The Year the Dam Burst

Shit hit the fan in 2015: college date rape hysteria, US Supreme Court’s rainbow rulings, Islamic attacks in the very hearts of our wrecked nations, Black Lives Matter equal-parts farce and barbarism, the slaughter of the innocents, and Angela Merkel’s very own Operation Barbarossa.

The globalists’ big lie of human fungibility and its “social justice” application was pushed hard this past year and its victories were celebrated in Google, Inc.’s Nuremberg rally year-end retrospective. This acceleration of events and the globalists’ brazen triumphalism points to one of three possible scenarios:

1. Touchdown spike (they won)
2. Hubris (they think they won)
3. Panic (pre-extinction burst)

Which one is it? In trying to answer that question in a recent conversation with a friend, I mentioned that a decade ago I was despondent about the course of things. And yet paradoxically, it’s gotten a lot worse since then and I am now optimistic. Ten years ago, the decline seemed utterly unopposed. But last year we saw first stirrings of effective — and truth-based — resistance:

  • Ideological Counter-Offensive. On the ideological battleground, we’ve gotten new confidence in the wake of #Gamergate with Vox Day’s publication of “SJWs Always Lie,” as well as great neologisms and memes burning up Twitter and appearing on network broadcasts like “cuckservative,” “dindu,” “Weimerica,” “poz,” and “it’s the current year.”
  • Donald Trump. He demonstrated that he is serious, destroyed a Bush, and discredited the very perception of legitimacy in the political process by exposing the Republican Party as a donor-driven false opposition.
  • Viktor Orban Defies the EU. Where the Greek Syriza party was bought off by Merkel’s bailouts, Hungarian prime minister Victor Orban effectively asserted the right of Hungarians to a homeland and a future and constructed the groundwork for a new Europe that is home of White Christians.
  • Ascendant Nationalism in Europe. Nationalism is rising because Multikult is pushing Europeans to where they have nothing to lose in pushing back. German and Swedish youths with no prior criminal records are torching facilities awaiting the migrants and firemen are refusing to fight the fire. In November, 50,000 nationalists marched in Warsaw and burned the European Union flag.

What will happen in 2016? Here is my take on the forecasting of historic events: change happens either much later — or much sooner — than expected. Rarely when expected. Examples of mistimed expectation include dashed hopes after a series of earlier anti-Communist uprisings behind the Iron Curtain, followed by the unexpected tearing down of the Berlin Wall.

This year, things will either come to a head or they will continue to simmer with more misery sewn in our countries and a continued piling-on of insults to God Himself. Either the anti-White Globalist empire will continue to appear like it will rule forever (like all the empires before it) or the buildup of opposing forces will steer it toward a reckoning.

This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
Not with a bang but a whimper

These lines from T.S. Eliot’s “The Hollow Men” are among the most quoted of 20th century English-language poems. But what is “the world”? What if our world has already ended a long time ago and this present world is now Google’s rainbow flag empire?

Depending on one’s interpretation, The Beatles’ line “nothing’s gonna change my world” expresses a hope in the eternal persistence of good. Those words can also be used to mock the ruling party’s hubris. Sooner or later in one of history’s turns, chaos always corrects an overreach of order and man’s works crumble. Conversely, when agents of entropy become too arrogant, man eventually unbinds his hands and asserts his liberated will, shining light where darkness has mocked him for too long and settles the scores where justice is due.

In 2015, the globalist big lie was exposed. What will our efforts culminate in this year — more of the same? or the end of their world?

Advertisements

120 thoughts on “The Year the Dam Burst

  1. This year, the show will go on. We can expect more filth because nothing will change until there is widespread street level resistance. Let’s talk about amerika.

    amerika is the new soviet union. Communism had to be discredited in the ussr, and globalism will be discredited in the ussa. But not next year. It will take a recession (we are due for one) and hyperinflation from QE to make most people feel the pain. It may be this one or the next, I cant say. What I can say is that when the world economy slows down, the homogenous nations will get through mostly ok, while the multikult states will experience much strife, in some cases race war. And this will be the moment when the remaining Whites say…oh, so this is why we need our own countries. We are on the cutting edge of the new paradigm shift, but the mainstream is not there yet. We know this because the mainstream is not talking about it. When they do talk about it (they will inevatably attack us) then we know that the dam is about to burst.

    The election. 2016 is Trump’s national front/ukip moment. He will most certainly not win the election, nevermind get the nomination, even though he may have the numbers. The clinton machine will kick into full gear and we will have our fist female president. Hey, at least shitlibs will own the coming trials though.

    Europe. The next spring will see a new migrant invasion. Borders will go up in eastern europe but I am afraid the west is lost…for now. If the recession hits the eu hard, and the uruk hai are at the gates, then central and eastern european nation will take a good long look at why they are even in this game in the first place, maybe breaking it up. Brussels bureaucrats will throw a hissy fit but they will be powerless to resist.

  2. It’s crazy how so many in the alt-rite cannot see the assault on white America as an attack on virtually the last, small, diasporic collectives of principled sexual regenerates steeped in the perfecting of the creation process… A truly unique white racial endeavor.

  3. 1. Touchdown spike (they won)
    2. Hubris (they think they won)
    3. Panic (pre-extinction burst)

    Here we go again…..

    Us and Them
    And after all we’re only ordinary men
    Me, and you
    God only knows it’s not what we would choose to do
    Forward he cried from the rear
    and the front rank died
    And the General sat, as the lines on the map
    moved from side to side
    Black and Blue
    And who knows which is which and who is who
    Up and Down
    And in the end it’s only round and round and round

    I think you need to have a fourth option future scenario; an unexciting but much more likely one, in which some dreary compromise and resolution by default kicks in amongst these pepetually warring factions.
    Even if the pendulum did swing entirely one way for a period; it would be just that, a limited period of time before the tidal sway commenced its return.

    The halfrican: society’s existential ghost? Or its fourth-dimension aribitrator, the perceptual missing link?

  4. “..principled sexual regenerates steeped in the perfecting of the creation process…”

    See, this is what I find sorta scary in the manosphere; this absolute faith in eugenic evolution; along these lines, I recall feeling a similar ideological chill when PA mused in a comment about how it might be theoretically prudent to sacrice unattractive white females, as they held no reproductive value. [I’ve said no such thing -PA]

    This thinking is hysterically over-deterministic, for starters; and it also makes evident the crisis of spirit and imagination, that the left has accused the right of since the start of the 20th-century. (Incidentally, the apex of this rightist tendency was WWII; and for all those alt-righters who’re proudly in the “Hitler Revised” subset of the man-o-sphere, remember that your boy killed and sacrificed many–upon-many Aryans who didn’t fit neatly or aesthetically into the ‘Master Plan.’

    Thor, does your WS theory consider such ‘in-house’ corrections virtuous?

  5. [I’ve said no such thing -PA]

    I should’ve offered more detailed attribution; it was either gl piggy or onestdv… i recall you sorta musing aloud, in a rhetorical/question-to-your-self kinda way…. in reply to some sorta tangent that delved into breeding habits among ethnic groups, you said something like ‘I dunno, what are you going to do with ugly white females, kill ’em?” ….. to be clear: it was conversational and in service to some larger point; it WAS NOT some literal and detailed theory or position you were conveying.

    Given the content, i should’ve made that clear…. i’m pretty sure that was the context and that i’m not confusing you with someone else.

  6. Borders will go up in eastern europe but I am afraid the west is lost…for now.

    It’s my understanding that there are renewed and reinvigorated nationalist movements popping up all over Europe—– and not just central or eastern Europe. IMO, however, the impulses in play that led things being the way they are is a enervation of spirit that befells many-a-society’s most evolved; in that sense, the current situation is possibly a spiritual re-generation: or consider this: what do you objectively think would occur in the Scandinavian countries if every, single non-European was removed tomorrow? I think the politics and social views you lament would prevail. No, as in the past, there has to be a social challenge, a period of strife, follwoed by a resolve which includes the contemporary x-factor, some (European) technological innovation that invariably winds up in retrospect to have been an unseen game changer to all the social and political soothsaying preceding it.

  7. Well, i’ll say it now, if it helps to move things along.

    What else are you going to do with them?

    (That’s a cheap shot, i know, sorry. Those are thoughtful comments from nikcrit.)

    Women are what it comes down to. I have pointed out before, i don’t know that i am asking for credit for making this point about the intersection of “game a la the manosphere”, and right wing politics. I don’t get credit for an obvious point, but it does bear repeating.

    Women are the spoils of the world. And so when men see their women (yeah, THEIR women) going with others, it is not just symbolic of their defeat and failure – it IS their defeat and failure.

    And so in terms of strategy – military strategy – writing those women off as lost, is about the best option. It is the best option for hardliner advocates of White interests.

    I sense that nikcrit is again bringing up, his feelings about hardline White interests. I have been sympathetic to doubts about a hardline on White interests, and remain so. But my doubts about White interests, as in a strict WN, have more to do with practical politics than they do with what be considered ethics or realism. I think that such a hard line is hard to sell, even now still. RaHOwa down at City Hall? the police know my name, and they don’t need to hear it again.

    Because when considering the problems of race conflict with realism and ethics – those conflicts cannot be considered without biology and the specifics of animal behavior, kept forefront in mind. Because the very essence of those questions – questions of race and conflict thereof – is, Who are these animals then, and how are they themselves going to approach that.

    For an honorable mention, i will say that this is a good phrase and not just for the rhetoric,

    The halfrican: society’s existential ghost? Or its fourth-dimension aribitrator, the perceptual missing link?

    There are honest questions about the nature of existence and what we are trying to do here. I can’t help but think that it ought to be kept in mind, that this stuff is very transitory. Such consideration is opposed to politics, because politics is the art of practical advantage – but it is NOT opposed to politics if it is a selling point that appeals to the righteousness, or even just the feelings, of real people.

