.

    Whoa, when I was in the Midwest (Kansas City, on KS side) the average prole white female was way skinnier than the average Southern or black prole girl. By a wide margin. You must be talking about rural midwestern girls? But in terms of pure obesity, black women anywhere in the USA are leading the pack, followed by Mestizo border jumper women, then followed by rural Southern white women.

  187. “PA
    Thwack: Thordaddy is a valued commenter. I know your disruptive m.o. from Heartiste’s. Don’t make me mod you.”

    Hey, it’s your blog. But I don’t think Thwack said anything, umm, rude or transgressive; he merely pointed out in plaintive terms what almost all the regulars here have pointed out, some more abrasively than Thwack has done.

    Thordaddy, you reading this? You obviously have some respect here. Can you take heed of some of the advice in terms of clarity and rhetorical accessibility? Not doing as much may indicate a form of disrespect as well, no?

  188. “when I was in the Midwest (Kansas City, on KS side) “

    (Deep, exasperated sigh) Nothing personal, but you advance a very common misperception, so listen up, Southern Man: Neither Kansas nor Oklahoma, nor even Missouri, though it may be a bit more arguably qualified, are Midwestern states —— they’re fukin’ GREAT PLAINS STATES!

    So here now and remember: Minnesota, Wisconsin, Indiana, Michigan, Illinois and Ohio—– and that’s it!

    (Kansas belongs in the above list about as much as Rutgers and Penn State do…..NOT!

  189. Nikcrit…

    Smart people do not get the benefit of ignorance.

    Does the nigger exist? Yes or no?

    Failing to answer this simple question UNDER THE GUISE of incomprehensibilty can no longer hold.

    BUT WHEN *you* inevitably fail to answer “yes” or “no,” what are “WE” to make of this failure?

    I make of this “failure” something diabolical.

  190. thor: “I say it is to make the nigger EVEN MORE radically autonomous… To enable “it” to violate the white race invisibly… This is the true motive behind taking this particular word off “our” minds, tongues and lips.”

    You say this a lot —– but how can you confidently presume that upon everyone you accuse? Meaning, what indicators are on display coming from each of the individuals you throw this rather wild and random charge at?

    I’m not really fond of those in the self-appointed mind-reader business; but you sure seem like a dime-store shrink at times in your mass societal diagnoses; and to borrow another tired debate accusation and charge, your over-presumptive tendency to claim N-word amnesty on the citizenry writ large seems like a textbook case of projection, however tired the charge.

  191. Nikcrit…

    Have you already forgotten of the “white” liberals routinely polar-bared naked by packs of “yoof” motivated by no racial animus swears the semi-vegetative “white” liberal?

    In YOUR MIND, niggers do not really exist.

    Can you not come to concede this issue?

  192. “Have you already forgotten of the “white” liberals routinely polar-bared naked by packs of “yoof” motivated by no racial animus swears the semi-vegetative “white” liberal?”

    No, not forgotten; just not distinctive enough of a pathological subset to make your assertion correct.
    It’s not INcorrect, but rather it overlooks the fact that the barbarity is based in lower intelligence and assaultive tendency toward people of ALL races.

    Now hear this, since you so routinely overlook this point: In order for your ‘Niggah’-trope to exist with descriptive detail and merit, ‘it’ would have to have a specific and well-honed ‘zero-ing in’ target of white victims.

    But it doesn’t! They are just as violent and predatory toward fellow-blacks, or asians or whomever. And you don’t realize that, i suspect because you have no academic nor personal empathy for said other-victimized groups.

    I’ve made that point a hundred times but you and other don’t hear it.

    Perhaps you and them understandably enough discard the thought as some sort of SJW scolding and rhetoric —— but that it is not the point nor goal; rather, it’s to say you’re figurative ‘N’ is flawed because his specific animus is not mutually exclusive to other-race targets (e.g., ‘victims’), which it would need to be if your theoretical figure had existential merit.

    Address that point, clearly, or please drop this rap of yours, cuz it ain’t going nowhere!

