EU Macht Frei

If you have not already read Vox Day’s “SJWs Always Lie: Taking down the Thought Police,” you should click on the preceding link and buy it now. There are Kindle as well as paperback editions. Go ahead, I’ll wait.

One of the underpinnings of that book is the lesson on dialectic vs rhetoric, which Vox borrows from Aristotle’s “Rhetoric.” In short, dialectical persuasion appeals to reason and rhetorical persuasion appeals to emotion. Dialectic is ineffective against rhetoric because reason-based arguments can’t overcome appeals to emotion. You have to fight fire with fire, and fight rhetoric with sharper rhetoric. As Vox put it elsewhere, the effective rhetorical weapon incorporates truth + simplicity + contempt.

Political cartoons, by the necessity of the medium, are rhetorical, rather than dialectical weapons. In a recent example, as reported by the Polish-language Niezależna, the moderate-left German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung (SZ) ran an editorial attacking east/central European countries for pushing back on the European Union’s (EU) demands to take in refugees. Their immediate target was Poland’s newly-elected conservative government. SZ’s editorial was accompanied by a cartoon showing Poland retreating into a bunker and throwing out the EU flag while panhandling for EU’s money:


There is one problem with the cartoon. It goofed on an important detail. Can you spot it? Answer: it’s unclear how Indonesia (or Monaco) fits into the story. Yes, the cartoonist fucked up and got the Polish flag wrong, and SZ’s editorial staff failed to catch that mistake.

One of the many rhetorical responses to that cartoon includes this one by twitter account holder @karnkowski:


Karnkowski writes in the above tweet: “the German newspaper made an error in coloring the flags, so I corrected both — the Polish and the German one.” A slap in the face is met with a kick in the teeth.

The revised cartoon is pure, 200-proof rhetoric. The implied message is clear: “Here is our flag drawn correctly. Here is YOUR supranational, imperialistic flag drawn correctly. I’m ignoring the panhandling thing because I don’t care.”

Equating the European Union flag — not the three-color German national flag but the EU flag — with Hitler’s swastika hits hard as visual rhetoric. It is a vulnerability particular to the pro-EU German ruling class that smart nationalists exploit.

This isn’t Poland vs Germany. The German people are bearing a major part of the brunt of the EU-driven migrant resettlement. Germans are also actively resisting their government, in underreported acts of arson and mass protests that feature Angela Merkel hanged in effigy. Nationalists across Europe, from Spain to Russia, including German patriots, know that they stand in solidarity with one another against the EU superstate as they declare “Europe belongs to us.”

Rather, the EU = Nazi meme is something Eastern European nationalists push hard, not as puerile Godwin babble but as living memory of Luftwaffe bombs dropping on their cities, along with countless wartime atrocities. Associating Nazi symbolism with the EU works because it hits the central vulnerability of Merkel’s government — its invitation of Syrian (and “Syrian”) migrants being an ostensible act of atonement over Germany’s aggressive actions in World War II. That’s why the burning of EU flags to the chants of “EU Macht Frei” at this year’s Independence Day march in Warsaw made news around the world.

This rhetoric works because it unmasks the predator’s face behind EU’s pacifist mask. It exposes its quest for political control under the guise of economic development. Central to this “Nazi” rhetoric is the accusation that the EU project is promoted as a repudiation of Germany’s attempted conquest of Europe seventy years ago, while in fact being Act Two of the same, this time spearheaded not with Wehrmacht but with military-age Middle Eastern and African male migrants.

At its heart, this conflict is nationalism vs. globalism, the latter represented by the blue flag. And that blue, yellow-starred circle-jerk is getting rhetorically aligned with the Hakenkreuz to expose the Fourth Reich the European Union as another transnational assault on the nations of Europe, and one that aims to bring ruin, once again, to Germans first and foremost, while taking all of us down.


Berlin’s conquest of Europe: how it ended the last time.