    It is the current year though (to bring it back to topic) – and people’s inclinations toward such appeals, is exactly the question.

  8. Again on that question, the intersection of race realisms and specifically White advocacy, and “the manosphere” with its shortcomings – i was thinking back on the Last current year, about what for me sticks in the craw.

    Two “memes” (oh, that fucking stupid word again – how about instead of meme, we use Ideograph or Idoegram or Ideographicgram slash the basic aspirational concept unit of ontological and metaphysical inquiry – though if that is not linguistically exactly right, then maybe not? – it is not worth getting bogged down – meme sucks because its gay and we can no longer laugh ironically at its gayness).

    But these were simply two pictures, and their context, which was hashed over at length in this part of the web. In regards to the situation in Europe, that picture of Angela Merkel and youth Turkish suave, getting down the both of them, with a selfie and a crowd of onlookers. The look on Merkel’s face? just everything wrong with the world. The German Chancellor being pushed around by her feels and barely desperately handled by her security detail. At the young suave, we can perhaps even admire his Balls for getting IN that situation and pulling it off (or out), and with the look on HIS face.

    And the other picture, very similar context, though the themes would be different, was of the group portrait of the Ministers of Defense of four of those countries, the Scandies and maybe one other. All women, young and slim if not sexy, with their look just being, like isn’t this oh so much catnip! look at us! politicos of the highest rank and we get to wear a skirt and use our emotions as guideposts for the future children. Same context as the first, but the theme would be more on the women’s conception of themselves and their place in things, but without the direct stimulation of the suave little dick. Or it maybe the theme is identical?

    But those pictures? neither needs links. Infamous and truly, … upsetting. They push my buttons for personal reasons, which i have gone into before. The very reason that i am sympathetic to the manosphere is because of the so-called feminine imperative and its implications on the life of one little man.

    Which leads to my final point, which again is repetitive. It is in our own lives, and with our own stories, that we suffer and make our case. But that sufferance of our own follies and the case we would like to make – has to be balanced with the big picture – which is why it is so crucial that there be a big picture to provide the tent stakes and ties. And i don’t mean that in a personal and awkward way – but truly, rather as a metaphor. It is only its accuracy as a metaphor that allows me to say it.

  9. Jumping Jack Flash: I liked reading your analysis because it was level headed. It’s a tendency of the male mind to imagine large, epic events, when reality is mundane and “conservative”, except when punctuated by a spasm of activity. Sometimes that eruption can be world-changing.

    That said, American patriots (younger Bundy of the Bundy ranch fame) are occupying a federal building in Oregon, openly defying the US government. This has occurred after you wrote your comment.

    Suburban_elk “But those pictures? neither needs links. Infamous and truly, … upsetting.”

    I know exactly the pic you’re describing. Related, Dalrock has a post about male rites of passage. More to be said about that.

  10. Nikcrit…

    Now, your next step is in deconstructing the false equation that you are attempting to impose and then reconceptualize what I’ve stated versus what you have interpreted that I stated.

    A sexually regenerate collective steeped in the perfecting of the creation process is what the secular-minded should simply understand as healthy procreation… What I stated is what normal people shall do ideally…. Eugenics could be the farthest thing from one’s mind I this regard.

    BUT….

    Because healthy-minded whites are EXACTLY what both the “default elite” and the self-annihilating masses DO NOT WANT they the attempt to linguistically degrade the SPIRIT of this collective of white sexual regenerates by linking their principled healthy-mindedness to “nazi eugenics.”

    It’s old hat now….

    You won’t “see” the real aim within this elaborate war by proxy….

    You refuse to recognize you are drawn to white Supremacy and in HBD terms this correlates with certain genetic profiles unequally triggered by the modern assault.

    And yet, you still facilitate in the mass delusion concluding that white Supremacy is the pathology when the stark reality is that the “white” anti-white Supremacist is pathological… Literally, infected with the disease of self-annihilation.

  11. Suburban Elk…

    Females may be the “spoils of war,” but my white daughters are the “spoils” of this war and far too many in the erroneously self-proclaimed “manosphere” are not really losing all that much being largely childless themselves… So the will to fight must not be there because the spoils of this war are not actually our white daughters and just merely “females.” No one REALLY fights for just females.

  12. Nikcrit — “I think you need to have a fourth option future scenario; an unexciting but much more likely one, in which some dreary compromise and resolution by default kicks in amongst these pepetually warring factions.”

    There are too many irreconcilable vectors in multikult West. A 1965 United States had enough healthy tissue and space to accommodate one of the most unnatural edicts, in historic terms: aggresive desegregation. That’s no longer the case. Europeans/Whites are finding themselves in the position of young men who are figuring out that the hot girl wants to hook up with assholes in her twenties, marry a beta with a job in her thirties, and frivorce him in her forties. Those young men are catching on to the racket and feminists are wondering why young men are no longer playing their assigned beta role.

    In economic terms, the West is approaching Communist levels of productivity disincentive. Multikult can’t function without White productivity and stewardship. There cant be any “dreary compromise” because the irreconcilable interests of Whites and Muds who share a jurisdiction are: (1) Whites want their living space; (2) Muds want to be around Whites. A “dreary compromise” would be an inherently unstable arrangement. When sufficiently motivated, Whites simply say “fuck it” and start revolutions.

    — “Even if the pendulum did swing entirely one way for a period; it would be just that, a limited period of time before the tidal sway commenced its return.”

    A pendulum is not a helpful analogy here. We are not talking about a closed-system society’s leaning libertine and then puritanical like Americans in the Roaring 20s vs Depression 30s. A better metaphor for today’s politics is that of Gulliver bound with ropes, and him either breaking the ropes (possibly accompanied by TONS of collateral damage) or dying of strangulation.

    — “The halfrican: society’s existential ghost? Or its fourth-dimension aribitrator, the perceptual missing link?”

    How ’bout simply a congenial pain in the ass?

  13. the irreconcilable interests of Whites and Muds who share a jurisdiction are: (1) Whites want their living space; (2) Muds want to be around Whites. A “dreary compromise” would be an inherently unstable arrangement. When sufficiently motivated, Whites simply say “fuck it” and start revolutions.

    yeah, that’s what ”you and yours” is feeling. And perhaps more relevant, ‘you and yours,’ represent a valid political sentiment and feelign that is NOT getting its fair due in political representation or in terms of honest and just mediation treatment.

    But you’re also not rea,ching some critical mass in terms of evne a race-realist consensus; not even close. And you’re outright pariahs when it comes to those cries for succession or some sort of return to defacto Jim Crow; the latter are in fact sorta embarrassing and an element that hurts your cause and budding numbers, etc.

    Say what you will re. my halfrican lobbying and filibustering on alt-right planks and platforms; but my positions and reasoning are much, much more accepted by the all the major American race and class political consitutencies, however rare it is for the alt-right to engage with NAMs who aren’t stereotypical strawmen —– which you tend to reduce to ‘wannabe whites,” a la Thor’s declaring me ‘not discernably black,’ despite the evident reality of my day-to-day nine-to-five and even after hours.

    I don’t feel singular kinship to whites at the expense of blacks or vice-versa, or whatever peripheral ethnic combination one may conjure. And lots of ‘pure’ whites, blacks, Asians and Hispanics don’t, either.

    I simply speak for them to you —- but ideally not a conveniently caricatured level.

    Ps to PA,
    I wonder if some of what i sense as a extremeness and heavily polarized racial view you omit comes from you living in the DC metro area; my experience there is limited to a few NABJ conventions (as well as a magical night interlude at the Hay Adams hotel), but from what i’ve witnessed combined with info i’ve read and drawn from conversations with residents, you —- or what i can know fromt he avatar ‘PA’—– would be super ill-suited for life in that area. In fact, i think you would be much more content in the upper Midwest, particualrly the Twin Cities, where you get fairly big-time metropolitan arts and sophistication, yet a still predominantly white, nordicc and Scandinavian, ethnicities and cultures. Yet all that alabaster sophistication is only a hours drive away from some of country’s best nature retreats and freshwater resorts, as you’ ve stated a love of the outdoors as well.
    I would hate living in D.C.

  14. Nikcrit…

    What part of “virtual” world must I repeat for you to admit that there is nothing discernibly black about Nikcrit IN THIS VIRTUAL REALM?

  15. Nikcrit, that’s the beauty of blogging — I can fix my typos. As to Washington DC, it’s a shithole. If it were to take human form, it would look like a fat, middle aged, angry-faced Black woman, legions of whom fill the subway every morning noise-polluting it with their headphones on their way to their low-level federal government jobs.

    DC’s affluent inner suburbs are full of strivers and transients — many foreign-born — employed in various forms of government contracting,

    However, outer suburbs and the Baltimore region can be a flashback to 80s, depending on what angle you’re looking from — none of the Brown/Indian/Asian middle class you see in the affluent inner ring suburbs of DC. Few Hispanics. Blacks are around like they always were, and service sector jobs are heaviy staffed by lower class White teenagers. Auto parts stores and such are full of good ‘ol boy Rednecks. Plenty of suburbs with working class and non-striver middle class Whites. If you drive two hours west of DC, it’s open countryside, with confederate flags on homes and trucks.

  16. Nikcrit, you are profoundly misjudging the mood of American Whites. Donald Trump’s popularity should be a tip-of-the-iceberg indicator.

  17. Trump’s labor and economic policies are basically everything the alt-right abhors; I doubt very much he has any genuine anti-pc or ‘anti-cathedral’ convictions; he’s basically a pathological egomaniac with limited ability to empathize (a virtue for aspiring if pragmatic politicians)…

    By the way, he also happens to be a non-serious candidate; while acknowledging that anything can happen, i don’t see the established GOP bureaucracy allowing him anywhere near the convention and its delegates; I know that infuriates the alt-right and others disgusted with the GOP status quo. But in the cold and honest political calculus, that is a very, very small slice of the GOP electorate, regardless of whatever latent resentments that can eventually be tapped.