  193. Nikcrit…

    In fact, I have made the point elsewhere that the nigger is a threat to all of humanity with its emphasis being its racial animus towards whites. And it is you who not only operates on a stunted conception of nigger, ie., one that doesn’t recognize the white man’s DISTINCT concept of nigger, but also gives credence to the “black” concept of “nigger” that can practically mean anything from homie to hater… And then even hater homies and homie haters…

    Taking nigger off the mind, tongue and lips of white man IS TO MAKE the nigger invisible…

    Able to hide a special animus for whites inside a general animus for all… Datz real nigger.

  194. And even further Nikcrit… In case it has not become obvious?

    IF you “liberate” a thing so that this “thing” must “matter” and be “anti-matter” then eventually you make for this “thing’s” ultimate demise.

  195. P.s—- Thor: I fikin’ give up…..

    Cam,: I neglected to put Iowa on my list of MIDWESTERN States, though Cornhuskers need not apply.

  196. And Nikcrit… You never even answered The Simple Question as I predicted you would not… And so you have “answered” through omission and torn your “race-realist” bona fides to shreds.

    Imagine representing yourself a “halfrican” race-realist who claims the nigger doesn’t exist? That’s as absurd as a “white” race-realist claiming to be anti-wS. And both of *you* readily acknowledge the existence of the wS. So it is a mindboggling absurdity all around.

  197. Cam,: I neglected to put Iowa on my list of MIDWESTERN States, though Cornhuskers need not apply.

    LOL, if it’s past the mountains and doesn’t have a coast it’s midwest to me… until you go so far as to see real mountains. This includes Arkansas.

  198. thordaddy

    So this then makes one wonder?

    What is your real purpose in denying the existence of the worst and lowliest type of “black” individual?
    ——————————————————————————————————-
    Why are you accusing me of denying ni66ers exist?

    Ive never done that. I fully understood the point you were making but I didn’t respond in order to see if anyone else got it (plus I didn’t want to use my single comment per day that black people are restricted to responding to your point)

    Your problem is by focusing on “the worst and lowliest type of “black” individual” you contradict yourself regarding black people as existential threats to the white race; and therefore provide aid and comfort to white people who don’t want to practice racism and hate racists like you.

    You can’t have it both ways.

    If you got rid of all the “worst and lowliest type of “black” individuals” you’d have an even more difficult time selling racism than you do now?

    The Joker explained all this to Batman in the movie; were you paying attention?

    or were you thinking about ni66ers “stabbing” white women?

  199. Thwack….

    But your entire point is degenerately based on a LIBERAL CONCEPTION of “racism.”

    And all I CAN DO is work to minimize the autonomy of the nigger within the “limits” of perfect thought and action…

    The first step BEING just that simple acknowledgement that the nigger should have his freedom revoked with extreme prejudice.

    Whether sometime far, far away this becomes a reality BECAUSE THOSE MOST ACCOUNTABLE in submitting, containing and oppressing the nigger itself… Er, the decent black man… Has taken the task upon himself and succeeded that this then would make “racism” harder to sell…

    No… It actually doesn’t IF you possessed an illiberal conception of “racism.”

  200. Read the above and recognize that to believe me so as to “hate” me as a “white supremacist” IS TO DESIRE maximizing the autonomy of the nigger. And when one comes to this realization… A realization that says, “I maximize the autonomy of soxiety’s most vicious predators…” Then one recognizes a self-annihilator in himself.

    From this “we” can draw a conclusion about a “black” collective that doesn’t publicly and quite vocally speak its intention of caging the nigger with extreme prejudice…

    The “black” collective is self-annihilating and only “white” liberals “stand in their way.” A real symbiotic regression.

  201. OT@PA:
    FORGOT to ask earlier. What did you mean with your reference to Brewers Reserve Wines,” earlier in this string? I don’t recall hearing that reference before.

  202. Your problem is by focusing on “the worst and lowliest type of “black” individual” you contradict yourself regarding black people as existential threats to the white race;

    Because black people always includes the subset enwords, there is no contradiction, in saying that black people are an existential threat to white people.

    First of all, i do not agree that the existential threat to white people, within this racial struggle for dominance that affects (and effects!) everyone – is only from the enwords. The existential threat to white people in the struggle for race, is not just those lowlies.

    But even if it were; since those lowlies are always a part of the black race: there is no contradiction. The black race includes enwords, and even if the threat to whites is only those enwords (which it is not) – even then the black race as a whole is a threat because it will always include its lower subsets.