How To Help Prevent Mudsharking

Part-time blogger and full-time hell-raiser who goes by the pen name “Whorefinder” asks this serious question over at Chateau Heartiste:

I have some very young (under the age of 5) nieces. I am afraid they are growing up in this milieu of influence and may be affected by it. Their parents are decent, strong folk (both together), but I want to ensure they don’t grow up to be mudsharks. As the uncle, how do I do this? Remember, the kids’ TV shows these days are even more pushing mudsharking than not.

My short, glib answer: don’t let them get fat. And get rid of the TV.

For my long answer, read on.

The ultimate and irreversible repudiation of one’s identity is to have children with someone of another race. This is a particularly stinging repudiation when done by a woman, and it is especially true in the context of the state-engineered genocidal assault on White nations, from aggressive desegregation in the United States to the massive importing of immigrants into European homelands. Fifty years ago in homogeneous places, a White woman who crossed racial lines may have been benevolently dismissed as a rare curiosity. Today, she is an unwitting tool in a global war on our people.

There have been several good responses to Whorefinder’s question, all tailored to parents or other relatives whose daughters are, like in his question, of formative age. I provide excerpts from several commenters’ responses below, arranged by key themes. These scenarios assume a stable two-parent home, or at least the father actively involved in raising his daughters.

This post is written for fathers and adult male relatives of child and pre-teen girls and it focuses on the daughter, granddaughter, or niece developing a healthy sense of identity before she matures. Advice regarding teenage girls and young women is a separate discussion.

1. The Fundamentals: Cultivate a Positive Cultural Identity

This first piece of advice to Whorefinder, offered by reliably excellent commenter Carlos Danger, is good to lead things off with because it hits on the fundamentals — transmit a positive identity to your child through storytelling:

Read to them. Read them the great stories you should have had read to you and discuss the stories with them.

The dominant cultural institutions in Western countries have all but openly declared war on you. To live functionally, you have to keep an in mala fide relationship with them, unlike if, say, you had a country of your own. You have a legitimate racial, cultural, religious, and ethnic heritage, which is your child’s birthright and a basis for his or her ability to walk through life confidently and live meaningfully. But in a hostile, nihilistic environment, acculturation of your children is up to you, and reading — storytelling — is one of the most common ways of passing on your ancestral identity.

Read them classic Brothers Grimm fairytales, which will validate the child’s instinctive feelings of prudence in a chaotic world. Greek mythology has perfect allegories for human nature and it teaches courage. I own a thick, beautifully illustrated kids’ edition of major myths that I recommend, Usborne Illustrated Stories from the Greek Myths, 2011 ed. If you are American, also read them children’s stories about the 1776  War of Independence or about frontier settlers. If you are of another nationality, read them your country’s myths.

At your public libraries, look for books published before 2000 or so. Newer books will be infused with politically correct revisionism and illustrations will invariably juxtapose characters of different races, including the ubiquitous White girl with a Black boy. (Aside: be alert for homo-bombs. I once borrowed a nicely illustrated new book about two friends who go adventuring, and BOOM! they suddenly discover that they are in love and on the next page they explicitly marry each other.)

As with everything else involving subtle education, keep the reading light and fun. A heavy-handed or didactic approach is counterproductive. One serious book for three funny or light ones.

2. The Father as Bedrock Figure

On to other commenters’ responses to Whorefinder’s question. Philomathean writes:

The Father must be a psychologically strong man who knows who he is and where he comes from. If he lets his daughters watch TV he must be a formidable counterbalance to its lies.

This is the foundation on which everything else rests. When a woman miscegenates, she overcomes her feminine imperative to genetic hygiene. Her willingness to take that leap into darkness (heh) is driven by her dissatisfaction with men of her own race. Her negative judgment of her own men may or may not be those men’s actual fault in an objective sense but subjectively, that’s her world. Her father is her archetype of the masculine ideal and as such represents either a model of what she embraces or what she rejects.