    I’ve said it before, but my media-bred cynicism sees the candidacies of Trump and Ben Carson as little more than p.r. moves for their future entertainment and entrepreneurial careers.

  18. I believe that the two biggest political issues in this country are labor-economic policy and immigration; steered toward security and profitability, those two issues can reverse the country’s decline and revive its spirit.
    Along those lines, I really would like to see a ticket that has Bernie Sanders and Patrick Buchanan; such a combo would alleviate the partisan bickering and contrarianism that is at this late date rote and boring; and I think those two have very compatible economic platforms, while Buchanan could humanize and alleviate much of Sanders’ cold secularism on social issues, IMO.

  19. Nikcrit…

    You only think this because mass desire for pleasurable self-annihilation is not yet a pathology that you reject or recede from…

  20. In fact, when one examines the issues that you have mentioned, one can easily leap to the conclusion that your issues and the angle you maintain are, in fact, directly related to ensuring that the pathology of pleasurable self-annihilation “progresses” unimpeded. And this really is the sickness…. The “revolutionary battle” sans DESIRE FOR white Supremacy is no more “epic” than a battle of degenerates arguing over the unequal distribution of “luxuriant annihilation.”

  21. In fact, when one examines the issues that you have mentioned, one can easily leap to the conclusion that your issues and the angle you maintain are, in fact, directly related to ensuring that the pathology of pleasurable self-annihilation “progresses” unimpeded.

    Hardly. You’re talking to someone who was a damn-near ascetic aesthete even in his salad days while accorded the kind of advantageous social expenses and platforms that could handily be exploited, though i did have my days from time-to-time.
    No, and you assume that my eugenic-minded critique of your obsession with race-and-aesthetic-focused breeding rituals is some sort of piously left scolding over ‘Nazi eugenics.’ Talk about boring and old-hat, the fascist-leaning right’s obsession with being condescending toward naive lefties, as you tried to do to me, is pretty moldy too.
    In any case, it’s irrelevant. No, the crisis of racial eugenics is more of hte ‘What Next?” variety; the real existential angst of being bored with your privilege sans direction —– the “Is-that-all-there-is?”-ism that we’ve discussed here and on other such blogs many times before. There is a ton of such-themed literature from the end of the war through mid ’60s (Norman Mailer’s early-to-mid-period canon comes to mind) and I’m pretty sure you know as much)

    Quit blowing smoke; you know goddamn well that i’m not some rote, rorsharch blot leftie, and i’m certainly no SJ moral scold.

    I only wish i could be that naive.

  22. Nikcrit….

    You picked “labor-economic policy and immigration” as your top political issues AS THOUGH the existential crisis of the white race was simply paranoid imagination. Even if you merely grant the majority of “whites” DESIROUS of self-annihilation, the top political issue IS STILL the existential crisis of the white race. So rather than penning you “naive,” I am otherwise hinting at a diabolical-ness given to a high IQ mulatto. The issues you RAISE OVER AND ABOVE the existential crisis of the white race IS ON PURPOSE…. The purpose of which is to COVER OVER (like a blanket) the existential crisis of the white race AS NUMBER ONE political issue NOW and UNTIL it is solved.

  23. And the “beauty of your blanket” is that it requires no detailed pattern (your actual stance on economy/immigration is irrelevant) to serve its primary function of smothering the thing beneath it.

  24. Nikcrit…

    Don’t you understand that you are not the beneficiary of “ignorance?” That this primitive mechanism of radical autonomy is off limits to you for the very reason it is so effectively utilized by the nigger?

    The question is whether the racial reality can be seen by all WITHOUT OBSTRUCTION? And then who helps obstruct and who creates clear eyes to this racial reality (it exists objectively whether organically derived or socially manufactured by the individual megalomaniacs)?

    In my profiling of Nikcrit, your high IQ facilitates in the obstruction and you wittingly play “black ignorant” when faced with this scenario as though your “primitive black mind” (childish appeal to my inherent “racism,” ie., “white supremacy”) could not even contemplate the thought.

    You are radical autonomy in action being mercilessly pulled into white Supremacy. Believe that with all your intelligence.

  25. When it comes to an OPENED source Narrative, the class of authors is limited to a high IQ set. Dummies do not write the Narrative NO MATTER how openly accessible and user-friendly is the “technology.” The dominant Narrative is penned by the high IQ “white” males in the radical liberationist left, the neo-reactionary sphere, the “anti-Semitic hard right” and to a tiny degree the intellectual Christian theologian..

    Knowing this IS NOW KNOWING that ALL AUTHORS across the “political spectrum” author a Narrative of anti-white Supremacy.

  26. On Jan. 4, Thor says this of Nikcrit:

    Nikcrit….
    You picked “labor-economic policy and immigration” as your top political issues AS THOUGH the existential crisis of the white race was simply paranoid imagination. Even if you merely grant the majority of “whites” DESIROUS of self-annihilation, the top political issue IS STILL the existential crisis of the white race. So rather than penning you “naive,” I am otherwise hinting at a diabolical-ness given to a high IQ mulatto. The issues you RAISE OVER AND ABOVE the existential crisis of the white race IS ON PURPOSE….

    Yet, early last month, in a detailed exchange with the avatar ‘trainspotter,’ nikcrit said this of the history, role and stature of the white human race, writ large:

    No, I didn’t mean to imply that whites are this purely derived physical midpoint of Africans and Asians; of course they are distinct human beings. Nonetheless, I do believe the real point of my remark is true: that whites are somewhat fated to the strictures of ‘the white man’s burden;’ e.g., they’re always going to be exemplars for the future of mankind, to some degree. and when or if they don’t, they and the rest of said mankind will suffer greatly. <b<That is why I think current anti-white sentiment is so flawed and downright fatalistic.

    Thor, now before i get overwhelmed in detail and lost track of thought, concede my basic point and contradiction of your non-point: I HAVE CLANDESTINE DESIRE FOR WHITE RACIAL DEMISE.

    The above quote and clear refutation of your charge is one of many i could have cited, but this one was crisp, clear and coincidentally the one that came quickest to mind….. why do you and others in this movement, whih you occasionally put down, bend over backwards to find something devious and anti-white? We’re all anonymous here; why can’t our face-value candor be takent for what it is? Why is it so incomprehensible to believe that some people, reared a certain why, don’t have all their crucial distinctions of identity based on a crucible of race?

  27. lolzz. b.s.! ……i’m also thinking that it may be inappropriate to be hashing out detailed back-n-forth with thor on your blog….. he’s just getting on my nerves, man; that refutation quote of mine exchanged with Trainspotter stands on its own as vindication; there are many-upon-many more that could’ve been cited. ;;; and btw, you’re going to cite freud after trashing him just a few days ago as anathema to the alt-right?

    you guys are just used to your strawmen NAMs; that’s why you all were so in love with Obsidian while often evading some of my challenges….This halfrcan is his own man and can hyold his own; I don’t need a crowd to back me up!!! lolzzz

  28. You’re one of a kind indeed, Nikcrit.

    Hey… I have a post on deck, 80% complete content, 10% complete editing, which tackles your occasional Mulatto Ubermensh proposition. I promise it is not a hit job. In fact, I am writing it with a detached, sympathetic voice. If you want to provide (here) a short case for Eurofrican Ubermenschood, go for it. Make a note as to whether you are writing it tongue in cheek or seriously so I know how to handle your words and I don’t misconstrue your intent. NO more than one or two paragraphs please. You game?

  29. Nikcrit…

    In a radically autonomous society, you are guilty and ALWAYS PROVING innocence. I would simply retort that you are not yet fully cognizant of your facilitation of anti-white Supremacy… That you are not only now in the position of proving that you reject anti-white Supremacy, but also embrace the white Supremacy that you are clearly seeking. Anything less is default subversion. It’s that stark FOR YOU!

  30. And now what you have done is opened up an inspection of the “details.” Since economy/immigration are the issues, what are your pro-white regenerating positions?

  31. Thor, you overestimate nikcrit’s IQ. I’m skilled at discerning intelligence through grammatical execution and content. Nikcrit’s IQ hovers in the 105-108 range.

    Nickrit flatters himself when you says your IQ is 160. It is not. Your IQ is between 127-129. If your IQ was 160 you wouldn’t strain yourself with him.

    With regard to your prose: If your goal is the communication of ideas through language then you need to recognize your audience. As it stands, the way you use language is a barrier to most people, i.e., it’s incommunicable. On the other hand, if your goal is to earn the wonderment of midwits or to communicate exclusively to a coterie of philosophically minded participants, then continue apace.

  32. Philomathean….

    You are right, it’s not that complex. The Idea is to out all anti-white Supremacy everywhere it afflicts. Are you up for that?

  33. PA; thank you for your compliment. It means a lot to me because you are a perceptive writer and one of the best (I have the NRx feed and only your blog in my favorites list).

    I was listening to a Dan Carlin podcast (he’s a shitlib, but unintentionally revealing in his shitlibbery. his history podcasts are excellent though) where he was talking about the 60s civil rights/anti war movement. During that time there were bombings, assassinations, race riots in every diverse city and general mayhem. Right now we are at a time of discontent, this is true. The Bundy family are heroes I admit. And Trump is exposing the establishment as well.