    **************

    If someone gets kicked out of a bar, he is almost always let back in provided he doesn’t wear the same clothes.

  203. Your problem is by focusing on “the worst and lowliest type of “black” individual” you contradict yourself regarding black people as existential threats to the white race;

    Black people aren’t a “threat” to do a damn thing that white liberalism doesn’t enable, encourage and allow.

  204. OT: I have a prediction that I think will please most of you wayward raycysts; I think Trump will pull it out here in the heartland; I gather he’s coyly crying aloud for Kasich to leave the race and get ‘votes he’s now stealing;’ but the smarter punditry figures Kasich’s hurting Cruz more than Trump….. if you look at the consensus and aggregate computation of the GOP polls here, one would reasonably think that Cruz is comfortably out front:

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/wi/wisconsin_republican_presidential_primary-3763.html

    But here’s what’s going into my public long-shot call: Lot of Wisconsin voters are going to go withy their heart over ramrodded-reason and pick Trump in lieu of Kasich, which would shed a point of two from that lead. Meanwhile, the Trump-aide brouhaha seems to be subsiding at the right moment. But most of all, a look at Cruz’s and Trump’s Monday itineraries are critical IMO; for some idiotic reason, Cruz is spending the bulk of his time in The Peoples Republic of Madison tomorrow, with Gov Walker; he’s preaching and grandstanding to the converted —–and he doesn’t realize that Walker’s endorsement will hurt more than help him in this intra-GOP circumstance. People here were pissed Walker entered the race, compromising some bills for national appearances sake and stockpiling public election-fund donations.

    Meanwhile, Trump’s doing the big-media ops in the big city downtown —– but then wisely going up to the Duluth-Superior area and playing to white hinterlands, where they’re dying to back Trump and push aside their lackluster prudence in backing GOP status quo.

    I say Trump pulls it off by 1 point; it may even be one of those deals where it’s so close that the final call is delayed.

    You heard it here first.

  205. “Must be a great place for minorities to live?:”

    I love Madison but not for any specific racial-political reason; it’s very left in that big state-university kinda way; but such a sort-of over-the-top orthodoxy also creates a fairly prominent backlash culture and civic attitude. So there are a lot of people living in Madison who sorta pride themselves on “not being Madison stereotypes,’ if you know what I mean. it’s a great place to do your undergrad time; i liked the contrast of the Madison babysteps after high-school, then, after getting your feet wet and gaining some adulthood independence, going to chicago for grad school and ‘real-city’ living; i think i would’ve been a bit timid going to chi as a undergrad; you need those places like Madison and Colombia, Missouri and Ann Arbor and East Lansing to get your feet wet before entering real adulthood.

  206. it’s a great place to do your undergrad time; i liked the contrast of the Madison babysteps after high-school, then, after getting your feet wet and gaining some adulthood independence,

    Great place to send your daughter to school, nice and safe. But not somewhere I would’ve wanted to attend myself due to the cold and the insufferable, finger-wagging brand of liberalism you’d have to endure from people who haven’t actually been around much “diversity” themselves.

    But did you read the Sailer article?

  207. “(plus I didn’t want to use my single comment per day that black people are restricted to responding to your point)”

    PA, is this hearsay or ‘excited utterance?’ (In either case, I didn’t know of this rule and thus am not guilty of illegally skirting around it!) Lolzz!

  208. But did you read the Sailer article?

    Yeah, again now and probably when it came out a couple of years back. I knew as much about ‘urban Madison’ but was a bit surprised by the ‘extremeness’ and record-setting aspect of the negative metrics. .Simply because that city is smaller, its ghetto come across as much less harsh than does the ones in Chicago and Milwaukee, etc. Madison’s ain’t shite in comparison….. hey, don’t worry about the cold; that’s what kegger parties are for? Have a few of those and you’ll feel no pain…… Just don’t drink and get too comfortable outside when it gets below zero —— elk and I can attest to that fact with personal stories of people we know.

  209. I should note that not only was there no claim of niggers being the white race’s only existential threat, there was, equally, no claim of the nigger as only an existential threat to the white race.