A strong father also keeps a girl grounded and keeps her from making psyche-damaging mistakes.

3. Don’t AMOG Your Own Case

Salesmanship is key. On a road trip in my twenties, a friend and I stopped at a fast food restaurant in western Kentucky and I flirted with the pretty cashier. My travel companion fancied himself an upstart and in an out-of-character display of cock-blockery, tried to interject with clumsy negs directed at yours truly while she and I talked and eye-fucked each other, completely ignoring him. Back in the car, he sheepishly says to me “You know, I think that the more I babbled, the better I was making you look.” I laughed “Yeah, you were helping me out a lot, thanks man!”

Don’t let your babbling make your adversary look good. Reader Balmung writes:

Above all, you must make sure you are appropriately subtle about your goals, you don’t want to be the crazy uncle at Thanksgiving that rants about Jews and niggers non stop.

This next point by commenter Regular John is related to the previous one:

Kids don’t care about hatefacts and who is or isn’t dangerous. They know who is more likely to be violent. They care about what is cool.

With older girls, teenagers in particular, the worst possible thing you can do is bore them with crime statistics or excite them with stories of abandonment and violence. Chicks dig the Bad Seed.


The Bad Seed

Philomathean also adds:

Avoid branding nogs as subhuman scum in front of them. Your nieces are female and it’s nearly impossible for them to abandon their compassion reflex, particularly when every cultural organ is arrayed against such vulgarity.

Good point. If you have to get into HateFacts, slyly refer to astronomical rates of venereal diseases among blacks. But better yet, take her to Walmart to get a good look at the walking-dead fat White single moms with mixed-race kids.

Hostile commenter The Spirit Within offers a related note of caution:

Then just wait til she meets her first middle-class black guy, probably at college. “Oh my God, you’re so nice, you’re not an animal like my dad says, what was he thinking, I can’t even lulz…” Hearts in the eyes, and it’s game over for your agenda at that point.

Eye on the prize: help your daughter develop a positive cultural identity. With that in place, there is little need to tear others down, beyond age-appropriate, smartly delivered common-sense advice.

4. Keep It Natural — Trust Yourself, Trust Your Child

Reader Corvo below ties in a tactically sound way of building identity boundaries between Us and Them, without which a human being reels through life like leaves in the wind:

I don’t rant, but I don’t spare the sarcastic/negative real-talk comments about blacks in everyday conversation with the family, whether I’m talking to her or to another adult in front of her and my other kids. I actually think that one of the most important benefits of having race-real family and friends is the subtle but constant pro-White attitude that underpins most mealtime conversations … times when the kids are halfway listening to their elders talk about current events or something else they don’t quite fully understand, but get the gist of: White is “ours,” good, safe, advanced, accomplished … black and “others” are dangerous, dirty, lazy, etc.

Left to themselves, kids develop a healthy sense of identity, but as mentioned above, you are in a struggle with a hostile institutions, public and private, for your child’s soul. Corvo then underscores that point:

By default, I think most White kids, boys and girls, will grow up to be pro-White if they are not corrupted/brainwashed into being otherwise. So, given that, the fundamental thing is keeping out the negative influences (mostly media and pop “culture”) and trying to find better substitutes.

Finally, the following take on “nature,” an outside-the-box practical recommendation by Balmung, is very good:

One more thing, encourage them to appreciate nature, maybe invite the family along on camping trips? At the risk of sounding new age, children who are immersed in nature can be partially immunized to mass society lies.

We camp every year, getting together with three other families with children of similar age to ours. Not many kids today know the experience of waking up to a massive thunderstorm in the middle of the night with lighting flashes searing through the tent, rain pounding, and thunder rumbling like you’ll never hear it rumble from inside a suburban home. And startled but reassured that mom and dad aren’t afraid, calmly listening to the sounds of the storm.