    All of these are positive developments but until White men take to the streets and cause chaos and carnage it will be business as usual. Do you think that if negroes peacfully protested and conducted sit ins at White only restaurants they would have gotten what they got? No, the civil rights movement would have just blown over in a few years and it would be business as usual! Violence works, thats why they were bought off with White people’s money. Think of it this way; good cop, bad cop. MLK was the good cop, and Malcolm X was the bad cop. So until I see widespread resistance on the ground level I just dont see things changing in any meaningful way. The discontent may be there, but its harder to organize because we are so atomized. It would take a black swan economic or warfare event to bring us together first, and then we can take action. Like I said, events may have to play themselves out so that the mainstream comes around to our paradigm which is only inevetable after all. The question is, will there be enough racially aware Whites for us to to have a future of anything other than halfrican jungle beats in place of modern machinery and science? I dont know the answer to that. I really dont.

    nickrit: I dont know why you bother here. This is for us, your shitty arguments have no weight. If we can agree on racial seperation then I’m fine. Otherwise, any counter you have is a poorly veiled disguise at your need to suck on the teat of White civilization, which your people are not capable of. If I seem harsh, I will admit the mulatto dominican republic is way better than Haiti, but WE (not you) want and can do better.

  34. Philo, I disagree with your critique of the blog host’s rhetorical skills. All the moreso in that it comes as a second language…… As for the IQ ‘estimates:’ they were somewhat tongue in cheek & possibly inspired by a tad of flattery. I thought it was clear it was somewhat tongue in cheek, e.G., an end-of-year folly. As for mine? That was the only one based in pirical fact, tho gathered 20+ years ago. In any case, I don’t take any of those figs too terribly seriously.

  35. JumpinJackFash, sorry about messing up your handle. I agree with your point about violence. I used to say, somewhat glibly, that people take it to the street when one or more of the following conditions is present: (1) they are led or sponsored, (2) acting out is thrilling, low-risk activity that enhances your status, and/or (3) they are hungry, literally.

    Mencius Moldbug counseled against right wing violence, saying that it does not work. However, he struggled with defining “right wing” and I think he overestimated the omnipotence of the so-called “Cathedral.” In his post on Breivik he wrote “don’t kill the youth camp, convert the youth camp.” In the comments, I said (as I roughly recall) that violence can also convert people, by appealing to their awe.

    Vox Day believes that hard cleansings are inevitable in Europe, underscoring his point that in the future every Norwegian town will have either a statue of Breivik or a mosque. He bets on Europe

  36. To add to thoughts on taking it to the streets: demoralized people without hope are docile. They rise up when they feel hope in things changing for the better.

    I should re-read “The Prince”. Someone mentioned that the Western ruling class is doing a lot of things in ways that are the opposite of how Machiavelli counseled.

  37. I havent read The Prince but I did read somewhere that according to Machiavelli you guaranteed revolution and overthrow if you mess with two things; a people’s money and a people’s women.

  38. Philomathean…

    As you can read upthread, I scoffed at Nikcrit’s assessment as, he said, a “tongue-in-cheek” attempted inflation of my ego… I estimated my IQ at 120-130 and so you have confirmed my estimation at the high end.

    But…

    As to your critique, I’m afraid that you are ALSO too intelligent to find my “prose” incomprehensible.. And that you are, in fact, just another high IQ “white” male deeply immersed in anti-white Supremacy. IF this were not the case then you would have easily comprehended my message to ALL EXTREMELY high IQ white males of the necessity of.white Supremacy OR one’s inevitable descent into a liberated self-annihilation, ie., an anti-white Supremacist.

    The game is straightforward.

    IF you are a high IQ white male who then denies that he is a white Supremacist then you are, in fact, a foolish charlatan.

  39. In other words Philomathean, one cannot be a high IQ white male anti-white Supremacist AND STILL BE CONSIDERED highly intellegent. So from this perspective, one assumes that you and Nikcrit are in reality of the exact same mindset in denying the truth of the above assertion. I am confident that you will counterintuitively claim that one can be a high IQ white male anti-white Supremancist and still be considered highly intelligent even though one is a bona fide self-annihilator.

  40. Think of the absolute absurdity in claiming that the white dummies are the ones who put the white race in this existential crisis!!!

    Now think of the reality of a mass of suicidal high IQ “white” males bringing the white race to the brink of annihilation through BOTH an overt (leftist) and covert (alt-riter) authoring of an anti-white Supremacist Natrative that does not actually fear a mass of white dummies or dark hordes, but rather, fears a spiritually racialized white regenerate who is smart enough to know that he must desire to wholly exist or he will surely self-annihilate. And it is in the innate intelligence to exist wholly that the high IQ “white” self-annihilator “sees” his most potent weapon eviscerated.

  41. Think of our state of reality…

    High IQ “white” male… Because he’s a self-annihilator.

    So one “white” male is ONLY HIGHly INTELLIGENT BECAUSE he does not believe in his right to existence EVEN from the beginning. His “intelligence” is in rationalizing AND justifying his annihilation at the hands of his “mother” in what is an exercising of her “fundamental right” and subsequent “doing of good.”

    ^^^ This is the “white” male pathology that INDICATES high IQ. This pathology is formally understood as anti-white Supremacy… What cucks call, in culturally correct, passive-liberal speak, “anti-racism.” That nearly all high IQ “white” males suffer the pathology of anti-white Supremacy means the IQ metric is busted. “We” are suffering from a giant failure of “our” intellectual class due their total lack of desire for white Supremacy and a whole existence from conception through eternal life.

    You can understand this ^^^ Philomathean, no?

  42. You picked “labor-economic policy and immigration” as your top political issues AS THOUGH the existential crisis of the white race was simply paranoid imagination.

    No, I picked those subjects because they’re commonly known issues that the politicos, pundits and constituents trade in. Not sure what you’ve gathered but i haven’t seen Wolf Blitzer asking Trump what he’d do about the peril of self-annihilating white males in America or Chris Matthews holding forth with Ted Cruz on the growing menace of radical autonomy.

    But I’d like to.

  43. Philomathean on Thor:

    With regard to your prose: If your goal is the communication of ideas through language then you need to recognize your audience. As it stands, the way you use language is a barrier to most people, i.e., it’s incommunicable. On the other hand, if your goal is to earn the wonderment of midwits or to communicate exclusively to a coterie of philosophically minded participants, then continue apace.

    Philo, if you will, how would you tidily sum-up Thor’s theories and references to ‘radical autonomy’ and ‘self-annihilation?” I’m genuinely curious. I’ve casually had back-n-forth with Thor on blogs for a few years; i feel he’s on to something —– some contemporary logical fallacy that’s generational in its scope —— but i never quite grasp it.

  44. Greetings y’all

    PA – what a pleasant surprise to stumble upon this blog via Heartiste. I’ve always enjoyed your writing, and even better, it seems all the usual suspects are present for what is always engaging debate you just can’t get elsewhere.

    I’d agree that 2015 was a breakout year for the mainstreaming of many alt-right musings that had been festering for years in the blogosphere. I recall nikcrit often commenting something to the effect of “well, if these ideas are so self-evident why doesn’t anyone ever discuss them in the light of day?” To which I responded “baby steps… dissident movements always start underground and percolate to mainstream discourse once a critical mass is achieved.”

    Most notably, there has been more honest discussion about disporportionate level of NAM crime and violence. The BLM movement ironically triggered this dialectic, causing a relentless backlash on twitter and in the comment sections of newspapers. The dialogue was further bolstered by Ann Coulter’s book, though dismissed by the liberal media because of it’s folksy style, contained indisputable facts about the ways uncontrolled NAM immigration is ripping at the fabric of our society, not the least of which is increased crime and reduced quality of life.

    It has been a good year for blogging as well. I’ve particularly enjoyed Radix Journal and it’s affiliated podcast. This is a blog maintained by young non-anonymous alt-righters that seem rather level headed, which I believe is very important to counter the stereotype of pro-whites as ignorant rednecks living in trailer parks. I highly recommend listening to “Allies of Color” (found here: http://www.radixjournal.com/podcast/2015/12/8/allies-of-color). In it, the editor discusses the nascent movement of white student unions forming on campuses, and the challenges they face from the administration. (One school had no legal leg to stand on, and resorted to suing for copyright violation!) He interviews a leader of said movement, who makes the point that in order to succeed, we must adopt many of the tactics the left has been using…. He actually references Derrick Bell and critical race theory as the framework for discussing white identity in order to appeal to those steeped “blue pill” thinking.

    If I had to choose one video this year, it would be the Yale Shrieker, who in one 30 second tirade consolidated the absurdity and philosophical exhaustion of leftist identity politics, which played out in such an distasteful manner across campuses this year. There is nothing more delicious than watching shitlibs devour each other.

  45. … and peterike! Are you out there somewhere?

    By the way, Happy New Year… looking forward to a year of great posting from you.

  46. Peterike checks in from time to time. Lots of good comments by him under a couple of posts.

    K(yle) was always one to read as well. Haven’t seen him since GLPiggy.

  47. MGE…

    If the smartest “white” males cannot understand that one doesn’t beat radical autonomy with more radical autonomy then it is hopeless. If the smartest “white” males cannot understand that adding their radical autonomy to the shitstew of radical autonomy all about ONLY AMPLIFIES radical liberation on the whole then it is hopeless. If the smartest “white” males cannot understand that you beat radical liberation with white Supremacy AND THIS IS “WHY” one’s entire life was oriented towards anti-white Supremacy SO THAT one could not in the future topple radical liberation in his life THEN it is collectively hopeless for the white race.

  48. http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/12/23/paternalism-and-classism-but-not-racism/

    “So you know, I’m a CLASSIST, in that i recognize the problem of carrying a large and counterproductive underclass, but I am not a RACIST in that I want all groups to transcend the animal, become fully human, and evolve into what we imagine as gods.” — Curt Doolittle

    An egalitarian (s)upremacist…. Lol… Only high IQ “white” aspie could conjure up such a self-refuting stance.

    So even when some revel in their primitiveness, it is “racist” to posses no desire for their transcending this relished primitive state?