    In fact, those making claims of “contradiction” are attempting to gloss over the reality that the opposing sides haven’t even reached to a level of agreement of MERE EXISTENCE such that claims of “contradiction” could have any merit.

    The ABSURDITY is in a “white” “race-realist” DENYING the existence of the nigger. <– This is the fundamental debate.

    So… IT IS NOT… "I don't think the nigger is an existential threat to the white race."

    It is REALLY… "I don't think the nigger is an existential threat to the white race BECAUSE I do not believe that the nigger exists.

    Colossal difference…

  210. Well, thanks to Phi and T-Daddy, I think this post set some sorta record, as my ‘find’ function in the browser tallies 169 instances of the “N”-word, singular and plural, within this single post.

    Yeah, most of those instances are within objective discussion of the use of the word and societal description — but talk about ways of living up to the stereotype, alt-right blogs have some stereotypes too. FWIW, i wish more of these blogs banned usage of that word; and to make the concession to p.c. fair, I’d accept policy asking that people refrain from swearing or using ethnic slurs of other ‘others’ as well, including WASP caucasians as well.

    And, yes, I do see the irony of me advancing that view in a forum like this;

  211. i wish more of these blogs banned usage of that word; and to make the concession to p.c. fair, I’d accept policy asking that people refrain from swearing or using ethnic slurs of other ‘others’ as well, including WASP caucasians as well.

    No.

  212. Thor: “One cannot be “black” and especially not a nigger and known nothing of “liberating” from “white supremacy.” It’s inconceivable to conceptualize an American “black” who knows nothing of the “struggle” as an American black. “

    I’ve had a Thor epiphany: this is the cog in your gears that is broken and is what makes you so cryptic: your above observation is wrong! Flat out and absolutely; though it makes sense and is understandable that you are totally alienated from the demo that proves your statement above wrong, there is nonethless great-majority swaths of blacks and other NAMs 25-and-under who indeed “no nothing of the struggle.” I conceive of and have affirmed that evident truth every single weekday.
    I also have to point out facts relating to that meta-fact here to other commenters as well; younger blacks may have pathos galore amongst ‘them and theirs”—– but they do not hate or are preoccupied with whites theoretically, or dumbed down, in some base ‘conceptual’ way; no, they probably reflexively correlate ‘white’ with ‘greater wealth.” But they’re neither resentful nor covetous of white aesthetics or its cultural logos. In that regard Cam is right: underclass blacks are quite enamored with themselves and their ever-growing cultural mythology and folklore.

  213. In other words thordaddy has a strong outgroup homogeneity bias and ingroup preference, all common in social groupings, but combined with his perseveratory thought process, makes for some pretty tedious reading. Next!

  214. Nikcrit…

    No man… First, I’m around <25 year old "blacks" on the daily at work as a bouncer in SoCo. Ditto for NAMs. Secondly, I've already stated "blacks" are radically autonomous… Post-liberation from "white supremacy." I've already stated that a lot of young "blacks" like Thwack have no real conception of wS. You've really just confirmed everything I've already stated.

    What YOU WILL NOT ANSWER TO is at the time when these post-liberated, radically autonomous “blacks” who have NO CONCEPTION of white Supremacy are asked to opine about the nature of “white supremacy,” and STILL, nonetheless, react like standard-issue nigger?

  215. Lara…

    “Nigger” is not an ethnic slur… It’s a nearly universally understood name for a subset of “blacks” that are purposefully and boastfully anti-white civilization. “Nigger” is also predominantly understood as the “alpha” of the radical “black” collective amongst the black collective itself.

  216. MGE…

    Memes dominate through redundancy and through redundancy.

    Your critique is mere gripe.

  217. Totally serendipitous finding – I was browsing a used book store just after reading the few comments above, when sitting atop of a stack of loose magazines I saw a June 1982 issue of Dollars & Sense, a now defunct back business rag. I picked it up for the campy 1980’s sci-fi aesthetic throughout, and it’s always interesting to read these retro-future predictions to see what has come to fruition. Browsing through the articles, I’ve found it notable for it’s optimistic tone and complete absence of rhetoric involving racism and oppression, ect. . . I think PA’s right, something soured in the 1980s. What was it?