In addition to camping, there is gardening, as well as 4H clubs where kids work with farm animals. Spend weekends at farm bed & breakfasts or if you are lucky enough to have family out in the country, let your daughter stay with them regularly.

5. Listen to Your Child 

Stated briefly: listen to your kid. She wants to tell you exciting things that are not related to Greek myths or identitarian struggles. Don’t lose sight of that. She is not an empty vessel for you to fill but an active little brain that concocts wild stories she wants you to hear about. Talk with her, ask her questions about her imaginary worlds. When you actively listen, she bonds with you and learns to trust you. If you shut her out (you may not even realize you are doing that), she will grow to find you remote at best, indifferent to her well-being at worst.

6. My Own Advice to Whorefinder

Finally, I offered my own impromptu response to Whorefinder in that comment thread as follows, with minor revisions here:

As an uncle, there is not much you can do directly. Do you have a good relationship with the father and can talk with him candidly? I’d so, broach the subject with him.

It really all hinges on him. Immaterially, if the girls respect him, he is near-clear of mudsharking risk. He also has to imbue them with a positive identity so that the girls value who they are, rather than seeing themselves as lower-case whites who seek an identity among Others.

Materially, he needs to keep them away from unchecked influence of pop culture and public schools. No TV at home. Do all he can to give them good peer groups.

As an uncle, you can subtly tool “lifestyle losers” in age-appropriate ways. Also, foster in them a sense that they have a protective extended family (you).

7. Closing Words and Coda

Miscegenation brought about by the daughter’s lack of strong cultural identity doesn’t just lead to an existential abyss of having grandchildren who look nothing like you, sired by a male who despises you, and who grow up to regard you with contempt. It also brings on the soul-killing sadness of watching your adult daughter degenerate in a thousand little ways, reminding you of your failure every time she hits you up for money, this time because she can’t pay her car registration renewal stickers.

Rejection of one’s race or culture is also not limited to mixing with blacks. You may recall news from April 2014 about two pretty Bosnian teenage girls residing in Austria running off to Syria to join ISIS. One of them, the 17-year-old Samra Kesinovic, is now believed to have been beaten to death while attempting to flee her new comrades.

If you are a father or another relative of a young White girl, the odds that she stays true to her race are still on your side. Psychologically healthy White people are drawn to other Whites. Intermarriage rates for White women are miniscule and according to the OK Cupid study from a few years ago — and anecdotal evidence — so is interracial dating among attractive, smart young White women.

All that said, sometimes there’s not a damn thing you can do. She could be a congenital headcase, or she can baloon up to monstrous obesity despite your best efforts, and end up a mudshark. But you greatly improve your odds of her having White children and living with dignity if you as a father, or to a limited extent as another male relative, are a central part of her life during her most impressionable years.

Three generations ago, fathers could afford to be remote protectors and providers because robust faith, extended family, and community were there to nurture a child’s identity and sense of purpose. But we are now atomized and under cultural and demographic assault on all fronts. The modern White father can no longer be uninvolved in his daughter’s emotional and intellectual development. He is the only thing that stands between her and the malevolent, child-destroying maw of moloch America.

All your life all you asked
When is your Daddy gonna talk to you
But we’re living in another world
Tryin’ to get your message through

No one heard a single word you said
They should have seen it in your eyes
What was going around your head

Oh, she’s a little runaway
Daddy’s girl learned fast
All those things she couldn’t say
Ooh, she’s a little runaway

You know she likes the lights
At night on the neon Broadway signs
And she don’t really mind
Its only love she hoped to find

– Bon Jovi, “Little Runaway”

The Most Anti-Human Song Ever Written


The anti-humanity of John Lennon’s song “Imagine” lies in the bleak nihilism of ending conflict by destroying everything that anyone has ever cared about.

And that’s what 500 corporate logos would have you do. Stop loving the things you care about and hating those that would harm them. No space to secure a future for your child. Stop reaching for transcendence or thinking about the destination of your soul. Stop dreaming. They gave you Miley Cyrus’s twerking ass. Meat hangs on hooks. Peace.