  49. Nikcrit….

    Philo is under the same spell… He must avoid BEING a white Supremacist by any means necessary, ie., by employing radical autonomy. But, such an application reduces to a 140 IQ claiming incomprehensible the writings of a 125 IQ WHILE touting the comprehensibility of the writings penned by a 160 IQ… Lol…. It’s nuts. The smartest “white” males are literally stuck playing dumb for the sole purpose of saving their necks when the aggressive culling begins… Because it seems always the intellectual class that gets mass executed first in the pending revolution for they are the smart ones that mucked everything up in the first place.

  50. Thordaddy, I took a stab at translating your abstract language into a hypothetical scenario. Can you tell me where I’m reading you right and correct me where I’m not? Here goes:

    — “If the smartest “white” males cannot understand that one doesn’t beat radical autonomy with more radical autonomy then it is hopeless.”

    A highly intelligent depressed young hipster who doesn’t like his feminist, anti-White society wants to improve his life and his mood, and maybe help change politics, so he learns how to pick up women and posts raciss comments online. But contrary to his expectations, he becomes more depressed and starts drinking.

    — “… you beat radical liberation with white Supremacy”

    Acceptance of Jesus Christ as one’s ultimate authority, along with meditation, prayer, study, exercise, and fasting equip you to overcome the destructive forces of your environment. That should be the aforementioned hipster’s first step toward playing his part in restructuring society away from feminism and other abominations.

    — “AND THIS IS “WHY” one’s entire life was oriented towards anti-white Supremacy SO THAT one could not in the future topple radical liberation in his life”

    Misguided efforts at improving oneself and one’s social arrangements, such as through hedonism and anger, play into the hands of our corrupt leaders, who want to perpetuate the destructive state of affairs.

    — “THEN it is collectively hopeless for the white race”

    The ultimate goal of securing our homelands and a future for White children can never be reached through methods that reject God and self-discipline.

    Did I interpret you correctly?

  51. PA….

    Excellent!

    Yet… The key pivot point is belief in The Perfect Man AS EMPIRICAL FACT… Such a fact IS falsification of “universal equality” which stands as the global clarion call to annihilate the genuine white Supremacist wherever one is found.

    The pathology is a high IQ “white” male who DOES NOT believe in The Perfect Man EVEN IN CONCEPT and is thus determined to self-annihilate.

  52. Continued…

    — A highly intelligent depressed young hipster who doesn’t like his feminist, anti-White society wants to improve his life and his mood, and maybe help change politics, so he learns how to pick up women and posts raciss comments online. But contrary to his expectations, he becomes more depressed and starts drinking.

    And this is in part because although he knows this thing “feminism” is related to females AND recognizes it lacks all things feminine, he still refuses to “see” dyke “nature” because he’s still hip to lesbianism. And so it goes for his “raciss” rantings… They are MERELY THE STUFF of liberal stereotype AND NOT genuine white Supremacy and that ethos which is truly feared to hatred.

    — Acceptance of Jesus Christ as one’s ultimate authority, along with meditation, prayer, study, exercise, and fasting equip you to overcome the destructive forces of your environment. That should be the aforementioned hipster’s first step toward playing his part in restructuring society away from feminism and other abominations.

    But because one is a high IQ modern aspie, belief in Jesus Christ is silly… BUT, belief in The Perfect Man IS NECESSARY in order to even begin talking about “intelligence.” That one claims high IQ WHILE rejecting The Perfect Man in MERE CONCEPT is totally absurd… Evidence of an irrational, self-annihilating mind.

    — Misguided efforts at improving oneself and one’s social arrangements, such as through hedonism and anger, play into the hands of our corrupt leaders, who want to perpetuate the destructive state of affairs..

    Because a mass of self-annihilators EQUALS a “default elite.”

    — The ultimate goal of securing our homelands and a future for White children can never be reached through methods that reject God and self-discipline.

    But even more simplistically, if the greatest white warriors are not NATURALLY referred to as white Supremacists… And in fact, it is verboten to be a white Supremacist… Then it is COLLECTIVELY OVER short of a mass conversion.

  53. @PA,
    RE. the ‘ubermensch’ post: I’ll file something short and sweet by mid-evening, if you’re still planning to put up a post on the topic…… having some context of me and my style, i’m assuming you know that my ‘halfrican ubermensch’ isn’t a real theory or belief but simply a figurative proposition and trope that took shape to query Thor on some of his more adamant references; i’m kidding, of course, about the b-w-hybrid of primitive athleticism and industrialized intellect, but then in the context of my back-n-forth with thor, i’m sorta not…. i think that creation is a good foil to some of (what i contend) is Thor’s theoretical folly……. (I do feel i’m getting a better understanding of him and his thoughts; the repetition and changing discussional contexts are necessary to understand Thor’s views on a gut level, IMO…..

    Thing about Thordaddy, i like the way he just forges ahead and maintains his guns and priorities, even if the face of others calling him crazy or silly —– and many blog commenters are more merciless with him than we are. Yet he soldiers on…… he’s like the halfrican in a way: he incarnates the soul of the outcast, even making the alienation work in the form of further purifying his thoughts and ideas; he don’t need the choir approval of those who simply share some genetic traits via the accident of birth.

    In that way Thor is like a halfrican: sometimes falsely feted, sometimes unfairly vilified, but whose vantage point is unique.

  54. This breaks down into simple equations….

    The “Elite” Unified Theory is:

    Mass of self-annihilators = “default elite…”

    Ergo, a society of “perpetuating” self-annihilators, ie., a radically autonomous society, MUST MANIFEST an AUTOMATIC elite… A “default elite” (read: absolutely entrenched power).

    But, because a mass of “perpetuating” self-annihilators MUST BE AT THE HAND of an already existing “elite” then such a scenario creates not just an automatic regurgitating cycle of “elite,” but a regressing “default elite” whose very “eliteness” is measured by their TOTAL LACK OF ELITE THOUGHT AND ACTION… The very nature of a beast with only self-annihilating sheep to “lead.” Our “default elite” is NOW “elite” ONLY BY THE DEFINITION OF THEIR exaggeratedly unearned luxuriant degeneracy.

    To break this equation with what can be extrapolated out into a formula:

    Mass of “white” self-annihilators + “default elite” = anti-white Supremacy….

    One needs genuine white Supremacists to stand any chance of destroying this diabolical formula.

  55. Nikcrit….

    You are not properly incorporating the HBD truths that you have at hand…. There are simply some genetic profiles more susceptible to rejecting objective Supremacy than others given the “right” external stimuli. At the very same time, there are also certain genetic profiles more “susceptible” to embracing objective Supremacy more fervently and faithfully than others given the “right” external stimuli.

    Now, IF one is a part of a deracination global “default elite” then your aim is perpetuating the former so as to create the distracting chaos to annihilate the latter KNOWING BOTH KINDS reside within the white race and the annihilation of the latter ensures a default status.

  56. Hey Nikcrit, no pressure. I’ve been slow to develop that post, had it in draft form for weeks and wrote/deleted chunks of it repeatedly. It started on a hardline note, similar to my “Prevent Mudsharking” post, but as I tinkered with it, it occurred to me that I am not saying anything anyone on the AltRight doesn’t already know. So I took a more ‘devil’s advocate’ tack, looking at pros and cons of mixing (ultimately with a “con” conclusion), and recalled your occasional jestful comments about the superhybrid of Euro brains and Afro bodies.

    So basically, I was gonna start out with a Nikcrit quote, but then I realized that you never actually laid out any “racial eugenic theories” in seriousness. Therefore, I thought it may be useful to ask you for a short thesis of which I could bounce some ideas.

    Anyway, I’ll take a look at my draft later and play with it some more. No biggie if that’s not something you feel like doing.

  57. Nikcrit….

    Your “halfrican superman” WOULD STILL HAVE TO FIRST assert a belief in Super Man…. Short of that, you get not a single toe off the ground and your “cape” is but a blanket.

    But the less trivial reality is that those who embrace The Perfect Man MOST FERVENTLY AND FAITHFULLY are the greatest threat to “universal equality.” A threat that must be eradicated for “universal equality” to stand true. And those who embrace “universal equality” most fervently and “faithfully” are ALL also within the white race. So the milieu is that of self-annihilation…. A radically autonomous setting means “we” must annihilate our own. Those whites that embrace Perfection must eradicate those that embrace “universal equality” BECAUSE they won’t allow a separation and therefore imply our annihilation.

    This is the operating paradigm.and your Super Man status will certainly have consequences.

  58. Objective Supremacy = The Perfect Man….

    The high IQ “white” male should “see” the self-evident truth of the above equation…. But he does not. Rather, he either stands in a state of perplexion OR he mocks the person of Jesus Christ employing plagiarized bits snd pieces of a two thousand year deconstruction of The Perfect Man. So he is caught between paralyzing ignorance or wilfull ignorance.

    So in fact, this RENDERS his high IQ DELETERIOUS to his very existence.

  59. “recall nikcrit often commenting something to the effect of “well, if these ideas are so self-evident why doesn’t anyone ever discuss them in the light of day?” To which I responded “baby steps… dissident movements always start underground and percolate to mainstream discourse once a critical mass is achieved.”

    Most notably, there has been more honest discussion about disporportionate level of NAM crime and violence. The BLM movement ironically triggered this dialectic, causing a relentless backlash on twitter and in the comment sections of newspapers.”

    Hi MGE,
    Nice to hear from you….. yeah, i noticed too that there’s a lot more candor and questioning of p.c. etiquette that was all but set-in-stone as recently as a few years ago.. I think the real page-turner though was Ferguson —– just the absolute nonsense and denial involved in keeping the narrative pristine and stage-ready. My motto in casual pub-ed-arena discussions, whether with students, teachers or fellow administrators, is: “If BLM

  60. “recall nikcrit often commenting something to the effect of “well, if these ideas are so self-evident why doesn’t anyone ever discuss them in the light of day?” To which I responded “baby steps… dissident movements always start underground and percolate to mainstream
    once a critical mass is achieved.”