    I’ve snapped a few pics… take a look (I can post more if you want):

  218. Wow — I didn’t know wordpress will automatically embed imgur albums – if you click on the pic it will take you to the imgur site where you can zoom in on the image to read the text

  219. MGE…

    If you are a white male then you were born to be an anti-white Supremacist…

    As you are and you still don’t question it.

    In fact, your homosexuality doesn’t even seem to suggest to you that you were more “educated” than others in your anti-white Supremacy.

    You are not even cognizant of the fact that your response above stinks of homosexuality to those not having been “liberated” of all their senses.

  220. Relevant to Thordaddy:
    In the editor’s note (pg. 5), Donald C. Walker writes,
    As cloning, gene splicing, invitrol fertilization and other forms of biogenetic take hold, the nation will amass the scientific knowledge to weed out so-called “inferior strands.” Who will decide the criterion of superiority?

  221. I think PA’s right, something soured in the 1980s. What was it?

    I think journalism and media changed – you had a new generation of pampered, entitled kids that came through the ranks and they were self-absorbed and hyper sensitive about pretty much everything – this was the genesis of Political Correctness.

  222. That magazine cover hearkens back to a certain style of futuristic artwork from the 1980’s that I thought was very cool. I don’t know if there’s a name for that style, though?:

  223. Nikcrit…

    Let’s get on the real… Speaking as two Gen X race realists…

    To BE American black JUST IS to liberate from “white supremacy.”

    Saying this isn’t true is only saying YOU ARE post-liberation from “white supremacy.” SO MUCH SO that your yoofs no longer POSSESS a real conception of “white supremacy,” BUT still react like savage nigger when dog-whistled by the “talented tenth.”

    RADICALLY AUTONOMOUS… These lil’ homies uh yurz.

  224. MGE…

    What you are not getting is that these “advances” in fertility technology ONLY ALLOW the white race to join the chaos of perpetuating self-annihilators without needing to fight or fuq.

  225. What went sour in the eighties was high IQ Gen Xer (age range 10-20) became self-aware and began to rationalize self-annihilation in response to “infinite regress.” In other words, if total degeneracy is inevitable, one can “win” by getting there faster.

    “We” are now so advanced that a “right” to self-annihilation is the high IQ response to General Entropy.

    It is very coherent… It starts with denying objective Supremacy…

    Infinite regress and General Entropy naturally fill the void.

    The connection to the ground and the masses is ultimately through anti-white Supremacy.

  226. That magazine cover hearkens back to a certain style of futuristic artwork from the 1980’s that I thought was very cool. I don’t know if there’s a name for that style, though?:

    It’s called futurism. It was pioneered by Arthur Radebaugh, a Michigan graphic artist who did a lot of work for the auto companies in Detroit during the 50’s-60’s. I have some of his prints hanging on my walls.

    https://www.flickr.com/search/?text=radebaugh

  227. … that was back when Detroit was the “City of Tomorrow.” People forget that in the 50s Detroit was the wealthiest city in America! It was also nicknamed the “Paris of the West.”

  228. I think PA’s right, something soured in the 1980s. What was it?

    What happened is PA went from adolescence to adulthood —— and that is a very monumental event for someone who tends to equate his purely personal revelations and life-learning rites of passage with historical events writ large. Lol!!

  229. Of the total of 4,323 approved comments on this blog, Nikcrit leads the pack by an impressive margin with his 907 comments.

  230. Not being acerbic now — just noticed an interesting coincidence: Camlost and Thordaddy currently have an exactly equal number of approved comments here: 555 each.

  231. and that is a very monumental event for someone who tends to equate his purely personal revelations and life-learning rites of passage with historical events writ large.

    Pot, kettle… kettle, pot.

  232. It’s called futurism. It was pioneered by Arthur Radebaugh, a Michigan graphic artist who did a lot of work for the auto companies in Detroit during the 50’s-60’s. I have some of his prints hanging on my walls.

    Ah, yeah. That’s the name of the style. I think Robocop’s look captured some of that, as did the machines in the Will Smith movie “I, Robot.”

  233. And now what is “futurism” other than a multi-futural virtual reality full of transhumanists desiring the “Singularity.”

  234. Collectively, the futuristic “vision” of high IQ “white” male is like an absolute “black hole.”

  235. Pingback: 100th Post – PA

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s