(The above graphic was created by me.)

Through a Prison Window

See the short public service announcement (PSA) about emotional abuse of children, embedded just below. It’s in Polish but the video is easy to follow without understanding the language.

The PSA presents two scenarios. In the first one, a mother pushes away and criticizes her toddler, with a flash-forward of him as a nervous young man self-sabotaging before a job interview. In the alternate scenario, she praises and attends to him, with the result being that he approaches the interview confidently. In the concluding scene the narrator says “one day your child will spread his wings;  it is up to you whether he will fail to launch (the Polish idiom is ‘be a flightless bird’) or fly like an eagle.”

Take a quick look:

The video is well done and the message is spot-on. But as is often the case when encountering something foreign, it’s the little details that make it an experience at odds with what you are accustomed to. For example, in this PSA:

  • There are no distracting actors of another race, which makes the vignette a coherent morality play involving characters with natural relationships among each other. This homogeneity is psychologically satisfying in its harmonious simplicity.
  • The people look right because they look natural. The mom is pretty but neither glamorous nor “empowered” looking. The prim, officious secretary is congruent with the archetype. There is no character engorgement that’s common to Western ads.
  • The male narrator. Did it surprise you to hear him speak? In that PSA, a man represents society’s voice of authority. In American ads, authority figures are women, when they’re not disconcertingly reptilian blacks such as the Nationwide Insurance spokesman.
  • Finally, the focus of this PSA is the well-being of a young White man. In the U.S., the establishment’s crocodile tears are shed for everybody except White men and boys.

Now that we’ve reveled in the normalcy of the Eastern European PSA, let’s take a look at an American one on a similar theme. You will recoil at the icy bark of an adult female ambushing a young boy:

The voice that retracted a thousand scrotums.

(UPDATE: reader Peterike provides additional background info on the LikeAGirl PSA in the comments.)

During the Communist decades, Eastern Europeans watched the free people of the West like through a prison window. Beautiful cities with bright cafes, people moving about freely, speaking freely, and they longed for that.

Today, we in pozzed West watch images of healthy social arrangements through our own metal bars, our thirsty eyes following a glass of cold, clean water, unaccustomed to a public affirmation that an institution of the state, and the talent that it harnesses, endeavors to secure a future for her native sons.



Hospitality Done Right. The guests arrive, respectfully remove their hats and shoes. You feed and entertain them like kings. Then the guests leave and praise you to their friends.

Hospitality Done Wrong. The guests arrive, eat your food, leer at your daughter, shove your son, put their feet on your table, laugh at you, bring their friends over and never leave.

Asylum for Refugees. A generous humanitarian gesture toward a large numbers of foreigners seeking safety — assuming they are deemed asylum seekers and not non-uniformed invaders — should be a temporary sanctuary in a confined campus, with mandatory return once the hostilities are deemed to have ended. And no possibility of release to integrate with the host state’s population.

In no moral law is it written that asylum for refugees must become an open door to changing the national character of the host country. A good host will feed you and board you, not dispossess his son or give away his daughter for the guest’s sake.

The Bitch and Her Whelps. A bitch, ready to whelp, begged a shepherd dog for a place where she might litter. When her request was granted, she sought permission to rear her puppies in that same kennel. The shepherd dog again consented. But at last the bitch, protected by her whelps, who had now grown up and were able to defend themselves, asserted her exclusive right to the kennel and the yard, and would not permit the shepherd dog to approach.  (Aesop’s Fable)

Dear Editors of Scotland’s The National: by welcoming the migrants, you are not entering into a host-guest relationship with your fellow men, as you may think you are. They hear you say “welcome to Scotland” and they think you’re a joke. They think that Scotland is a joke. They will never respect you, they will never show your grandchildren an ounce of kindness. They laugh at you because you just gave away your most valuable possession, your future.