    Most notably, there has been more honest discussion about disporportionate level of NAM crime and violence. The BLM movement ironically triggered this dialectic, causing a relentless backlash on twitter and in the comment sections of newspapers.”

    Hi MGE,
    Nice to hear from you….. yeah, i noticed too that there’s a lot more candor and questioning of p.c. etiquette that was all but set-in-stone as recently as a few years ago.. I think the real page-turner though was Ferguson —– just the absolute nonsense and denial involved in keeping the narrative pristine and stage-ready. My motto in casual pub-ed-arena discussions, whether with students, teachers or fellow administrators, is: “If BLM, then let’s stop every black-on-black murder and assault, for one year, before we talk anymore about those evil, homicidal and racist white men —– then, we’ll reassess see where we sit with our goals!”

  61. Thor,

    I didn’t mean to chap your behind and, further, I don’t have the inclination to participate in your extreme intellectualizations. For years now, I’ve lurked in the comment sections of various blogs, e.g., piggy/firepower, and I have routinely skimmed your comments because of your use of language.That’s not to say there’s no value in your words, there is, and to the limited extent that I’ve engaged your text, I’ve absorbed some of that value. However, your mode of communication remains problematic in that you are engaging in a form of self-annihilation, i.e., your attempts at transferring knowledge are by-and-large stillborn. You’re in the comment sections of blogs, not in academic studios debating the efficacy of a particular philosophical technology. As I mentioned before: know your audience.

    All the hyper-abstract text you’ve written over the years doesn’t carry a nanogram of this video’s emotional or intellectual resonance:

    Why is this important?

    Most people don’t have the capacity to synthesize much less concretize complex philosophical abstractions. You can communicate in plainer language which would serve you better assuming your goal is the transfer of knowledge through language and not semantic parlor tricks to draw attention to yourself.

    That said: We’re on the same team. My issue is your system of delivery. After years of skimming your comments, I felt compelled to address you.

    ***

    With respect to my IQ, I don’t what it is but I’d assume it’s north of 120.

  62. Nik,

    Radical Autonomy: Hyper individualism which leads to extreme atomization which leads to mulattoes, trannies and otherkin which leads to cultural Balkanization which ultimately left unchecked leads to civilizationional death, i.e., self-annihilation.

  63. Philo….

    I’ve bounced for 20 years. You did no chopping. But, I do know my audience…. High IQ “white” males who reject objective Supremacy and are thus determined to self-annihilate. Such “white” males are known as anti-white Supremacists and they have been “cultivated” from birth towards this orientated being..

    So just for you I will cease my incessant intellectualization and simply ask, “Why is Philomathean not a genuine white Supremacist in this time of existential crisis for the white race?”

  64. “So you know, I’m a CLASSIST, in that i recognize the problem of carrying a large and counterproductive underclass, but I am not a RACIST in that I want all groups to transcend the animal, become fully human, and evolve into what we imagine as gods.” — Curt Doolittle

    This is what I call good. Every race of man should be allowed to realize their destinies, in peace, in their own lands, among their own kith and kin. There’s nothing in the above quote that sanctions multicultural dogma.

  65. Philo….

    In regard to radical autonomy, it all starts with the high IQ “white” male’s rejection of The Perfect Man and descends from there.

  66. Philo….

    It’s only good for those who believe in God-ordained free will. For those who don’t, it’s an impositional mindset to kill you for….

  67. Philomathean….

    Wouldn’t you concede that Curt Doolittle is conceptualizing The Land of white Supremacy?

  68. There’s nothing in the above quote that sanctions multicultural dogma.

    I hear that often in the ‘manosphere;’ but racial and ethnic speciation or ‘mixing’ or whatever updated term is the reason there exist different races, period. In any case, civilizational urges to both mix and sustain are natural; i would think the bio-civil balance would be something along the lines of this: what would be the level of racial or ethnic mixing to occur within a civilization if the practice was neither encouraged nor vilified?

  69. Nikcrit —“what would be the level of racial or ethnic mixing to occur within a civilization if the practice was neither encouraged nor vilified?”

    False premise – the entropy fallacy. It will always be “encouraged” by males seeking mate upgrade and will always be vilified by potential poachees.

    A better question would be, what would be the level of racial or ethnic mixing to occur if the state had kept out of it? In the modern American context, occurrance of mudsharking would be close to zero.

  70. Every race of man should be allowed to realize their destinies, in peace, in their own lands, among their own kith and kin.

    This is another common line found among what we might call the ‘anti-racist wing of the race-realist nation.” The question they need to be asked is: What do you think is the sole, biggest reason such a state of nations doesn’t exist if not because of Western European technological innovations and productions?

  71. A better question would be, what would be the level of racial or ethnic mixing to occur if the state had kept out of it? In the modern American context, occurrance of mudsharking would be close to zero.

    Lol!! Not at all; and your claim of ‘false premise’ is equally evasive. In fact, that ‘false premise’ is the reason different races exist, period. (probably no reason to continue this line of discussion; i’ve been down this road enough to know when it’s not worth fighting someone’s hysteria and wish lists… heh

  72. Here’s the telling and fallacious line in your comment; It will always be “encouraged” by males seeking “mate upgrade”

    “Mate upgrade” is both a cultural and biological ‘thing’ —— just ask your and other race realists favorite behavior pscyhologist, Kawanza; y ‘know, the one you like when he discusses black female SMV but disdain and ignore when he discusses black male SMV……lolzz; idk, given the forum, i suppose there are certain topics that one shouldn’t even expect people to be reasonable about them.

  73. “A better question would be, what would be the level of racial or ethnic mixing to occur if the state had kept out of it?”

    We’ll never know, because they state NEVER stayed out of it; laws against interracial marriage and legal segregative laws negate ‘had they KEPT out of it, no?”

  74. The practice of race-mixing being encouraged or not – whether or not that is a false premise depends on the assumption of, encouraged by whom.

    nikcrit is proposing to consider what would be its levels were it not encouraged specifically by the state.

    PA rejoinder of the “entropy fallacy” applies to conditions on the ground with or without the state, and as a rejoinder it is a bulls-eye.

    Entropy is not an easy concept. Not being a science guy, i can only speak of its meaning in the context of this conversation, which i presume to be something like as follows.

    Entropy is things running down and out of energy. Like the universe. Like the suburbs, like the cities. Like the mall. Like your brain on drugs like a vegetable left to rot. Like a carcass, like a rusting automobile. Like decaying paint falling onto the ground. And all that not being regenerated into something new and more ordered and better. Less energy, less higher levels of organization, less structure. Presumably the higher levels of organization, such as life and its attendant species, requires more energy and is opposed to entropy.

    With that in mind, the Entropy Fallacy would be assuming that there is being brought to bear no energy on the question of who gets to mate with (or at least stick his dick into) whom.

    As long as people are alive and evolving, part of the deal is that race mixing will be encouraged and discouraged by concerned parties on either end.

    The entropy fallacy in this context: There is no laboratory wherein the pressures and selections upon people exchanging warm sticky and sometimes sickly bodily fluids, can be contained curtailed and modified for measured results.

    As i said above, it is reasonable to consider what might it be like if race mixing were not encouraged by the social power structure of the state under which we suffer.

    And even in that case where it is not encouraged by the state, race-mixing is NOT zero, and whether it is “near” zero is too vague a term for dispute. Some leading original race realist voice has an axiom about the inevitability of race-mixing, when races share living space. Given enough time …

    The best looking black women, the worst looking white women. The best black men, the lonely white guys. And exceptions in all cases. And then it adds up overtime.

  75. Re Kawanza and black male SMV: dating studies don’t bear it out, starting with the famous OK Cupid analysis. The current Black male SMV among Whites is a function of these factors:
    – artificially sustained material status
    – protection by the full power of national institutions
    – apex fallacy, wherein top Blacks (athletes and entertainers) are dating the kind of White women any White greater beta male would have no trouble getting.
    – personality/seduction style (natural game) that sometimes bypasses the evolved White female slut defense mechanism.

    That last bullet is behind much of the vaunted black smv. Few blacks are able to wield it in ways that either don’t drift to shuck n jiving or to scaring the White female.

    And the White male posse was always on standby as a second line of White female antislut defense.

  76. “Mate upgrade” is both a cultural and biological ‘thing’ —— just ask your and other race realists favorite behavior pscyhologist, Kawanza; y ‘know, the one you like when he discusses black female SMV but disdain and ignore when he discusses black male SMV……lolzz; idk, given the forum, i suppose there are certain topics that one shouldn’t even expect people to be reasonable about them.

    nikcrit comes here to be baited. He tries to bait, but instead gets the hook: nikcrit aka the spinning monkey.

    And realistically sir – i don’t mean to be such a jerk as to call you a monkey – we all know you are more evolved than a lowly monkey. But have a look at the First Lady, or Patrick Ewing, and then consider why perchance the phrase “mate upgrade”.

    It’s not just a baiting insult. There is a book online called Erectus Walks Amongst Us, which the best racist white kids know about, and the thesis under evaluation is that Modern Humans migrated into Africa and mated with Homo Erectus and hence the Black Race.

  77. “apex fallacy, wherein top Blacks (athletes and entertainers) are dating the kind of White women any White greater beta male would have no trouble getting.”

    What world are you observing? Are you seriously saying that professional black athletes and entertainers can’t pull the most attractive white females? Seriously?

    I’ve seen, repeatedly, such figures employ valets and personal assistants to handle/process/prohibit access to such figures by sightly females. Perhaps Sub_elk could even weigh-in; you once mentioned the legacy of Prince in the ’80s…. Do you ever recall seeing attractive interracial couples at, say, First Ave or the Pacific Club and others? I recall laughing upon seeing a Oprah Winfrey show “special,” in which they actually flew the fat lady into town to discuss and interview the rash of young urban jungle fever cases (and let it be noted that this young, ambitious, trendy and narcissistic crowd was the farthest thing in the world from the freaky Walmartasaurus-type females often cited by the alt-right when conjuring miscegenating couples. Negative projections speak volumes.)

    This is why i don’t like discussing this topic on alt-right sites; people I otherwise respect get comically childish and defensive; I’d rather not discuss these things til they become less incendiary.

  78. Nikcrit “We’ll never know, because they state NEVER stayed out of it; laws against interracial marriage and legal segregative laws negate ‘had they KEPT out of it, no?”

    A fair point, but ultimately irrelevant. (1)Anti-miscegenation laws in practice largely applied to White men marrying Black women. (2) They were passed in a handful of states; there was no substantially higher rate of BM/WF mixing in states without such laws. (3) The state effectively did keep a laissez faire attitude toward mixing because it let citizens police their own sexual habits. In other words, White posse kept would-be Black suitors at an arm’s length. It needn’t have involved drastic acts such as hanging. All you need is local muscle to decide how things go down in the community.

  79. But have a look at the First Lady, or Patrick Ewing, and then consider why perchance the phrase “mate upgrade”.

    My casual, uninvestigated hunch is that B.O. married who he did to assuage overall-sum pieties and convictions among the u.s. electorate writ large; the example you cite and people you listed in its service could serve to back up my point as well as yours……. Let’s call a truce on this one, ok?

  80. Professional black athletes and entertainers: fucking celebrities, dude. Mercenary magnets. And Kim Kardashian is disgusting. I pulled hotter girls in my day than Kayne, apparently.

  81. “I pulled hotter girls in my day than Kayne, apparently.”

    Y’know, I really try to keep it cool. And that is one of the reasons I don’t go to CH’s site very often. I mean, if we ever got all venal and male and competitive, I swear by the alt-right lights, I could bring tears to a few of the regular’s eyes there…… I mean, please: tell me seriously how these guys like ‘George Eliot’ and “Uncle Whorefinder” are going teach me how to score pussy? I mean, I know how silly these chats can become — but someday down the line, let’s dig out the scrapbooks and do some comparative reminiscing!! lolzzz…

  82. “fucking celebrities, dude. Mercenary magnets”

    But I was citing YOUR earlier claim: that beta white males could pull the best woman that black athletes and entertainers could —– -which I contend is nonsense.

    For real this time: That’s enough! Subject over. lolzz.

  83. Nikcrit, you said nothing of substance re my 10:48 am comment, the one with the bullet list, except a quibble on Black celebrities and objection to my rhetorical flourish re. Kayne.

    So I’ll take that as a concession.

  84. (Deep sigh)
    Ok, if you insist:

    RE:: ” Re Kawanza and black male SMV: dating studies don’t bear it out, starting with the famous OK Cupid analysis. The current Black male SMV among Whites is a function of these factors:
    – artificially sustained material status
    – protection by the full power of national institutions
    – apex fallacy, wherein top Blacks (athletes and entertainers) are dating the kind of White women any White greater beta male would have no trouble getting.
    – personality/seduction style (natural game) that sometimes bypasses the evolved White female slut defense mechanism.

    That last bullet is behind much of the vaunted black smv. Few blacks are able to wield it in ways that either don’t drift to shuck n jiving or to scaring the White female.

    And the White male posse was always on standby as a second line of White female antislut defense.”

    1) WTF is artificially sustained material status? A wad of dollar bills folded in your pocket, with $50 denominations first and last and everything in-between singles?
    2) Institutional protection? Ahh, the Dept. of Corrections —– on this point, i’ll concede.
    3) This I outright challenged; IDK, i guess it’s all technically ‘subjective,’ to those suffering from hysteria and denial. But i would argue that rich black men have no problem pulling creme de le creme women, alabaster and not.
    4) I don’t know what you’re saying re. ‘game’ and blacks;

    point is, i honestliy wasn’t conceding a thing to you re. the above comment of yours; to me it read desperate, someone bending over backwards to rationalize away a familiar dread.

    I’m just saying……

  85. When you start with the premise that the aim of the zeitgeist is to annihilate all white Supremacy then one can “see” that the relations between the radical “black” male collective and the “white” female liberationist will converge on a tactic of “fugg me or I out you as a filthy racist” for any white female drawn to genuine white Supremacy.

    And because ultimately this collective of de facto dyke works insidiously to “include” all white females then the practical effect for MY white daughters is a literal gun to the head FROM BOTH SIDES…. First strong arming my young daughters into the radical sexual autonomy of a de facto dyke lifestyle and then conspiring to seal the deal with the nigger who “games” her by squealing “racism.” It’s all worthy of a total eradication. In fact, looking beyond the horizon, it should be a death penalty to coerce a white female into sexual relations with a “black” male using public accusations of her “racism.”

  86. Another thing about these high profile BM/WF celebrity couples is how often unremarked is the radical ego of the “white” female who truly has no intent to assimilate, but rather, seems intent on one-upping the perceived Alpha white males that have done her wrong in the past. A literal, “Look you loser, you can’t control the “black” alpha like I can!”

  87. “to me it read desperate, someone bending over backwards to rationalize away a familiar dread.”

    Then you read it wrong, as evidenced by your revealed and conceded lack of comprehension above.

  88. @PA, yes, if you’re referring to misreading philo’s statement re. thor, which i took as directed at you —– hence, my unneeded defense of english being your second language.

    If not that but relating to our lil’ jungle-fever riffing? Well, I’ll just ask to beg off once more; i really don’t see the use in debating this subject; it’s too primal.

    Thor,
    Apropos of what i just said, is perhaps the strong, overwhelming nausea you feel at the thought of your daughter miscegenating the key here? Though i have no way of knowing for sure, and hate self-appointed mindreaders as much as the next guy, I get the feeling that that strong and powerful distaste you feel combining with ‘dumb-redneck’ association levied upon modern-day ‘racists’ complels you toward the complex ‘pro-supremacist’ positions that you hold.

    I appreciate that you admit/concede/work-with/elaborate-upon the unpopular convictions that you have; I think more of us, society-wide, should own our passions and other verities re. social matters. My mantra is that, good or bad, we have to feel our full allegiances, which also means feeling the depths of our distaste—– otherwise we get numb, desensitized, the biggest peril of engaging on the dulling altar of politically correct sanctimony.

  89. Nikcrit….

    The zeitgeist is easily deconstructed if one is actually compelled to perceive its influence.

    “We” KNOW that the “white supremacist” is bad, bad, bad, evil, irrational, sick, twisted and reviled. AND “we” need not even experienced a single genuine white Supremacist in our entire lifetimes.

    So “we” know that anti-white Supremacy is the way of the masses. Ergo, the masses are anti-white Supremacy which then tells us WHY there are less and less great white men executing our collective affairs.

    But “we” also know the masses ARE SHEEP. So “we” know the sheep ARE BEING LED to anti-white Supremacy… Being led to accept and tolerate less and less great white men executing our collective affairs.

    ^^^ This IS THE ZEITGEIST.

    IF one is a white male….

    He joins the zeitgeist and a treasonous wretch of a human being…

    Or, he converts to white Supremacy and shows himself true enemy of the zeitgeist.

    And yet, this ^^^ is but he initial orientation… The necessary disposition to possibly be consider a great white man worthy of collective leadership.

  90. Nikcrit….

    Nausea is indicative of pathological invasion….

    The better manner in which to look at this is from the attempt at falsifying or validating “universal equality.”

    The radical “black father” does not suffer nausea at the thought of his black daughter’s miscegenating with “white supremacy,” ie., her embrace of “universal equality.” This is the cost of a belief in radical sexual autonomy. In other words, a radical “black father” MUST PRETEND that such a scenario is not really a pathological invasion. IN FACT, so desperate does the need to pretend that “white supremacy” has not just invaded his private space due his daugther’s genuine embrace of “universal equality” AND because he had open the door wide open THAT he SHALL BE FORCED to claim the pathological invasion AS “good.”

    So, the new reality for the radical “black father” is that his “black daughter’s” radical sexual autonomy leading to her assimilation with “white supremacy” IS GOOD because he feels not an inkling of nauseaousness!!!

    THIS ^^^^^^ IS PATHOLOGICAL!!!

  91. Nikcrit…

    There was a time when a black man contemplating the oppressiveness of “white supremacy” could bring himself to a state of nauseaousness… A place where he felt a visceral invasion by a real evil thing..

    BUT NOW…

    Radical “black father” feels no such nauseaousness BECAUSE radical “black father” is a believer In radical sexual autonomy…. An ideologically-impressed believer in miscegenation….

    AND IF….

    The cultural expectation of the radical “black father” was a logicsl consistency THEN I can truthfully state that the radical “black father” FEELS GOOD when contemplating his “black daughter’s” miscegenating with “white supremacy.”

    THIS ^^^ IS THE PRICE of radical autonomy.

  92. Thor says: “The radical “black father” does not suffer nausea at the thought of his black daughter’s miscegenating with “white supremacy,” ie., her embrace of “universal equality.” This is the cost of a belief in radical sexual autonomy. “

    You go on to say that such a common circumstance is pathological —— but I know many-upon-many of black fathers, of all social and financial classes, who find distasteful the thought of their daughters crossing racial lines romantically, to the point of unasked-for intervention….Some, as you say, experience the cog-dis of proclaiming no such bias in theory but then have to deal with it in the personal/practical realm.

    Yet in your example you posit the opposite at a universal level and go on to let that conceit inform your point.

    You do that often in debate.

  93. But dare I be accused of digressing….

    The manifestation of my personal nausea IS IN THE COERCIVE AIM of the predatory nigger towards my to-a-degree naive daughters (their innocence) COUPLED with the mob mentality of a mass of sexual degenerates to whom sexual coercion by charge of “racist” is “perfectly legitimate” as it falls under the “any means necessary” protocol of “universal equality.” In other words, MY nauseaousness IS DUE IN PART to the sheer indefensibility of it all with both niggers and their mob of cowardly “white” minions disgustingly ubiquitous.

  94. Nikcrit….

    I put forth this thought experiment for the purpose of informing the masses of exactly what you have just confirmed…

    IT IS NOT PATHOLOGICAL for a black father to be disgusted by his black daugher’s miscegenating. IN FACT, it is pathological FOR HIM NOT TO BE DISGUSTED. And the “pathology” is called nigger.

    So in “universally equal” fashion, “we” apply the same understanding to white fathers. White Supremacists are repulsed by overt miscegenating ESPECIALLY of the coercive kind WHILE the radical “white” self-annihilator is more than just indifferent, he is down right positive about coercive miscegenating.

    Young white males that sense a visceral nausea at the sight of their white female peers’ “desire” for miscegenating ARE HEALTHY MINDED…. Anti-pathological…. While their “indifferent” “white” peers SIMPLY HIDE THEIR PATHOLOGY beneath MOB COERCED liberal pieties.

  95. @Thor,
    I read back my last comment and I think it comes off more critical than I intended; rather, i think sometimes what is to you a impassioned ‘moral absolute’ you put forth as a situational reality, which makes it then open to objective criticism….at which point with some personal history examples that countered that ‘reality.’

  96. all i can say that a father condoning a cross-cultural relationship of his daughter is NOT —- in and of itself —— a pathological transgression.

  97. Hypothetical for Nikcrit, since the thread is meandering along so gingerly: do you think you’d have an aversion to your daughter’s (if made with a White woman) dating Black boys, solely on racial grounds?

    How about if you had her with a Black or a Mulatta woman?

  98. @PA,

    I’ve thought about that; oddly, you were also the hypothetical inquisitor asking!

    No aversion on racial grounds alone; depends on the character. Now, i know that’s the safe answer, but it’s also the true answer.

    But I will give you this: when i run a range of real-life hypothetical ‘boys,’ e.g., potential father’s to my hypothetical daughter, i somewhat feel more menace coming from the ‘black’ ones —— but then i work 40-plus-per in an environment in which lower-middle-class black male adolescents live up to their aggregate socio-behavioral norms and then some.

    But beyond even that, there is a sorta purely physical aesthetic imagining that comes back repeatedly; a sorta idealized figure that i’m sure is tied to my id and history —- a halfrican with appealing features that nonetheless cover the vastness of its essential being…. I have some haunts along this line of personal inquiry; such a figure just might not be a pure figment in terms of me and my past.

    In any case, i hope i don’t sound too confrontational or accusatory on this subject; i may not be a fellow traveler in terms of being a ‘single-race’ father of a 21st-century female; but i do think i could empathize, as i have my own issues re. patrimony.

  99. Nikcrit…

    This line of inquiry is distractionary because ultimately the white Supremacist does not seek to coerce you out of pathology, but rather, fight through the pervasive pathology about WHICH INCLUDES the diabolical memetic instruction to pathologize white male’s visceral disgust for the overt miscegenating of his “white” female peers.

    What you’ve added to this diabolical zeitgeist is the purposeful obscuring of the high-class black father’s nauseous reaction to a miscegenating “black” daughter. So I applaud your personal anecdote.

  100. @PA & Thor:
    Thor: thanks, but let’s let all this soak in a bit and call a detente for now…

    PA: thanks for the floor but let me apologize for taken to the floor too much and even in moments hijacking the thread for the sake of two-man debate… I mean, format is loose among familiar voices, but this was a straight-out takeover and shouldn’t be…… I’ll consider it a reunion of sorts and pledge now to keep such overindulgence in the past…… here’s to a focused yet engaging 2016!

  101. Nikcrit….

    Do understand how far you have traveled in the last couple days? No time for detente… You have readily admitted of the black father appalled and repulsed by a miscegenating “black daughter” as possessing a HEALTHY-MINDEDNESS signaled by this visceral rejection. Ergo, white males that viscerally reject their miscegenating white female peers ARE OF FUNDAMENTALLY HEALTHY MIND. And you have also publicly remounced anti-white Supremacy only bolstering the above reframe. You have essentially converted to a generic Supremacism ONLY LACKING in your firmly-held HBD understandings. If you were to efficaciously incorporate such HBD understanding then your perception turned conception lifts the genuine white Supremacist farther away from near extinction. This is your last step to conversion and a concretization of your “halfrican Superman” concept.

  102. Think about what Curt “Do little” says (it this counter-reverse psychology)…

    ALL race of men should get to transcend… An egalitarian “Supremacist.”

    BUT THIS DOES NOT WORK for those who reject God-ordained free will… What this does instead is signal to a determined entity of an external threat willing to extricate one from their ravenous comfort zone. In other words, TELLING THE nigger that he can strive towards Supremacy is all well and good UNTIL one recognizes that said nigger DESIRES TO BE nigger and therefore YOUR MERE SUGGESTION to strive towards Supemacy BECOMES ETERNAL pretext for your violet eradication. And so this is WHAT ONE NOW EXPECTS FROM the high IQ “white” male…. One expects this type of self-annihilating conclusion… One expects an egalitarian “Supremacist” (radical autonomy) as the next-to-last step until genuine white Supremacy.

  103. Think how deadly is the ubiquitous modern nigger mainly due white man’s technology. Now think of the diabolical memetic instruction to render this ubiquitously deadly threat psychological INVISIBLE through a media driven push to take THE WORD “nigger” off of the white man’s tongue?

    A high IQ “white” male (>140) is the type of self-annihilator THAT FACILITATES IN the technological advance invisibility of the modern nigger thus social engineering an even deadlier predator.

    They HIDE THIS INTENT behind the idea that even niggers should strive towards Supremacy….

    Being social retards, they done spit in the nigger’s face with such “nonsense..”

    So they never say “nigger” again…

  104. One quick, hypothetical posit for Thor (yes, i’m breaking my pledge to STFU in this thread), but here goes:

    Thor, if overnight some Western European medical science eradicated all the typical markers of ethno-racial traits (skin tone, hair tone, meta verbal dialect) yet otherwise maintained those individuals whole as human entities, would ‘supremacism’ as you’ve described it still manifest in some form? (perhaps collective racial memory?).

    I’m trying to figure out the permanence of race in your critical framework and i’m thinking this hypothetical perhaps offers a glimpse via another, so-far-unexamined perspective.

  105. Edited…

    Think how deadly is the ubiquitous modern nigger mainly due white man’s technology. Now think of the diabolical memetic instruction to render this ubiquitously deadly threat [psychologically] INVISIBLE through a media driven push to take THE WORD “nigger” off of the white man’s tongue?

    A high IQ “white” male (>140) is the type of self-annihilator [WHO] FACILITATES IN the [technologically-advanced] invisibility of the modern nigger thus social engineering an even deadlier predator.

    They HIDE THIS INTENT behind the idea that even niggers should strive towards Supremacy….

    Being social retards, they done spit in the nigger’s face with such “nonsense..”

    So they never say “nigger” again…. Because they narrate the public “bitch smack” in the most subtle of manner.

  106. No worries Nikcrit, you guys can chat on this thread all you want to.

    I do ask, however, that on future posts commenters stay on topic. It’s OK to use the topic as a point of departure to other subjects, but do try to anchor your comments to the original topic.

    I have a fluff but fun new post that I’ll probably post tomorrow.

  107. Nikcrit….

    You need to “see” how you are mired in a stunted relativist paradigm analogous to a vacuum devoid of both beginning and end… Origin and destination… The radical “white” liberationist denies meaning in origins and ultimate ends and thus inevitably falls into the abyss of radical autonomy.

    White is a particular origin although generalized to an extent. Supremacy is a desired destination. Past and future. White Supremacy is the NOW that bridges the gap.

    The “centrality” of race (rather than race as origin/beginning/collective conception) IS WHAT YOU REQUIRE to stay immersed in an environment of radical autonomy. Genuine white Supremacy is a rejection and hence a separation from radical autonomy.

  108. There are certain avenues to radical autonomy, the two most prevalent are lack of origin and lack of destination. In other words, if one can completely detach from his real, factual physical origin and all the language signifiers evidencing his origins than he can hope to be radically autonomous. In the same vain, with a nod to an “open ending,” ie., no clearly visible final destination, one can maintain a sense of radical autonomy devoid that push/pull of a particularly visualized ending. So with no meaningful origin or any discernible final destination, one is immersed in the stunted relativist paradigm of radical autonomy. The solution to this reality is a white man striving towards objective Supremacy. Ergo, the solution is the “white” male converting to white Supremacy.

  109. PA….

    At this level, the entire discussion revolves around conceptualizing The Land of white Supremacy….

    But the pathology is a high IQ “white” male who does not believe in either his right to existence nor The Perfect Man as empirical fact… So the high IQ “white” is a self-annihilator not fit to lead.

    So the reality is that “our” most “intelligent” are self-annihilators, the most sexually degenerate “man” the bureaucracy, the traditional archnemesis of white Supremacy dominate the entertainment and professional sport complexes and the academia is wholly subservient to dyke nature.

  110. I think the real page-turner though was Ferguson —– just the absolute nonsense and denial involved in keeping the narrative pristine and stage-ready.

    One thing I am looking forward to in the years to come is the complete crack up of the MSM, which has essentially become the propaganda wing for the elite. I recently saw a stat that cable news is now mostly watched by old people, the median age for CNN viewers is 61, and 63 for MSNBC, and 67 for Fox News.

  111. Pingback: 100th Post – PA

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s